Submitted:
02 February 2025
Posted:
03 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Since its completion in 214 BCE, the primary function of the Lingqu Canal has evolved from military transportation and irrigation to tourism. Today, with the advancement of urbanization, the canal’s functions have further diversified, giving rise to economic models such as "Agriculture + Tourism," "Water Conservancy + Tourism," and "Culture + Tourism." These developments have stimulated regional economic growth and enhanced the value of the Lingqu Canal as a cultural heritage site. However, due to high population density along both banks, complex production activities, lagging infrastructure development, and weak regulatory capacity, certain sections of the canal are experiencing significant sediment accumulation, water quality degradation, and ecosystem deterioration. The habitat quality along the canal is declining, placing the integrity of the Lingqu Canal itself at risk. Therefore, exploring the synergistic effects between urbanization and habitat quality—while also examining both the economic benefits and trends in habitat quality changes resulting from transformations in the canal’s functions—is crucial not only for its sustainable development but also for ensuring its long-term preservation and utilization as a World Cultural Heritage site. Based on land use data from 2000 to 2023 and utilizing the InVEST model, this study investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality along the Lingqu Canal. Additionally, it analyzes the driving factors using the Geodetector model. A spatial autocorrelation analysis is conducted to explore how the functional diversification of the canal impacts economic development, ecological protection, and sustainable development. The findings are as follows: (1) The average habitat quality index along the Lingqu Canal increased from 0.63 in 2000 to 0.76 in 2023, reflecting a consistent annual increase with an average growth rate of 0.83%. This indicates significant ecological restoration efforts during this period. (2) The spatial variation in habitat quality along the canal between 2000 and 2023 results from multiple influencing factors, with changes in land use, precipitation levels, and population density identified as key determinants. (3) A strong correlation exists between habitat quality along the Lingqu Canal during this period and local Moran’s I index values, revealing high-high clusters predominantly located in urban centers in the eastern regions. This demonstrates notable spatial synergies, suggesting that the diversification of the canal’s functions has significantly facilitated the harmonious coexistence of ecological protection and local economic development, providing valuable insights for the sustainable development of global historical and cultural heritage
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Land Use and Cover Change Dataset
2.2.2. Auxiliary data
3. Method and Results
3.1. Habitat quality and ecological pattern analysis based on InVEST modeling
3.2. Driver analysis
4. Conclusions
5. Discussion and outlook
5.1. Changes in Habitat Quality and Impacts
5.2. Recommendations for future development policies for cultural heritage
5.3. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jiang, W.; Wang, C.; Liu, N.; et al. Ecological quality of a global geopark at different stages of its development: Evidence from Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark, China. Global Ecol. Conserv. 2023, 46, e02617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, N.; et al. The impact of LUCC on the spatial pattern of ecological network during urbanization: A case study of Jinan City. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 155, 111004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Han, Z.; et al. Research on the impact of urbanization on the Climate and Ecological Environment of World Cultural Heritage Site-- A case study of Fuling Mausoleum in Qing Dynasty. Preprints, 1. Available online. [CrossRef]
- Dong, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, B.; et al. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of habitat quality in the loess hilly area of the Yellow River Basin: A case study of Lanzhou City, China. J. Arid Land 2022, 14, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Dong, B.; Gao, X.; et al. Habitat quality assessment of wintering migratory birds in Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve based on InVEST model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 28847–28862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, X.; Zhu, Q. Research on the Impact of Urban Expansion on Habitat Quality in Chengdu. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Su, Y. Spatiotemporal evolution of habitat quality and its response to landscape patterns in karst mountainous cities: A case study of Guiyang City in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 114391–114405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- People.com.cn.
- Venkat, K.P.; Sivakumar, V.L. Characterisation of Landuse / Landcover Changes and its Comparison in Vijayawada City using Artificial Neural Networks with Minimum Distance to Mean. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF), Chennai, India; 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ara, Z.; Jha, R.; Quaff, A.R. Critical Appraisal of Satellite Data for Land Use/Land Cover Classification and Change Detection: A Review. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Vol. 339; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, P.; Sanders, S.L.; Parajuli, P.; Ouyang, Y. Improving the Accuracy of Land Use and Land Cover Classification of Landsat Data in an Agricultural Watershed. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hegde, R.; Hegde, S.K. A Fuzzy-Based Predictive Approach for Soil Classification of Agricultural Land for Efficient Cultivation and Harvesting. In Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, Vol. 181; Springer: Cham, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, J.; Nijhawan, R.; Gangodkar, D.; Singh, A.K. A.K. A Novel Meta-Classifier Framework Approach for Land Use Land Cover Classification. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 467; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Sanchez, L.; See, L.; Yordanov, M.; Verhegghen, A.; Elvekjaer, N.; Muraro, D.; d'Andrimont, R.; van der Velde, M. Automatic Classification of Land Cover from LUCAS In-situ Landscape Photos Using Semantic Segmentation and a Random Forest Model. Environ. Model. Softw. 2024, 172, 105931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, A.A.; Behnam, A.; Almodaresi, S.A.; et al. Exploring Factors Influencing Urban Sprawl and Land-Use Changes Analysis Using Systematic Points and Random Forest Classification. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Natural Capital Project. InVEST 3.14.2 User’s Guide. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, and Stockholm Resilience Centre: Stanford, CA, USA, 2022.
- Tang, F.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; et al. Spatio-temporal Variation and Coupling Coordination Relationship Between Urbanisation and Habitat Quality in the Grand Canal, China. Land Use Policy 2022, 117, 106119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.F.; Xu, C.D. Geographical Detector: Principle and Prospect. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2017, 72, 116–134. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Xu, C. Geographic detector: principles and prospects. In Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1); Science Press: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 116–134. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Z.; Gao, G.; Fu, B. Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Forces of Ecosystem Vulnerability in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.T.; Li, J.L.; Tian, P.; et al. Spatio-temporal Evolution of Habitat Quality in the East China Sea Continental Coastal Zone Based on Land Use Changes. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, X.; et al. Characteristics of Spatio-temporal Evolution and Influence Mechanism of Habitat Quality in the Upper Reaches of the West Liaohe River. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, Y.; Hu, Y. Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors Analysis of Habitat Quality: A Case Study in Harbin, China. Land 2024, 13, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, N.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, S. Estimating GDP by Fusing Nighttime Light and Land Cover Data. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2024, 50, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| THREAT | MAX_DIST | WEIGHT | DECAY |
| Cropland | 1.8 | 0.6 | Linear |
| Unit | 5 | 1 | Exponential |
| Barren | 8 | 0.5 | Exponential |
| Highway | 2.6 | 0.5 | Linear |
| Landuse types | Habitat suitability | Cropland | Unit | Barren | Highway |
| Forest | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| Shrub | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| Grassland | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.35 |
| Cropland | 0.7 | 0.35 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.6 |
| Unit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
| Barren | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Water | 0.9 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| HQ level | Lower | Low | Medium | High | Higher | Average HQ | |
| 2000 | Area /km2 | 17.70 | 11.45 | 60.21 | 27.82 | 20.81 | 0.63 |
| Proportion /% | 12.83 | 8.30 | 43.63 | 20.16 | 15.08 | ||
| 2005 | Area /km2 | 12.95 | 22.61 | 80.14 | 17.61 | 4.69 | 0.75 |
| Proportion /% | 9.38 | 16.38 | 58.07 | 12.76 | 3.40 | ||
| 2010 | Area /km2 | 54.06 | 42.27 | 7.13 | 30.31 | 4.23 | 0.61 |
| Proportion /% | 39.17 | 30.63 | 5.17 | 21.96 | 3.07 | ||
| 2015 | Area /km2 | 14.66 | 30.23 | 23.55 | 36.91 | 32.64 | 0.71 |
| Proportion /% | 10.62 | 21.91 | 17.06 | 26.75 | 23.66 | ||
| 2020 | Area /km2 | 16.67 | 18.85 | 23.63 | 63.22 | 15.63 | 0.78 |
| Proportion /% | 12.08 | 13.66 | 17.12 | 45.81 | 11.33 | ||
| 2023 | Area /km2 | 24.49 | 23.35 | 21.80 | 53.48 | 14.88 | 0.76 |
| Proportion /% | 17.74 | 16.92 | 15.80 | 38.75 | 10.78 |
| driving force | encodings | unit (of measure) |
| GDP | X1 | billions |
| Population density | X2 | Persons/km2 |
| Night time light index | X3 | |
| Land use change | X4 | |
| Average annual temperature | X5 | ℃ |
| Average annual rainfall | X6 | mm |
| Elevation | X7 | ° |
| Elevation | X8 | m |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).