Submitted:
05 February 2025
Posted:
05 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Surgical Anatomy and Motion Constraints
2.2. Images and Processing
2.3. Biomechanical Framework for Dynamic Thoracic Wall Simulation
2.3.1. Fascia Superficialis Simulation
2.3.2. Multi-Resolution IMA Vessel Simulation
2.3.4. Connective Tissue Modeling
2.3.3. Bidirectional Coupling of IMA and Adipose Tissue
2.4. Interactive Haptic-Enabled Surgical Manipulation and Cutting
2.4.1. Topology-Preserving Cutting Method
2.4.2. Connective Tissue Surgical Cutting Simulation
2.4.3. Kinematic Modeling of Surgical Instrument Motion
2.4.4. Force Feedback Modeling for Electrosurgical Simulation
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The top 10 causes of death. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 10 March 2020).
- Hemli JM, Patel NC. Robotic Cardiac Surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2020;100:219-236. [CrossRef]
- Virk HUH, Lakhter V, Ahmed M, O' Murchu B, Chatterjee S. Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Literature Review. Curr Cardiol Rep 2019;21:36. [CrossRef]
- Bonatti J, Wallner S, Winkler B, Grabenwöger M. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020;17:33-40. [CrossRef]
- Balkhy HH, Nathan S, Torregrossa G, et al. The learning curve of robotic totally endoscopic coronary bypass: insights from a single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;108:1459-1466. [CrossRef]
- Valdis M, Chu MW, Schlachta C, et al. Evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery simulation training: A randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:1498-1505. [CrossRef]
- Trehan K, Kemp CD, Yang SC. Simulation in cardiothoracic surgical training: where do we stand? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:18-24. [CrossRef]
- Jung C, Wolff G, Wernly B, et al. Virtual and Augmented Reality in Cardiovascular Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:519-532. [CrossRef]
- Pelargos PE, Nagasawa DT, Lagman C, et al. Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci 2017;35:1-4. [CrossRef]
- Niederer SA, Lumens J, Trayanova NA. Computational models in cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol 2019;16:100-111. [CrossRef]
- Paulus CJ, Haouchine N, Kong SH, et al. Handling topological changes during elastic registration. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2017;12:461-470. [CrossRef]
- Faure F, Duriez C, Delingette H, et al. SOFA: A multi-model framework for interactive physical simulation. Soft Tissue Biomech Model Comput Assist Surg 2012;11:283-321. [CrossRef]
- Zeng H, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. A Liver Electrosurgery Simulator Developed by Unity Engine. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Biomedical Signal and Image Processing 2021:14-19.
- Qian K, Wang M, Cui Y. Simulation ready anatomy model generation pipeline for virtual surgery. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 2021. [CrossRef]
- Moore J, Scheirich H, Jadhav S, et al. The interactive medical simulation toolkit (iMSTK): An open source platform for surgical simulation. Front Virtual Real 2023;4:1130156. [CrossRef]
- Okamura, AM. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2009;19:102-107. [CrossRef]
- Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D, Kuchenbecker KJ. Cutaneous feedback of fingertip deformation and vibration for palpation in robotic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016;63:278-287. [CrossRef]
- Cardoso MJ, et al. Monai: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare. arXiv:2211.02701 2022.
- Kong F, Shadden SC. Learning Whole Heart Mesh Generation From Patient Images for Computational Simulations. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2023;42:533-545. [CrossRef]
- Updegrove A, et al. SimVascular: an open source pipeline for cardiovascular simulation. Ann Biomed Eng 2017;45:525-541. [CrossRef]














| Trial No. | Dynamic Group SAI | Static Group SAI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0. 583 | 0. 247 |
| 2 | 0. 621 | 0. 268 |
| 3 | 0. 545 | 0. 221 |
| 4 | 0. 602 | 0. 285 |
| 5 | 0. 568 | 0. 238 |
| 6 | 0. 634 | 0. 276 |
| 7 | 0. 592 | 0. 212 |
| 8 | 0. 551 | 0. 257 |
| 9 | 0. 615 | 0. 228 |
| 10 | 0. 577 | 0. 243 |
| Mean±SD | 0.589±0.029 | 0.248±0.024 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).