Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Sustainable Financial Instruments for Public Sector in Developing Countries: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Framework

Submitted:

11 November 2024

Posted:

12 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The growing field of sustainable financing for public sector projects in developing nations is examined in this study, along with its potential to balance environmental stewardship and economic growth. Through a comprehensive literature review and case study analysis, the research investigates the regulatory frameworks, market mechanisms, and policy initiatives shaping the adoption of green finance practices within public sector entities in developing countries. The study scrutinises the multifaceted challenges and opportunities inherent in this transition, considering socio-economic context and the legacy structures of public sector in developing countries. By evaluating policy effectiveness and drawing comparisons with international best practices, this research contributes to the nascent body of literature on green finance in emerging economies. The findings illuminate pathways for enhancing the environmental sustainability of public enterprises in developing countries through innovative financial instruments and strategies, whilst offering insights that may inform policy formulation and institutional reforms in the broader context of sustainable development.
Keywords: 
Environmental sustainability
;  
Public sector enterprises
;  
Sustainable bonds
;  
Green finance
Subject: 
Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

Introduction

In the current global economic context, the relationship between environmental sustainability and public sector finance has become a crucial field of study. Within this context, the concept of green finance for public enterprises in developing countries presents a particularly compelling subject for academic scrutiny. As the world's most populous nation and a rapidly developing economy, Approach to reconciling economic growth with environmental stewardship in developing countries carries profound implications for global sustainability efforts.
Public enterprises, which have historically played a pivotal role in developing countries’ economic development, now find themselves at the forefront of a paradigm shift towards environmentally conscious operations and investments. The imperative to integrate green finance principles into these entities stems from a confluence of factors, including mounting environmental concerns, international climate commitments, and the recognition of sustainable development as a cornerstone of long-term economic resilience.
This paper seeks to examine the multifaceted landscape of green finance as it pertains to public enterprises in developing countries. It will explore the regulatory frameworks, market mechanisms, and policy initiatives that are shaping the adoption of green finance practices within these organisations keeping in mind the legacy structure of their public sector. This paper endeavours to shed light on this crucial intersection of public policy, finance, and environmental sustainability in emerging economies. The existing literature points out optimising the cost of capital. The project appraisal by financial institutions puts a premium on Green Finance. Green Finance has received wide support from.
The burgeoning field of green finance has garnered importance currently, as global concerns about environmental sustainability and climate change have intensified. Green finance, broadly defined as financial investments and services that support environmentally sustainable development and growth, has emerged as a crucial mechanism for addressing climate change and promoting ecological conservation. The main problems facing the field are the under-theorisation of the notion, the conventional short-term character of financial reasoning, and the absence of evidence of the repercussions on society and the environment.
The literature reveals a multifaceted landscape, encompassing various financial instruments, regulatory frameworks, and market dynamics that collectively contribute to the greening of the global financial system. Several authors have demonstrated the value that sustainable approaches bring to particular businesses and industries. They have shown how managers may make better judgements by integrating sustainable policies into financial decisions. In order to ensure that sustainability elements are seamlessly integrated into financial systems, their report offers an outlook on the risks related to the sustainability effort and how those risks might be managed.
A recurring theme in the literature is looking into a supply chain system where a manufacturer with little capital and a well-funded supplier dealing with erratic demand looks to banks for green credit financing in this scenario. They discover that there are areas where the manufacturer's profit and social welfare can coexist together. By imposing various carbon restrictions, the government may direct producers towards a decision that benefits everyone.
Green bonds serve as an effective investment tool for fostering a resilient future and achieving circular economy objectives. This view is corroborated by a comprehensive survey of literature on green bonds and loans, highlighting their potential benefits whilst also acknowledging the limitations of these instruments. The evolution of green bonds can be traced from niche products to mainstream financial instruments, exploring the associated environmental paradox within Wall Street's paradigm. Based on 25 research publications that were chosen from a variety of databases, including SCOPUS, EBSCOHOST, and SSRN, it has been demonstrated that the sustainability bonds can help commercial organisations across borders gain a competitive edge with stakeholders.
Evaluation of the relationship between the circular economy in manufacturing and sustainable development through an analysis of the literature demonstrates that the area has progressed from conceptual work alone to empirical investigations and research leading to practical instruments. To prevent implementing solutions that may be portrayed as circular but ignore the sustainability component, holistic methods are required. The geographical scope of green finance research is notably diverse, with a particular emphasis on emerging economies. China, for instance, features prominently in the literature as a case study for green finance implementation and policy effectiveness. Bibliometric analyses of green finance research reveals the current status, developmental trends, and future directions of the field, with a notable focus on China's green finance initiatives.
The literature also highlights the broader economic objectives, underscoring the critical role of green finance in environmentally sustainable innovations. A significant strand of research focuses on the performance and efficacy of green finance initiatives, e.g., empirical investigations into whether green finance delivers on its promises, analysing its impact on ecological footprints across Asian economies. The literature also grapples with the role of investors as de facto regulators, highlighting the need for a public-private hybrid regulatory framework to optimise stakeholder interests. This governance aspect is further explored in the analysis, revealing an evolving landscape of regulatory and operational requirements.
Notably, the literature identifies several gaps and future research directions with a call for increased attention to green finance in developing countries and emphasis on the need for greater innovation in entrepreneurial finance to support sustainable ventures. Researchers advocate for a systems perspective in addressing the green finance gap, suggesting policy interventions to improve both green project financing and the broader financial ecosystem.
The literature on green finance presents a rich tapestry of research, encompassing theoretical frameworks, empirical analyses, and policy recommendations. While significant strides have been made in understanding the challenges that remain in terms of standardisation, measurement, and implementation across diverse economic contexts. Future research should focus on developing more robust methodologies for assessing the impact of initiatives, exploring the intersection of green finance with emerging technologies such as fintech, and investigating the long-term economic and environmental outcomes of green finance policies. The urgent need for sustainable development ensures that this field is poised to play an increasingly critical role in shaping the future of the global economy and environment.

Green Finance for Public Sector

One of the critical limitations eroding the earnings of public enterprises has been the cost of capital. The higher cost of funds makes public enterprises uncompetitive in domestic and international markets. It impacts the purchasing power of the Indian consumer and perpetuates multidimensional poverty. A large chunk of investments in public enterprises belongs to the energy and transport sectors. Enterprises in these sectors are highly investment-prone and continue to have an unlimited appetite for funding. Green Finance has emerged as an important source of raising cheaper finance for these enterprises and contributes to their effective discharge of corporate social responsibility. Equity financing from the government and retained earnings are considered cost-free sources in the case of these enterprises. It is high time that public enterprises look beyond debt and equity from the government and tap green finance as alternative instruments of finance. Green Finance will provide public enterprises with economic, social, and governance benefits. Clean finance will combat pollution, low-carbon finance will reduce Greenhouse gas emissions, bio-finance will contribute to biodiversity, climate finance will lead to climate change adaptation, and blue finance will foster a blue economy. Social finance will provide the wherewithal to public enterprises engaged in education, social housing, health, affordable food, affordable infrastructure, and financial services.
The instruments can be accessed by the government, national development financial institutions, commercial banks, capital markets, and private equity. Government instruments include green subsidies, public spending, public investments, and green facilities. National development financial institutions provide blended finance, green public funds, green project guarantees, concessional funding, transition finance, and credit enhancement. Commercial banks lend green credit, green loans, sustainability-linked loans, and green insurance. Capital market instruments relate to green bonds, green sukuk, transition bonds, social bonds, and sustainability-linked bonds. Capital markets provide Environment, Social, and Governance funds and green-themed funds. Private equity involvements are seen in green innovation funds and sustainability funds. While structuring the capital mix, it has to be borne in mind that green finance instruments require positive financial returns for investors. Government funding or, partly, development finance funding may be exceptions in this regard.
Green bonds vary in type, use, and debt alternative. “Use of proceeds” bonds are earmarked for green projects and with recourse to the issuer. A challenge for public enterprises is to select the right standard as various standards for green bonds have come to stay in existence. A green bond issue can attract individual investors as they perceive a lower risk. It can provide ‘greemium’, improve corporate governance, public reporting and improve corporate strategy. Green bonds reduce the risk of stranded assets.
Finally, the choice of selecting the right green finance instrument would depend on factors such as the type, duration, profit motivation, capacity, operational efficiency, and transparency. ESG funds and green bonds are characterized by longer duration, proposed motivation, risk, high exposure to the market, and high transparency. Green credit and blended finance are for a medium duration and characterized by moderate profit motivation, risk, operational efficiency, and transparency.

Requisite Factors for Issuance of Green Bonds

Public Enterprises intending to access green finance should have bankable green assets based on applicable domestic or internationally recognized processes and standards. Government can support public enterprises by creating an enabling environment and tackling governance issues. A better grip on capital market-related issues can help in raising green finance from its constituents successfully. Similarly, the regulators may have to put in place moderately liberal standards. On the score of public enterprises strong stakeholder engagement and timely and regular reporting on the use of proceeds can be helpful in garnering green finance.
Green bonds can be an investor's choice provided the issuer has sound cash flows and the hedge has the risks. Economic risks can impact a project and jeopardize the mobilization of green finance. Internally, deficient operational processes can hit the revenue and impact cash flows adversely. As a corollary, good financial management can ward off any turbulence in projected cash flows. However, these do not obviate the need for setting up an independent unit managing green finance.
A comprehensive process for developing and managing green financial instruments, within a sustainable finance framework needs to be followed. This intricate procedure commences with the identification of environmentally beneficial projects and assets, which serve as the foundation for the subsequent stages. Following this crucial initial step, the focus shifts to the sustainable finance framework, establishing the parameters and guidelines that will govern the financial instrument.
Once the framework is in place, the process moves inward, concentrating on the confirmation of internal processes and controls. This stage is vital for ensuring the integrity and credibility of the green bond issuance. Subsequently, the emphasis transitions to external communication, with the reporting of allocations and green credentials. This transparent disclosure is essential for maintaining investor confidence and regulatory compliance.
The process then evolves to address the broader implications of the green bond issuance. Setting up for impact reporting becomes a priority, as it allows for the quantification and communication of the environmental benefits derived from the financed projects. This is followed by the management of the external review process, a critical step in validating the green credentials of the bond and ensuring alignment with international standards and best practices.
As the process advances, it reaches a stage where formal recognition is sought through certification. This external validation enhances the credibility of the green bond and potentially broadens its appeal to environmentally conscious investors. The subsequent phase involves engagement with a diverse array of stakeholders, including media outlets, relevant indexes, and listings. This multifaceted engagement strategy aims to increase visibility and attract a wider investor base.
The final stages of the process focus on the long-term management and expansion of the green bond programme. Post-issuance reporting and disclosure become ongoing responsibilities, ensuring continued transparency and accountability to investors and regulators alike. The culmination of this process is the potential for further issuance of labelled instruments, leveraging the established framework and reputation to expand the organisation's portfolio of sustainable financial products.
This comprehensive approach to green bond issuance and management reflects the growing sophistication of the sustainable finance market. It underscores the intricate balance between environmental integrity, financial viability, and stakeholder engagement required to successfully navigate the complexities of green finance in today's global markets.

Case Study of Finaning of Solar Plant

Rapid urbanization is a part of India’s development strategy. Much of India’s population is designed to be urban-based. This causes a financial challenge to urban governance. Municipal corporations are in a deep financial crisis. The reliance on municipal corporations has to shift from governmental to non-governmental resources. Recommendations for bridging the significant gap in funding at the local level regularly highlight the need for municipalities to take on debt financing mechanisms. There is a growing interest in green bonds as a way to mobilize resources for green infrastructure. Though the current green bond activity is led by the private sector, India issued its first sovereign green bonds in January 2023 and municipalities have been entering this space as well—Ghaziabad Nagar Nigam in 2021 and Indore Municipal Corporation in 2023.
Green bonds offer certain advantages over other financing mechanisms such as loans and grants. They are useful in terms of borrowing size which gives access to large upfront capital, and long maturity periods which often span about 10 years in India, allowing long-term manageable repayments. Green Bonds have to be credit-rated.
This Green Bonds issue regulations prescribe a four-fold process for issuing the Green Bonds: Appointment of intermediaries such as merchant bankers, rating agencies, registrar and transfer agents, and debenture trustees; preparation of Information Memorandum requiring data collection, structuring of Green Bonds and repayment, preparation of cash flow statement and draft information memorandum as per the guidelines indicated by the regulators; creation of escrow account and obtaining a rating letter, and launching issue/bidding process and taking it to the conclusion.
The bond offer document incorporates the details regarding the nature of the instrument, mode of issue, issue size, coupon rate, tenor, credit rating, collateral, and purpose. Indore Municipal Corporation issued the green bond to finance the installation of a 60MW ground-mounted captive solar PV power plant at Jalud pumping station to fetch water from the Narmada River. Carbon credits generated through this project are to be traded on the global carbon credit market. It is not that the project is not faced with any risk. The project faces internal risks, financial risks, and external risks. However, the cost of funds and their application override the benefits. Further, Municipal Corporations are also entitled to the Viability Gap Funding.

Strategies for Stepping Up Mobilization of Funds from Green Finance

Green Finance offers a vast scope for raising capital by public enterprises. It is necessary to formulate strategies to enable enterprises to progressively increase the share of green finance in their capitalization. We suggest below some of these strategies.
1. Transformative Reforms: Developing the national capital markets for sustainability will give a fillip to green bonds, green Initial Public Offers, and other green instruments mentioned earlier. It would allow for coordination among policymakers, regulators, institutional investors, and consumers while spreading awareness, understanding, and availability of green investment options over brown alternatives. A strategy to set up a green finance exchange or make it a part of social capital exchange can be a bold step.
2. Institutional Reforms: The entire spectrum of financial institutions can be examined to ascertain the gaps or absence in regard to providing green finance. Key financial institutions supporting decarbonization and climate resilience should be strengthened, and the conversion of development finance institutions into commercial banks should be reconsidered. Banks can play an important role in providing green finance to public enterprises. Banks should avoid green washing.
3. Regulatory reform: Sovereign funds, pension funds, and insurance companies should be encouraged to invest in green finance schemes floated by public enterprises. By doing this they will only reduce the market risk and promote investor protection. Regulatory reforms should be introduced to reduce the compliance burden on these enterprises. Tax concessions can be extended to retail investors. This will help in the spread of eco-awareness by way of differentiating between green and brown assets. The government can consider ways to enhance the overall credit rating of green bonds.

Conclusion

Public Enterprises/State-owned Enterprises are endowed with two special features which separate them from enterprises in other sectors: ‘public’ and ‘enterprise’. Being ‘public’ in nature, they should serve social purposes, and being ‘enterprise’ in nature, they should produce goods and services at the least cost. Green Finance offers an olive branch to these enterprises to achieve both ends. Green Finance with its availability at a lower cost of capital can be available in abundance both to such enterprises in India and abroad. Green Finance Instruments can be designed in different ways to suit their requirements. Transformative reforms need to be introduced to attract, among others retail investors, pension funds, provident funds, insurance funds, private equity, and sovereign funds. Capital market reforms and tax breaks can boost green finance's efficacy for public businesses.

References

  1. Park, S. K. (2018). Investors as regulators: green bonds and the governance challenges of the sustainable finance revolution. Stanford Journal of International Law, 54, 1.
  2. Bou, V. C. M. P. (2022). Measuring Energy efficiency in public enterprise: The case of Agribusiness. Public Enterprise, 26(1), 53-59. [CrossRef]
  3. Bancel, F., and Glavas, D. (2017). The Role of State Ownership as a Determinant of Green Bond Issuance. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746644. [CrossRef]
  4. ASEAN Taxonomy Board. (2021). ASEAN Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance. The ASEAN Secretariat.
  5. Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29, 425-430. [CrossRef]
  6. Saxena, N. C. (2021). Yogic Science for Human Resource Management in Public Enterprises. Public Enterprises, 25(1-2), 27-38. [CrossRef]
  7. Saxena, N. C. (2022). Profitability prediction in Public Enterprise contracts. Public Enterprise, 26(1), 25-42. 43. [CrossRef]
  8. Saxena, N. C. (2023). Using Machine Learning to improve the performance of Public Enterprises, Public Enterprise, 27(1), 39-51. [CrossRef]
  9. Asian Development Bank (2021). The Bankable SOE: Commercial Financing for State-Owned Enterprises. ADB.
  10. Asian Development Bank (2021). Detailed Guidance for Issuing Green Bonds in Developing Countries. ADB.
  11. World Bank. (2018). State-Owned Enterprises, Understanding Their Market Effects and the Need for Competitive Neutrality. World Bank.
  12. Climate Bonds Initiative. (n.d.). Explaining Green Bonds. Climate Bonds Initiative. Retrieved November 9, 2024, from https://www.climatebonds.net/market/explaining-green-bonds.
  13. Bhatt, M. (2023, January 25). Green Bonds – Working, SEBI Guidelines, Green Bonds Issued in India. Fisdom. https://www.fisdom.com/green-bonds/.
  14. Trompeter, L. (2017). Green is good: How green bonds cultivated into wall street's environmental paradox. Sustainable Development Law and Policy Brief, 17(2).
  15. Bjørnbet, M. M., Skaar, C., Fet, A. M., & Schulte, K. Ø. (2021). Circular economy in manufacturing companies: A review of case study literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126268. [CrossRef]
  16. AlAhbabi, R., & Nobanee, H. (2020). Sustainability bonds: A mini-review. Available at SSRN 3540119.
  17. Amoah, L., Dzeha, G. C. O., & Arun, T. (2022). Sustainable finance and banking in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04162-4_12. [CrossRef]
  18. Asthana, A. N. (2023). Reskilling business executives in transition economies: can yoga help? International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 15(3), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEM.2023.10055609. [CrossRef]
  19. Asthana, A. N. (2023). Prosocial behavior of MBA students: The role of yoga and mindfulness. Journal of Education for Business, 98(7), 378-386. [CrossRef]
  20. Asthana, A. N. (2023) Determinants of Cultural Intelligence of Operations Management Educators. The Seybold Report, 18(6), 789-800.
  21. An, S., Li, B., Song, D., & Chen, X. (2021). Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(1), 125-142. [CrossRef]
  22. Desalegn, G., & Tangl, A. (2022). Enhancing green finance for inclusive green growth: A systematic approach. Sustainability, 14(12), 7416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127416. [CrossRef]
  23. Al Nuaimi, A., & Nobanee, H. (2019). Corporate sustainability reporting and corporate financial growth. Available at SSRN 3472418.
  24. Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (2014). Entrepreneurial finance and innovation: An introduction and agenda for future research. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/RFS/HHT063. [CrossRef]
  25. Asthana, A. N., & Tavželj, D. (2022). International Business Education Through an Intergovernmental Organisation. Journal of International Business Education, 17, 247-266.
  26. Asthana, A. N. (2022). Impact of mindfulness on irrigation water consumption. Frontiers in Water, 4, 1062835. [CrossRef]
  27. Brears, R. C. (2022). Green bonds, loans, credit lines, and microfinance financing nature-based solutions. In Financing Nature-Based Solutions: Exploring Public, Private, and Blended Finance Models and Case Studies (pp. 105-134). Springer International Publishing.
  28. Aracil, E., Nájera-Sánchez, J. J., & Forcadell, F. J. (2021). Sustainable banking: A literature review and integrative framework. Finance Research Letters, 42(1), 101932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101932. [CrossRef]
  29. Asthana, A. N. (2015). Sustainable Fisheries Business in Latin America: Linking in to Global Value Chain. World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences, 7(3), 175-184.
  30. De Cunha, F. A. F. S., Meira, E., & Orsato, R. J. (2021). Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3821–3838. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2842. [CrossRef]
  31. Asthana, A. N. (2012). Human rights and corruption: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Human Rights, 11(4), 526-536. [CrossRef]
  32. Falcone, P. M., & Sica, E. (2019). Assessing the opportunities and challenges of green finance in Italy: An analysis of the biomass production sector. Sustainability, 11(2), 517. [CrossRef]
  33. Dong, S., Xu, L., & McIver, R. (2020). China’s financial sector sustainability and “green finance” disclosures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(2), 353-384.
  34. Asthana, A. N. (2011). The business of water: fresh perspectives and future challenges. African Journal of Business Management, 5(35), 13398-13403. [CrossRef]
  35. Asthana, A. N. (2011). Entrepreneurship and Human Rights: Evidence from a natural experiment. African Journal of Business Management, 5(3), 9905-9911.
  36. Gangamreddypalli, L. (2023). Municipal Bonds for Financing India's Urban Infrastructure: The Case of Indore. [Master’s dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT Libraries. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152754.
  37. Gilchrist, D., Yu, J., & Zhong, R. (2021). The limits of green finance: A survey of literature in the context of green bonds and green loans. Sustainability, 13(2), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13020478. [CrossRef]
  38. Asthana, A. N. (2010). Descentralización y necesidades básicas. Politai, 1(1), 13-22.
  39. He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019). Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? A consideration of bank credit. Renewable Energy, 143, 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2019.05.059. [CrossRef]
  40. Hafner, S., Jones, A., Anger-Kraavi, A., & Pohl, J. (2020). Closing the green finance gap--A systems perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 26–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007. [CrossRef]
  41. Asthana, A. N. (2008). Decentralisation and corruption: Evidence from drinking water sector. Public Administration and Development, 28(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.496. [CrossRef]
  42. In, S. Y., Park, K. Y., & Monk, A. (2017). Is “being green” rewarded in the market? An empirical investigation of decarbonization risk and stock returns. International Association for Energy Economics (Singapore Issue), 46(48), 46-48.
  43. Asthana, A. N. (1999). Ahmad, Ehtisham (ed.)(1997). Financing Decentralized Expenditures. An International Comparison of Grants. Kyklos, 52(1), 103-104. [CrossRef]
  44. Asthana, A. N. (1999). Lemmen, J. and Elgar, E. (eds.)(1999). Integrating financial markets in the European Union. Kyklos, 52(3), 465-467.
  45. Khan, M. A., Riaz, H., Ahmed, M., & Saeed, A. (2022). Does green finance really deliver what is expected? An empirical perspective. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 586-593. [CrossRef]
  46. Julia, T., & Kassim, S. (2020). Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(3), 729-744. [CrossRef]
  47. Asthana, A. (2000). Social mechanisms, Peter Hedström...(eds.): Cambridge[u. a], Cambridge Univ. Press. Kyklos, 53(1), 88-89.
  48. Asthana, A. (2000). Soltan, Karol, Eric M. Uslaner und Virginia Haufler (eds.)(1998). Institutions and Social Order. Kyklos, 53(1), 105.
  49. Nandy, A., & Sur, A. (2024). Fiscal policy in India: Trends, challenges, and future directions. In S. Ghosh & P. Ray (Eds.) Perspectives on Economics and Management (pp. 193-227). Routledge India.
  50. Liu, C., & Xiong, M. (2022). Green finance reform and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2022.102993. [CrossRef]
  51. Asthana, A. N. (1998). Pines, David, Efraim Sadka and Itzhak Zilcha (eds.)(1998). Topics in Public Economics. Kyklos, 52(1), 122-123. [CrossRef]
  52. Asthana, A. (1998). Fisher, Ronald C.(ed.)(1997). Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, 1997. Kyklos, 51(4), 595-596.
  53. Asthana, A. (1998). Dorn, James A., Steve H. Hanke and Alan A. Walters (eds.)(1998). The Revolution in Development Economics. Kyklos, 51(4), 589-590.
  54. Soundarrajan, P., & Vivek, N. (2016). Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India. Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/174/2014-AGRICECON. [CrossRef]
  55. Shinde, A. A. (2021). Green Bonds an investment tool for resilient future: Helping to achieve Circular Economy business models (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo). https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/17676.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated