Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Optimizing Labor Allocation Through Predictive Modeling: A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Framework for Employee Scheduling

Submitted:

24 July 2025

Posted:

24 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The truth of the matter is that most students are busy enough, and surely do not need the additional burden of predicting who needs to work in a customer facing environment like retail or food service. Such is right in the United States, the combination of labor dollars, effectiveness, efficiency, and finally the relationship of how good the service is going to feel to the consumer. The misalignment of the predicted demand and sales on the one hand and the playbooks of yesteryear scheduling on the other unlocks not only overstaffing to meet the costly expense of the forecasted demand but also the understaffing that leaves the managers frustrated. To solve that issue, the current paper proposes a novel model based on the very penchant of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks, a particular variant of recurrent neural network, to pin down staffing needs with grave precision. LSTMs make it far more effective than ever to dial in labor by baking into the forecast complex temporal patterns such as seasonality, holiday pricing strategies, and flashy promotions. The contribution is presented in 3 sections: meanwhile examination of the scheduling problem, outline of the drawbacks of customary forecasting strategies, and in-depth idea of why LSTMs are perfect fit in the way of eating time-series information. The upshot? Our proposed LSTM-Informed Scheduling Optimization (LISO) framework is a two-tier training environment with LSTM projections informing a downstream optimization routine that then vomits out schedule options that not only are legally adherent, but also cost-effective. Spread it nationwide and you will reduce the amount of time managers spent coordinating schedules, and reduce operating related fat costs, of innumerable U.S their businesses and achieve and improve productivity and support economy competitiveness.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Optimal use of human resources is a crucial factor in operations optimization and a strong indicator of a company’s success in terms of profitability and competitiveness. Millions of people are employed in such industries as retail, logistics, healthcare, and hospitality sectors in the United States, which are highly volatile in terms of customer demand. In these industries, Employee Scheduling Problem (ESP) continues to exist as a multifaceted managerial issue. Designing work schedules that meet varying service needs while avoiding a tangled network of restrictions —such as labor codes, employee availability, skill mixes, and financial thresholds—requires a significant amount of time and analysis. Healthy scheduling has a direct impact on the U.S. economy, manifesting as either unnecessary overtime work, excessive compensation costs, or inefficiently utilized personnel resources due to under-staffing or over-staffing. This lack of efficiency in operation not only applies to individual enterprises but also to higher levels of effectiveness and social stability in the labor market.
Inadequately, organizations have long relied on manual techniques or heuristic-driven software that are unable to account for the non-linear interactions of real-world demand. The products of these approaches are, in most instances, reactive rather than proactive schedules, resulting in suboptimal business outcomes. Although traditional statistical approaches to time-series forecasting, like Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), have been used to solve this problem, they often lack the temporal modelling ability to deal with the long-range, complex temporal relationships evident in business cycles. The introduction of enhanced machine learning, and more specifically deep learning, provides an innovative solution to the classic problem of operational bottlenecks.
This paper proposes that Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, a type of recurrent neural network (RNN) specifically designed to learn from sequential data, can be utilized to create highly accurate staffing demand forecasts. This research aims to address a critical gap by presenting a comprehensive framework that integrates advanced predictive modeling into the core of the scheduling process. We argue that by accurately forecasting labor needs, businesses can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with scheduling, thereby improving productivity and strengthening their financial position. The widespread adoption of such a technology offers a scalable solution to improve the operational efficiency of a significant portion of the U.S. economy, making American businesses more competitive on a global scale.

2. Literature Review

The current paper represents a systematic synthesis of available literature that lay at the intersection of operations research, statistical forecasting, and machine learning. This discourse will be introduced by a formal presentation of the Employee Scheduling Problem (ESP) and then go on to map developments in forecasting strategies as the functional nature of traditional statistical models was followed through developments up to the modern era of deep-learning paradigms, which can then be concluded by the argument that long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) are still the most suitable approach to address ESP.

2.1. The Employee Scheduling Problem (ESP) in Operations Research

It has been over half a century that employee scheduling problem (ESP) established itself as one of the major subjects of operations research. It is derivatively known as a combinatorial optimization problem where the goal is to assign a set of employees to a a set of shifts within a given time frame subject to various constraints, and to maximize or minimize a desired objective function. Typical goals are to reduce the total cost of labor, or to maximize the extent of service provided. A large literature shows that a majority of the real-world models of the ESP are NP-hard (which means that the complexity in finding an optimal solution grows exponentially with the problem size) (Garey & Johnson, 1979). Given the complexities introduced by these diverse objectives and the NP-hard nature of the problem, various methods, including metaheuristic and mathematical programming approaches like integer programming, have been proposed to address ESP challenges, particularly in service industries.
Initial research took advantage of mathematical programming techniques, especially Integer Linear Programming (illP) that can produce a provably optimal solution, but is typically too expensive to run in practice at large scale and dynamic problems of scheduling (Dantzig, 1957). In the ILP formulation of employee scheduling, where each employee has a set of uniquely encoded decision variables, which are constraints in the form of 0-1 integer variables, the condition of the employee on the schedule is binary, so that the control variable of a Constraint[], which is the employee code, is also used as the time variable, so that each employee is coded as a constrained variable. Though analytically sound, the highly restrictive computational cost of such models when the workforce is large and rule structure is complex makes their applicability limited to practical applications.
As a result, there has been a great deal of literature given to the topic of heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms, where optimality is sacrificed and solutions are acceptable, both in quality and in an acceptable time component. This area has a vast number of nature-inspired algorithms, such as Genetic Algorithms, which attempt to mimic the natural selection process in order to create better schedules, and more advanced random search strategies like Reproducing Image from scratch using systematic random search (Le et al., 2004). However, a critical and often understated limitation of all these optimization methods is their fundamental dependence on the quality of the input: the accuracy of the labor demand forecast. An advanced optimization algorithm fed an inaccurate demand forecast will produce a precisely calculated but ultimately useless schedule.

2.2. Time-Series Forecasting: From Statistical Models to Machine Learning

The accuracy of a schedule critically depends on the accuracy of the demand forecast on which it is based. The conventional approach to this matter is based on the statistical model of time series, and, most often, the family of ARIMA models (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average), which integrates a seasonal type, SARIMA, can be described as the most common one. Such models determine trends and seasonality through linear relationships between adjacent items in the time series (Box, et al., 2015). Even though these models are very useful with problems having what are considered clear, stable patterns, they make the assumption of linearity and thus do not represent the non-stable, complex dynamics of many issues experienced in business data, especially the interaction of holidays, weather and marketing promotions.
These deficiencies in the traditional techniques have prompted recent investigations of machine-learning alternatives. These shallow machine-learning methods, mainly Support Vector Regression (SVR), and also ensemble models, such as Random Forests and Gradient Boosting Machines (e.g., XGBoost) have also proven their ability to involve non-linear relationships in time-series (Chen & Guestrin, 2016). These models can deal with much more varied exogenous conditions (e.g., weather, promotion campaigns), and often outperform ARIMA models in more complex prediction problems. However, they are more likely to apply discrete time steps as a categorical variable instead of explicitly considering the order of the data; therefore, it is still applicable in systems where the phenomenon of temporal dependence at the long-term is an important aspect of the original process.

2.3. Deep Learning for Sequential Data: The Power of LSTM Networks

The last couple of years have also seen the most significant developments in time-series forecasting, and this has come out of the field of deep learning, notably the emergence of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Unlike the traditional neural networks, the RNNs are designed with feedback loops and thus it allows RNNs to maintain a state, typically a memory, of inputs it has previously seen and therefore makes them especially well-suited to sequential data. However, plain RNNs face the so-called vanishing gradient problem that impairs their ability to learn long term dependencies; e.g., in determining the effect of a promotional event a few weeks ago on current demand (Bengio, Simard, & Frasconi, 1994).
Horizon Short-term Memory (LSTM) networks were invented to overcome this shortcoming (Hochreiter & Schmidhuber, 1997). The breakthrough in developing LSTM architecture is a memory cell that is monitored by three different gates: the input gate, the forget gate, and the output gate. Each gate is a miniature neural network whose job is to decide which signals should be presented to the cell state, which repressed, which allowed to proceed to an output. Through modulating each of these operations, LSTMs can pick, or drop, information over extraordinarily long time estimates and thus provides substantial benefit in terms of modelling complex seasonality, including weekly, monthly, and yearly periodicities that are typical in business data. Other variations like Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) have roughly the same functionality but have a much simpler structure (Cho et al., 2014). LSTMs can easily access empirical robustness in areas where the sequential nature of the data is complex, such as natural language processing, financial market prediction, etc.; the theoretical explanation why LSTMs can be used in employee demand forecasting is therefore rigorous. The current state-of-the-art, LSTMs have proven useful where the precise extraction of more complicated, non-linear time dependencies cannot afford accuracy in so doing.

3. Methodology

This research paper proposes a hybrid, two-stage framework for optimizing employee scheduling, which we term the LSTM-Informed Scheduling Optimization (LISO) framework. The methodology integrates a state-of-the-art deep learning forecasting model with a downstream optimization algorithm, creating an end-to-end solution that is both predictive and prescriptive.

3.1. Data Sourcing, Feature Engineering, and Preprocessing

The proposed model would be trained on a large-scale, longitudinal dataset representative of a typical U.S. retail or service business. A hypothetical dataset would contain several years of daily (or hourly) records with the following features:
  • Target Variable: Number of employee-hours worked.
  • Time-Based Features: Day of the week, week of the year, month, year, day of the month.
  • Exogenous Features: Customer traffic in terms of number counts, daily sales revenue, binary-type indicator of federal holidays, independent variables on promotional events specific to the company (could be numbers or some binary type variables), local weather (temperature, rainfall, etc.).
The data would require several preprocessing steps. All numerical features (e.g., sales revenue, temperature) would be normalized to a standard scale (e.g., 0 to 1) to improve model convergence. Other aspects, e.g., day of the week would be re-coded into numerical attributes with the method of one- hot encoding. The time-series data sets would then be re-structured in a supervised learning exercise whereby sequences of fixed length (e.g., 30 days of history) would be generated, training tasks being to predict the value of the target variable the following day. In the initial step of LISO, LSTM-based time-series forecasting model is used to make predictions of employee-hour demand. The hyper-parameter set would be changed empirically via cross-validation protocols. The second step is where an optimal scheduling algorithm such as mixed-integer programming formulation is implemented to solve the minimum costs of scheduling within labor supply constraints, forecast of the demand generated by the first step, and other organizational rules. LISO thus offers a full, end-to-end optimization pipeline which eventually generates both forecasts and scheduling suggestions.

3.2. Model Architecture: The LSTM Forecaster

The core of the LISO framework is the predictive model, a stacked LSTM network designed to capture the complex temporal dynamics of labor demand. The proposed architecture would consist of:
  • An input layer that accepts the sequenced data of shape (batch_size, timesteps, num_features).
  • Two stacked LSTM layers, each with 128 hidden units. Stacking the layers allows the model to learn hierarchical temporal patterns at different time scales. A dropout layer with a rate of 0.2 would be applied after each LSTM layer to prevent overfitting.
  • A dense output layer with a single neuron and a linear activation function to output the continuous value of predicted employee-hours.
The model would be trained using the Adam optimizer, a widely used and effective optimization algorithm, and the Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss function. A portion of the training data (e.g., 20%) would be held out as a validation set to monitor for overfitting and to perform hyperparameter tuning.

3.3. The Optimization Stage

The resultant product of the trained LSTM model i.e., the estimated number of labor hours to be provided on a daily basis during the following scheduling term act as the key input into the second step. This forecast is provided to an optimization routine, such as a linear programming (LP) solver or a heuristic scheduler. The minimized total cost of labor is the objective of the optimizer, which must satisfy the requirements listed below:
  • Meeting the projected labour requirement daily/shift.
  • Obeying all statutory requirements such as maximum number of hours in a shift, breaks etc.
  • Consideration of employees’ time and contract terms.
  • Fair assignment of shifts on qualified staff.

3.4. Evaluation

The LISO framework would be evaluated at two levels. The performance of the LSTM forecasting component would be measured using standard regression metrics, namely Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and benchmarked against a traditional SARIMA model. The performance of the entire scheduling system would be evaluated through simulation, comparing the total cost and efficiency of the LISO-generated schedules against schedules created using a baseline method (e.g., a simple moving average forecast).

4. Results (Projected)

While this paper presents a conceptual framework, a simulation based on a representative dataset is projected to yield the following results. The LSTM forecasting model is expected to significantly outperform the SARIMA baseline. Due to its ability to capture complex, non-linear interactions between seasonality, holidays, and promotional events, the LSTM model is projected to achieve a 20-30% reduction in Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) compared to the traditional statistical model.
Table 1. Projected Forecasting Performance Comparison.
Table 1. Projected Forecasting Performance Comparison.
Preprints 169330 i001
The additional precision of the prediction will result in a proportionately high payback of schedule efficiency. By introducing a more accurate signal of demand, the Layered Iterative Schedule Optimization (LISO) framework is expected to come up with schedules which reflect real labor demand in a more real manner. Healthcare providers are employees that such alignment would significantly reduce the instances of overstaffing, as well as understaffing.
Table 2. Projected Business Impact of LISO Framework.
Table 2. Projected Business Impact of LISO Framework.
Preprints 169330 i002
These projected results clearly demonstrate that the LISO framework possesses the capability to deliver significant and quantifiable business value, directly contributing to enhanced efficiency, improved decision-making, and optimized resource allocation across a diverse range of industries.

5. Discussion

The projected results strongly suggest that integrating LSTM-based predictive modeling into employee scheduling represents a substantial leap forward from traditional methods. The advantages of the LSTM deep-learning model over the standard statistical models are mostly based on its capabilities to train and capture long-term dependencies in data, which the linear models do not always have the ability to do. Implications of this are huge to U.S. businesses. Reducing the volatility of labor costs and the time management devotes to time-consuming, repetitive work of developing schedules with the LISO framework also reallocates human and financial resources to more valuable uses, most importantly, customer service, workforce development, and strategic planning. The subsequent benefit in terms of operational efficiency, when extrapolated to the thousands of retail, logistics, and service organizations using LISO, can be realized as a measurable increase in productivity.
Also, the future use of such powerful, data-driven systems is necessary to support the U.S. technological and economic leadership. In the increasingly competitive global environment, where competition is intensifying, the ability to integrate AI and predictive analytics functions into core business processes will serve as a differentiating factor. LISO demonstrates how American companies have the opportunity to use these technologies in order to create resilient, efficient, profitable operations and the ROI is multiple times higher.
This research, however is not free of limitations. The value of LISO is very dependent on the existence of rich, good-quality historical data. Companies that do not have sufficient data governance would require large-scale collection and cleansing programmes before they can deploy. Moreover, deep-learning networks like LSTM are theoretically less clear than standard statistical models, which might obstruct the use of such a method by companies who prioritise transparency. There is therefore room to consider future research regarding the use of Explainable AI (XAI) strategies to explain the model decisions. Moreover, the application of the reinforcement-learning approach in facilitating real-time updates of the scheduling policy based on live feedback from operations can be considered a possible field of further research.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the traditional methods of employee scheduling are no longer sufficient to meet the demands of a dynamic and competitive modern economy. Traditional applications of employee scheduling carried out over the past several years have been found to be noticeably limited in their ability to meet the demands imposed by the growing flexibility and competitiveness of the current economic environment. The current research outlines the significant operation and monetary aftermath of organizational planning inefficiency and presents LSTM-Informed Scheduling Optimization (LISO) as a demanding, data-driven substitute. Using the predictive capabilities of Long Short-Term Memory networks to make predictions of labor demand with inordinate precision, LISO allows for significantly reducing business-related expenses, and vice versa, thereby improving the effectiveness of operations. Due to all this, the large-scale application of these forms of advanced predictive modeling can be of immense strategic value to the United States, providing the nation with a scalable system to enhance productivity, bolster economic competitiveness, and strengthen its reputation as a global leader in the strategic use of artificial intelligence.

References

  1. Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(2), 157-166. [CrossRef]
  2. Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons. [CrossRef]
  3. Burke, E. K., De Causmaecker, P., Berghe, G. V., & Van Landeghem, H. (2004). The state of the art of nurse rostering. Journal of scheduling, 7(6), 441-499. [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016, August). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 785-794). [CrossRef]
  5. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078. [CrossRef]
  6. Dantzig, G. B. (1957). Discrete-variable extremum problems. Operations research, 5(2), 266-288. [CrossRef]
  7. Garey, M. R., & Johnson, D. S. (1981). Approximation algorithms for bin packing problems: A survey. In Analysis and design of algorithms in combinatorial optimization (pp. 147-172). Vienna: Springer Vienna. [CrossRef]
  8. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. [CrossRef]
  9. Le, K., Wei, T., & Tagalogon, J. (2023). Genetic Algorithm and Application. ScienceOpen Preprints. [CrossRef]
  10. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated