Submitted:
30 June 2025
Posted:
01 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Applications of ChatGPT in Medical Genetics
3.1. Application in the Literature Review and Writing Case Reports, Research Articles, and Medical or Educational Documents
3.2. Application in Patient and Genomic Data Analysis
3.3. Application in Genetic Counselling
4. Benefits
4.1. Efficiency and Time-Saving
5. Limitations
5.1. Accuracy and Reliability
6. Ethical Issues
6.1. Informed Consent and Data Privacy
7. Discussion
8. Conclusion and Future Directions

Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statements
Acknowledge
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aradhya, Swaroop, Flavia M. Facio, Hillery Metz, Toby Manders, Alexandre Colavin, Yuya Kobayashi, Keith Nykamp, Britt Johnson, and Robert L. Nussbaum. “Applications of artificial intelligence in clinical laboratory genomics.” In American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, vol. 193, no. 3, p. e32057. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2023.
- Afzal, Iraj, Samin Rahman, Faiz Syed, Ofek Hai, Roman Zeltser, and Amgad N. Makaryus. “Transient ischemic attack in a patient with Poland syndrome with dextrocardia.” Cureus 15, no. 4 (2023). [CrossRef]
- Guo, Kairui, Mengjia Wu, Zelia Soo, Yue Yang, Yi Zhang, Qian Zhang, Hua Lin et al. “Artificial intelligence-driven biomedical genomics.” Knowledge-Based Systems 279 (2023): 110937. [CrossRef]
- Mehnen, Lars, Stefanie Gruarin, Mina Vasileva, and Bernhard Knapp. “ChatGPT as a medical doctor? A diagnostic accuracy study on common and rare diseases.” MedRxiv (2023): 2023-04.
- Labbé, Thomas, Pierre Castel, Jean-Michel Sanner, and Majd Saleh. “ChatGPT for phenotypes extraction: one model to rule them all?.” In 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1-4. IEEE, 2023.
- Rane, Nitin. “Contribution and Challenges of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.” Genetics and Molecular Biology (October 16, 2023) (2023).
- Stier, Quirin, and Michael C. Thrun. “Deriving Homogeneous Subsets from Gene Sets by Exploiting the Gene Ontology.” Informatica 34, no. 2 (2023): 357-386.
- Mansur, Maureen, Thomas J. Jacob, Helen Wong, and Ilya Tarascin. “Cat eye syndrome with a unique liver and dermatological presentation.” Cureus 15, no. 4 (2023).
- McCormick, Benjamin J., and Razvan M. Chirila. “ANKRD26 gene variant of uncertain significance in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia.” Cureus 15, no. 3 (2023): e36152. [CrossRef]
- Yu, Xiao, Yuang Qi, Kejiang Chen, Guoqiang Chen, Xi Yang, Pengyuan Zhu, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. “Gpt paternity test: Gpt generated text detection with gpt genetic inheritance.” CoRR (2023).
- McGrath, Scott P., Beth A. Kozel, Sara Gracefo, Nykole Sutherland, Christopher J. Danford, and Nephi Walton. “A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in responses to selected genetics questions.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 31, no. 10 (2024): 2271-2283.
- Veach, Patricia McCarthy, Dianne M. Bartels, and Bonnie S. LeRoy. “Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.” Journal of genetic counseling 16 (2007): 713-728. [CrossRef]
- Zampatti, Stefania, Cristina Peconi, Domenica Megalizzi, Giulia Calvino, Giulia Trastulli, Raffaella Cascella, Claudia Strafella, Carlo Caltagirone, and Emiliano Giardina. “Innovations in Medicine: Exploring ChatGPT’s Impact on Rare Disorder Management.” Genes 15, no. 4 (2024): 421. [CrossRef]
- Shikino, Kiyoshi, Taro Shimizu, Yuki Otsuka, Masaki Tago, Hiromizu Takahashi, Takashi Watari, Yosuke Sasaki et al. “Evaluation of ChatGPT-Generated Differential diagnosis for Common diseases with atypical presentation: descriptive research.” JMIR Medical Education 10 (2024): e58758. [CrossRef]
- Baumer, David, Julia Brande Earp, and Fay Cobb Payton. “Privacy of medical records: IT implications of HIPAA.” ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 30, no. 4 (2000): 40-47.
- Venkatapathappa, Priyanka, Ayesha Sultana, K. S. Vidhya, Romy Mansour, Venkateshappa Chikkanarayanappa, and Harish Rangareddy. “Ocular Pathology and Genetics: Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Anterior Segment Diseases.” Cureus 16, no. 2 (2024). [CrossRef]
- Huang, Jingwei, Donghan M. Yang, Ruichen Rong, Kuroush Nezafati, Colin Treager, Zhikai Chi, Shidan Wang et al. “A critical assessment of using ChatGPT for extracting structured data from clinical notes.” npj Digital Medicine 7, no. 1 (2024): 106. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Jinge, Zien Cheng, Qiuming Yao, Li Liu, Dong Xu, and Gangqing Hu. “Bioinformatics and biomedical informatics with ChatGPT: Year one review.” Quantitative Biology 12, no. 4 (2024): 345-359. [CrossRef]




| Year / Reference |
Article Type |
ChatGPT application for | Benefits | Limitations / Ethical issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 [1] | Review | -identifying individuals who should consider genetic testing. -exchanging information during the informed consent process. -sharing information. -providing education. |
- medical providers, genetic laboratories, and patients. - patient education. |
- privacy |
| 2023 [2] | Case Report | -providing information about clinical presentation and epidemiology of Poland syndrome. -discussing dextrocardia in the setting of Poland syndrome. |
- medical providers, practitioners, and students. | - privacy |
| 2023 [3] | Review | -medical note-taking and consultation. | - medical providers. - less time consumed. |
- privacy |
| 2023 [4] | Research | -the diagnosis of clinical cases and rare diseases. | - accurately resolves all common cases. -good tool to assist human medical doctors in diagnosing difficult cases, but despite the good diagnostic accuracy, ChatGPT should be used with caution by non-professionals. |
-limited to diagnose rare diseases, required more prompts, but latest and pay versions have a better perform. |
| 2023 [5] | Research | -information extraction and phenotypes recognition. |
- information extraction | -phenotypes recognition |
| 2023 [6] | Review | -providing accessibility and dissemination of knowledge in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. -simplification of complex scientific literature. -providing concise explanations. -answer queries and generate summaries. -global collaboration by enabling discussions and knowledge sharing among scientists. -genetic sequence analysis. -identification of potential disease markers. -providing suggestions for experimental designs. |
- researchers, students, and practitioners. - decoding intricate genomic and proteomic data. - assist in composing and reviewing research papers. |
-struggle to grasp highly specialized or novel research topics that could potentially leading to the dissemination of inaccurate information. -privacy concerns arise when discussing sensitive genetic or medical data. |
| 2023 [7] | Research | -providing gene biological meaning and identify meaningful descriptions genes. -gene expression analysis. |
- research - biological understanding of disease. |
|
| 2023 [8] | Case Report | -providing information about features and treatments of cat eye syndrome and classical presentations of autoimmune hepatitis. -discussing dextrocardia in the setting of Poland syndrome. -findings on dermatological. associations of cat eye syndrome. |
- medical providers, practitioners, and students. | - privacy |
| 2023 [9] | Case Report | -writing the introduction and abstract. -reporting variants of uncertain significance. |
- healthcare professionals, researchers, and students. | - privacy |
| 2023 [10] | Research | -detecting machine-generated text. | - evaluating information - generate text prompts |
-misuses, plagiarism, planting fake reviews on e-commerce platforms, or creating fake social media postings |
| 2024 [11] | Review | -developing algorithms for interpreting genetic data and variants associated with diseases. -provide personalized recommendations for treatment or preventive measures. recommendations for treatment or preventive measures. -provide personalized counseling. |
- reduce the turnaround time for test results and increase the efficiency of the testing process. - accelerate data processing and to improve the accuracy of variant calling. |
|
| 2024 [13] | Review | -diagnose, but It does not replace the medical doctor. | -analyze the input data |
-rare and infrequent diseases where there is limited information lose diagnostic yield and Incorrect answers. |
| 2024 [14] | Research | - evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT in diagnosing common diseases. | -diagnosing typical and mildly atypical presentations of common diseases. | - decrease in diagnostic accuracy as the degree of atypical presentation increased |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).