Submitted:
27 September 2024
Posted:
29 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Conclusions
Conflict of interests
Declarations of interest
Acknowledgments
References
- Poštić, S.D. Specially designed copings for stability of overdentures. JSM Dent 2016, 4, 1061–1065. [Google Scholar]
- Ilić, D.; Brković, S.; Poštić, S. Overdenture in terms of preparation and restoration of supporting teeth: Review report. VSP 2020, 77, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar]
- Brković-Popović, S.; Stanišić-Sinobad, D.; Poštić, S.D.; Djukanović, D. Radiographic changes in alveolar bone height on overdenture abutments: a longitudinal study. Gerodontology 2008, 25, 118–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Preiskel, H.W. Overdentures made easy: A guide to implant and root supported prostheses; Quintessence Int. Co.: London, 1996; pp. 21–137. [Google Scholar]
- Chhabra, A.; Chhabra, N.; Jain, A.; Kabi, D. Overdenture prostheses with metal copings: A retrospective analysis of survival and prosthodontic complications. J Prosthodont 2019, 28, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Mercouriadis-Howald, A.; Rollier, N.; Tada, S.; McKenna, G.; Igarashi, K.; Schimmel, M. Loss of natural abutment teeth with cast copings retaining overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2018, 62, 407–415. [Google Scholar]
- The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: Ninth Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017, 117, e1–105.
- Zarb, G.A.; Jacob, R.F.; Zarb, J.P. Overdentures. In Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Eckert ST, et al (eds): Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients (ed 12); Mosby: St Louis, 2004; pp. 160–176. [Google Scholar]
- Gul, E.B.; Suca, G.Ç. Finite Element Stress Analysis of Overdentures Supported by Angled Implants. Merit Res J Med Med Sci 2014, 2, 196–206. [Google Scholar]
- Windisch, S.; Jung, R.; Sailer, I.; Studer, S.; Ender, A.; Hämmerle, C. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007, 18, 545–551. [Google Scholar]
- Poštić, S.D.; Milošević, M.; Maneski, T.; Mladenović, G.M.; Brković, S.; Trifković, B. Optical stereometric analysis of an experimental partially-edentulous mandible. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.R.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, J.B.; Han, J.S.; Yeo, I.S.; Yoo, S.H. Effects of coping designs on stress distributions in zirconia crowns: Finite element analysis. Ceram Int 2016 42, 4932–4940.
- Shahar, R.; Weiner, S. Insights into whole bone and tooth function using optical metrology. J Mat Sci 2007, 42, 8919–8933. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, B.; Kim, J. Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations. Med Image Anal 2010, 14, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kulchin, Y.; Vitrick, O.; Lantsov, A.; Vorobyev, A.; Moskvin, Y. Measuring the deformity of dentofacial bone tissues using a speckle correlation method. Optoelectr Instrum Data Process 2008, 44, 264–268. [Google Scholar]
- Durbin, D.M.; Durbin, D.A. Patent US 6364660B1. 6364. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6364660B1/en.
- Kahn-Jetter, Z.; Chu, T. Three-dimensional displacement measurements using digital image correlation and photogrammic analysis. Exp Mech 1990, 30, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
- Windisch, S.; Jung, R.; Sailer, I.; Studer, S.; Ender, A.; Hämmerle, C. A new optical method to evaluate three dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007, 18, 545–551. [Google Scholar]
- Tanasić I, Milić-Lemić A, Tihaček-Šojić Lj, Stančić I, Mitrović N. Analysis of the compressive strain below the removable and fixed prosthesis in the posterior mandible using a digital image correlation method. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2012, 11, 751–758.
- Gubeljak, N.; Kocak, M.; Huther, M.; Valh, T. Fitness-for-service Fracture Module SOFTWARE. FME Transactions 2008, 36, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
- Lovald, S.T.; Wagner, J.D.; Baack, B. Biomechanical optimization of bone plates used in rigid fixation of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67, 973–985. [Google Scholar]
- Sedmak, A.; Milošević, M.; Mitrović, N.; Petrović, A.; Maneski, T. Digital image correlation in experimental mechanical analysis. Struct Integr Life 2012, 12, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
- Tihaček Šojić Lj, Milić-Lemić A, Tanasić I, Mitrović N, Milošević M, Petrović A. Compressive strains and displacement in a partially dentate lower jaw rehabilitated with two different treatment modalities. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e851-7.
- Yang, H.S.; Park, J.M.; Han, J.S.; Lee, J.B.; Kim, S.H.; Yeo, I.S. Measuring abutment convergence angles using stereovision dental image processing system. J Adv Prosthodont 2014, 6, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Bradski, G.R.; Kaehler, A. Learning open CV: computer vision with the open CV library; O’Reilly: Farnham, 2008; p. 555. [Google Scholar]
- Mamoun, J.S. On the ferrule effect and the biomechanical stability of teeth restored with cores, posts and crowns. Eur J Dent 2014, 8, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ye, Y.; Di, P.; Jia, S.; Lin, Y. Occlusal force and its distribution in the position of maximum intercuspation in individual normal occlusion: a cross-sectional study. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015, 50, 536–539. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hidaka O, Iwasaki M, Saito M, Morimoto T. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res 1999, 78, 1336–1344.




| Stage | Points | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name (Sub-project: Point-ID) | Facets XY |
Actual data (mm) | Coordinate X |
(Deformed) Y |
(mm) Z |
Coordinate X |
(Undeformed) Y |
(mm) Z |
|
Incisor with conventional oval coping |
0.4 |
+3.39 |
+0.57 |
+0.98 |
-1.65 |
+0.55 |
+1.24 |
+1.47 |
|
Canine with conventional oval coping |
0.3 |
+0.51 |
+6.56 |
+1.86 |
-1.64 |
+6.57 |
+2.10 |
-1.39 |
| Premolar with conventional oval coping |
0.5 |
-0.39 |
+1.14 |
+3.29 |
+0.99 |
+0.75 |
+3.74 |
+1.30 |
| Stage | points | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name (Sub-project: Point-ID) | Facets XY |
Actual data (mm) | Coordinate X |
(Deformed) Y |
(mm) Z |
Coordinate X |
(Undeformed) Y |
(mm) Z |
|
Incisor with experimental milled coping |
0.2 |
+0.12 |
+0.52 |
+3.75 |
-0.33 |
+0.53 |
+3.76 |
+0.23 |
|
Canine with experimental milled coping |
0.1 |
+0.10 |
-0.12 |
+4.42 |
-1.57 |
-0.19 |
+4.47 |
-1.18 |
| Premolar with experimental milled coping |
0.1 |
+0.13 |
-0.61 |
+1.88 |
-2.12 |
-0.69 |
+1.87 |
-1.94 |
| Displacement | Deformation | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of coping | Mean score | |
| Round | 5.0 | 10.0 |
| Milled | 13.0 | 5.0 |
| Normal Approximation Z | 3.2814 | 2.1722 |
| Two-Sided Pr > |Z| | 0.0010* | 0.0298* |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).