Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

When Crops Meet Code: A Meta-Review of Arduino-Driven Irrigation Systems

Submitted:

24 May 2025

Posted:

26 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This meta-analysis critically examines over 50 studies on Arduino-driven automated irrigation systems, highlighting their potential to enhance water use efficiency and crop yields, particularly in the context of sustainable agriculture. The analysis reveals that Arduino-based systems consistently achieved water savings ranging from 30% to 60% compared to traditional irrigation methods, while crop yields improved by 15% to 25%. Key techniques involved real-time soil moisture monitoring, automated water delivery using soil moisture thresholds, and integration of environmental sensors (temperature, humidity, rainfall) to optimize irrigation schedules. Remote access area utilizing GSM, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth modules was implemented in 66% of the reviewed systems, enabling enhanced monitoring and control. Additionally, 44% of the studies employed solar photovoltaic modules for sustainable power supply, ensuring off-grid operability. The discussion identifies typical hardware configurations, evaluates the applicability of these systems in diverse farm settings, and assesses the role of sensor accuracy and system calibration in driving performance. The analysis also highlights key challenges, including sensor calibration complexity, system scalability, and cost considerations, and proposes directions for future research and technological refinement.
Keywords: 
Arduino-based irrigation systems
;  
Irrigation systems
;  
smart agriculture
;  
water consumption
;  
sustainable agriculture
Subject: 
Environmental and Earth Sciences  -   Sustainable Science and Technology

I. Introduction

For the majority of developing nations, agriculture is one of the main sources of income because it forms the foundation of their economy. Quick and enhanced food production, lack of water, as well as climatic change, are some of the problems or challenges they encounter, [7,13,20,23,27]. Traditional irrigation methods can lead to labor-demanding processes, inefficient use of water and low supply of agricultural yields. Intelligent farming was a means to enhance sustainability and production in response to this [11,12,15,22,26,29,54].
The development of adaptive irrigation systems that maximize the water supply to agriculture using real-time information is one of the largest developments in this sector [1,33,40,51,55,56]. Due to its low cost, open-source, and flexibility, the Arduino microcontroller platform is distinct from the other technologies employed [6,8,34,44,46,47,52]. For the building of adaptive irrigation systems based on crops, Arduino-based systems can be interfaced with various sensors, such as temperature, humidity, and moisture in the soil, and actuators, such as water pumps and valves.
There are multiple ideas and applications that can be formed using Arduino-based irrigation. For instance, researchers have developed devices that monitor soil water content and automate the irrigation schedule to conserve water and improve agricultural yields [1,4,6,9,16,33,36,43,55,56]. Temperature and humidity have also been integrated into some research in order to further optimize watering schedules [23,34,44,52,56].
Such breakthroughs are particularly beneficial for smallholder farmers as they not only improve water use efficiency but also reduce human labor requirements.
The applicability, scalability, and challenges of Arduino-based irrigation systems are not yet well known, even with the growing body of papers. It is difficult to make general conclusions or discover best practices from current work due to the broad differences in scope, methodology, and metrics of evaluation.
The aim of the present meta-analysis is to bridge the existing gap in knowledge by systematically assessing and aggregating the evidence on Arduino-powered automated irrigation systems. Specifically, this study seeks to explain the performance and efficiency of these systems under various agricultural conditions, recognize typical sensor combinations, control algorithms, and design patterns, analyze the scalability and suitability of Arduino-based solutions across different farm sizes and types, and highlight the limitations and challenges associated with their application and utilization.
This present study is intended to educate policymakers, researchers, and practitioners on the existing status of Arduino-based irrigation technology and how these technologies contribute to the development of sustainable agriculture through a brief overview.

II. Methodology

This section describes the examined and revised findings of research studies that are related to Arduino-based automated irrigation systems. The objective was to highlight and examine the prevalent methodologies employed in these studies, offering an understanding of the leading practices and emerging technological trends in the field.
In every study that was part of the analysis, a physical prototype was designed, developed, and tested experimentally. Either actual agricultural settings or carefully regulated lab settings that replicated field conditions were typically used to implement these systems [1,4,5,11,21,42]. The experimental method made it easier to directly assess system performance, dependability, and operational effectiveness in a range of soil and environmental circumstances.

2.1. Methods and Techniques

Arduino-based automated irrigation systems are widely recognized for their cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and adaptability in modern agricultural applications. Core methodologies observed across studies included real-time soil moisture monitoring, automated water delivery, and remote accessibility, often supported by energy-efficient power systems such as solar photovoltaic modules [1,7,9,34].
Central to these systems are soil moisture sensors that continuously monitor soil water levels. A solenoid valve or water pump is triggered by an Arduino microcontroller when sensor readings drop below a predetermined threshold. Irrigation ceases once the desired soil moisture is restored, ensuring precise water use while avoiding under- or over-irrigation [1,4,5,11,16].
Advanced implementations enhanced this basic feedback loop with multi-sensor integration including temperature, humidity, rainfall, and water level sensors to support context-aware irrigation [2,3,10,18,38]. Several studies included real-time clock (RTC) modules for scheduled watering cycles, offering a hybrid approach between time-based and condition-based irrigation [6,21].
Remote communication was achieved using GSM, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi modules, enabling SMS alerts and mobile/web-based system control [2,3,8,12,24,48]. Data visualization and logging were supported by LCDs, mobile apps, or SD card modules, which displayed sensor readings and operational status to users in real-time [5,6,8,22].
To promote sustainability, many systems were powered by solar panels and battery storage units, ensuring functionality in off-grid rural settings and contributing to reduced carbon emissions [7,9,34,44]. For accuracy assurance, a number of designs incorporated cross-checking mechanisms such as water flow sensors to validate irrigation volumes [10,45].
In summary, the most frequently applied methodologies featured sensor-based decision logic, automated control, remote accessibility, and renewable power integration, collectively enhancing water conservation, productivity, and agricultural sustainability.

2.2. Research Instrument

This meta-analysis identifies the core hardware components commonly used across the reviewed Arduino-based automated irrigation systems. These instruments ranging from microcontrollers to sensors and actuators served as the foundation for system automation, data collection, and performance evaluation [1,4,5,11,21].

A. Arduino Microcontroller Boards

All systems employed an Arduino board primarily UNO, Mega, or Nano as the central control unit, responsible for processing sensor data and executing irrigation commands [1,4,5,11,28].

B. Soil Moisture Sensors

All studies employed soil moisture sensors as the primary sensing instrument. These sensors provided real-time data on soil water content, which was critical for determining when irrigation was necessary [1,5,6,11,28].

C. Water Delivery Components

The prototypes included water pumps (DC or submersible) and, solenoid valves. These components were controlled by the Arduino via relay modules to deliver water to plants when triggered by sensor data [5,6,9,10,13,20,25,50].

D. Environmental Sensors

Many systems integrated supplementary sensors such as water level, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and water flow sensors to enhance system accuracy and adaptability to varying environmental conditions [2,3,10,18,37,41].

E. User Interface and Feedback Devices

LCD displays, LEDs, and mobile applications or web dashboards were used to present real-time system status, sensor readings, and alerts to users [1,5,6,8,16,17,19,53].

F. Remote Communication Modules

Several studies incorporated GSM, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi modules, enabling remote monitoring and control via SMS, mobile apps, or web interfaces [2,12,24,26,32,37,39,48,49].

G. Power Supply System

The prototypes were powered by various means, including DC adapters, batteries, and, in some cases, solar photovoltaic panels for sustainable, off-grid operation [7,9,26,30,34,44].

H. Data Logging and Storage

Some systems featured SD card modules or cloud storage for logging sensor data and system events, supporting long-term analysis and optimization [5,6,8,45].

2.3. Method of Use

Across the reviewed literature, the implementation of Arduino-based automated irrigation systems consistently involved the development of functional prototypes. These prototypes were constructed and subsequently deployed in various settings ranging from laboratory environments and greenhouses to open-field agricultural plots to facilitate empirical evaluation under realistic operational conditions [1,4,5,21,29]. Sensor calibration procedures were rigorously conducted to ensure measurement accuracy, with gravimetric oven-drying methods and comparative field-based techniques commonly employed, particularly for soil moisture sensors [6,35].
Following system deployment and calibration, continuous data acquisition was a core component of experimental protocols. Key data streams included real-time monitoring of soil moisture content, which served as the primary input for irrigation control algorithms [1,4,5,11]. Additionally, several studies incorporated environmental sensing such as ambient temperature and relative humidity to enhance system adaptability to varying climatic conditions [2,3,10,18]. Operational performance indicators, including irrigation duration and water volume dispensed, were systematically recorded to assess the efficiency and precision of water delivery mechanisms [10,45].
Furthermore, systems featuring remote interaction capabilities enabled the collection of user engagement data, such as SMS command logs and mobile application inputs, thereby allowing for the evaluation of system responsiveness and user interface efficacy [2,8,12,24]. In solar-powered implementations, energy consumption and storage parameters were also monitored to determine the sustainability and autonomy of the power systems in off-grid scenarios [7,9,34].

2.4. Data Collection

In all studies reviewed, data collection was conducted through experimental procedures and was predominantly sensor-driven. The primary data sources were the electronic sensors integrated into each automated irrigation system prototype. Among the most frequently collected parameters were soil moisture levels, which were continuously monitored in real time using dedicated soil moisture sensors. These readings provided essential input for irrigation decision-making algorithms and constituted the core operational parameter in nearly all systems [1,4,5,11].
In addition to soil moisture, several studies extended the scope of data acquisition to include environmental variables such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, rainfall intensity, and water reservoir levels. These additional parameters were captured through corresponding sensors, thereby enabling systems to respond more intelligently to changing environmental conditions [2,3,10].
System performance data were also systematically recorded. This included metrics such as water pump activation frequency, irrigation durations, and total water volume delivered. In select implementations, water flow sensors were employed to cross-validate the amount of water dispensed, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the system's irrigation logic [10].
For prototypes incorporating remote monitoring and control functionality, data related to user interaction were collected. These included logs of SMS-based alerts, system responses, and user-issued control commands, which were analyzed to assess the responsiveness and stability of remote access interfaces [2,8,12].
Furthermore, in systems powered by photovoltaic sources, energy-related data were acquired to evaluate the sustainability of power supply mechanisms. Parameters such as solar energy generation, battery charge levels, and energy consumption rates were monitored to ensure operational continuity in off-grid environments [7,9].

2.5. Procedure

Across the reviewed studies, the experimental procedure generally followed a structured process involving system assembly, deployment, operation, and performance evaluation. Initially, each prototype system was assembled by integrating the Arduino microcontroller with sensors, actuators (water pumps or solenoid valves), and user interface elements. Sensor calibration particularly for soil moisture sensors was conducted using standardized techniques such as gravimetric oven-drying to ensure measurement accuracy [6].
The assembled systems were then deployed in laboratory environments, greenhouses, or open-field settings. During the testing phase, real-time sensor data were continuously monitored and logged. The Arduino executed pre-programmed logic to control irrigation: when soil moisture fell below a defined threshold, the system activated water delivery components and automatically ceased irrigation once the desired moisture level was reached. In some cases, real-time clock (RTC) modules were utilized to enable scheduled irrigation [6].
Data related to sensor readings, system status, and irrigation events were displayed on LCDs or transmitted remotely via GSM, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi modules. Many systems also incorporated SD card or cloud-based data logging for post-experimental analysis [2,5,6,8,14]. Collected data were evaluated to assess water efficiency, irrigation effectiveness, and system responsiveness under varying environmental conditions [4,5,7]. Based on the performance analysis, system parameters such as soil moisture thresholds and irrigation timing were adjusted to optimize operation. Additionally, flow sensors were occasionally integrated to validate water output and enhance irrigation precision [10].

2.6. Statistical Treatment

The statistical treatment in the reviewed studies was designed to objectively evaluate the performance, reliability, and efficiency of the Arduino-based automated irrigation systems. The analysis focused on both the quantitative sensor data collected during experiments and the system performance metrics observed over repeated trials.

A. Descriptive Statistics

Most studies employed descriptive statistical methods to summarize and present the core findings. These included:
  • Mean and Standard Deviation:
The arithmetic mean was used to determine average values of soil moisture levels before and after irrigation events. This allowed researchers to evaluate whether the system maintained optimal moisture conditions consistently [4,5].
  • Minimum and Maximum Values:
The minimum and maximum statistics were used to define the operational range of environmental and system parameters, including soil moisture, temperature, humidity, and water volume delivered. These metrics helped identify system limitations under varying field conditions [4,5].
  • Percentages:
Percentage-based analyses were used to quantify system benefits, such as water savings, reduction in manual labor, and increases in crop yield compared to traditional or manual irrigation practices. For example, the study titled “Automatic plant Irrigation Control System Using Arduino and GSM Module” reported water conservation ranging from 30% to 50% [12].

B. Comparative Analysis

Several studies compared the automated system's performance against traditional/manual irrigation approaches:
  • Paired Observations:
Measurements such as soil moisture and water consumption were recorded under both manual and automated irrigation setups to directly compare performance outcomes [5,9].
  • Before-and-After Analysis:
In this method, data were collected prior to and following system implementation. Metrics like water usage and crop health were compared to assess system improvements over time [4].

C. Calibration and Validation

To ensure data accuracy, calibration and validation procedures were incorporated:
  • Sensor Calibration Using Regression Analysis:
Soil moisture sensors were calibrated by correlating sensor outputs with gravimetric oven-drying results. Linear regression and calibration curves were used to validate measurement accuracy [6].
  • Cross-Checking Mechanisms:
Systems equipped with water flow sensors used cross-checking to statistically compare the calculated water needs and actual water delivered, thereby confirming irrigation precision and enhancing reliability [10].

D. Graphical Representation

Graphical tools were employed to visualize data trends and patterns:
  • Time Series Plots:
These visualizations depicted real-time fluctuations in soil moisture levels, irrigation start-stop cycles, and water usage over time [5,9,10].
  • Bar and Line Charts:
Used to compare variables across multiple trials or system setups, such as crop yield under different irrigation methods, or energy usage in solar vs. battery-powered systems [6,12,21].

E. Inferential Statistics (When Applicable)

While most studies focused on descriptive and comparative statistics, a few studies incorporated inferential techniques:
  • t-tests and ANOVA (Analysis of Variance):
Applied to assess whether changes in water usage or yield between test groups were statistically significant at a defined confidence level [4,31].
  • Correlation Analysis:
Some implementations explored relationships between variables (temperature and irrigation frequency), supporting more adaptive and intelligent irrigation strategies [10,45]

III. Result

The meta-analysis of over 50 peer-reviewed studies on Arduino-driven irrigation systems revealed significant improvements in water use efficiency and crop yield outcomes. Water conservation showed as a notable result, with the majority of systems generating water savings ranging from 30% to 60% in comparison to conventional manual irrigation techniques. This improvement was largely due to the integration of soil moisture sensors that enabled real-time monitoring and precise water delivery, effectively eliminating over-irrigation.
Crop yield improvements were also observed, with reported increases ranging from 15% to 25% for various crops productivity. These gains were linked to more consistent soil moisture levels and reduced plant stress, made possible by automated and sensor-driven irrigation schedules. In addition, the systems significantly reduced labor requirements; many implementations required minimal user intervention due to features like remote control via GSM, Wi-Fi, and mobile applications.
Moreover, in terms of system configuration, all prototypes utilized an Arduino board which most commonly the UNO, Mega, or Nano used as the control unit. Additionally, sensor accuracy played a key role in system performance. Studies that calibrated soil moisture sensors using gravimetric methods reported accuracy rates exceeding 90%. Soil moisture sensors were universally implemented, while 76% of systems included additional sensors such as temperature, humidity, and water level modules. Approximately 66% of the systems supported remote access via GSM, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi, enabling real-time monitoring and control through SMS, mobile apps, or web dashboards. Precision irrigation was further improved in designs incorporating water flow sensors.
Furthermore, power supply systems varied, but 44% of the studies employed solar photovoltaic modules to ensure off-grid capability. These systems demonstrated reliable operation in remote settings, sustaining performance even with intermittent sunlight. Around 36% of studies included SD card or cloud-based data logging, enhancing system traceability and optimization.
In terms of system reliability, studies consistently reported stable operation and high system uptime. Remote modules like GSM and Wi-Fi enabled real-time notifications and control with over 95% uptime recorded during field trials. Although most studies focused on small-scale applications, approximately 25% explored larger field deployments, showing that these systems can be scaled with minimal performance degradation.

IV. Discussion

The findings of this meta-analysis explored the increasing body of evidence for the automated Arduino-based irrigation systems to offer a considerable leap towards sustainable agriculture practices, particularly in regions where water is very limited. A significant finding was the consistent achievement of 30% to 60% water savings, largely because of automated water management and real-time soil moisture sensing. These savings are important considering the impacts of climate change and the loss of freshwater resources, thus making Arduino-based systems an apt solution for commercial and small-scale farms.
Such technologies provide for accurate and timely watering cycles, in line with the projected 15% to 25% increase in crop yield. Standard and optimal moisture content enhances total crop quality, reduces plant stress, and promotes consistent growth. Another important point is that, the meta-analysis revealed that system precision and performance were directly related to sensor calibration, especially for soil moisture sensors. The importance of hands on calibration to ensure reliable automation is evident from research that employed gravimetric calibration methods and documented measurement accuracies of over 90%.
As far as technological components are concerned, system designs generally are using Arduino Uno, Mega, or Nano with solenoid valves or pumps controlled by relays and added GSM, Bluetooth, or Wi-Fi modules for remote operation. More adaptive irrigation control to weather conditions resulted from adding more environmental sensors for rain, temperature, and humidity.
44% of systems were off-grid powered, solar-powered configurations were a potentially exciting development. Energy-autonomous agriculture solutions are possible through these configurations, which are necessary for rural and remote farming sites. While even system performance and availability were typically good, scalability remains an issue, especially in scale deployments where calibration complexity, data transfer, and maintenance complexity escalate exponentially.
Additionally, although multiple systems were found to be operational, there were significant differences in costs and ease of use. Without proper training or institutional support, some designs may not have broad acceptance among smallholder farmers because they need technical support for assembly and repairs. This highlights the importance of having modular or plug-and-play systems with intuitive interfaces to allow for increased market penetration.

V. Conclusions

The paper gives a comprehensive review of more than 50 studies about automated irrigation system solutions controlled by Arduino. By having an ability to improve crop production performance and water usage efficiency, this research confirms that the research technology is relevant in promoting precision agriculture and sustainable farming practices.
Real-time soil moisture monitoring, multi-sensor integration, wireless communication modules, and use of renewable energy sources were the key reasons that made the system more efficient. All these features contribute to making the systems flexible and feasible in the case of limited resources.
Though encouraging, numerous challenges must be addressed before large-scale implementation is possible. These are the development of scalable and intuitive user interfaces, system robustness, and sensor calibration precision. Additionally, to assess operating cost-effectiveness and impacts in real-world environments, economic evaluations and long-term field tests are needed.
In summary, Arduino-based irrigation systems represent an inexpensive, scalable, and modular solution to optimize agricultural water management. These alternatives provide a viable path toward data-driven, sustainable irrigation in developed as well as emerging agri-food systems as climate-related limitations grow.

References

  1. S Gnanavel, M Sreekrishna, N DuraiMurugan, M Jaeyalakshmi, and S Loksharan, “The smart IoT based automated irrigation system using arduino UNO and soil moisture sensor,” in 2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology ICSSIT, 2022, pp 188–191. [CrossRef]
  2. L M Silalahi, S Budiyanto, F A Silaban, and A R Hakim, “Design a monitoring and control in irrigation systems using Arduino Wemos with the internet of things,” Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering JIAE, vol 1, no 1, pp 53–64, 2021.
  3. A Kumar and H Rajagopal, “Automated Seeding and Irrigation System using Arduino,” Journal of Robotics, Networking and Artificial Life, vol 8, no 4, p 259, 2021.
  4. H-H Zhu, Y-X Huang, H Huang, A Garg, G-X Mei, and H-H Song, “Development and evaluation of arduino-based automatic irrigation system for regulation of soil moisture,” International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, vol 8, no 1, 2022.
  5. T Triguntoro and M K Kelviandy, “Automatic irrigation system based on soil moisture using Arduino UNO R3,” nucleus, vol 5, no 02, pp 144–153, 2024.
  6. A Sudarmaji et al, “LOW-COST ADJUSTABLE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM BASED ON SOIL MOISTURE AND WATERING TIME USING A SINGLE ARDUINO MEGA2560 FOR DRY LAND CULTIVATION,” in The 7th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Approaches for Sustainable Rural Development, 2025.
  7. T A Manfo and M E Şahin, “Development of an Automatic PV-Battery Powered Water Irrigation System with Arduino Software for Agricultural Activities,” Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol 10, no 2, pp 314–328, 2024.
  8. J B Sy, E B Panganiban, and A S Endris “A low-cost arduino-based smart irrigation system LCABSIS,” International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, vol 8, no 9, pp 5645–5650, 2020.
  9. S A Hamoodi, A NHamoodi, and G MHaydar, “Automated irrigation system based on soil moisture using arduino board,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol 9, no 3, pp 870–876, 2020. [CrossRef]
  10. A Ajgar, and Dr N Malik, “Automatic Irrigation System Using Arduino for Accurate Irrigation with Cross Checking Mechanism,” International Journal of Engineering Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering IJERECE, vol 8, no 12, pp 6-8, 2021.
  11. S Dharani, “Automatic Plant Irrigation System using Arduino,” Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, vol 8, no 2, pp 591–594, 2020.
  12. S Akwu, U I Bature, K I Jahun, M A Baba, and A Y Nasir, “Automatic plant irrigation control system using arduino and GSM module,” I J Engineering and Manufacturing, vol 10, no 3, pp 12–26, 2020.
  13. M G M Barbade et al, “Automatic Sprinkler System using Arduino,” Indian Journal of Microprocessors and Microcontroller, vol 1, no 2, pp 12–16, 2021.
  14. P Kanade and J P Prasad, “Arduino based machine learning and IoT smart irrigation system,” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering IJSCE, vol 10, no 4, pp 1–5, 2021. [CrossRef]
  15. A E Mezouari, A E Fazziki, and M Sadgal, “Smart irrigation system,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol 55, no 10, pp 3298–3303, 2022.
  16. S Satra, A Agrawal, S Gogate, R Daryapurkar, and N Mehendale, “Design and implementation of arduino-based automatic irrigation with moisture sensor,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2023.
  17. A Hassan et al, “A wirelessly controlled robot-based smart irrigation system by exploiting arduino,” Journal of Robotics and Control JRC, vol 2, no 1, 2021.
  18. A Vij, S Vijendra, A Jain, S Bajaj, A Bassi, and A Sharma, “IoT and machine learning approaches for automation of farm irrigation system,” Procedia Computer Science, vol 167, pp 1250–1257, 2020.
  19. R S Ferrarezi and T W Peng, “Smart system for automated irrigation using Internet of things devices,” Horttechnology, vol 31, no 6, pp 642–649, 2021.
  20. D V Babu, K V Shijin, N S Sreejith, A V Sureshbabu, and C Karthikeyan, “Automatic Irrigation Systems for Efficient usage of Water using Embedded Control Systems,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020.
  21. İ Aktürk, M Koparan, M Yıldırım, and U Mucan, “A closed loop automated drip irrigation system based on Arduino Uno,” COMU ziraat fak derg, vol 12, no 1, pp 1–10, 2024.
  22. S Das, S Saha, and S Podder, “ARDUINO BASED SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEM,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 2023. [CrossRef]
  23. R Nelson, U Sankar, E G Ramanathan, V Sankar Prasanth, and A Sherwin Daniel, “Irrigation of water by automatic sprinkler system,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol 1145, no 1, p 012107, 2022.
  24. R Basheer, N N Hanass, M A U Sheikh, and K Hussain, “IoT Irrigation System Using Arduino,” Preprints, 2024.
  25. J Mitto and P Savant, “A Research paper on Auto Controlling Irrigation System Using Arduino UNO,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology IJRASET, vol 10, no 4, 2022.
  26. M Alagarsamy, S Devakadacham, H Subramani, S Viswanathan, J Johnmather, and K Suriyan, “Automation irrigation system using Arduino for smart crop field productivity,” International Journal of Reconfigurable and Embedded Systems IJRES, vol 12, no 1, pp 70-77, 2023.
  27. K Sandya, G Nagagopi, CH Krishnamachary, and R Kumar, “AUTOMATIC PLANT IRRIGATION SYSTEM USING ARDUINO FOR EFFICIENT WATER MANAGEMENT,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, vol 5, no, 6, 2023.
  28. M Alcalde, W Bueno, C Caylaluad, R J Concepcion, P Cimatu, P A Francisco, J Maiztegui, J V Maggay, J Paguig, A Rigor, and B L Unida, “Automatic Garden Irrigation System with Night Light Switch,” Academia, 2025.
  29. V Abhinav, “ARDUINO BASED SMART IRRIGATION SYSTEM”, ResearchGate, 2022.
  30. D Kadam, S Ambekar, P Pawar, and P Sanaha, “Automatic Irrigation by Smart Machine with Arduino Uno,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology IRJET, vol 8, no 6, 2021.
  31. T A Manfo and M E Sanhin, “Development of an Automatic PV-Battery Powered Water Irrigation System with Arduino Software for Agricultural Activities” GAZi Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2023. [CrossRef]
  32. J Guntur, S Srinivasulu Raju, K Jayadeepthi, and CH Sravani, “An automatic irrigation system using IOT devices,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol 68 , pp 2233-2238, 2022.
  33. I Prasojo, A Maseleno, O Tanane, and N Shahu, “Design of Automatic Watering System Based on Arduino,” Journal of Robotics and Control JRC, vol 1, no 2, pp 55-58, 2020.
  34. S E Babaa, M Ahmed, B S Ogunleye, S A Al-Jahdhami, S A Khan, and J R Pillai, “Smart Irrigation System using Arduino with Solar Power,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology IJERT, vol 9 no 5, 2022.
  35. S Akter, M Rahman, R Zannat, M Rana, M H Oliver, and A Ali, “Development of smart micro-irrigation system using Arduino Uno for okra cultivation in Bangladesh,” Research in Agricultural Engineering,, vol 71, no 1, pp 38–49, 2025.
  36. A N Samanta, M Halder, T Dhank, S Roy, G Das, and J Datta, “Auto Irrigation System Using an Arduino Uno and Soil Moisture Sensor,” AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTING, vol 2, no 2, 2023.
  37. M R H Naeem, S Gawhar, M B H Adib, S A Sakib, A Ahmed, and N A Chisty, “An IoT Based Smart Irrigation System,” in 2021 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques ICREST, 2021, pp 243–247.
  38. S Peraka, R Sudheer, B N Rao, A R Teja, and E N Kumar, “Smart Irrigation based on Crops using IoT,” in 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems ICIIS, 2020, pp 611–616.
  39. J Kwok and Y Sun, “A smart IoT-based irrigation system with automated plant recognition using deep learning,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2018.
  40. S F Di Gennaro, D Cini, A Berton, and A Matese, “Development of a low-cost smart irrigation system for sustainable water management in the Mediterranean region,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol 9, no 100629, p 100629, 2024.
  41. R K Kodali, M S Kuthada, and Y K Yogi Borra, “LoRa based smart irrigation system,” in 2018 4th International Conference on Computing Communication and Automation ICCCA, 2018. [CrossRef]
  42. H Sharifnasab, A Mahrokh, H Dehghanisanij, E Łazuka, G Łagód, and H Karami, “Evaluating the use of intelligent irrigation systems based on the IoT in grain corn irrigation,” Water Basel, vol 15, no 7, p 1394, 2023.
  43. M Pramanik et al, “Automation of soil moisture sensor-based basin irrigation system,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol 2, no 100032, p 100032, 2022.
  44. K K Rout, S Mallick, and S Mishra, “Solar powered smart irrigation system using internet of things,” in 2018 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Business Analytics ICDSBA, 2018, pp 144–149.
  45. E A Abioye et al, “IoT-based monitoring and data-driven modelling of drip irrigation system for mustard leaf cultivation experiment,” Information Processing in Agriculture, vol 8, no 2, pp 270–283, 2020.
  46. R Kodali and B S Sarjerao, “A low cost smart irrigation system using MQTT protocol,” 2017 IEEE Region 10 Symposium TENSYMP, pp 1–5, 2017.
  47. S Nallani, and V B Hency, “ Low Power Cost Effective Automatic Irrigation System,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol 8, no 28, pp 1-5, 2015.
  48. A Anitha, N Sampath, and M A Jerlin, “Smart Irrigation system using Internet of Things,” in 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering ic-ETITE, 2020, pp 1–7. [CrossRef]
  49. A Imteaj, T Rahman, M K Hossain, and S Zaman, “IoT based Autonomous Percipient Irrigation System using Raspberry Pi,” in 19th International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2016.
  50. K Namala, Krishna Kanth Prabhu A, A Math, A Kumari, and S Kulkarni, “Smart irrigation with embedded system,” 2016 IEEE Bombay Section Symposium IBSS, pp 1–5, 2016.
  51. P Naveen, R Adapala, A Sreekanth, and B Rakesh, “Automatic watering system using Arduino,” 3C Tecnología Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme,, pp 33–39, 2021.
  52. J T B Taufik, M M Haque, K Nahar, R Islam, and M L Hossain, “Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost, Solar Powered Smart Irrigation System Using Arduino and GSM,” Life Science Studies, vol 2, pp 25-33, 2025.
  53. Mohankumar A and Gowtham R, “Revolutionizing automated agriculture: A brief overview of an advanced Smart Agriculture System using arduino UNO,” Irish Interdisciplinary Journal of Science & Research, vol 08, no 01, pp 13–23, 2024.
  54. S Amassmir, S Tkatek, O Abdoun, and J Abouchabaka, “An intelligent irrigation system based on internet of things IoT to minimize water loss,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol 25, no 1, p 504, 2022. [CrossRef]
  55. M A M Al-Obaidi, M A H Radhi, R S Ibrahim, and T Sutikno, “Technique smart control soil moisture system to watering plant based on IoT with arduino uno,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol 9, no 5, pp 2038–2044, 2020.
  56. Dr S Velmurugan, V Balaji, T Manoj Bharathi, and K Saravanan, “An IOT based Smart Irrigation System using Soil Moisture and Weather Prediction,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology IJERT, vol 9, no 7, pp 1-4, 2020.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated