Submitted:
11 August 2025
Posted:
12 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Site visitation and survey – identifying a suitable deployment location based on factors such as ease of access, water flow, sediment accumulation, and surrounding land use
- Requirement analysis – determining the parameters to monitor, balancing functionality and resources
- Sensor acquisition – procuring a robust multiparameter probe and any additional sensors necessary for long-term deployment
- Sensor calibration – preparing the sensors for deployment by calibrating them according to the manufacturer’s instructions
- Sensor deployment – installing the sensors securely at the selected site, ensuring they were submerged in a protective casing
- Data collection – gathering continuous, high-resolution data with a logging interval of 15 minutes
- Web service and app development – developing a user-friendly mobile and web application to help stakeholders visualise and access water quality data in real-time.
1.1. Contribution to Environmental Conservation and Agricultural Sustainability
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sensor Selection
- Multiparameter sondes: Devices can simultaneously measure various parameters, including pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, electrical conductivity (EC), and turbidity.
- Nutrient sensors: Specialized sensors designed to detect concentrations of nitrates and phosphates.
- To effectively monitor the water quality of the River Ystwyth, the following key parameters were identified:
- Temperature: Influences DO levels and overall aquatic life.
- pH: Indicates the acidity or alkalinity of the water, affecting chemical solubility and biological availability.
- Dissolved Oxygen (DO): Essential for the survival of aquatic organisms.
- Electrical Conductivity (EC): Reflects the amount of dissolved salts and other chemicals.
- Turbidity: Measures water clarity, which can be affected by suspended particles.
- Nutrient levels: Including nitrates (NO₃) and ammonia, which can contribute to eutrophication when present in excess.
2.3. Sensor Setup and Calibration
- pH calibration: The pH electrode required a three-point calibration using standardized solutions at pH 7, 4, and 10 (provided by Aquaread). Calibration was performed at approximately 25 °C, as recommended by the manufacturer, to ensure optimal results.
- DO calibration: The DO electrode was calibrated at both 0% and 100% oxygen. For the 0% calibration, a sodium sulfite solution was used. For the 100% calibration, “damp air” was created by wrapping a damp paper towel around the probe.
- EC calibration: The EC electrode was calibrated using the Aquaread RapidCal solution for single-point calibration, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
- Nitrate and ammonia calibration: The optional nitrate and ammonia sensors were calibrated at three points: 100 ppm and two 10 ppm solutions. The 100 ppm and first 10 ppm solutions were calibrated at the same temperature, while the second 10 ppm solution was calibrated at 10 °C lower. All calibration solutions were supplied pre-diluted by Aquaread.
2.4. Website and Mobile Application Development
2.5. Sensor Data Collection
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Web and Mobile Application
3.2. Data Analysis Results for Sensor Data
4. Future Work
- Pilot deployment and user feedback: The applications developed in this test case have yet to be deployed to farmers and other stakeholders. A pilot deployment phase will focus on introducing the system to end-users (such as farmers, environmental agencies, and local authorities). Collecting feedback on usability, functionality, and effectiveness will help refine the app’s features and user interface. This iterative approach will ensure the system better meets the needs of those who rely on accurate and timely water quality data for decision-making.
- Large dataset mining and machine learning: To enhance the predictive capabilities of the system, future work will incorporate large dataset mining and machine learning algorithms. By leveraging existing historical data and real-time sensor readings, these techniques can identify patterns and predict potential pollution events. Developing predictive models will enable stakeholders to anticipate water quality issues and take proactive measures before significant pollution occurs, ultimately improving the effectiveness of environmental monitoring.
- Integration with satellite technology: Incorporating satellite data (such as imagery from Landsat) will complement ground-based sensor data by providing a broader spatial context. Satellite-derived water quality metrics, such as turbidity and chlorophyll concentrations, can be compared with on-site sensor readings to enhance monitoring accuracy. This integration will be particularly beneficial for identifying pollution sources across larger catchment areas and remote regions, offering a more comprehensive approach to environmental monitoring.
- Enhanced map features and resource integration: Future iterations of the application will expand map marker functionality to display site-specific pollutant information and provide links to additional resources (such as best practices for pollution mitigation, regulatory guidelines, and educational materials). These enhancements will offer stakeholders context-specific information, fostering a deeper understanding of pollution dynamics and supporting a more informed decision-making process.
5. Conclusion
Abbreviations
- CSC – Client-Side Components
- CSOs – Combined Sewer Overflows
- DO – Dissolved Oxygen
- EC – Electrical Conductivity
- IDE – Integrated Development Environment
- ISE – Ion Selective Electrode
- LULC – Land Use and Land Cover
- ORP – Oxidation-Reduction Potential
- RBMPs – River Basin Management Plans
- SEO – Search Engine Optimisation
- WFD – Water Framework Directive
Author Contributions
Funding
References
- Neal, C. and Jarvie, H.P. (2005) Agriculture, community, river eutrophication and the Water Framework Directive. Hydrological Processes, 19(9), pp. 1895–1901. [CrossRef]
- Jarvie, H.P. et al. (2010) Streamwater phosphorus and nitrogen across a gradient in rural–agricultural land use intensity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 135(4), pp. 238–252. [CrossRef]
- .
- Withers, P.J.A. et al. (2022) Re-focusing Phosphorus use in the Wye Catchment. RePhoKUs Project Report, p. 31. Available at: https://councillors.herefordshire.gov.uk/documents/s50101856/RePhoKUs_Wye_Report_310522.pdf.
- Cournane, F.C. et al. (2011) Effects of cattle, sheep and deer grazing on soil physical quality and losses of phosphorus and suspended sediment in surface runoff. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 140(1–2), pp. 264–272. [CrossRef]
- Mahmud, K., Panday, D., Mergoum, A. and Missaoui, A. (2021) Nitrogen losses and potential mitigation strategies for a sustainable agroecosystem. Sustainability, 13(4), p. 2400.
- Crooks, E.C., Harris, I.M. and Patil, S.D. (2021) Influence of Land Use Land Cover on River Water Quality in Rural North Wales, UK. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 57(3), pp. 357–373. [CrossRef]
- Mayer, P.M. et al. (2007) Meta-Analysis of Nitrogen Removal in Riparian Buffers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36(4), pp. 1172–1180. [CrossRef]
- Bai, X. et al. (2024) Research progress of inland river water quality monitoring technology based on unmanned aerial vehicle hyperspectral imaging technology. Environmental Research, 257, p. 119254. [CrossRef]
- Welsh Government (2024) Sustainable Farming Scheme: proposed scheme outline (2024). Available at: https://www.gov.wales/sustainable-farming-scheme-proposed-scheme-outline-2024-html (Accessed: 14 December 2024).
- Gomes, E. et al. (2021) Future land-use changes and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem services: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 781, p. 146716. [CrossRef]
- Camara, M., Jamil, N.R. and Abdullah, A.F.B. (2019) Impact of land uses on water quality in Malaysia: a review. Ecological Processes, 8(1), p. 10. [CrossRef]
- Locke, K.A. (2024) Impacts of land use/land cover on water quality: A contemporary review for researchers and policymakers. Water Quality Research Journal, 59(2), pp. 89–106. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-W. and Fan, C. (2023) Challenges of Water Quality Management for Agricultural Development. Water, 15(10), p. 1816. [CrossRef]
- Issaka, S. and Ashraf, M.A. (2017) Impact of soil erosion and degradation on water quality: a review. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 1(1), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Siqueira, T. da S. et al. (2023) Evaluating land use impacts on water quality: perspectives for watershed management. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 9(6), p. 192. [CrossRef]
- Shannon, P.D. et al. (2019) Adaptation strategies and approaches for forested watersheds. Climate Services, 13, pp. 51–64. [CrossRef]
- Lintern, A. et al. (2018) Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space. WIREs Water, 5(1), p. e1260. [CrossRef]
- Watts, O. (2023) Water Quality in Wales: Research Briefing. Senedd Commission (Welsh Parliament). Available at: https://senedd.wales/media/v3fl5zes/23-12-water-quality-in-wales.pdf (Accessed: 11 October 2024).
- Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water (2022) Improving River Water Quality: a Dŵr Cymru Discussion Paper. Available at: https://corporate.dwrcymru.com/en/community/environment/river-water-quality (Accessed: 11 October 2024).
- Natural Resources Wales (2023) Wales Better River Quality Taskforce. Available at: https://cms.cyfoethnaturiol.cymru/about-us/what-we-do/our-roles-and-responsibilities/water/wales-better-river-quality-taskforce/?lang=en (Accessed: 11 October 2024).
- Olin, B. and Beevers, L. (2024) River Flashiness in Great Britain: A Spatio-Temporal Analysis. Atmosphere, 15(9), p. 1025. [CrossRef]
- Foulds, S.A. et al. (2012) Causes and consequences of a large summer storm and flood in west Wales, 8th–9th June 2012. Fluvio Report 2012/01/73, Aberystwyth University, p. 49. Available at: https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/media/departmental/dges/newsimages/west-wales-floods-(final)-2012-fluvio-and-aberystwyth-university.pdf (Accessed: 14 December 2024).
- Evans, C.D. et al. (2014) Persistent surface water acidification in an organic soil-dominated upland region subject to high atmospheric deposition: The North York Moors, UK. Ecological Indicators, 37, pp. 304–316. [CrossRef]
- Morton, R.D.; Marston, C.G.; O’Neil, A.W.; Rowland, C.S. (2024) Land Cover Map 2023 (10 m classified pixels, GB). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. [CrossRef]
- Dewangan, S.K. and Srivatava, S.K. (2024) A correlation between EC and TDS in water: A review. IJPREMS, 5, pp. 180–186.
- Melesse, A.M., Khosravi, K., Tiefenbacher, J.P., Heddam, S., Kim, S., Mosavi, A. and Pham, B.T. (2020) River Water Salinity Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models. Water, 12(10), 2951. [CrossRef]
- Santy, S., Mujumdar, P. and Bala, G. (2022) Increased risk of water quality deterioration under climate change in Ganga River. Frontiers in Water, 4, p. 971623.
- Geels, C., Gyldenkærne, S., Nyord, T., Andersen, H.E., Molina-Navarro, E., Trolle, D., Thodsen, H., Bak, J.L., Konrad, M.T. and Hasler, B. (2023) Manure Acidification and Air Cleaners for Ammonia Abatement: A Holistic Assessment of the Costs and Effects on Terrestrial, Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems. Agronomy, 13, 283 (online).







Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).