Submitted:
09 March 2025
Posted:
10 March 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Office Workplace Environment
2.1. Definition
2.2. Overview of History Of Office Workplace Studies
2.3. Importance of Examining the Impact of COVID-19 on Office Workplace
3. Research Gaps
4. Review Methodology
4.1. Stage 1—Literature Search
4.2. Stage 2—Key Literature Identification
4.3. Stage 3—Thematic Analysis of Key Literature
5. Review Results
5.1. An Overview of the Search Results of Stage-1
5.2. Key Dimensions of Studies Relating to Office Workplace Transformation
6. Main Findings
7. Discussion
7.1. The Acceleration of Remote Work as an Initiation of Office Workplace Transformation
7.2. Transformative Trends in Office Design and Utilization
7.3. Integrating Health, Safety, and Sustainability in Organizational Strategies
7.4. Leveraging Digital Technologies for Enhanced Collaboration and Productivity
7.5. Advancing Energy Efficiency in the Post-COVID Workplace
8. A Summative Framework of Workplace Transformation Studies
9. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Parker, L.D. The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2020, 33, 1943–67. [Google Scholar]
- Pataki-Bittó, F.; Kapusy, K. Work environment transformation in the post COVID-19 based on work values of the future workforce. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 2021, 23, 151–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spell, C.; Bezrukova, K. What management history can tell us about the post pandemic workplace, and other useful things? Journal of Management History. 2023, 29, 167–78. [Google Scholar]
- Dar, S.A. The relevance of Taylor’s scientific management in the modern era. Journal of Psychology and Political Science (JPPS). 2022, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Rautrao, R.R.; Nille, N.S. Organizational Behavior. Ashok Yakkaldevi; 2025.
- Yu, Y.; Jiang, Y. Understanding the Digital Revolution and Its Influences. Springer Books. 2024.
- Rishi, S.; Breslau, B.; Miscovich, P. The workplace you need now: shaping spaces for the future of work. John Wiley & Sons; 2021 Oct 26.
- Latini, A.; Di Giuseppe, E.; D’Orazio, M.; Di Perna, C. Exploring the use of immersive virtual reality to assess occupants’ productivity and comfort in workplaces: An experimental study on the role of walls colour. Energy and Buildings. 2021, 253, 111508. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, L. Coordinating office space: Digital technologies and the platformization of work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2021, 39, 347–65. [Google Scholar]
- Bouncken, R.B.; Lapidus, A.; Qui, Y. Organizational sustainability identity:‘New Work’of home offices and coworking spaces as facilitators. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship. 2022, 1, 100011. [Google Scholar]
- Ganu, J. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Paradigm Shift towards Organizational Care for Employees’ Wellbeing. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 2024, 5, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, H.; Ho, D.C.; Yau, Y. Smart tools to facilitate digitalisation of facilities management service delivery: stakeholders’ perspectives. Facilities 2024, 42, 27–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, H.; Remøy, H.; Jylhä, T.; Vande Putte, H. A study on office workplace modification during the COVID-19 pandemic in The Netherlands. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 2021, 23, 186–202. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, H.; Lai, J.H.; Wu, H.; Wang, T. Digital twin application in heritage facilities management: Systematic literature review and future development directions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2024, 31, 3193–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madero Gómez, S.; Ortiz Mendoza, O.E.; Ramírez, J.; Olivas-Luján, M.R. Stress and myths related to the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on remote work. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. 2020, 18, 401–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortiços, N.D. and Duarte, C.C., 2021. COVID-19: The impact in US high-rise office buildings energy efficiency. Energy and Buildings, 249, p.111180.
- Ancillo, A.D.; del Val Núñez, M.T.; Gavrila, S.G. Workplace change within the COVID-19 context: a grounded theory approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2021, 34, 2297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, P.A.; Brown, S. Reconstructing attitudes towards work from home during COVID-19: a survey of South Korean managers. Behavioral Sciences. 2021, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schmidtner, M.; Doering, C.; Timinger, H. Agile working during COVID-19pandemic. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2021, 49, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surma, M.J.; Nunes, R.J.; Rook, C.; Loder, A. Assessing employee engagement in a post-COVID-19 workplace ecosystem. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 11443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayodele, T.O.; Kajimo-Shakantu, K.; Gbadegesin, J.T.; Babatunde, T.O.; Ajayi, C.A. Exploring investment paradigm in urban office space management: perspectives from coworking space investors in Nigeria. Journal of Facilities Management. 2022, 20, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooke, H.; Fiorentino, S.; Harris, R.; Livingstone, N.; McAllister, P. Corporate occupiers’ attitude to flex space in the post-Covid environment. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 2022, 40, 493–507. [Google Scholar]
- Cortiços, N.D.; Duarte, C.C. Energy efficiency in large office buildings post-COVID-19 in Europe’s top five economies. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2022, 68, 410–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dianat, A.; Hawkins, J.; Habib, K.N. Assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on activity-travel scheduling: A survey in the greater Toronto area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2022, 162, 296–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, C.C.; Cortiços, N.D. The energy efficiency post-COVID-19 in China’s office buildings. Clean Technologies. 2022, 4, 174–233. [Google Scholar]
- Fiorentino, S.; Livingstone, N.; McAllister, P.; Cooke, H. The future of the corporate office? Emerging trends in the post-Covid city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2022, 15, 597–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Zhang, A.; Xiao, X.; Das, S.; Zhang, Y. Work from home in the post-COVID world. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2022, 10, 1118–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jogunola, O.; Morley, C.; Akpan, I.J.; Tsado, Y.; Adebisi, B.; Yao, L. Energy consumption in commercial buildings in a post-covid-19 world. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2022, 50, 54–64. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Tong, Y.; Li, S.; Tian, Z.; He, L.; Zheng, J. Compliance with COVID-19-preventive behaviours among employees returning to work in the post-epidemic period. BMC Public Health. 2022, 22, 369. [Google Scholar]
- Mehra, S.K. The post-scarcity world and the post-pandemic office. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2022, 12, 9450. [Google Scholar]
- Smite D, Tkalich A, Moe NB, Papatheocharous E, Klotins E, Buvik MP. Changes in perceived productivity of software engineers during COVID-19 pandemic: The voice of evidence. Journal of Systems and Software. 2022 Apr 1;186:111197.
- Stefaniec A, Brazil W, Whitney W, Caulfield B. Desire to work from home: Results of an Irish study. Journal of Transport Geography. 2022 Oct 1;104:103416.
- Sundermeier J. Lessons for and from Digital Workplace Transformation in Times of Crisis. MIS Quarterly Executive. 2022 Dec 1;21(4).
- Weber C, Golding SE, Yarker J, Lewis R, Ratcliffe E, Munir F, Wheele TP, Häne E, Windlinger L. Future teleworking inclinations post-COVID-19: examining the role of teleworking conditions and perceived productivity. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022 May 9;13:863197.
- Yasin A, Delaney J, Cheng CT, Pang TY. The design and implementation of an IoT sensor-based indoor air quality monitoring system using off-the-shelf devices. Applied Sciences. 2022 Sep 21;12(19):9450.
- Zalat, M.; Bolbol, S. Telework benefits and associated health problems during the long COVID-19 era. Work. 2022, 71, 371–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogosian, R.; Byrd-Poller, L. The return-to-office decision post-COVID: The effects on firm performance. Rutgers Business Review. 2023, 8, 251–75. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Bajaj, D. Commercial office portfolio risks during the COVID pandemic and the future beyond–a survey of stakeholders in India. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 2023, 41, 523–37. [Google Scholar]
- Kerksieck, P.; Ballouz, T.; Haile, S.R.; Schumacher, C.; Lacy, J.; Domenghino, A.; Fehr, J.S.; Bauer, G.F.; Dressel, H.; Puhan, M.A.; Menges, D. Post COVID-19 condition, work ability and occupational changes in a population-based cohort. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe. 2023, 31. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Shin, D.J.; Kim, B.K. Effect of covid-19-induced changes on job insecurity, presenteeism, and turnover intention in the workplace—an investigation of generalized anxiety disorder among hotel employees using the GAD-7 scale. Sustainability. 2023, 15, 5377. [Google Scholar]
- Kurnitski, J.; Kiil, M.; Mikola, A.; Vosa, K.V.; Aganovic, A.; Schild, P.; Seppänen, O. Post-COVID ventilation design: infection risk-based target ventilation rates and point source ventilation effectiveness. Energy and Buildings. 2023, 296, 113386. [Google Scholar]
- Lake, B.; Maidment, D.W. “Is this a new dawn for accessibility?” A qualitative interview study assessing remote working experiences in adults with physical disabilities post COVID-19. Work. 2023, 76, 437–51. [Google Scholar]
- Shih, K.K.; Anderson, A.; Dai, J.; Fellman, B.; Rozman de Moraes, A.; Stanton, P.; Nelson, C.; DeLa Cruz, V.; Bruera, E. Hybrid Work from Home Clinical Academic Environment: A One-Year Follow-Up Survey of Attitudes and Beliefs of Members of a Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine. Journal of palliative medicine. 2023, 26, 342–52. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Stamatellou, A.M.; Zogou, O.; Stamatelos, A. Energy Cost Assessment and Optimization of Post-COVID-19 Building Ventilation Strategies. Sustainability. 2023, 15, 3422. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, E.; Kim, Y.; Hong, S. Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. Journal of corporate real estate. 2021, 25, 50–76. [Google Scholar]
- Al Riyami, S.; Razzak, M.R.; Al-Busaidi, A.S. Work from home and workplace ostracism, beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: moderating effect of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Manpower. 2024, 45, 466–83. [Google Scholar]
- Chalabi, G.; Dia, H. The impacts of remote work and attitudinal shifts on commuting reductions in post-COVID Melbourne, Australia. Sustainability. 2024, 16, 7289. [Google Scholar]
- Farjoo, M. Be An Impactful, Proactive Technology Transfer Office in a Globalized and Digitalized World: A Lived Experience. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Tamurejo, Á.; Rodríguez Herráez, B.; Mora Agudo, M.L. Teleworking and commuting mode choice in the post-COVID-19 era as a challenge for organisations. Management Decision. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Hosseini, M.; Heiranipour, M.; Wang, J.; Hinkle, L.E.; Triantafyllidis, G.; Attia, S. Enhancing Visual Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Office Lighting Using Parametric-Generative Design Approach for Interactive Kinetic Louvers. Journal of Daylighting. 2024, 11, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moen, P.; Chu, Y. Time work in the office and shop: Workers’ strategic adaptations to the 4-day week. Work and Occupations. 2024, 51, 607–33. [Google Scholar]
- Pulman, A.; Fenge, L.A. The evolving workplace: the possible impacts of hybrid working and hotdesking on retention of social workers. The British Journal of Social Work. 2024, 54, 3755–72. [Google Scholar]
- Riahi Samani, A.; Riahisamani, R.; Mishra, S.; Golias, M.M.; Jung-Hwi Lee, D. Evaluating relocation behavior of establishments: Evidence for the short-term effects of COVID-19. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 2024, 23998083241230580. [Google Scholar]
- Asaoka, R.; Umishio, W.; Kagi, N.; Hayashi, M.; Sawachi, T.; Ueno, T. Office environments and worker satisfaction with thermal and air environments during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Building and Environment. 2025, 268, 112349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| No. | Codes | Category |
| 1 | Remote work and its implications Hybrid and remote work dynamics Hybrid and remote work models Remote work adoption and integration Acceleration of remote work |
Hybrid and remote work trends and strategy |
| 2 | Workplace environment and design Work environment preferences of emerging generations Performance and user experience in office spaces Workplace design and spatial adjustments Changes in office demand and space utilization Changes in office design and use |
Transformative Trends in Office Design and Utilization |
| 3 | Health and Well-being Health and safety enhancements Health and safety concerns Health and safety enhancement Health and safety in the workplace Public Health Workforce and Policy Development |
Workplace health and safety strategies |
| 4 | Cultural and attitudinal changes towards work Behavioural and cultural shifts Behavioural changes and work culture Productivity and employee well-being Effects of COVID-19 on Establishment Relocation |
Work Culture and Behavioral Adaptations |
| 5 | Technological integration Digital transformation and technology utilization Digital and agile workplace adaptations Redefinition and Impact Measurement in Technology Transfer |
Digital Transformation and Technological Adaptations |
| 6 | Organisational strategy and management Workforce and organizational adaptations |
Strategic Workforce Management and Organizational Adaptations |
| 7 | Environmental impact and energy efficiency Energy efficiency and environmental concerns Impact on energy consumption and environment concerns |
Energy and Environmental Impact Strategies |
| Reference | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| [1] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [15] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [16] | √ | √ | |||||
| [17] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [13] | √ | √ | |||||
| [2] | √ | √ | |||||
| [18] | √ | √ | |||||
| [19] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [20] | √ | √ | |||||
| [21] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [22] | √ | ||||||
| [23] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [24] | √ | ||||||
| [25] | √ | ||||||
| [26] | √ | √ | |||||
| [27] | √ | √ | |||||
| [28] | √ | √ | |||||
| [29] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [30] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [31] | √ | √ | |||||
| [32] | √ | ||||||
| [33] | √ | √ | |||||
| [34] | √ | √ | |||||
| [35] | √ | √ | |||||
| [36] | √ | √ | |||||
| [37] | √ | √ | |||||
| [38] | √ | ||||||
| [39] | √ | ||||||
| [40] | √ | ||||||
| [41] | √ | √ | |||||
| [42] | √ | √ | |||||
| [43] | √ | ||||||
| [44] | √ | √ | |||||
| [45] | √ | ||||||
| [46] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [47] | √ | ||||||
| [48] | √ | √ | |||||
| [49] | √ | √ | |||||
| [50] | √ | √ | √ | ||||
| [51] | √ | ||||||
| [52] | √ | ||||||
| [53] | √ | ||||||
| [54] | √ | ||||||
| Total number | 13 | 20 | 11 | 14 | 4 | 13 | 7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).