Submitted:
23 December 2024
Posted:
24 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. A Theoretical Framework of RL and DL Based Solution
3. Method
- -
- Keyword: “University Students”, “Artificial Intelligence”, “Reinforcement Learning” or “Deep Learning”;
- -
- Studies published from 2014 to 2024;
- -
- Empirical studies;
- -
- Language: English;
- -
- Pertinence to the research question (DL and RL for assessing and enhancing academic performance in university students);
- -
- Participants: university students.
- -
- The exclusion criteria were:
- -
- reviews and conference papers;
- -
- retracted papers;
- -
- preprints;
- -
- DL and RL for other purpose.
- -
- participants: other students.

4. Results
4.1. DL and RL for Assessing Academic Performance
4.2. DL and RL for Enhancing Academic Performance
| Authors | Objective | Method | Participants | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kadhim & Hassan (2020) | Enhance e-learning systems by predicting students' learning continuity. | Utilized a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) optimized with the Adaptive Momentum (ADAM) algorithm to process grades and behavioral data, achieving superior accuracy in predictions. | 1000 rows collected from students enrolled in virtual classrooms | RNN-ADAM achieved 99.1% predictive accuracy. |
| Liu, Wang, and Yuan (2022) | Predictacademic performance. | Designed a feedforward spiking neural network (SNN) that encoded input data into spiking sequences, adapted synaptic weights, and decoded outputs to classify grades across three categories (high, medium, low). | 55 students over sixsemesters | Achieved highest accuracy; improved low-grade prediction. |
| Jing et al. (2022) | Enhance oral English assessment. | Combined fuzzy logic and neural networks with advanced speech recognition algorithms to analyze pronunciation quality, fluency, and emotional expression in oral English assessments. | 10 participants | Model achieved 86.16% accuracy, standardizing oral evaluation. |
| Yuhua (2024) | Assess English Language Teaching. | Designed a Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) to analyze nonlinear relationships between instructional factors and outcomes, using multi-layer neural networks with adaptive learning rates. | Classified sample data.#break#Number of participants not specified | The BPNN-based model improved assessment accuracy by 22.64% compared to traditional instructional systems. |
| Li and Mohamad (2023) | Assess English oral proficiency using. | Combined Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) for topic modeling with a Deep Learning (DL) framework to analyze linguistic and acoustic features for proficiency categorization. | 500 spoken English samples | Achieved 99% accuracy in proficiency assessment. |
| Tsai et al. (2020) | Predict university student dropouts using a multilayer perceptron model. | A logistic regression model (statistical learning) and a deep learning model using a multilayer perceptron algorithm trained with the TensorFlow framework to predict dropout probabilities. | 3552 university students in Taiwan (2093 females, 1459 males) with data from their first academic year. | The DL model achieved a 77% accuracy rate (and higher specificity), while the logistic regression achieved 68% accuracy. |
| Sayed (2024) | Develop dropout prediction model. | Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a feature-weighting method, Nadam optimizer, and pooling layers for dropout prediction using AOU-LMS and AOU-SIS datasets. | 12,000 students from the Arab Open University, diverse in age (below 20 to 29+), with data on demographics, GPA, and blended learning engagements. | Achieved 98.6% prediction accuracy for dropout rates. |
| Ujkani et al. (2024) | Predict course success and early identification of at-risk students | ML models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, k-NN, Neural Networks) and SHAP for explanation. | 32,593 students (Open University Learning Analytics Dataset), diverse demographics and academic backgrounds. | 94% prediction accuracy; engagement identified as a critical factor. |
| Xu and Yu (2024) | Enhance online learning platform. | Integrated a DL model with blockchain-supported decision tree algorithms and fuzzy convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to optimize resource scheduling and adapt learning paths in real-time. | 1,212 students over sixmonths | Improved scores, interaction levels, and resource efficiency by 30%. |
| Wang, Zou, and Xue (2023) | Enhanceoral English proficiency. | Created the EAP TALK system, integrating AI, DL, and big data to evaluate pronunciation, fluency, and comprehension using real-time scoring with speech recognition algorithms. | 110 university students in China (27 males, 83 females) aged 17-29, mostly freshmen and sophomores, with middle-level English entrance scores. | Improved fluency and pronunciation; 65.5% satisfaction rate. |
| Naseer et al. (2024) | Evaluate AI-driven adaptive learning platforms for personalized pathways. | Leveraged Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to analyze student data and dynamically adapt learning materials and assessments based on performance patterns. | 300 students (control + experimental) | 25% improvement in grades and engagement; significant p-value. |
| Jia and Zhang (2021) | Integrate AI into psychology and pedagogy teaching modes. | Weighted Evaluation Algorithm for cognitive ability, combining AI with traditional teaching methods. | 290 teachers and students (age not specified). | 90% reported improvement in teaching quality and learning outcomes. |
| Francisco and Silva (2022) | Enhance Software Maintenanceteaching. | Employed a Q-Learning algorithm, a type of Reinforcement Learning (RL), to model states and actions in educational tasks, refining content recommendations dynamically based on prior outcomes. | 10 virtualstudents | Optimal recommendations with fewer iterations; improved activity selection. |
| Yin, Peng, and Liu (2024) | Enhancepersonalized learning. | Developed the E-GPPE-C model using CNNs and subject knowledge mapping to construct learner profiles and recommend personalized learning paths based on engagement and performance data. | 103 college students in smart teaching classes, tracked over one semester. | The E-GPPE-C model showed significant improvement in learning engagement (β=0.286), participation (β=0.203), and creativity (β=0.424). AI-driven tools effectively promoted personalized learning and collaboration, enhancing the overall smart learning environment. |
| Liu, Chen, and Yao (2022) | Promote learning. | Applied the YOLOv3 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to analyze classroom behavior data, providing real-time feedback to inform teaching strategies and address learning gaps. | 40 first-yearuniversitystudents | Significant improvements in learning and emotional engagement. |
| Liu (2024) | Optimize Civics teaching using adaptive systems. | Utilized RL (Q-Learning) to tailor teaching interventions and resource recommendations, dynamically adjusting strategies based on student feedback and performance. | 50 first-year university students majoring in Ideology and Politics at University D. | Post-intervention scores improved by an average of 6.25 points; personalized recommendation accuracy exceeded 92.5%, and satisfaction ratings for system functionality averaged 4.63/5. The system enhanced learning engagement, outcomes, and adaptability across student groups. |
| Li, Wang, and Wang (2024) | Implement AI-driven personalized teaching system for local universities. | Face recognition, NLP, and virtualization technologies. | 88 students from two classes, ages not specified, divided into experimental and control groups. | Increased student participation (45.78%) and attention levels (0.6–0.9). Enhanced interaction and teaching outcomes in the AI-supported class. |
| Ou (2024) | Enhance English learning outcomes. | Integrated Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and RL to track learning progress and adapt teaching strategies dynamically, optimizing comprehension and addressing gaps. | 105 students from School Z (52 in experimental group, 53 in control group). | Significant improvements in English proficiency (listening, reading, writing, translation, speaking) and interest in English for the experimental group. Enhancedeffectiveness of AI-supported blended teaching. |
| Qiao and Fu (2022) | Enhanceuniversitymathematics learning. | Applied Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and Apriori algorithms to allocate resources and sequence tasks dynamically based on real-time learner data. | The study does not explicitly mention the number of participants but analyzes data from online self-paced mathematics microcourses conducted between 2011 and 2020, encompassing multiple student interactions over a decade | Proposed algorithms achieved 98.87% accuracy, enhancing microcourse customization and efficiency in meeting learning outcomes. |
| Liu and Ren (2022) | Improve English learning efficiency using AI and genetic algorithm. | Used a genetic algorithm-based framework analyzing English course performance using UCI repository data | 1046 students; highereducation | Significant improvement in learning and engagement. |
| Li and Wu (2023) | Develop embedded voice teaching system. | Hybrid HMM-LSTM model for voice recognition integrated with a cloud computing platform | 100 universitystudents | High voice recognition rate (96.25%) with robust noise immunity; improved learning engagement and satisfaction; efficient feedback on exercises; enriched course content fostering independent study skills. |
| Riedel et al. (2023) | Evaluate ChatGPT's performance in medical education exams. | Leveraged ChatGPT, a large language model based on DL, to process natural language questions and provide responses for medical education assessments. | The study involved a total of 786 participants across five OB/GYN course exams conducted between 2021 and 2023. The participant distribution included 154 in February 2023, 125 in July 2022, 185 in February 2022, 149 in July 2021, and 173 in February 2021. | ChatGPT achieved 85.6% accuracy on university questions and 70.4% on state exam questions. It performed comparably to medical students, especially in general knowledge. |
| He and Wang (2020) | Enhance public administration teaching using AI and blended learning. | Blended learning model integrating AI technologies for personalized learning pathways, knowledge tracking, and assessment. | Students enrolled in Public Administration courses at a Chinese university (number unspecified). | The AI-enhanced blended model improved learning outcomes, student engagement, and teaching effectiveness. Personalized pathways and automated assessments were pivotal in addressing diverse learner needs. |
| Wang Y. et al. (2024) | Evaluate AI-powered tools for vocabulary acquisition in EFL. | Apriori algorithm for analyzing survey data on AI-driven language platforms | 110 second-year university students from diverse majors (ages 19–21). | Enhanced vocabulary learning by identifying effective strategies; personalized learning experiences led to better language acquisition. |
| Wang and Zheng (2022) | Enhance English communication. | Deep Neural Network (DNN) incorporating cognitive psychology principles for English grammar detection and communication training. | 60 university students from North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, divided into experimental and control groups. | Experimental group improved significantly: reading comprehension (+13.33%), question answering (+15.19%), situational dialogue (+17.39%), topic description (+28.3%). Overall, class A's average score rose by 17.75% compared to a minimal 3.25% improvement in the control group. |
| Koć-Januchta et al. (2022) | Investigate AI-enriched biology textbooks' impact on learning. | AI-enriched textbook leveraging NLP and a knowledge base. | 42 university students (69% female, ages 17-44, M = 26.28). | Germane cognitive load significantly higher than intrinsic and extraneous loads, indicating meaningful engagement and learning. |
| Chen, Yu, and Wu (2024) | Improve English vocabulary acquisition using DL-based system. | The study used DL neural network models for student behavior detection, facial orientation recognition, and personalized recommendation. | 81 university students in School Y, divided into two classes (A and B) with similar initial abilities. Ages and detailedcharacteristicsnotspecified. | Class A (using the system) showed significant improvement in vocabulary test scores (average increase from 75 to 93) compared to Class B (traditional teaching). Improved engagement and efficiency. |
| Shao et al. (2022) | Develop AI-based Arabic tutor for pronunciation teaching. | The AI-ALST system used Mel-Frequency Cepstrum Coefficient (MFCC) for feature extraction and an attention BiLSTM model to process audio data and detect pronunciation errors. A cost-based learning strategy addressed class imbalance. | 12 participants learning Moroccan Arabic at the University of Arizona | The system achieved high accuracy in detecting mispronunciations. Attention BiLSTM outperformed BiLSTM for precision, recall, and F1-score across most words. It successfully provided tailored feedback, enabling learners to improve pronunciation effectively. |
5. Discussion
5.1. Limitations and Implications for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alnasyan, B., Basheri, M., & Alassafi, M. (2024). The power of Deep Learning techniques for predicting student performance in Virtual Learning Environments: A systematic literature review. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 6). [CrossRef]
- Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., & Primavera, L. (2009). Adaptive Experience Engine for Serious Games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 1(4), 264–280. [CrossRef]
- Chen, L., Yu, F., & Wu, J. (2024). Research on Deep Learning-based English Vocabulary Teaching Aid System in Colleges and Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 20240855. [CrossRef]
- Chitra, E., Hidayah, N., Chandratilake, M., & Nadarajah, V. D. (2022). Self-Regulated Learning Practice of Undergraduate Students in Health Professions Programs. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 803069. [CrossRef]
- Dong, S., Wang, P., & Abbas, K. (2021). A survey on deep learning and its applications. Computer Science Review, 40, 100379. [CrossRef]
- Doroudi, S., Aleven, V., & Brunskill, E. (2019). Where’s the Reward?: A Review of Reinforcement Learning for Instructional Sequencing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(4), 568–620. [CrossRef]
- Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. [CrossRef]
- Francisco, R., & Silva, F. (2022). A Recommendation Module based on Reinforcement Learning to an Intelligent Tutoring System for Software Maintenance: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 322–329. [CrossRef]
- He, H., & Wang, T. (2020). Application of Blended Teaching in Public Administration Courses under the Background of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1575(1), 012174. [CrossRef]
- Iglesias, A., Martínez, P., Aler, R., & Fernández, F. (2009). Learning teaching strategies in an Adaptive and Intelligent Educational System through Reinforcement Learning. Applied Intelligence, 31(1), 89–106. [CrossRef]
- Ismayilli Karakoc, A., Ruegg, R., & Gu, P. (2022). First-year writing in the humanities and social sciences: Requirements, expectations, and perceived weaknesses. Language Teaching Research, 13621688221130906. [CrossRef]
- Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., & Heinrich, K. (2021). Machine learning and deep learning. Electronic Markets, 31(3), 685–695. [CrossRef]
- Jia, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Teaching Mode of Psychology and Pedagogy in Colleges and Universities Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1852(3), 032033. [CrossRef]
- Jing, C., Zhao, X., Ren, H., Chen, X., & Gaowa, N. (2022). An Approach to Oral English Assessment Based on Intelligent Computing Model. Scientific Programming, 2022, 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Kadhim, M. K., & Hassan, A. K. (2020). Towards Intelligent E-Learning Systems: A Hybrid Model for Predicatingthe Learning Continuity in Iraqi Higher Education. Webology, 17(2), 172–188. [CrossRef]
- Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90. [CrossRef]
- Khalid, U., Naeem, M., Stasolla, F., Syed, M., Abbas, M., & Coronato, A. (2024). Impact of AI-Powered Solutions in Rehabilitation Process: Recent Improvements and Future Trends. International Journal of General Medicine, Volume 17, 943–969. [CrossRef]
- Koć-Januchta, M. M., Schönborn, K. J., Roehrig, C., Chaudhri, V. K., Tibell, L. A. E., & Heller, H. C. (2022). “Connecting concepts helps put main ideas together”: Cognitive load and usability in learning biology with an AI-enriched textbook. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 11. [CrossRef]
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. [CrossRef]
- Li, S., Wang, H., & Wang, L. (2024). Research and Practice of Personalized Teaching System of Local Comprehensive University Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 20240253. [CrossRef]
- Li, W., & Mohamad, M. (2023). An Efficient Probabilistic Deep Learning Model for the Oral Proficiency Assessment of Student Speech Recognition and Classification. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(6), 411–424. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., & Wu, F. (2023). Design and Application Research of Embedded Voice Teaching System Based on Cloud Computing. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2023, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Li, Y., Xiong, H., Kong, L., Zhang, R., Xu, F., Chen, G., & Li, M. (2023). MHRR: MOOCs Recommender Service With Meta Hierarchical Reinforced Ranking. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(6), 4467–4480. [CrossRef]
- Liu, C., Wang, H., & Yuan, Z. (2022). A Method for Predicting the Academic Performances of College Students Based on Education System Data. Mathematics, 10(20), 3737. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. (2024). Research on the Design and Effectiveness Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Intelligent Teaching and Assisting System for Civics and Political Science Courses. In Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (Vol. 9, Issue 1). [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y., Chen, L., & Yao, Z. (2022). The application of artificial intelligence assistant to deep learning in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 929175. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y., & Ren, L. (2022). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Technology on Teaching under the Threshold of “Internet+”: Based on the Application Example of an English Education Platform. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Mageira, K., Pittou, D., Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Zangogianni, P., & Daradoumis, A. (2022). Educational AI Chatbots for Content and Language Integrated Learning. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3239. [CrossRef]
- Meyn, S. (2022). Control Systems and Reinforcement Learning (1st ed). Cambridge University Press.
- Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T., Law, E. L. C., Schmitz, H. C., Vieritz, H., Nussbaumer, A., Berthold, M., Ullrich, C., & Dhir, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning in formal education: Perceptions, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 145. [CrossRef]
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Research methods and reporting. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, 332–339. [CrossRef]
- Narvekar, S., Peng, B., Leonetti, M., Sinapov, J., Taylor, M. E., & Stone, P. (2020). Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Framework and Survey. [CrossRef]
- Naseer, F., Khan, M. N., Tahir, M., Addas, A., & Aejaz, S. M. H. (2024). Integrating deep learning techniques for personalized learning pathways in higher education. Heliyon, 10(11), e32628. [CrossRef]
- Nie, A., Reuel, A.-K., & Brunskill, E. (2023). Understanding the Impact of Reinforcement Learning Personalization on Subgroups of Students in Math Tutoring. In Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 1831 CCIS (pp. 688–694). [CrossRef]
- Ou, Y. (2024). Strategies for Applying BOPPPS Model Supported by Intelligent Algorithms in Blended Teaching of College English. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9. [CrossRef]
- Qiao, Y., & Fu, H. (2022). Study on OBE Teaching Concept in the Context of Deep Learning for the Construction of University Mathematics Microcourses. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Renner, B., Wesiak, G., Pammer-Schindler, V., Prilla, M., Müller, L., Morosini, D., Mora, S., Faltin, N., & Cress, U. (2020). Computer-supported reflective learning: How apps can foster reflection at work. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(2), 167–187. [CrossRef]
- Riedel, M., Kaefinger, K., Stuehrenberg, A., Ritter, V., Amann, N., Graf, A., Recker, F., Klein, E., Kiechle, M., Riedel, F., & Meyer, B. (2023). ChatGPT’s performance in German OB/GYN exams – paving the way for AI-enhanced medical education and clinical practice. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1296615. [CrossRef]
- Sayed, M. (2024). Student Progression and Dropout Rates Using Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study of the Arab Open University. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 28(3), 668–678. [CrossRef]
- Shao, S., Alharir, S., Hariri, S., Satam, P., Shiri, S., & Mbarki, A. (2022). AI-based Arabic Language and Speech Tutor. 2022 IEEE/ACS 19th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), 1–8. [CrossRef]
- Stasolla, F., Akbar, K., Passaro, A., Dragone, M., Di Gioia, M., & Zullo, A. (2024). Integrating reinforcement learning and serious games to support people with rare genetic diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders: Outcomes on parents and caregivers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1372769. [CrossRef]
- Stasolla, F., Passaro, A., Di Gioia, M., Curcio, E., & Zullo, A. (2023). Combined extended reality and reinforcement learning to promote healthcare and reduce social anxiety in fragile X syndrome: A new assessment tool and a rehabilitative strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1273117. [CrossRef]
- Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Second edition). The MIT Press.
- Tran, K. A., Kondrashova, O., Bradley, A., Williams, E. D., Pearson, J. V., & Waddell, N. (2021). Deep learning in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. Genome Medicine, 13(1), 152. [CrossRef]
- Travers, C. J., Morisano, D., & Locke, E. A. (2015). Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: A qualitative study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 224–241. [CrossRef]
- Tsai, S.-C., Chen, C.-H., Shiao, Y.-T., Ciou, J.-S., & Wu, T.-N. (2020). Precision education with statistical learning and deep learning: A case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 12. [CrossRef]
- Ujkani, B., Minkovska, D., & Hinov, N. (2024). Course Success Prediction and Early Identification of At-Risk Students Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Electronics, 13(21). [CrossRef]
- Valenzuela, R., Codina, N., Castillo, I., & Pestana, J. V. (2020). Young University Students’ Academic Self-Regulation Profiles and Their Associated Procrastination: Autonomous Functioning Requires Self-Regulated Operations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 354. [CrossRef]
- Wang, W., Zou, B., & Xue, S. (2023). AI technology used as a tool for enhancing university students’ English speaking skills: Perceptions and practices. In S. Patnaik & T. Shen (Eds.), Seventh International Conference on Mechatronics and Intelligent Robotics (ICMIR 2023) (p. 97). SPIE. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, F., Wang, Z., Li, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Empirical Assessment of AI-Powered Tools for Vocabulary Acquisition in EFL Instruction. IEEE Access, 12, 131892–131905. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., & Zheng, L. (2022). A Novel Deep Framework for English Communication Based on Educational Psychology Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 916101. [CrossRef]
- Wells, L., & Bednarz, T. (2021). Explainable AI and Reinforcement Learning—A Systematic Review of Current Approaches and Trends. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 550030. [CrossRef]
- Xu, L., & Yu, W. (2024). Design and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Online Learning Platform Based on Resource Scheduling Technology: Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 26(1), 1–22. [CrossRef]
- Yin, Y., Peng, H., & Liu, H. (2024). Research on the Construction of Smart Teaching Mode with Artificial Intelligence Technology Facilitating Education Informatization in Colleges and Universities. In Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences (Vol. 9, Issue 1). [CrossRef]
- Yuhua, D. (2024). Integrating Deep Learning into English Language Teaching Within the Digital Cultural Framework. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 71–84. [CrossRef]
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. Handbook of Metacognition in Education, 299–315.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).