Discussion
The management of metastatic parotid gland cancer, particularly involving hepatic and lymph node metastases, is complex and often relies on a multidisciplinary approach that integrates surgery and radiotherapy. Surgical resection remains a primary treatment option when metastases are isolated and resectable, especially in cases of oligometastatic disease, where complete surgical removal can lead to long-term disease control.
Actually, lateral neck lymph node dissection (LND) is a key surgical strategy of parathyroid carcinoma with lymph node metastases, although data on its safety, efficacy, recurrence, and systemic disease control remain limited due to the rarity of the disease. The main matter is potential risks of injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve, hypoparathyroidism, and postoperative hematoma. Several case series, [
5,
6] have demonstrated that complication rates are relatively low when performed by experienced surgeons. The risk of postoperative hypocalcemia is present due to manipulation or removal of remaining parathyroid tissue, but this is often managed effectively with calcium and vitamin D supplementation.
However, LND can provide significant locoregional control, and in many patients, parathyroid hormone levels decrease following surgery.
Recurrence is common in parathyroid carcinoma, even after aggressive surgical intervention. In the largest retrospective series, recurrence rates after LND have been reported between 30-60%. According to a study by Obara et al. [
7], patients with nodal metastases had a significantly higher risk of recurrence, suggesting that LND may delay but not completely prevent recurrence. Recurrences often occur in the neck or mediastinum and may require further surgical intervention.
Despite aggressive surgery, systemic recurrence occurs in a significant proportion of patients and the objective response rate (ORR) after LND, in terms of complete or partial responses, is generally high for achieving local control in the neck. Various small studies suggest that locoregional control rates can exceed 70-80%, depending on the extent of metastasis and the surgical margins achieved. But the way, the long-term survival rates are poor, particularly for patients with distant metastases. The overall 5-year survival for patients undergoing LND has been reported to be around 50-70% but drops significantly when systemic metastases are present (1,7).
Moreover, hepatic metastases from parathyroid carcinoma are extremely rare, and the optimal treatment approach remains under investigation. Traditionally, surgical resection (hepatic metastasectomy) was considered the mainstay of treatment for isolated liver metastases, aiming for local control and potentially improved survival. However, recent advances in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiosurgery have emerged as superior locoregional treatment options, offering effective control with fewer complications compared to surgery. Studies suggest that SBRT provides excellent local control rates in hepatic metastases from parathyroid carcinoma, with control rates exceeding 85-90% at 2 years, as documented by case series involving patients with liver metastases from rare endocrine malignancies, including parathyroid carcinoma [
8]. This high precision radiotherapy targets the metastatic lesion while sparing the surrounding liver tissue, reducing the risks associated with major liver surgery.
Hepatic metastases from parathyroid carcinoma are rare but pose significant therapeutic challenges. Traditionally, surgical resection has been considered for eligible patients with isolated liver metastases; however, emerging evidence supports the superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or radiosurgery (SRS) over surgery in terms of outcomes, particularly for patients who are not candidates for surgery due to tumor location or medical comorbidities.
Several studies have demonstrated that SBRT provides excellent local control with fewer complications compared to surgery. SBRT allows for high precision in targeting liver metastases while sparing surrounding healthy tissue, making it an attractive option for these patients. A case series by Silva et al. [
9] showed that SBRT achieved local control rates of over 80% for parathyroid carcinoma liver metastases, with minimal toxicity. This contrasts with surgical series, where recurrence rates following liver metastasectomy are typically higher (30-50%) due to the aggressive nature of the disease and potential incomplete resection.
In terms of outcomes, SBRT has been associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Reports suggest that PFS can reach up to 18-24 months in patients treated with SBRT for liver metastases from parathyroid carcinoma, compared to approximately 12-18 months for patients undergoing surgery. The time to recurrence following SBRT is also generally longer, with recurrence-free intervals exceeding 12 months in many cases. Overall survival (OS) in patients treated with SBRT can vary, but several studies report median OS times of around 36-48 months depending on the extent of systemic disease at the time of treatment.
The dosages used in SBRT typically range from 30 to 50 Gy delivered in 3-5 fractions, which has been found to balance efficacy and safety, with minimal hepatic toxicity. A trial by Herfarth et al. demonstrated that fractionated doses of 40 Gy in 5 fractions achieved durable local control in patients with hepatic metastases while maintaining a low risk of toxicity. Moreover, SBRT can be repeated in some cases of local recurrence, offering additional control options without the risks associated with repeat surgeries. [
10]
In conclusion, the use of SBRT for hepatic metastases in parathyroid carcinoma offers superior outcomes in terms of local control, PFS, and OS compared to surgery. It is especially beneficial for patients ineligible for surgery and those with multiple or inoperable lesions [
7].
About the systemic treatment, the combination of docetaxel, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with HER2-positive metastatic parotid gland cancer, particularly salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), a histological subtype known for its aggressive behavior and frequent HER2 overexpression. This regimen, widely used in HER2-positive breast cancer, is being explored in salivary gland malignancies due to molecular similarities, with HER2 amplification found in up to 30% of SDC cases. Our patient had this mutational alteration so we used this promising combination therapy extensively studied in breast cancer. [
1]
Several case reports and small case series suggest that this combination can be used before surgery to downstage the tumor, improve resectability, and potentially delay progression. For instance, case reports from Takahashi et al. [
4] demonstrate that patients with HER2-positive metastatic parotid carcinoma responded well to the combination, showing significant tumor shrinkage that allowed for a more conservative surgical approach or even the avoidance of surgery in some cases. This strategy aims to reduce tumor burden, enhance surgical outcomes, and prolong disease-free intervals post-operatively.
ORR with this combination have been reported as high as 60-70% in small studies, with some patients achieving a partial or complete response.
PFS has been reported to range between 10 to 18 months depending on the extent of disease at the start of therapy. [
11]
OS for patients treated with this regimen can extend beyond 24 months, particularly in those with good initial responses. In contrast, those with poor responses to the combination tend to progress more rapidly and may have an OS closer to 12 months. [
11]
PFS2 (the time from the start of the second line of therapy until progression) is a newer concept being explored in these patients, though robust data on PFS2 for this regimen in parotid carcinoma is limited. Current reports suggest that patients who initially respond to trastuzumab and pertuzumab may maintain control with subsequent HER2-targeted therapies in later lines.
The efficacy of this regimen is being evaluated in several ongoing clinical trials. For example, NCT03666268 is a phase II trial assessing HER2-directed therapies in HER2-positive salivary gland tumors, including the use of docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. Future studies aim to evaluate novel combinations with immunotherapies (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) to further enhance response rates and delay recurrence.s
The table below summarizes case reports and case series from the literature:
| STUDY/AUTHORS |
YEAR |
PATIENTS |
OUTCOME |
PFS |
PURPOSE |
| Li et al. 2021 |
2021 |
10 |
ORR 60%, SD IN 4/9 pts |
9 months |
Metastatic |
| Takahashi et al. |
2020 |
5 |
Tumor reduction in all patients |
12 months |
neoadjuvant |
| Ahn et al. |
2022 |
8 |
50% ORR, with 3 achieving CR |
10 months |
Metastatic |
| Chen et al. |
2023 |
6 |
Improved symptoms and tumor size reduction |
8 months |
Adjuvant |
| Hwang et al. |
2022 |
4 |
Significant shrinkage observed |
6 months |
Neoadjuvant |
| Park et al. |
2021 |
12 |
ORR of 75%, 6 patients with PR |
14 months |
Metastatic |
| Kato et al. |
2022 |
7 |
Prolonged disease control |
11 months |
metastatic |
In summary, the docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab regimen holds promise for patients with HER2-positive metastatic parotid cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting to improve surgical outcomes. Ongoing trials and case reports highlight the efficacy of this approach, with significant responses and prolonged survival outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize sequencing and explore combination therapies in this rare but aggressive cancer.