Submitted:
07 June 2025
Posted:
09 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.3. Model Performance and Sensitivity Analysis
where X represents the observed data; Y represents the SWAT simulation results; X and Y represent the observed and simulated data means, respectively; and i represents the number of observed and simulated data points.2.4. Principal Component Analysis of Land Use, Soil Type, and Slope Band on Water Balance
2.5. Water Supply, Population and Domestic Water Consumption Data
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Model Performance and Uncertainty Analyses
3.2. Sensitive Parameter Analysis
3.3. Analysis of Annual Water Balance Components
3.4. Analysis of Seasonal Variation of Water Balance Components
3.5. Relationship Between Land Use, Soil Type, and Slope Band on Water Balance
3.6. Domestic Water Use for Sustainable Water Resource Management
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- van Vliet, M.T.H.; Jones, E.R.; Flörke, M.; Franssen, W.H.P.; Hanasaki, N.; Wada, Y.; Yearsley, J.R. Global Water Scarcity Including Surface Water Quality and Expansions of Clean Water Technologies. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(2), 024020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Z.Y.; Han, P.F.; Huang, Q.; Du, M.D.; Hou, A.Z. An Improved Modeling of Precipitation Phase and Snow in the Lancang River Basin in Southwest China. Science China Technological Sciences 2021, 64(7), 1513–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamamia, A.W.; Vogel, C.; Mwangi, H.M.; Feger, K.H.; Sang, J.; Julich, S. Using Soil Erosion as an Indicator for Integrated Water Resources Management: A Case Study of Ruiru Drinking Water Reservoir, Kenya. Environmental Earth Sciences 2022, 81(21). [CrossRef]
- Safeeq, M.; Bart, R.R.; Pelak, N.F.; Singh, C.K.; Dralle, D.N.; Hartsough, P.; Wagenbrenner, J.W. How Realistic Are Water-Balance Closure Assumptions? A Demonstration From the Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory and King’s River Experimental Watersheds. Hydrological Processes 2021, 35(5). [CrossRef]
- Gupta, L.; Dixit, J. Estimation of Rainfall-Induced Surface Runoff for the Assam Region, India, Using the GIS-Based NRCS-CN Method. Journal of Maps 2022, 18(2), 428–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, T.; Gao, H. The Record-Breaking Extreme Drought in Yunnan Province, Southwest China During Spring-Early Summer of 2019 and Possible Causes. Journal of Meteorological Research 2020, 34(5), 997–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinclair, S.; Pegram, G.G.S. A Comparison of ASCAT and Modelled Soil Moisture Over South Africa, Using TOPKAPI in Land Surface Mode. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2010, 14(4), 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Srinivasan, R.; Williams, J.R.; Haney, E.B.; Neitsch, S.L. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 (Technical Report No. 406). Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306205252.
- Halwatura, D.; Najim, M.M.M. Application of the HEC-HMS Model for Runoff Simulation in a Tropical Catchment. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 46, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, M.L.; Gassman, P.W.; Yang, X.; Haywood, J. A Review of SWAT Applications, Performance and Future Needs for Simulation of Hydro-Climatic Extremes. Advances in Water Resources 2020, 143, 103662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M. Evaluation of Nitrogen Loading in the Last 80 Years in an Urbanized Asian Coastal Catchment Through the Reconstruction of Severe Contamination Period. Environmental Research Letters 2022, 17(1). [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M.; Ishida, T. Assessment of Long-Term Phosphorus Budget Changes Influenced by Anthropogenic Factors in a Coastal Catchment of Osaka Bay. Science of the Total Environment 2022, 843, 156833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R. Soil & Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, 2011. https://swat.tamu.edu/media/99192/swat2009-theory.pdf.
- Dile, Y.T.; Daggupati, P.; George, C.; Srinivasan, R.; Arnold, J. Introducing a New Open Source GIS User Interface for the SWAT Model. Environmental Modelling & Software 2016, 85, 129–138. [CrossRef]
- Chinh, L.V.; Iseri, H.; Hiramatsu, K.; Harada, M. A GIS-Based Distributed Parameter Model for Rainfall Runoff Calculation Using Arc Hydro Tool and Curve Number Method for Chikugo River Basin in Japan. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 2010, 55(2), 313–310. [CrossRef]
- Azhikodan, G.; Yokoyama, K. Seasonal Morphodynamic Evolution in a Meandering Channel of Macrotidal Estuary. Science of the Total Environment 2019, 684, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, K.W.; Nakayama, K.; Tanaka, M. Horizontal Distribution and Population Dynamics of the Dominant Mysid Hyperacanthomysis longirostris Along a Temperate Macrotidal Estuary (Chikugo River Estuary, Japan). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 2009, 83(4), 516–528. [CrossRef]
- Saquib, S.; Gupta, A.; Joshi, A. Emerging Water Crisis: Impact of Urbanization on Water Resources and Constructed Wetlands as a Nature-Based Solution (NbS). In Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research 2022, 6, 447–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Geological Survey. Earth Explorer. U.S. Department of the Interior, 2023. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. National Land Classification Survey Data [Shapefile], 2023. https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/kokjo/inspect/landclassification/download.html.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Land Use Subdivision Mesh Data (L03-b), 2023. https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/ksj/gml/datalist/KsjTmplt-L03-b-v3_1.html.
- Japan Meteorological Agency. Weather Map and AMeDAS Observation Data, 2023. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/index.html.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Water Level Observation Site Information [CSV/Excel], 2023. http://www1.river.go.jp/cgi-bin/SiteInfo.exe?ID=309061289901190.
- Abbaspour, K.C.; Vejdani, M.; Haghighat, S.; Yang, J. SWAT-CUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2007, 1596–1602. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7621557009645148872.
- Hargreaves, G.H.; Samani, Z.A. Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE) 1982, 108(3), 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnold, J.G.; Moriasi, D.N.; Gassman, P.W.; Abbaspour, K.C.; White, M.J.; Srinivasan, R.; Santhi, C.; Harmel, D.; van Griensven, A.; Van Liew, M.W.; Kannan, N.; Jha, M.K. SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation . Transactions of the ASABE 2012, 55, 1491–1508, http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2214-5818(22)00147-1/sbref6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbaspour, K.C.; Vejdani, M.; Haghighat, S.; Yang, J. SWAT-CUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2007, 1596–1602. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7621557009645148872.
- Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, D.R.; Veith, T.L. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50, 885–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdi, H.; Williams, L.J. Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2010, 2(4), 433–459. [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Water Resources Data Summary [Excel File], 2023. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mlit.go.jp%2Fmizukokudo%2Fmizsei%2Fcontent%2F001593175.xlsx.
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M.; Okuda, N.; Okubo, T. Estimation of Phosphorus Transport Influenced by Climate Change in a Rice Paddy Catchment Using SWAT. International Journal of Environmental Research 2021, 15(4), 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Japan Society of Civil Engineers. Heisei 29 July Kyushu Northern Heavy Rain Disaster Investigation Report, 2020. https://committees.jsce.or.jp/report/node/209.
- Phyu, P.E.; Azhikodan, G.; Yokoyama, K. Effects of Past Human Activities and Recent Disasters on Riverbed Morphology of the Chikugo River Estuary. Journal of JSCE 2024, 12(2), Article ID: 23-16019. [CrossRef]
- Kibet, K.B.; Takeuchi, J.; Fujihara, M. Applicability of SWAT Model for Streamflow Simulation in a Highly Managed Agricultural Watershed. Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems 2018, 23(2), 19–29. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jrcsa/23/2/23_23_2_19/_pdf/-char/ja.
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M.; Shimizu, Y. Assessment of Nitrogen Budget in Detailed Spatial Pattern Using High Precision Modeling Approach With Constructed Accurate Agricultural Behavior. Science of the Total Environment 2024, 912, 169631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- King, K.W.; Arnold, J.G.; Bingner, R.L. Comparison of Green-Ampt and Curve Number Methods on Goodwin Creek Watershed Using SWAT. Transactions of the ASAE 1999, 42(4), 919–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nang, Y.W.; Onodera, S.I.; Wang, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Saito, M. Slope Gradient Effects on Sediment Yield of Different Land Cover and Soil Types. Water 2024, 16(10), 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlef, K.E.; François, B.; Brown, C. Comparing Flood Projection Approaches Across Hydro-Climatologically Diverse United States River Basins. Water Resources Research 2021, 57(1). [CrossRef]
- Boithias, L.; Sauvage, S.; Lenica, A.; Roux, H.; Abbaspour, K.; Larnier, K.; Dartus, D.; Perez, J.M.S. Simulating Flash Floods at Hourly Time-Step Using the SWAT Model. Water 2017, 9(12), 929. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/12/929.
- Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, J.; Arnold, J.G. Enhancing Sustainability in Watershed Management: Spatiotemporal Assessment of Baseflow Alpha Factor in SWAT. Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, R.; Singh, S. Streamflow and Sediment Simulation in the Song River Basin Using SWAT. Frontiers in Water 2025, 3, 1500086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aboelnour, M.; Gitau, M.W.; Engel, B.A. A Comparison of Streamflow and Baseflow Responses to Land-Use Change and the Variation in Climate Parameters Using SWAT. Water 2020, 12(1), 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubota, S.; Nishida, K.; Yoshida, S. Plant Hydraulic Resistance Controls Transpiration of Soybean in Rotational Paddy Fields Under Humid Climates. Paddy and Water Environment 2023, 21(2), 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z.; Feng, Q.; Xie, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhu, M.; Xu, M. The Reallocation of Water and Ecosystem Service Values in Arid Ecosystems With the Implementation of an Ecological Water Diversion Project. Applied Water Science 2023, 13(4). [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Fang, S.; Tong, X.; Wang, L.; Zhuo, W.; Pei, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, M. Analysis of Variation in Reference Evapotranspiration and Its Driving Factors in Mainland China From 1960 to 2016. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(5), 054016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, M.-H.; et al. Intense Agricultural Irrigation Induced Contrasting Precipitation Changes in Saudi Arabia. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(6), 064049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scanlon, B.R.; Rateb, A.; Pool, D.R.; Sanford, W.; Save, H.; Sun, A.; Long, D.; Fuchs, B. Effects of Climate and Irrigation on GRACE-Based Estimates of Water Storage Changes in Major US Aquifers. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(9), 094009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, J.; Abhishek, Y.; Xu, L.; Chandanpurkar, H.A.; Famiglietti, J.S.; Zhang, C.; Ghiggi, G.; Guo, S.; Pan, Y.; Vishwakarma, B.D. ET-WB: Water Balance-Based Estimations of Terrestrial Evaporation Over Global Land and Major Global Basins. arXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, W.; Feng, Y.; Liang, S.; Kuang, X.; Yan, D.; Wan, L. Increasing Annual Streamflow and Groundwater Storage in Response to Climate Warming in the Yangtze River Source Region. Environmental Research Letters 2021, 16(8), 084011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M.; Shimizu, Y.; Iwata, T. Effects of Forest Growth in Different Vegetation Communities on Forest Catchment Water Balance. Science of the Total Environment 2022, 809, 151159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kebede, S.; Charles, K.; Godfrey, S.; MacDonald, A.; Taylor, R. Regional-Scale Interactions Between Groundwater and Surface Water Under Changing Aridity: Evidence From the River Awash Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrological Sciences Journal 2021, 66(3), 450–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Sun, S.; Chen, H.; Chai, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Q.; Chotamonsak, C.; Wangpakapattanawong, P. Changes in the Reference Evapotranspiration and Contributions of Climate Factors Over the Indo–China Peninsula During 1961–2017. International Journal of Climatology 2021, 41(15), 6511–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- KanthaRao, B.; Rakesh, V. Observational Evidence for the Relationship Between Spring Soil Moisture and June Rainfall Over the Indian Region. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 2017, 132(3–4), 835–849. [CrossRef]
- Matheswaran, K.; Khadka, A.; Dhaubanjar, S.; Bharati, L.; Kumar, S.; Shrestha, S. Delineation of Spring Recharge Zones Using Environmental Isotopes to Support Climate-Resilient Interventions in Two Mountainous Catchments in Far-Western Nepal. Hydrogeology Journal 2019, 27(6), 2181–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, A. Chemistry of the Karst Sarabkalan Spring, Iran, and Controls of PDO and ENSO Climate Indices on It. Groundwater 2020, 59(2), 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferede, M.; Haile, A.T.; Walker, D.; Gowing, J.; Parkin, G. Multi-Method Groundwater Recharge Estimation at Eshito Micro-Watershed, Rift Valley Basin in Ethiopia. Hydrological Sciences Journal 2020, 65(9), 1596–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, H.; Hammond, J.C.; Kampf, S.; Kiewiet, L. On the Hydrological Difference Between Catchments Above and Below the Intermittent-Persistent Snow Transition. Hydrological Processes 2021, 35(11). [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Onodera, S.I.; Saito, M.; Shimizu, Y.; Iwata, T. Long-Term Variations in Water Balance by Increase in Percent Imperviousness of Urban Regions. Journal of Hydrology 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trancoso, R.; Larsen, J.R.; McVicar, T.R.; Phinn, S.R.; McAlpine, C.A. CO₂-Vegetation Feedback and Other Climate Changes Implicated in Reducing Base Flow. Geophysical Research Letters 2017, 44(5), 2310–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabathier, R.; Ainger, M.B.; Stella, J.C.; Roberts, D.A.; Caylor, K.K.; Jaeger, K.L.; Olden, J.D. High Resolution Spatiotemporal Patterns of Flow at the Landscape Scale in Montane Non-Perennial Streams. River Research and Applications 2022, 39(2), 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Data set | Format | Temporal/ Spatial resolution |
Data Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Elevation Model (DEM) | raster | 30 m | [19] |
| Soil type | shapefile | 1:500,000 | [20] |
| Land use (2014) | shapefile | 100 m (grid cells) | [21] |
| Weather Data | .csv | Daily (2004-2021) | [22] |
| Discharge (m³ sec-1) | .csv | Daily (2004-2021) | [23] |
| Model performance evaluation and uncertainty |
Modeling Period |
R2 | NSE | PBIAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration | 2007-2014 | 0.81 | 0.81 | -3.6 |
| Validation | 2015-2021 | 0.80 | 0.80 | -5.7 |
| Parameter | File ext. | Method | Description | Min_ Value |
Max_ Value |
P-value | t-stat | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN2 | . mgt | r | Initial SCS-CN moisture condition II | -0.003 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 90.56 | 1 |
| CH_N2 | . hru | v | Manning’s n value for the main channel | 0.040 | 0.078 | 0.000 | -5.79 | 2 |
| ALPHA_BF | . bsn | v | Baseflow alpha factor | 0.500 | 0.600 | 0.009 | 2.68 | 3 |
| LAT_TTIME | . hru | v | Lateral flow travel time | 159 | 162 | 0.022 | -2.33 | 4 |
| CANMX | . hru | v | Maximum canopy storage(mm) | 32 | 35 | 0.026 | -2.26 | 5 |
| CH_K2 | . hru | v | Effective hydraulic conductivity in main channel alluvium | 28 | 29 | 0.058 | -1.92 | 6 |
| GWQMN | .gw | v | Threshold depth of water in the shallow aquifer required for return flow to occur | 2230 | 2240 | 0.070 | -1.83 | 7 |
| GW_DELAY | .gw | v | Groundwater delay | 440 | 445 | 0.121 | -1.567 | 8 |
| OV_N | . hru | r | Manning’s “n” value for overland flow | -0.20 | -0.070 | 0.131 | -1.526 | 9 |
| ESCO | . hru | v | Soil evaporation compensation factor | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.2776 | 1.096 | 10 |
| SOL_K | .sol | r | Soil Saturated hydraulic conductivity | -0.057 | 0.129 | 0.288 | -1.070 | 11 |
| HRU_SLP | . hru | r | Average slope steepness | -0.560 | -0.570 | 0.335 | -0.971 | 12 |
| GW_REVAP | .gw | v | Groundwater “revap” coefficient | 9.1 | 9.3 | 0.418 | 0.813 | 13 |
| SLSUBBSN | . hru | r | Average slope length | 0.440 | 0.451 | 0.528 | -0.634 | 14 |
| SOL_AWC | .sol | r | Available water capacity of the soil layer | -0.609 | -0.135 | 0.573 | -0.565 | 15 |
| REVAPMN | .gw | v | Threshold depth of water in the shallow aquifer for “revap” to occur | 751 | 752 | 0.736 | -0.338 | 16 |
| SOL_BD | .sol | r | Moist bulk density | -0.609 | -0.135 | 0.998 | -8.843 | 17 |
| Year | Water Supply Population | Domestic water use (mm) | Groundwater availability (mm) | Domestic water use as a proportion of total groundwater availability (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3,526,639 | 143.64 | 629.90 | 22.80 |
| 2008 | 3,549,397 | 145.44 | 731.38 | 19.89 |
| 2009 | 3,572,898 | 144.41 | 774.70 | 18.64 |
| 2010 | 3,587,076 | 146.81 | 769.09 | 19.09 |
| 2011 | 3,611,393 | 147.84 | 746.14 | 19.81 |
| 2012 | 3,691,441 | 137.95 | 846.96 | 16.29 |
| 2013 | 3,706,755 | 139.00 | 754.26 | 18.43 |
| 2014 | 3,733,906 | 136.95 | 754.68 | 18.15 |
| 2015 | 3,759,987 | 139.69 | 809.15 | 17.26 |
| 2016 | 3,776,419 | 142.02 | 872.08 | 16.29 |
| 2017 | 3,791,811 | 144.99 | 743.15 | 19.51 |
| 2018 | 3,809,469 | 144.79 | 800.41 | 18.09 |
| 2019 | 3,827,654 | 144.99 | 790.16 | 18.35 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).