Submitted:
02 October 2024
Posted:
03 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection and Preprocessing
2.2. Model Training and Evaluation
3. Results
3.1. Collected Data and Its Geospatial Distribution
3.3. Test Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Biel, A.W. Saguaro Cactus: Sentinel of the Southwest. 2009; Available from: https://www.nps.gov/articles/saguaro-cactus-facts.htm.
- Service, U.S.N.P. Cacti. Available from: https://www.nps.gov/orpi/learn/nature/cacti.htm.
- Yetman, D.; et al. The saguaro cactus: a natural history. 2020: University of Arizona Press.
- Tomoff, C.S. Avian species diversity in desert scrub. Ecology 1974, 55, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drezner, T.D. The keystone saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea, Cactaceae): a review of its ecology, associations, reproduction, limits, and demographics. Plant Ecology, 2014, 215, 581–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. National Park Services. The Saguaro Cactus. April 11, 2024 [cited 2024; Available from: https://www.nps.gov/sagu/learn/nature/saguaro.htm. /.
- Saguaro National Park Arizona. Long-term Saguaro Monitoring. [cited 2024; Available from: https://www.nps.gov/sagu/learn/nature/long-term-monitoring.htm.
- O’Brien, K.; Swann, D. Three decades of ecological change: the 2020 saguaro census. Part I: changes in the saguaro population 1990-2020. Unpublished report to Western National Parks Association, Tucson, 2021.
- Hassanalian, M.; Abdelkefi, A. Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review. Progress in Aerospace sciences 2017, 91, 99–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, F.; van Leeuwen, W.J. Mapping saguaro cacti using digital aerial imagery in Saguaro National Park. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2018, 12, 036016–036016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, K.; Bradshaw, K. Detecting plant species in the field with deep learning and drone technology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2020, 11, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y. Artificial intelligence image recognition method based on convolutional neural network algorithm. Ieee Access 2020, 8, 125731–125744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.-Q.; et al. Object detection with deep learning: A review. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2019, 30, 3212–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; et al. Review of image classification algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing 2021, 13, 4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, J.; Singh, W. Tools, techniques, datasets and application areas for object detection in an image: a review. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2022, 81, 38297–38351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OpenAI, DALL·E 3 System Card. 2023.
- Girshick, R.; et al. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2014.
- Girshick, R. Fast r-cnn. in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2015.
- Ren, S.; et al. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 2015, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, K.; et al. Mask r-cnn. in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2017.
- Hsia, C.-H.; et al. Mask R-CNN with new data augmentation features for smart detection of retail products. Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahin, M.E.; et al. Detection and classification of COVID-19 by using faster R-CNN and mask R-CNN on CT images. Neural Computing and Applications 2023, 35, 13597–13611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; et al. Detectron2. 2019: Github.
- DataTorch Inc. DataTorch (Version 0.1.1) [Software]. [cited 2024; Available from: https://datatorch.io/ and https://github.com/datatorch/python.
- Dwyer, B.; et al. Roboflow (Version 1.0) [Software]. Available from: https://roboflow.com/.
- Torre, D. Cactus. 2017: Reaktion Books.
- Lin, T.-Y.; et al. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6–12, 2014. Proceedings, Part 2014, 13, 740–755. [Google Scholar]
- Redmon, J.; Farhadi, A. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017.
- Ruder, S. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv, 2016; arXiv:1609.04747. [Google Scholar]
- Henderson, P.; Ferrari, V. End-to-end training of object class detectors for mean average precision. in Computer Vision–ACCV 2016: 13th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Taipei, Taiwan, November 20-24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, Part V 13. 2017. Springer.
- Bisong, E.; Bisong, E. Google colaboratory. Building machine learning and deep learning models on google cloud platform: a comprehensive guide for beginners, 2019: p. 59-64.



| Metrics | Test pictures taken from 486/507m AMSL |
| Recall | 98.1% |
| Precision | 83.6% |
| Overall F1 | 90.3% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).