Submitted:
29 July 2025
Posted:
30 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Prevalence of Bacteriological Contamination (DUWLs)
3.2. Multivariable Logistic Regression Model
4. Discussion
Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| DUWLs | Dental Unit Water Lines used in dental units to supply water to handpieces and cup fillers. |
| CFU | Colony Forming Unit a standard used to measure bacterial concentration in water sample lab results. |
| IWR | Independent Water Reservoir an attachable bottle to the dental chair. |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
| CDC | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
| HPC | Hetero plate count |
| TPC | Total Plate Count |
| MOH | Ministry of Health |
| PHA | Public Health Administration |
| EHD | Environmental Health Department |
| ADA | American Dental Association |
| EPS | Extracellular polymeric substances |
| GCC | Gulf Cooperation Countries |
| Stata 17 | A statistical software used to analyze data for descriptive and regression analysis. |
References
- Odonnell, M.J.; Boyle, M.A.; Russell, R.J.; Coleman, D.C. Management of Dental Unit Waterline Biofilms in the 21st Century. Future Microbiol 2011, 6, 1209–1226. [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Zeng, J.; Hong, F.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Yu, X. The Importance of Biofilm Contamination Control for Dental Unit Waterlines: A Multicenter Assessment of the Microbiota Diversity of Biofilm in Dental Unit Waterlines. Journal of Oral Microbiology 2023. [CrossRef]
- RM Donlan Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 2002.
- Wirthlin, M.R.; Marshall, G.W.; Rowland, R.W. Formation and Decontamination of Biofilms in Dental Unit Waterlines. J Periodontol 2003, 74, 1595–1609. [CrossRef]
- Coleman, D.C.; O’Donnell, M.J.; Shore, A.C.; Russell, R.J. Biofilm Problems in Dental Unit Water Systems and Its Practical Control. J Appl Microbiol 2009, 106, 1424–1437. [CrossRef]
- Palenik, C.J.; Miller, C.H. The Effect of Distillation and Line Cleaning on the Quality of Water Emitted from Dental Units. Am J Dent 2003, 16, 385–389.
- Shuai, T.; Shao, T.; Yi, L.; Han, S.; Jiménez-Herrera, M.F.; Wang, Z.; Li, X. The Effect of Different Types of Water Sources on Dental Unit Waterline Contamination: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35745. [CrossRef]
- Sauer, K.; Camper, A.K.; Ehrlich, G.D.; William Costerton, J.; Davies, D.G. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Displays Multiple Phenotypes during Development as a Biofilm. J Bacteriol 2002, 184, 1140–1154. [CrossRef]
- Spagnolo, A.M.; Sartini, M.; Cristina, M.L. Microbial Contamination of Dental Unit Waterlines and Potential Risk of Infection: A Narrative Review. Pathogens 2020, Vol. 9, Page 651 2020, 9, 651. [CrossRef]
- Kohn, W.G.; Collins, A.S.; Cleveland, J.L.; Harte, J.A.; Eklund, K.J.; Malvitz, D.M.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings--2003 . Recommendations and Reports: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2003, 52, 1–61.
- Marino, F.; Mazzotta, M.; Pascale, M.R.; Derelitto, C.; Girolamini, L.; Cristino, S. First Water Safety Plan Approach Applied to a Dental Clinic Complex: Identification of New Risk Factors Associated with Legionella and P. Aeruginosa Contamination, Using a Novel Sampling, Maintenance and Management Program. J Oral Microbiol 2023. [CrossRef]
- European Council Directive 93/42/EEC Medical Devices Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/ALL/?uri=celex%3A31993L0042 (accessed on 22 July 2025).
- Enivronment Public Authority - Kuwait Executive Lists Available online: https://epa.gov.kw/ExecutiveLists (accessed on 22 July 2025).
- Ma, S.Y.; Al-Hiyasat, A.S.; Yacoub Hindiyeh, M.; Saleh Khader, Y. Legionella Pneumophila Contamination of a Dental Unit Water Line System in Dental Teaching Centre. Article in International Journal of Dental Hygiene 2008, 6, 48–55. [CrossRef]
- Lal, B.; Ravindra, K.; Biswal, M. Appraisal of Microbial Contamination of Dental Unit Water Systems and Practices of General Dental Practitioners for Risk Reduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25, 33566–33572.
- Hussain Akbar, J.; Behbehani, J.; Karched, M. Biofilm Growth and Microbial Contamination of Dental Unit Waterlines at Kuwait University Dental Center. Frontiers in Oral Health 2023, 3. [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, S.; Suvarna, S.; Suvarna, J.; Saralaya, V.; Saldanha, S.; Shenoy, V.K. Microbial Assessment of Dental Unit Waterlines in an Institutional Setup in Karnataka, South India. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2017, 28, 555–559. [CrossRef]
- Okubo, K.; Ito, T.; Shiota, Y.; Kawata, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Takashiba, S. Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Concentrated Ozonized Water for the Reduction of Contamination in Dental Unit Water Lines. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02306. [CrossRef]
- Khajezadeh, M.; Mohseni, F.; Khaledi, A.; Firoozeh, A. Contamination of Dental Unit Water Lines (DUWL) with Legionella Pneumophila and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa; A Middle East Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2023, 12, 93–99. [CrossRef]
- Vinh, R.; Azzolin, K.A.; Stream, S.E.; Carsten, D.; Eldridge, L.A.; Estrich, C.G.; Lipman, R.D. Dental Unit Waterline Infection Control Practice and Knowledge Gaps. Journal of the American Dental Association 2024, 155, 515-525.e1. [CrossRef]
- Hoogenkamp, M.A.; Brandt, B.W.; Laheij, A.M.G.A.; de Soet, J.J.; Crielaard, W. The Microbiological Load and Microbiome of the Dutch Dental Unit; ‘Please, Hold Your Breath.’ Water Res 2021, 200, 117205. [CrossRef]
- Gawish, S.; Abbass, A.; Abaza, A. Occurrence and Biofilm Forming Ability of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in the Water Output of Dental Unit Waterlines in a Dental Center in Alexandria, Egypt. Germs 2019, 9, 71. [CrossRef]
- Dang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Han, M.; Niu, Y.; Li, H.; Li, X. Assessment of Microbiota Diversity in Dental Unit Waterline Contamination. PeerJ 2010. [CrossRef]
- Arvand, M.; Hack, A. Microbial Contamination of Dental Unit Waterlines in Dental Practices in Hesse, Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) 2013, 3, 49. [CrossRef]
- Barbot, V.; lie Robert, A.; lè ne Rodier, M.-H.; Imbert, C. Update on Infectious Risks Associated with Dental Unit Waterlines. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2012, 65, 196–204. [CrossRef]
- Costa, D.; Mercier, A.; Gravouil, K.; Lesobre, J.; Delafont, V.; Bousseau, A.; Verdon, J.; Imbert, C. Pyrosequencing Analysis of Bacterial Diversity in Dental Unit Waterlines. Water Res 2015, 81, 223–231. [CrossRef]
- Siqueira, M.F.; Buitrago, J.M.; Kolbe, R.J. Dental Unit Waterline Testing Practices: An 11-Year Retrospective Study. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 867. [CrossRef]
- Lizzadro, J.; Mazzotta, M.; Girolamini, L.; Dormi, A.; Pellati, T.; Cristino, S. Comparison between Two Types of Dental Unit Waterlines: How Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination Can Support Risk Containment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, Vol. 16, Page 328 2019, 16, 328. [CrossRef]
- Hikal, W.M.; Kačániova, M.; Hussein, D.E.E.; Ghit, A.; Smaoui, S.; Aleem, M.T.; Čmiková, N.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. Dental Unit Waterlines and Health Risks of Pathogenic Microbial Contamination: An Update Review. Journal of Biological Studies 2023, 6, 282–298. [CrossRef]
- Kettering, J.D.; Muñoz-Viveros, C.A.; Stephens, J.A.; Patrick Naylor, W.; Zhang, W. Reducing Bacterial Counts in Dental Unit Waterlines: Distilled Water vs. Antimicrobial Agents. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002, 30, 735–740. [CrossRef]
| Characteristic | Total | Contamination Status | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncontaminated | Contaminated | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Total | 3,290 (100%) | 2,735 (83.1%) | 555 (16.9%) | |
| Year | <0.001*** | |||
| 2022 | 1,391 (42.3%) | 1,213 (87.2%) | 178 (12.7%) | |
| 2023 | 1,899 (57.7%) | 1,522 (80.2%) | 377 (19.8%) | |
| Governorate | 0.001** | |||
| Asima | 919 (27.9%) | 774 (84.2%) | 145 (15.8%) | |
| Ahmadi | 734 (22.3%) | 635 (86.5%) | 99 (13.5%) | |
| Farwaniya | 394 (12.0%) | 317 (80.5%) | 77 (19.5%) | |
| Hawally | 603 (18.3%) | 507 (84.1%) | 96 (15.9%) | |
| Jahra | 156 (4.7%) | 127 (81.4%) | 29 (18.6%) | |
| Mubarak Alkabeer | 484 (14.7%) | 375 (77.5%) | 109 (22.5%) | |
| Water Sampling Outlet | 0.023* | |||
| Hand piece | 1,050 (31.9%) | 891 (84.9%) | 159 (15.1%) | |
| Cup filler | 1,428 (43.4%) | 1,158 (81.1%) | 270 (18.9%) | |
| Distillation unit | 812 (24.7%) | 686 (84.5%) | 126 (15.5%) | |
| Bacterial Finding | <0.01** | |||
| TPC1 | 3,290 (100%) | 2,742 (83.4%) | 548 (16.6%) | |
| Coliform | 3,290 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| E.coli | 3,290 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| P.aerug | 3,290 (100%) | 3,246 (98.7%) | 44 (1.3%) | |
| F.Strep | 3,290 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Others | 3,290 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Characteristic | OR | (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | |||
| 2022 | Reference | ||
| 2023 | 1.6 | (1.3, 2.0) | <0.001 |
| Governorate | |||
| Asima | Reference | ||
| Ahmadi | 0.9 | (0.7, 1.2) | 0.332 |
| Farwaniya | 1.3 | (1.0, 1.8) | 0.104 |
| Hawally | 1.0 | (0.8, 1.4) | 0.877 |
| Jahra | 1.2 | (0.8, 1.9) | 0.369 |
| Mubarak Alkabeer | 1.4 | (1.1, 1.9) | 0.014* |
| Water Sampling Outlet | |||
| Hand piece | Reference | ||
| Cup filler | 1.3 | (1.3, 1.6) | 0.017 |
| Distillation unit | 1.1 | (0.8, 1.4) | 0.593 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).