Submitted:
04 May 2025
Posted:
08 May 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction

- Definition: Augmented Reality and Virtual reality
- Benefits of AR and VR
- -
- Dynamic Learning Environment: AR creates responsive learning environments with features like virtual labs and gamified assessments, stimulating critical thinking and problem-solving skills.[11]
- -
- Real Time Guidance: AR provides immediate feedback and guidance, enhancing the learning process by allowing students to correct mistakes in real time.
- -
- Interactive Learning: AR makes lesions more engaging and effective by offering by unique and interactive learning experience where student can manipulate virtual objects within their real environments [12].
- -
- Immersive Experience: VR has the potential to motivate students to explore new academic interests and tackle complex concepts with greater enthusiasm[13].
- -
- Improved Student Outcomes: VR has been reported to improve student attention, with certain implementations increasing exam result by up to 20% by enhancing retention through experimental learning [14].
- -
- Enhanced problem-solving skills: The use of simulation and multimedia content in VR environments helps students develop and enhance their problem-solving skills through scenario-based learning [15].
Methodology
- Challenges of AR and VR in Education
- -
- High initial costs for devices [22]. High costs can exacerbate the digital divide, as only those with higher incomes can afford AR/VR devices.
- -
- It's not enough to simply use AR/VR; teachers need to understand how to effectively integrate these technologies into their teaching methodologies. They require training on how to design engaging and effective AR/VR-based learning experiences that align with curriculum objectives. VR training programs often demonstrate greater effectiveness compared to traditional training methods [23].
- -
- Potential motion sickness in VR is a common issue. It occurs when there is a mismatch between the visual motion perceived through the VR headset and the lack of corresponding physical movement felt by the body. This sensory conflict can lead to symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, headaches, sweating, and disorientation [24].
- -
- High production cost. AR/VR devices rely on sophisticated components like high-resolution displays, powerful processors, advanced sensors, and specialized cameras. These components are often expensive to manufacture, especially in early production stages.
- -
- AR/VR technologies gather a unique and highly sensitive data profile of a user and can be used to infer sensitive information that users may not explicitly share.
- -
- The performance of AR applications varies based on the device used [25].
- -
- AR applications rely on online access and will not work without it [25].
- -
- Even well-designed applications can introduce security risks through coding flaws or implementation weaknesses [26].
| Basis | AR | VR |
|---|---|---|
| Concept | Overlays digital content on the real world | Creates a fully immersive virtual environment. |
| Accessibility and Implementation | AR can be implemented using existing devices like smartphone and tablets, making it relatively more accessible in the developing countries like Nepal. No additional hardware cost. | VR requires specialized equipment hardware such as headsets and powerful computers, which can be challenging in rural areas where infrastructure is limited. |
| Engagement and Interaction | AR excels in providing contextual, real-time guidance, and feedback while maintaining connection with the real world. | VR creates fully immersive environments that can transport students to different worlds and scenario, completely removing external distractions. |
| Learning Outcomes | AR has shown particular effectiveness in providing dynamic learning environments that stimulate critical thinking and problem-solving skills. | VR has demonstrated potential in improving exam results and reducing learning error through immersive experience. |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Primary Devices | Smartphones, tablets, AR glasses (e.g., Microsoft HoloLens) | VR headsets (e.g., Meta Quest, Valve Index) |
| Processing Power | Moderate (runs on smartphones) | High (requires powerful GPUs) |
- Future Prospects and Recommendations
- Tiered Implementation Strategy: Develop a national strategy that prioritizes AR implementation in schools with limited resources while supporting VR adoption in select institutions that can serve as centers of excellence and shared resources.
- Public-Private Partnerships: Establish partnerships between educational institutions and technology companies to reduce costs and develop localized content relevant to the curriculum.
- Teacher Training Programs: Implement comprehensive training programs specifically designed for educators to build capacity in effectively utilizing AR and VR technologies.
- Infrastructure Development: Coordinate with telecommunications and internet service providers to improve connectivity in educational institutions, particularly in rural areas.
- Content Development: Invest in developing AR and VR content that specifically addresses the cultural context, rather than relying solely on imported educational materials.
Limitations
Conclusions
References
- Ardiny, H.; Khanmirza, E. The role of AR and VR technologies in education developments: opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of 2018 6th rsi international conference on robotics and mechatronics (icrom); pp. 482–487.
- Zhang, X.; Jiang, S.; Ordóñez de Pablos, P.; Lytras, M.D.; Sun, Y. How virtual reality affects perceived learning effectiveness: A task–technology fit perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 2017, 36, 548–556. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Y.-S.; Chou, C.-H.; Chuang, M.-J.; Li, W.-H.; Tsai, I.-F. Effects of virtual reality on creative design performance and creative experiential learning. Interactive Learning Environments 2023, 31, 1142–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, O.A.; Omdahl, M.K.; Makransky, G. Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: A media and methods experiment. Computers & Education 2019, 140, 103603. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, K.; Tsai, C. A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students’ learning experience and teacher-student interaction behaviors. Comp Edu 140: 103600. 2019.
- Reddy, K.V. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Implementing AR in Manufacturing Training Programs. Availabe online: https://www.aidoos.com/blog/cost-benefit-analysis-of-implementing-ar-in-manufacturing-training-programs/?
- HQSoftware. How to Implement AR/VR Solutions for Your Business. Availabe online: https://hqsoftwarelab.
- n.d. Science & Tech Spotlight: Extended Reality Technologies. Availabe online: https://www.gao. 1055.
- Jang, J.; Ko, Y.; Shin, W.S.; Han, I. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Learning: An Examination Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 6798–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. Augmented Reality in Education and Training. TechTrends 2012, 56, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navigating Tomorrow: The Future of Education in the Digital Age. Availabe online: https://nepaledu.
- Augmented Reality in Education. Availabe online: https://www.swifttech.com.
- Bhattarai, D. Revamping Nepal's Education: Innovation and AI at the Forefront. Edusanjal: 2024.
- Virtual Reality for Schools. Availabe online: https://www.classvr.
- Pal, R. Technology in Education. Availabe online: https://www.21kschool.
- Kesim, M.; Ozarslan, Y. Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012, 47, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- What Is Edutainment? Tips for Mixing Education and Entertainment in the Classroom. Availabe online: https://soeonline.american.
- Gervasi, O.; Perri, D.; Simonetti, M. Empowering Knowledge With Virtual and Augmented Reality. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 144649–144662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, A.; Billinghurst, M.; Lindeman, R.W.; Swan, J.E. A systematic review of 10 years of augmented reality usability studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2018, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garzón, J.; Pavón, J.; Baldiris, S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual reality 2019, 23, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radu, I. Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and ubiquitous computing 2014, 18, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naugolnova, I.A. VR/AR Technologies in Cost Management Throughout the Product Life Cycle Stages. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the XI International Scientific Conference "Digital Transformation of the Economy: Challenges, Trends and New Opportunities" (ISCDTE 2024), Cham, 2024//.
- Howard, M.C.; Gutworth, M.B.; Jacobs, R.R. A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs. Computers in Human Behavior 2021, 121, 106808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chattha, U.A.; Janjua, U.I.; Anwar, F.; Madni, T.M.; Cheema, M.F.; Janjua, S.I. Motion Sickness in Virtual Reality: An Empirical Evaluation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 130486–130499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, R.; Khan, M.O.; Arif, M.; Alvi, A.; Alam, T. Augmented Reality and its Applications in Education: A Systematic Survey. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 143250–143271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapagain, D.; Kshetri, N.; Sihag, V.K. webCyberBlock: Cybersecurity and Cyber Ethics via Blockchain Technology–Need for Web Security, Software Practices, and End-User Cyber Education. In Blockchain Technology for Cyber Defense, Cybersecurity, and Countermeasures, CRC Press: 2025; pp. 123-138.
- AlGerafi, M.A.M.; Zhou, Y.; Oubibi, M.; Wijaya, T.T. Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics 2023, 12, 3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- V. Magomadov, "Examining the potential of VR and AR technologies for education," in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, vol. 1691, no. 1: IOP Publishing, p. 012160.
- Y. Koumpouros, "Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 2024; 2. [CrossRef]
- K. Takrouri, E. K. Takrouri, E. Causton, and B. Simpson, "AR Technologies in Engineering Education: Applications, Potential, and Limitations," Digital, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171-190, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-6470/2/2/11.
- Nincarean, D.; Alia, M.B.; Halim, N.D.A.; Rahman, M.H.A. Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2013, 103, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).