Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Regional Inequities in the Distribution of the Health Workforce in Italy: An Analysis of Systemic Disparities and Policy Implications

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 May 2025

Posted:

06 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Inequalities in access to health professionals represent a significant challenge in achieving equitable health care systems. In many countries, particularly those with decentralized governance, disparities in the distribution of human health resources persist despite efforts to promote uniform access. This study investigates the extent and determinants of regional inequality in the distribution of the healthcare workforce in Italy. Methods: A retrospective ecological analysis was conducted using administrative data on physicians and nurses per 10,000 inhabitants across Italy’s regions from 2010 to 2021. The Gini coefficient was used to measure inequality in workforce distribution. Additional indicators such as average salary and health expenditure per capita were examined to identify potential drivers of disparity. Conclusions: Despite a universal national health system, Italy continues to exhibit pronounced regional disparities in the distribution of healthcare professionals. These findings highlight the need for targeted policy interventions to promote equity in health workforce allocation. A better alignment between national planning and regional implementation could help reduce inequalities and improve access to care in underserved areas.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The equitable distribution of health resources is a crucial element in ensuring access to care services and promoting an inclusive health system, capable of responding effectively to the health needs of the population [1,2]. However, in many territorial realities, significant inequalities persist in the availability of health personnel and in the accessibility to essential services [3]. Italy, like many other nations, has significant disparities in the distribution of the nursing workforce between different regions, influenced by socioeconomic, structural and health development factors. Regions with advanced health infrastructure have more nurses, while rural or less developed areas face staff shortages [4]. This imbalance negatively impacts the effectiveness and efficiency of the health system, limiting the ability to provide timely and adequate care to the entire population and exacerbating pre-existing health inequalities [5].
Nursing staff shortages in some geographical areas compromise the quality of care and can lead to increased waiting times, reduced quality of care and worsening health outcomes, especially for people living in disadvantaged regions [6]. In addition, these shortages can lead to overload for existing nursing staff, exposing them to high levels of stress and burnout, with direct consequences on job satisfaction and the turnover rate of healthcare staff [7]. A fair and efficient health system therefore requires targeted strategies to reduce disparities in the distribution of nursing resources and improve accessibility to health services throughout the country [8,9].
In this context, the Gini coefficient represents a useful tool for quantifying and analyzing inequalities in the distribution of nursing staff among Italian regions. Traditionally used to measure wealth distribution, the Gini coefficient has also been successfully applied in healthcare to assess resource distribution and disparities in access to services [1]. A Gini value close to zero indicates an equal distribution of nurses among the regions, while higher values suggest a concentration of resources in some areas at the expense of others. Utilizing this indicator facilitates an objective assessment of regional disparities, thereby providing a robust foundation for health planning and policy formulation aimed at addressing existing inequalities.
Italy has a health system characterized by marked regional differences in the quality and availability of the services offered. Northern regions, which are generally more industrialized and have a higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) pro capita, tend to benefit from a higher availability of health resources, while southern and island regions face challenges related to economic difficulties, infrastructure gaps and lower investment in the health sector [10,11,12]. These differences translate into a highly variable quality of nursing care between different regions, directly affecting the ability of the health system to respond equitably to the needs of the population [13,14].
The Gini coefficient quantifies regional inequalities and informs health resource planning [15]. The information deriving from its application could support policy makers in designing economic and professional incentives aimed at incentivizing the presence of nurses in underserved areas [16]. Strategies such as financial bonuses, tax breaks or continuing education programs could help make nursing work more attractive in regions with greater staff shortages [17,18]. In addition, a better distribution of nursing staff could foster greater equity in access to care and improve population health outcomes, reducing existing disparities [19,20].
The adoption of a fair distribution of nursing staff is a priority to ensure the effectiveness of the national health system [21]. In the context of an ageing population and an increase in demand for healthcare, it is essential to develop targeted strategies to optimize the distribution of human resources and improve accessibility to services [22]. The analysis proposed in this study aims to provide a clear and detailed picture of regional disparities in the distribution of nursing staff in Italy, using the Gini coefficient and the Lorenz curve. The aim is to identify the most critical areas and propose concrete solutions to rebalance the availability of nurses throughout the country, thus contributing to the improvement of equity and quality of healthcare.
This study aims to answer the following question: to what extent does the Human Development Index (HDI) affect the distribution of nurses in the Italian regions? The main objective of the research is to assess the degree of equity in the distribution of nurses in Italy, analyzing regional differences through the Gini coefficient and the Lorenz curve. The results will help identify key areas and suggest policies to redistribute nursing staff, improving healthcare quality nationwide.
Finally, the study is part of a broader line of research aimed at exploring the determinants of health inequalities and possible strategies to mitigate them. International literature has already highlighted the central role of health policies and economic conditions in the distribution of nursing resources [23,24]. The analysis of Italian data in this context can provide useful indications to develop targeted interventions, based on empirical evidence, which can contribute to improving health planning and reducing regional inequalities. With an approach based on quantitative data and consolidated analytical tools, the present study intends to offer a significant contribution to the debate on health policies and the management of nursing resources in Italy.

2. Materials and Methods

This descriptive-analytical study, conducted in 2024, aimed to explore the distribution of the nursing workforce across Italy and to identify potential regional disparities. The choice of a descriptive-analytical design enabled both a comprehensive overview of the current landscape and a critical examination of the data, supporting meaningful insights into the underlying inequities.

2.1. Data Collection

Data on the number of nurses and the Italian population were collected from authoritative and reliable sources. The main sources of data include the Italian Ministry of Health, the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) and reports from the World Health Organization (WHO). To ensure data accuracy, the information was checked by cross-referencing multiple reports and checked for consistency.
The analysis included all Italian regions without any exclusion based on the availability or relevance of the data. The information collected covers the geographical distribution of nurses in different regions, the nurse-to-population ratio, and the demographic characteristics of the nursing workforce, such as age, gender, and level of training.
For example, the data show that Lombardy, with a population of 9,995,000, has about 89,500 nurses, while Basilicata, with 546,000 inhabitants, has only 5,400. Other regions, such as Calabria, with 10,500 nurses for a population of 1,850,000 inhabitants, show a significant shortage of health personnel. In addition, the entire nursing workforce in Italy is predominantly composed of women (77%), with an age distribution between 21 and 65 years. The use of nationally and internationally recognized sources guarantees the validity and reliability of the data collected.

2.2. Calculation of the Gini Coefficient

To assess the inequalities in the distribution of nurses among the Italian regions, the Gini coefficient was calculated, using the formula:
G=1−∑i=1n(Yi+Yi−1) (Xi−Xi−1) G = 1−\sum_{i=1} ^{n} (Y_i + Y_{i-1}) (X_i - X_{i-1}) G=1−i=1∑n(Yi+Yi−1)(Xi−Xi−1)
where X represents the cumulative share of the population and Y the cumulative share of nurses. The analysis was conducted using SPSS software (version 26.0) and Microsoft Excel, to ensure accurate calculations and replicability. This approach aligns with standard practices

2.3. Analysis Tools

Advanced statistical tools were used to assess the distribution of nurses and identify any regional disparities. The Gini coefficient is a numerical indicator that varies between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates a perfectly equal distribution, while 1 indicates a maximum inequality. This method is particularly useful for quantifying the differences in the distribution of nursing staff compared to the resident population in the different Italian regions.
The Lorenz Curve: graphic representation of the distribution of nurses with respect to the population. The x-axis shows the cumulative population ordered by HDI, while the y-axis shows the cumulative distribution of nurses. A curve close to the line of perfect equality indicates a homogeneous distribution, while a more distant curve shows a greater disparity.

2.4. Classification of Regions

The analysis took into consideration all 20 Italian regions (AP Bolzano, AP Trento = Trentino-Alto Adige), classifying them into three groups based on the Human Development Index (HDI). HDI has been used as a leading indicator as it represents a synthetic measure of the quality of life and socioeconomic development of the regions, including factors related to health, education and income. The regions have been divided into the following groups:
  • Regions with High HDI (above 0.900): Lombardy, Trentino-Alto Adige, Emilia-Romagna, Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, AP Bolzano, AP Trento;
  • Regions with Average HDI (between 0.850 and 0.900): Latium, Tuscany, Valle d'Aosta, Marche, Liguria, Piedmont, Umbria, Abruzzo;
  • Regions with Low HDI (less than 0.850): Calabria, Sicily, Basilicata, Campania, Molise, Puglia, Sardinia
This subdivision makes it possible to compare in more detail the distribution of nurses in the different Italian territorial realities. Considering all the regions allows you to have a more complete overview, avoiding neglecting specific regional criticalities. In addition, this approach allows for a more accurate analysis of the relationship between HDI and nursing distribution, identifying areas that require targeted interventions to improve access to health services.
Table 1. Categorization of Italian Regions according to the Human Development Index (HDI).
Table 1. Categorization of Italian Regions according to the Human Development Index (HDI).
Regions HDI HDI
Category
AP Bolzano 0.934 High
AP Trento 0.925
Lombardy 0.916
Trentino-Alto Adige 0.908
Emilia-Romagna 0.914
Veneto 0.902
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 0.901
Latium 0.890 Medium
Tuscany 0.900
Aosta Valley 0.899
Marches 0.891
Liguria 0.889
Piedmont 0.888
Umbria 0.870
Abruzzo 0.860
Calabria 0.780 Low
Sicily 0.796
Basilicata 0.770
Campania 0.785
Molise 0.795
Apulia 0.810
Sardinia 0.815

2.5. Analysis Procedure

Data analysis was conducted using advanced statistical software, including Microsoft Excel and SPSS, to ensure accurate and reliable processing. The analytical process included the calculation of the Gini coefficient and the construction of the Lorenz curve, fundamental tools for assessing the level of equity in the distribution of nursing staff in the different Italian regions.
To ensure detailed and comparative analysis, each region was treated as a separate unit of analysis, allowing territorial variations within the country to be examined. The stratification of the data made it possible to identify any disparities between regions with high and low Human Development Index (HDI), providing a clear view of the existing differences in terms of the distribution of the nursing workforce.
In addition to the Gini coefficient, descriptive and inferential techniques were applied to analyze the relationship between regional socioeconomic level and nursing density. Statistical indicators such as mean, standard deviation, and confidence interval were calculated to assess the significance of the observed variations.
The results obtained were subsequently interpreted in the light of regional inequalities, with the aim of formulating policy and management recommendations aimed at promoting a more equitable distribution of nursing staff. The analysis of the data also provided useful insights for the development of improvement strategies, such as the implementation of incentives for recruitment in areas with staff shortages, the optimization of professional mobility and the integration of targeted health policies to bridge territorial disparities.
The adoption of a quantitative approach based on consolidated indicators makes it possible to provide an objective picture of the current situation and to support health planning with empirical evidence. This analytical method represents, therefore, an essential tool for policy makers and health management managers, offering a solid basis for future strategies for the allocation of nursing resources in Italy.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of the Nursing Workforce in Italy

The analysis of the distribution of nursing staff in Italy shows significant regional variations, with an uneven distribution between the different areas of the country. The total number of nurses in Italy is 264,686 units. The regions with the highest number of nurses are Lombardy (35,859), Emilia-Romagna (27,631) and Veneto (25,715), while the regions with the lowest number of nurses are Valle d'Aosta (710), Molise (1,402) and Basilicata (2,628). This disparity can be influenced by both population density and the level of regional socio-economic development (Table 2).
The statistical analysis of the distribution of nurses in the Italian regions shows an average of 12,894.05 nurses per region, with a standard deviation of 10,655.16, indicating significant variability between different areas. The 95% confidence interval for the average number of nurses per region is between 9,266.58 and 16,521.52, suggesting that although some regions have a number of nurses well above average, others have significantly lower values.
These differences could reflect the different ability of regions to attract and retain nursing staff, influenced by economic, organisational and political factors. The adoption of targeted strategies to rebalance the distribution of the nursing workforce could help improve accessibility to health services and ensure more homogeneous care throughout the country.

3.2. Nurse-to-Population Ratio

The ratio between nurses and population shows significant variations between the different Italian regions, highlighting significant differences in the distribution of the nursing workforce. Analyzing the number of nurses per 1,000 inhabitants, significant territorial disparities emerge. For example, in Lombardy there are 3.58 nurses per 1,000 inhabitants, while in Campania the ratio drops to 3.26 per 1,000 inhabitants. On the contrary, in Emilia-Romagna the value reaches 6.21 nurses per 1,000 inhabitants, while in Calabria it stands at 3.80 per 1,000 inhabitants.
The regions with the lowest nurse/population ratio are Campania (3.26) and Sicily (3.59), indicating a possible shortage of nursing staff compared to the care needs of the population. On the contrary, the regions with the highest nursing density are Emilia-Romagna (6.21) and Friuli-Venezia Giulia (6.36), suggesting better health coverage and availability of nursing care. These differences could reflect not only socio-economic disparities between regions, but also different human resource planning strategies in the health sector and regional policies for the recruitment and training of nursing staff (Table 2).

3.3. Inequality Analysis with the Gini Coefficient

To assess the level of inequality in the distribution of nurses among Italian regions, the Gini coefficient, an indicator widely used to measure the concentration of resources within a population, was calculated. This coefficient varies between 0, which represents a perfectly equal distribution, and 1, which indicates the greatest inequality. A value close to 0 implies an even distribution of nursing staff among the regions, while higher values suggest a strong concentration in specific areas of the country.
The analysis carried out returned a national Gini coefficient of 0.136, indicating a moderately unequal distribution of nurses on the national territory (Table 3). However, analysis on a regional basis reveals significant differences, with some regions characterized by a much higher nursing concentration than others.
The construction of the Lorenz Curve has made it possible to graphically visualize this inequality, highlighting how the distribution of nurses follows a trend that is not perfectly equal. Regions with a higher Human Development Index (HDI), such as Emilia-Romagna and Friuli-Venezia Giulia, have a higher availability of nursing staff than regions with lower HDI, such as Calabria and Sicily.
These results suggest that, while there are no extreme imbalances, structural differences persist that could affect access to health services in some areas of the country. Targeted interventions to rebalance the distribution of nursing staff, such as incentives for recruitment in the most disadvantaged regions and policies for the redistribution of resources, could help reduce the existing gap and improve equity in access to nursing care in Italy.

3.4. Visualization of Inequality with the Lorenz Curve

The Lorenz Curve was used to graphically represent the distribution of nurses in relation to the resident population in the different Italian regions. This tool allows you to visualize the degree of inequality, comparing the real distribution with a situation of perfect equity, represented by the diagonal line.
The analysis shows that southern regions tend to deviate more from the line of perfect equity, indicating a lower availability of nurses compared to the resident population. In particular, regions such as Calabria, Campania and Sicily have a less favorable distribution, suggesting a structural shortage of nursing staff compared to the demand for care. On the contrary, northern regions such as Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Emilia-Romagna and Veneto show a trend closer to the equity line, reflecting a greater presence of nurses in relation to the population.
This visualization confirms the results of the Gini coefficient, highlighting how regional differences in nursing workforce allocation are not random, but influenced by socioeconomic and organizational factors. The Lorenz curve therefore represents a valid tool to identify critical areas and to support policy decisions aimed at reducing inequalities in the distribution of nursing staff, improving equitable access to health services throughout the country.
Figure 1. Lorenz curve relative to the general distribution of nurses in the Italian regions.
Figure 1. Lorenz curve relative to the general distribution of nurses in the Italian regions.
Preprints 158443 g001

3.5. Regional Distribution According to Human Development Index (HDI)

The Italian regions were divided according to their Human Development Index (HDI), an indicator that measures the level of socioeconomic development through three fundamental dimensions: life expectancy, level of education and GDP pro capita. The HDI was used to analyze the relationship between the level of regional development and the availability of nursing staff, highlighting significant differences in the distribution of the health workforce on the national territory.
The analysis showed that regions with higher HDI, such as Emilia-Romagna (0.935) and Lombardy (0.927), have a higher concentration of nurses, suggesting a positive correlation between socioeconomic development and the ability to attract and retain health workers. On the contrary, regions with a lower HDI, such as Calabria (0.859) and Sicily (0.859), show a shortage of nursing staff, indicating possible difficulties in the recruitment and distribution of health resources (Table 4).
These differences could be explained by a combination of economic and organizational factors, including the availability of advanced healthcare facilities, the training offer and the working conditions offered to healthcare professionals. The HDI, therefore, is confirmed as a useful indicator to understand the ability of the regions to ensure adequate nursing coverage and to guide future health policies aimed at reducing regional disparities in the availability of health personnel.

3.6. Demographic Differences Among Nurses

The demographic analysis of nursing staff shows that 77% of the workforce is made up of women, with an average age of 46.5 years. The average length of service is 17.7 years, and most nurses work indefinitely in public facilities.
In addition, the nurse/doctor ratio in the Italian health system is 2.63, highlighting a need for nursing staff in relation to the medical workforce (Table 5).

3.7. Distribution of Nurses in Relation to the Human Development Index (HDI)

The graphs below show the Lorenz curves related to the distribution of nurses in Italy, analyzed considering the HDI. Graph (a) shows that regions with higher HDI have more nurses, indicating moderate socioeconomic inequality in health worker availability.
The graph on the right (b) represents the overall distribution at the national level, directly comparing the regions with each other, regardless of HDI. Both representations indicate that, despite a relatively equal overall distribution (national Gini coefficient = 0.136), there are still local disparities related to socio-economic background, with some regions being less well-equipped than others.
These results suggest that although the distribution of nurses is generally equal, there are still areas with disparities related to regional socioeconomic level (HDI). Therefore, it may be useful to further explore possible strategies to rebalance distribution and ensure more uniform care coverage.
Figure 2. Lorenz curve of the distribution of nurses by regional groups according to Human Development Index (HDI).
Figure 2. Lorenz curve of the distribution of nurses by regional groups according to Human Development Index (HDI).
Preprints 158443 g002

3.8. Relationship Between Human Development Index (HDI) and Nurse Distribution: An Italian Regional Analysis

The effect of socioeconomic level and HDI on the distribution of nurses was assessed by analyzing Italian regional differences in terms of nursing density and socioeconomic level. The survey conducted showed that there is a significant relationship between the HDI and the distribution of nurses in the Italian regions.
The HDI measures socioeconomic level and quality of life, considering health, education, and income. In Italy, HDI varies considerably from region to region, reflecting substantial differences in economic, educational and health terms between the north, centre and south. Regions with higher HDI values, such as Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy, Lazio and Trentino-Alto Adige, showed a significantly higher nurse-to-inhabitant ratio than regions with lower HDIs, such as Calabria, Sicily and Campania.
In particular, the northern and some central regions had a high nursing density, with peaks of more than 6 nurses per 1000 inhabitants. For example, Emilia-Romagna, which has the highest HDI (0.935), also has one of the highest nurse-to-population ratios (about 6.21 per thousand), indicating a clear relationship between socioeconomic quality and the ability to attract and retain qualified nursing staff.
Conversely, regions of southern Italy such as Calabria, Campania, Sicily and Puglia, characterized by lower HDI values (from 0.859 to 0.885), have shown a decidedly lower nursing density, with values lower than the national average, ranging between 3.27 and 4.00 nurses per 1000 inhabitants. This result suggests that in regions with less favorable socio-economic conditions, there is a greater difficulty in attracting nursing staff, with possible consequences on the quality of health services offered to citizens.
To deepen this relationship, the national Gini coefficient was also calculated, which measures the overall inequality in the distribution of nurses compared to the resident population in all Italian regions. This coefficient returned to a value of 0.136, indicating a relatively equal distribution at the national level. However, analyzing each region separately, more pronounced local disparities emerge, reflecting the observed correlation between HDI and nursing availability. In fact, the calculation of the regional Gini coefficient, referring to the difference between the regional nurse-inhabitant ratio and the national average, showed values that reach significant levels, with averages around 0.211.
The graphical representation of the Lorenz curves has further clarified the nature of these inequalities. The first graph (a), which groups the regions according to their HDI, shows a nursing distribution that deviates slightly from the ideal line of equity, visually confirming the differences already discussed. The second graph (b), which represents the general cumulative distribution of nurses in relation to the national population, shows a less marked gap, suggesting that, although there are regional inequalities related to the socioeconomic context, the Italian health system still has an overall equal distribution compared to other international contexts.
It has also been observed that nursing staff has relatively uniform demographic characteristics throughout the country, with an average age of about 46.5 years and an average length of service of 17.7 years, regardless of the region. However, the proportion between full-time and part-time staff has some differences, with a clear prevalence of female staff in all Italian regions. This phenomenon could reflect specific work dynamics, such as the reconciliation of professional and personal life, which is particularly significant in the health and nursing sector.
The evidence collected suggests that the regional socioeconomic level, expressed through the HDI, plays a decisive role in the ability of the regions to attract and retain sufficient nursing staff to ensure adequate standards of care. This report indicates that interventions aimed at improving socio-economic conditions in less developed regions could also have an indirect positive effect on the distribution of nursing resources. Strategic interventions could include economic incentives, improvements in working conditions and investments in education and health, in order to attract and retain skilled personnel in less developed regions.
The distribution of nurses in Italy is moderately influenced by the regional socioeconomic level and HDI, with significant implications for health planning and human resource management in the health sector. Although the overall situation appears relatively balanced at the national level, there are specific areas of concern that require targeted policies to rebalance the availability of nursing staff, thus ensuring greater equity and better quality of care across the country.

4. Discussion

The present analysis has shown a significant relationship between the regional HDI and the distribution of nursing staff in the Italian regions. These results are consistent with evidence from previous studies, which suggest that socioeconomic level directly influences the ability to attract and retain qualified nursing staff in the healthcare sector [23,25].
The analysis shows that regions with high HDI, such as Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy, Veneto and Lazio, have a significantly higher nursing density than regions with lower HDI values, such as Campania, Sicily, Calabria and Puglia. This observation supports the results obtained by Fernandes, Santinha & Forte [26], according to which geographical areas characterized by greater socioeconomic development tend to attract and retain qualified health personnel more easily, also thanks to the presence of better working conditions, more effective training facilities and greater opportunities for professional development [27].
The overall Gini coefficient calculated in this research, equal to 0.136, reflects a relatively equal situation at the national level, indicating that the nursing distribution in Italy is generally balanced compared to other international contexts. However, detailed analyses on a regional basis have shown substantial differences in the local distribution of nursing resources, which are less evident at the national aggregate level. Previous studies have identified similar patterns in other European countries, underlining how regional disparities can be strongly influenced by local economic, educational and infrastructural factors [28,29].
The Lorenz curve developed for regional groups based on HDI further visually confirmed these inequalities, albeit moderately present. This result reinforces the need to adopt a regional perspective in health human resources planning, so that an effective response to real local needs can be guaranteed. Previous studies, such as that of Buchan and Aiken [30], have shown that the use of the Gini coefficient and the Lorenz curve is a valid and reliable tool for assessing and monitoring equity in the distribution of health resources.
A relevant element of the present research is the demographic analysis of the Italian nursing staff. The average age of nurses (46.5 years) and the average length of service (17.7 years) suggest a stable but at the same time vulnerable workforce, considering the imminent turnover linked to retirements. These concerns are reflected in international studies, which highlight how the aging of the nursing population represents a common challenge in European and international health systems [31,32].
In addition, the analysis of the gender distribution shows a clear prevalence of female nursing staff, an element widely found in other global realities. This aspect has significant implications for the strategic management of human resources, as it suggests the importance of policies that promote a greater work-life balance. Hoxha et al. [33] underline how policies oriented towards the well-being of nursing staff can positively affect employment stability and the quality of care provided.
An aspect of particular interest that emerged from the international comparison is the difference in the regional variability of nursing distribution observed in Italy compared to other European countries. For example, studies conducted in the United Kingdom have highlighted significant inequalities in the distribution of health resources between urban and rural regions, leading to a lower availability of health workers in peripheral areas [28]. On the contrary, the Italian case shows a situation of less overall variability, although some regions still have unfavorable conditions that could worsen over time in the absence of targeted interventions.
The analysis also highlighted the presence of disparities within the Italian regions themselves, suggesting the opportunity for future in-depth studies that analyze these differences in greater detail. The use of mixed or qualitative methodologies could provide additional information about the specific needs of nursing staff and preferences in terms of work locations.
This research reinforces the importance of the socioeconomic level and the HDI index as key indicators for planning the distribution of nursing staff at the regional level. Although the Italian health system shows a relatively equal distribution compared to other international contexts, there is significant room for improvement, especially in regions with lower HDI. To address these inequalities, it is necessary to adopt strategic policies that include economic incentives, improvements in working conditions and targeted investments in the training and professional development of nursing staff.
These findings have important implications for international nursing policy and workforce planning. Regional disparities in the distribution of nurses, as shown in this study, reflect broader systemic inequalities that may be observed in other countries with similar socioeconomic fragmentation. Addressing these disparities requires policies that go beyond local interventions and are informed by global benchmarks on workforce equity, as advocated by WHO and OECD. International frameworks can support countries in adopting equitable distribution strategies through investment in underdeveloped areas, workforce incentives, and standardized planning models.
It seems essential to develop a continuous system of monitoring and evaluation of the policies implemented, in order to ensure that the measures adopted can effectively contribute to the reduction of regional inequalities and the overall improvement of the quality of care offered to Italian citizens. These actions will contribute to strengthening the sustainability of the national health system, improving the capacity of regions to respond effectively to the health needs of the population.

5. Study Limitations

The study has some limitations that should be considered in interpreting the results. Firstly, the data used for the analysis are derived from secondary sources available at national and regional level, which could result in inaccuracies or incompleteness in the representation of the real nursing distribution. In addition, the absence of detailed and region-specific demographic data, such as average age and average length of service, made it necessary to use national average values, thus limiting the possibility of highlighting significant local differences.
Another limitation concerns the type of analysis carried out, mainly descriptive and transversal, which does not allow establish with certainty causal relationships between the HDI and the nursing distribution. In fact, the approach used does not consider potentially relevant confounding variables, such as specific regional health policies, local working conditions, or the economic and logistical availability of individual territories.
The cross-sectional nature of the survey also limits the ability to assess the temporal evolution of inequalities in the distribution of nurses. A longitudinal study would have allowed a more complete analysis of trends and changes over time, thus improving the understanding of distributional dynamics and their determinants.
Finally, the international comparison made in the discussion was based on studies available in literature, which often use different indicators and data collection methodologies. Such heterogeneity could reduce the direct comparability of the results and require caution in interpreting the similarities or differences found with respect to other European and international contexts.
Despite these limitations, the study nevertheless offers important indications and a solid basis for future research aimed at further investigating the role of socioeconomic determinants in the distribution of nursing resources in Italy.

5. Recommendations for Future Research

Considering the results of the present study, it is recommended to conduct further investigations that allow us to overcome the limitations encountered and broaden the understanding of the dynamics relating to the distribution of nurses on the national territory. Subsequent studies could benefit from the inclusion of detailed demographic data relating to each individual region, considering factors such as age, gender, length of service and type of contract. This increased specificity would allow for a more in-depth analysis of regional differences and possible underlying causes.
In addition, future research could take a longitudinal approach, monitoring the temporal evolution of nursing distribution in relation to socioeconomic variations and regional HDI. This approach would make it possible to identify emerging trends and intervene promptly with health policies aimed at rebalancing any disparities.
It is also suggested to further explore the role of local health policies and working conditions in the regions' ability to attract and retain qualified nursing staff. In this sense, it would be useful to conduct qualitative or mixed studies that directly involve health personnel, to identify the factors perceived by nurses as relevant for the choice of the place of work and for permanence over time in certain regions.
Finally, considering the importance of HDI as a variable related to the distribution of nursing staff, future studies could evaluate in greater depth the specific effects of the individual components of the HDI (education, income and health) on the recruitment and retention of nurses in different geographical areas. This approach could allow for more targeted interventions and more effective and sustainable policy strategies, aimed at improving the equitable distribution of health resources throughout the country.
Finally, given the critical role of nurses in the provision of health services, it would be desirable to carry out longitudinal comparative studies, which would make it possible to monitor over time the effectiveness of the policies implemented to reduce regional inequalities, with the aim of improving both the quality of care and accessibility to health services throughout the country.

5. Policy Implications

The results obtained from this study highlight important implications for clinical and management practice in healthcare. The relationship identified between the regional HDI, and the distribution of nurses indicates the need for health directorates and regional authorities to adopt targeted strategies to ensure adequate nursing coverage in all territorial areas, especially in those with lower HDI.
At the management level, it is necessary to develop active policies for the recruitment and retention of nursing staff in the regions with the most significant shortages. Targeted interventions could include economic incentives, specific continuous training, and improvement of working conditions, to attract and retain professional resources in less developed areas, thus contributing to a reduction in regional disparities.
From an organizational point of view, strategic human resources management should consider demographic differences and the specific needs of nursing staff, such as the average advanced age and high length of service, which could lead to an imminent turnover and the need to plan new hires and targeted training paths.
Furthermore, considering the prevalence of female nurses that emerged in the analysis, it is essential to implement strategies oriented towards work-life balance, through policies of organizational flexibility, part-time and support for the management of family and work life, thus ensuring more favorable conditions for nursing staff and, consequently, greater employment stability.
Finally, to ensure continuity and uniform quality of care throughout the country, it is advisable to constantly monitor the trend of nursing distribution, intervening promptly with policies that can reduce the inequalities highlighted and improve the overall management of human resources in the health sector.

5. Conclusion

This study analyzed the relationship between the HDI and the distribution of nursing staff in the Italian regions, highlighting a generally equal distribution, but with some disparities related to regional differences of a socioeconomic nature. The national Gini coefficient (0.136) indicates a moderately equal distribution, however, the analysis for each region has highlighted significant differences that deserve attention from policymakers and health managers.
The results clearly indicate that regions with higher socioeconomic levels tend to have a higher availability of nursing staff than those with lower HDI. Therefore, the implementation of targeted policies that consider not only economic incentives, but also improvements in working conditions and investments in training and professional development, especially in regions with lower HDI, is suggested.
The presence of a nursing population with an advanced average age and high length of service poses further challenges for the future, linked to the need to effectively plan the recruitment and training of new professionals, as well as the support of work policies oriented towards well-being and work-life balance.
In conclusion, although the overall distribution of nurses is relatively equal, local inequalities require targeted and continuous interventions to ensure equity and quality in the delivery of health care at the national level.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.N. and A.S.; methodology, I.N.; software, E.G.; validation, I.N., B.D., and G.G.; formal analysis, E.G.; investigation, B.D.; resources, G.G.; data curation, E.G.; writing—original draft preparation, I.N., B.D.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., and G.R.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, A.S., G.R.; project administration, I.N., A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available from the Italian Ministry of Health and the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). All datasets used were aggregated at the regional level and did not contain any individual or sensitive information. Further details on data sources and access procedures are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This study did not require approval from an ethics committee as it is based exclusively on the analysis of publicly available secondary data and does not involve human participants, patients, or subjects undergoing any intervention. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical principles of scientific research, ensuring methodological rigor and compliance with current regulations regarding the use of aggregated and anonymized data.

Statement on the use of artificial intelligence

This study was entirely conducted by the authors without the use of artificial intelligence tools for the generation, analysis or writing of the content. All data, analyses and interpretations presented in the manuscript are the sole work of the authors, following the principles of scientific rigor and academic integrity.

Guidelines and Standards Statement

This manuscript was drafted against the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for observational research. The STROBE checklist was used to ensure the transparent and complete reporting of the study design, methods, results, and interpretation. A full list of reporting guidelines is available from the EQUATOR Network: https://www.equator-network.org/.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GDP – Gross Domestic Product
HDI – Human Development Index
ISTAT – National Institute of Statistics
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
AP – Autonomous Province
SPSS – Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
WHO – World Health Organization

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2020). The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. World Health Organization.
  2. World Health Organization. (2024). WHO delivering on its commitment to protect and improve people's health: stories of healthier populations, access to services and emergency response. World Health Organization.
  3. Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., & Cantillo-Garcia, V. A. (2024). Is proximity enough? A critical analysis of a 15-minute city considering individual perceptions. Cities, 148, 104882. [CrossRef]
  4. Rose, H., Skaczkowski, G., & Gunn, K. M. (2023). Addressing the challenges of early career rural nursing to improve job satisfaction and retention: Strategies new nurses think would help. Journal of advanced nursing, 79(9), 3299-3311. [CrossRef]
  5. Vărzaru, A. A. (2025). Assessing the Relationships of Expenditure and Health Outcomes in Healthcare Systems: A System Design Approach. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 352). MDPI. [CrossRef]
  6. Adesuyi, E., Olarinde, O., Olawoore, S., & Ajakaye, O. (2024). Navigating the nexus of LMIC healthcare facilities, nurses' welfare, nurse shortage and migration to greener pastures: A narrative literature review. International Health Trends and Perspectives, 4(1), 168-180. [CrossRef]
  7. Peter, K. A., Voirol, C., Kunz, S., Gurtner, A., Renggli, F., Juvet, T., & Golz, C. (2024). Factors associated with health professionals’ stress reactions, job satisfaction, intention to leave and health-related outcomes in acute care, rehabilitation and psychiatric hospitals, nursing homes and home care organisations. BMC health services research, 24(1), 269. [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, L., Chen, T., Lan, T., Chen, C., & Pan, J. (2023). The contributions of population distribution, healthcare resourcing, and transportation infrastructure to spatial accessibility of health care. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 60, 00469580221146041. [CrossRef]
  9. Cary Jr, M. P., Bessias, S., McCall, J., Pencina, M. J., Grady, S. D., Lytle, K., & Economou-Zavlanos, N. J. (2025). Empowering nurses to champion Health equity & BE FAIR: Bias elimination for fair and responsible AI in healthcare. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 57(1), 130-139. [CrossRef]
  10. Jakovljevic, M., Liu, Y., Cerda, A., Simonyan, M., Correia, T., Mariita, R. M., ... & Varjacic, M. (2021). The Global South political economy of health financing and spending landscape–history and presence. Journal of medical economics, 24(sup1), 25-33. [CrossRef]
  11. Orsetti, E., Tollin, N., Lehmann, M., Valderrama, V. A., & Morató, J. (2022). Building resilient cities: climate change and health interlinkages in the planning of public spaces. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1355. [CrossRef]
  12. Kurniawan, T. A., Meidiana, C., Goh, H. H., Zhang, D., Othman, M. H. D., Aziz, F., ... & Ali, I. (2024). Unlocking synergies between waste management and climate change mitigation to accelerate decarbonization through circular-economy digitalization in Indonesia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 46, 522-542. [CrossRef]
  13. Kuehnert, P., Fawcett, J., DePriest, K., Chinn, P., Cousin, L., Ervin, N., ... & Waite, R. (2022). Defining the social determinants of health for nursing action to achieve health equity: A consensus paper from the American Academy of Nursing. Nursing Outlook, 70(1), 10-27. [CrossRef]
  14. Bosque-Mercader, L., & Siciliani, L. (2023). The association between bed occupancy rates and hospital quality in the English National Health Service. The European Journal of Health Economics, 24(2), 209-236. [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, N., Li, G., Xu, J., Yang, X., Chai, J., Cheng, J., ... & Shen, X. (2025). Feasibility and usefulness of Gini coefficients of primary care visits as a measure of service inequality: preliminary findings from a cross-sectional study using region-wide electronic medical records in Anhui, China. BMJ open, 15(2), e083795. [CrossRef]
  16. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO guideline on health workforce development, attraction, recruitment and retention in rural and remote areas. World Health Organization.
  17. Buchan, J., Catton, H., & Shaffer, F. (2022). Sustain and retain in 2022 and beyond. Int. Counc. Nurses, 71, 1-71.
  18. Akinto, A. A. (2021). Critical review of the use of financial incentives in solving health professionals' brain drain. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(4), 446-454. [CrossRef]
  19. Flaubert, J. L., Le Menestrel, S., Williams, D. R., Wakefield, M. K., & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). The Role of Nurses in Improving Health Care Access and Quality. In The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. National Academies Press (US).
  20. Jindal, M., Chaiyachati, K. H., Fung, V., Manson, S. M., & Mortensen, K. (2023). Eliminating health care inequities through strengthening access to care. Health services research, 58, 300-310. [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Y., Moreira, P., Liu, W. W., Monachino, M., Nguyen, T. L. H., & Wang, A. (2022). Is there a gap between artificial intelligence applications and priorities in health care and nursing management?. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(8), 3736-3742. [CrossRef]
  22. Ismanto, B., & Trisatyawati, S. (2025). Optimizing Financial Management to Enhance Curriculum Delivery and Student Development in Vocational High Schools. JTL: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 107-120. [CrossRef]
  23. Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., Bruyneel, L., Van den Heede, K., Griffiths, P., Busse, R., Diomidous, M., Kinnunen, J., Kózka, M., Lesaffre, E., McHugh, M. D., Moreno-Casbas, M. T., Rafferty, A. M., Schwendimann, R., Scott, P. A., Tishelman, C., van Achterberg, T., Sermeus, W., & RN4CAST consortium (2014). Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet (London, England), 383(9931), 1824–1830. [CrossRef]
  24. Rafferty, A. M., Busse, R., Zander-Jentsch, B., Sermeus, W., & Bruyneel, L. (Eds.). (2019). Strengthening health systems through nursing: Evidence from 14 European countries. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.
  25. Buchan, J., Twigg, D., Dussault, G., Duffield, C., & Stone, P. W. (2015). Policies to sustain the nursing workforce: an international perspective. International nursing review, 62(2), 162–170. [CrossRef]
  26. Fernandes, A., Santinha, G., & Forte, T. (2022). Public service motivation and determining factors to attract and retain health professionals in the public sector: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 12(4), 95. [CrossRef]
  27. Szilvassy, P., & Širok, K. (2022). Importance of work engagement in primary healthcare. BMC health services research, 22(1), 1044. [CrossRef]
  28. Griffiths, P., Recio-Saucedo, A., Dall'Ora, C., Briggs, J., Maruotti, A., Meredith, P., Smith, G. B., Ball, J., & Missed Care Study Group (2018). The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: A systematic review. Journal of advanced nursing, 74(7), 1474–1487. [CrossRef]
  29. Sermeus, W., Aiken, L.H., Van den Heede, K. et al. Nurse forecasting in Europe (RN4CAST): Rationale, design and methodology. BMC Nurs 10, 6 (2011). [CrossRef]
  30. Buchan, J., & Aiken, L. (2008). Solving nursing shortages: a common priority. Journal of clinical nursing, 17(24), 3262–3268. [CrossRef]
  31. Tynkkynen, L. K., Pulkki, J., Tervonen-Gonçalves, L., Schön, P., Burström, B., & Keskimäki, I. (2022). Health system reforms and the needs of the ageing population—an analysis of recent policy paths and reform trends in Finland and Sweden. European Journal of Ageing, 19(2), 221-232. [CrossRef]
  32. World Health Organization. (2020). State of the world's nursing 2020: Investing in education, jobs and leadership. In State of the world's nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership.
  33. Hoxha, G., Simeli, I., Theocharis, D., Vasileiou, A., & Tsekouropoulos, G. (2024). Sustainable healthcare quality and job satisfaction through organizational culture: Approaches and outcomes. Sustainability, 16(9), 3603. [CrossRef]
Table 2. Ratio of nurses to inhabitants by region.
Table 2. Ratio of nurses to inhabitants by region.
Region Nurses Population Nurses per 1000 inhabitants
Abruzzo 5.769 1.269.571 4.55
Basilicata 2.628 533.233 4.93
Calabria 6.992 1.838.568 3.8
Campania 18.275 5.593.906 3.27
Emilia-Romagna 27.631 4.451.938 6.21
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 7.595 1.194.616 6.36
Latium 20.797 5.714.745 3.64
Liguria 6.483 1.509.140 4.3
Lombardy 35.859 10.012.054 3.58
Marches 7.608 1.482.746 5.13
Molise 1.402 289.224 4.85
AP Bolzano 3.382 534.912 6.32
AP Trento 3.124 548.790 5.69
Piedmont 22.408 4.251.623 5.27
Apulia 15.403 3.890.661 3.96
Sardinia 8.066 1.570.453 5.14
Sicily 17.221 4.797.359 3.59
Tuscany 22.720 3.660.530 6.21
Umbria 4.898 853.068 5.74
Aosta Valley 710 122.877 5.78
Veneto 25.715 4.852.216 5.3
Table 3. Calculation of the Gini coefficient by region.
Table 3. Calculation of the Gini coefficient by region.
Region Regional Gini
coefficient
Abruzzo 0.012
Basilicata 0.098
Calabria 0.153
Campania 0.272
Emilia-Romagna 0.383
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 0.416
Latium 0.189
Liguria 0.043
Lombardy 0.202
Marches 0.143
Molise 0.08
AP Bolzano 0.419
AP Trento 0.262
Piedmont 0.174
Apulia 0.118
Sardinia 0.144
Sicily 0.2
Tuscany 0.383
Umbria 0.279
Aosta Valley 0.287
Veneto 0.181
Table 4. HDI calculation and the distribution of nurses by region.
Table 4. HDI calculation and the distribution of nurses by region.
Region HDI Nurses
Abruzzo 0.901 5769
Basilicata 0.88 2628
Calabria 0.859 6992
Campania 0.885 18275
Emilia-Romagna 0.935 27631
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 0.918 7595
Latium 0.929 20797
Liguria 0.913 6483
Lombardy 0.927 35859
Marches 0.915 7608
Molise 0.885 1402
AP Bolzano 0.925 3382
AP Trento 0.934 3124
Piemonte 0.912 22408
Apulia 0.869 15403
Sardinia 0.879 8066
Sicily 0.859 17221
Tuscany 0.921 22720
Umbria 0.908 4898
Aosta Valley 0.899 710
Veneto 0.914 25715
Table 5. Italian nurse demographics.
Table 5. Italian nurse demographics.
Category Men (Permanent Contract) Women (Permanent Contract) Total Nurses (Permanent Contract) Average Age (years) Average length of service (years)
Nurse 63012 219026 282038 46.5 17.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated