Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Tracking Education Transformation: A Bibliometric Review on The Influence of Socioeconomic Factors in the Education Ecosystem

Submitted:

25 September 2024

Posted:

26 September 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The flow of mapping the development and direction of research on Socioeconomic Factors in the Education Ecosystem is known through published articles with the Scopus database index. Quantitative approach is used as the article research with bibliometric data analysis techniques to explore all publications indexed in the Scopus database on Socioeconomic Factors in the Education Ecosystem from 1990 to 2023. The data obtained were analyzed using Excel and R/R-Studio. VOSViewer is used to perform visual analysis of keyword occurrence and document citations stimulantly. Researchers found 772 publications that fit the function, subject, and criteria that had been set. The annual growth rate is seen in the data obtained. The papers are analyzed in terms of publications by field of science, the number of studies published annually. The bibliometric data analysis performed was limited to Scopus data. Other national and international databases were not taken into account in the study. The limitation of this study is only taking data sets or meta data in publications indexed by Scopus. This article presents a brief overview of the literature accessible to researchers working in the field of Socioeconomic Factors in the Education Ecosystem as well as provides recommendations for future research.
Keywords: 
Educational Transformation
;  
Socioeconomic Factors
;  
Ecosystem
;  
Education
Subject: 
Arts and Humanities  -   Humanities

Introduction

The fundamental problem that occurred at that time was the failure of educators to help the understanding of students and the younger generation to think independently, so that many students did not dare and did not become independent[1]. The main and fundamental idea of the world of education written by Eka Priyatma in Kompas with the title "Merdeka Belajar" with a rhetorical problem that he answered himself challenged, "What exactly is our education problem?" This problem we cannot answer with a cool head, while the reply should be the center of all our responses in formulating policies to improve the quality of education[2]. So far, changes in wisdom and learning provisions are more directed at tackling cases (symptoms) than educating the root of the problem[3]. These cases include the weakening of the competence of graduates, low production power, and the quality of scientific work [4,5].
Education is a fundamental pillar of social and economic development, playing a crucial role in promoting social mobility and enhancing quality of life[6]. Over time, education has been shaped not only by policies and institutions but also by various socioeconomic factors that influence access, quality, and outcomes for different groups in society[7]. Socioeconomic factors, such as household income, parental employment status, and residential environments, have been shown to significantly affect individuals' opportunities and achievements within the education ecosystem[8].
As global education systems undergo transformation, numerous studies have explored the extent to which these factors contribute to educational disparities and how education systems themselves evolve in response to socioeconomic dynamics[9]. However, a systematic and comprehensive understanding of the influence of these factors within the context of educational transformation remains necessary[10].
This study employs a bibliometric review to trace the development of research that examines the impact of socioeconomic factors on the education ecosystem[11]. By conducting a quantitative analysis of academic literature, this research aims to identify key trends, influential authors, and the most frequently discussed topics related to education's evolution under socioeconomic conditions[12]. In doing so, it provides critical insights into how education is being transformed by ever-changing socioeconomic contexts[13].
According to Abang Edwin Syarif Agustin (2019), linear economic education is able to facilitate education for sustainable development and increase employability in a job[14]. Previous research highlighted the education ecosystem, but there has been no discussion related to socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem using quantitative approaches and bibliometric analysis[15]. In fact, to get maximum results, a philosophical and systematic foundation is needed[16].
The implementation of Merdeka Belajar can be realized by taking a role in the teaching campus program that has been carried out by stakeholders with a good impact[17], as found by Widya Karmila Sari Achmad in 2022[18]. The family, school, community, mosque, social media, work environment, and nature are able to improve the quality of good education in synergy between educational institutions; this recognition has been raised by Abdul Rokhim, 2022[19].
According to Kusoy Anwarudin, 2022, pesantren and the community are getting closer, and good cooperation is established because of the implications for all pesantren stakeholders to always improve their human resources so that they appear to have the excellence of the oldest education in the country[20]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research related to this. In this research, researchers use bibliometric analysis, which aims to determine the mapping of developments and research directions related to socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem.

Method

The writing of this article uses a quantitative approach with a thorough bibliometric analysis, which contains document and network analysis. Information or data obtained using the Boolean search engine to comb through the Scopus database between 1990 and 2023. The search will be conducted on December 14, 2023[21,22], at 6:00 p.m. This research uses R/R-Studio software, VOSViewer, and Microsoft Excel to analyze documents, citations, and networks[23]. The stages taken by researchers include: in the first stage, researchers review literature with related themes to ensure relevant research so that gaps occur in bibliometric topics[24]. In addition, a literature review is also useful for determining appropriate keywords and is considered to represent the scope of research[25].
In the second stage, this research uses Boolean operato generated from Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY ("education") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY ("ecosystem")) to produce 11,760 documents[26]. Then, filtaration was carried out with Boolean operators obtained from Scopus, namely (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, "ar")) AND (LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, "ecosystem") OR (LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, "education")) AND (LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE, "j")) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, "english")), resulting in 772 documents.
The third stage, bibliometric analysis, is carried out using the Scopus analyzer and R/R-Studio to find out the number of documents per year by journal, author, affiliation, country, and subject or field. Furthermore, analysis of the document network level was carried out by reading visualizations through VOSViewer and Microsoft Excel data processing.
Preprints 119278 g001
Figure 1. Image Flow.
Figure 1. Image Flow.
Preprints 119278 g001

Results and Discussion

a. 
Document Analysis
Table 1 shows the results of documents collected over 33 years, resulting in the discovery of 3,839 authors with 84 single authors, and 31.99% international writing collaborations, 39190 references with an average citation per document of 21.86.
The influence of socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem is recorded in several publications from 1990 to 2023. This is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that since 2010, there has been an increase in article publication with an insignificant decrease, and then in 2016, it has increased significantly.
The authors who appear in Figure 3 are Fisher, B., Larson, L.R., and Li, C., with the same number of article publications of 3 documents [27,28,29].
The most published university is the University of Florida, with a number of publications of 12 documents, which is then continued by the CNRS Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique with the same number of 11 documents as the results of the University of California, Davis. This can be seen in Figure 4 [30,31,32,33].
Figure 5 shows the most countries that publish articles on the topic of socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem, namely the United States with 276 publications, followed by the United Kingdom with 99 publication documents, and accompanied by China with 71 documents.
This research produced three of the most published sources on Scopus, namely the National Science Foundation with the number of publications of 38 documents, which was then continued by the National Institute of Health with the number of documents 22, and the Horizon 2020 Framework Program with the number of documents 19. The results can be seen in Figure 6 [34,35].
On the R/R-Studio device, researchers found 3 elements that had been examined in the Three Field Plot by examining 3 elements, namely the name of the journal publication, the list of author names, and the theme or topic used. The three elements are then connected by gray plot lines that are incorrectly related to each other[36]. Based on the name of the journal publication, each journal shows the name of the author who contributed the most to its publication, especially on the theme of the education ecosystem[37].
The size of the plot shows how much of the publication relates to the theme. In Figure 7, there are 3 journals. The journal that publishes the most research on the theme of socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem is the journal Sustainability (Switzerland)[38], which is displayed in maroon so that it is connected to seven authors, but the most published author is Zhang H with a discussion of the topic of ecosystem services and sustainability, and II[39]. C, by publishing in the same journal as well as in another journal, namely the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Research.[40,41].
In the third element, each research topic is connected to the name of the author who published the results of the research with that theme. From the results of this analysis, there are five keywords[42]. Education is the top position. This shows that the keyword is related to the title that will be raised by the researcher.
Figure 8 describes authors from various countries with the most article publications in terms of MCP and SCP. Researchers found that there are 3 samples of countries with the most publications, the first being the USA with the number of MCP 44 documents and SCP 123 documents, followed by China with MCP 10 documents and SCP 52 documents, and the UK with the number of CP 23 documents and SCP 27 documents[43]. From this much data, it can be explained that the publication is dominated by the European continent.
Researchers explain three data points on articles that have the most citations in Table 2, the first largest article citation is Richardson Ge, 2002, Journal Clin Psychol with 1,266 citations; Hope D, 2003, the second Proc Natl Acad Sci USA with a total of 631 citations; and Israel Ba, 1994, Health Educbehav with 532 Sibanye citations.
b. 
Network Analytics
The study used the VOSViewer tool to obtain an analysis of the co-occurrence network with a minimum cluster size of 15[44]. Figure 9 describes three kinds of clusters with various colors, namely, the first cluster is red with 41 items, the second cluster is green with 31 items, and the third cluster is blue with 22 items.
In network analysis on co-occurance density, it can be explained that clusters with bright yellow colors include keywords that are still often used and are still current, while clusters with faded yellow to green colors include keywords that are minimally used[45]. The keywords Education, Ecosystem, and Article, including keywords with light green clusters, were often used in 2018–2019[46]. The keywords Ecosystem Service, Experiment, and Educational Status include those that are bright yellow, so they are still often used since 2020 until now. This data can be seen in Figure 10.
Researchers analyzed the data in Figure 11, the keywords that have the highest color density, with the data that is bright yellow in the example keywords: education, ecosystem, and article. As well as keywords that are rarely researched with blurred yellow data, for example: ecosystem services, urban areas, and adults.
Table 3 shows keywords in each cluster that have the main theme in the research field of the education ecosystem. The theme in the first cluster is education items; the second cluster has ecosystem items; and the third cluster has adult health items.

Conclusion

The findings of this study determine the development and direction of research on socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem between 1990 and 2023. This analysis is carried out at five levels of indicators in a broad bibliometric, namely scientific production, author, country level, affiliation, source, or journal. This bibliometric study provides many advantages for analytical enthusiasts who want to know more and gain insight into the social factors of the economy in the education ecosystem. This research is able to open horizons for prospective researchers by using bibliometric analysis. In this study, it was found that the topic of socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem was widely researched by the USA, China, and the UK, but there are still few who discuss this same topic with bibliometric analysis from Indonesia, so it is hoped that researchers for this research can be researched and redeveloped by further researchers from within Indonesia so that this topic is able to extend to research scholars. This research was limited to articles indexed in Google Scholar and Scopus. Future research should include databases and other tools to track the growth of subjects. It is hoped that authors in the future can study socioeconomic factors in the education ecosystem more deeply and thoroughly by applying bibliometric analysis studies so that it is easier to read and also include citations of other documents from Google Scholar, WoS, Scopus, etc.

References

  1. A. Nirwana et al., “Exploration of Wasatiyah Diction to Realize Sustainable Tolerance Between Religious Communities: A Study of the Translation of the Quran of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia,” Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 6, p. e05717, Mar. 2024. [CrossRef]
  2. Waston, Muthoifin, S. Amini, R. Ismail, S. A. Aryani, and A. Nirwana, “Religiosity to Minimize Violence: A Study of Solo Indonesian Society,” Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 6, p. e05426, Apr. 2024. [CrossRef]
  3. A. Wahid, M. Ibrahim, B. A. Shomad, A. Nirwana AN, and D. Damanhuri, “UTILIZING ZUHD HADITHS FOR UPPER-CLASS CRIME PREVENTION,” J. Ilm. Islam Futur., vol. 23, no. 2, p. 263, Aug. 2023. [CrossRef]
  4. J. Eka Priyatma, Menggugat Ekosistem Pendidikan Kita, Cetakan Pe. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press, 2022.
  5. S. W. Hertinjung, “The Dinamyc of Causes of Child Sexual Abuse Based on Availability of Personal Space and Privacy,” Fak. Psikol. Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta Kasus, pp. 1–10, 2012.
  6. A. M. Yahya, M. A. K. Hasan, and A. N. AN, “Rights Protection Guarantee for the Partners of Indonesian Gojek Company according to Labour Laws no 13 of 2033 and Maqasid,” Al-Manahij J. Kaji. Huk. Islam, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 115–132, May 2022. [CrossRef]
  7. Waston et al., “Islamophobia and Communism: Perpetual Prejudice in Contemporary Indonesia,” Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 2, p. e04875, Feb. 2024. [CrossRef]
  8. Sukisno, Waston, A. Nirwana, Mahmudulhassan, and M. Muthoifin, “Parenting problems in the digital age and their solution development in the frame of value education,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2024163, Apr. 2024. [CrossRef]
  9. Suwarsono, B. Setiadji, M. Asy’arie, Waston, A. Nirwana, and Muthoifin, “The Future of the Civilization of the Ummah Is Reviewed from the Sociology of Education for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’S),” J. Lifestyle SDGs Rev., vol. 4, p. e01688, Jul. 2024. [CrossRef]
  10. S. Anwar et al., “Development of the concept of Islamic education to build and improve the personality of school-age children,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2024139, May 2024. [CrossRef]
  11. M. Marthoenis, A. Nirwana, and L. Fathiariani, “Prevalence and determinants of posttraumatic stress in adolescents following an earthquake,” Indian J. Psychiatry, vol. 61, no. 5, p. 526, 2019. [CrossRef]
  12. A. N. Andri Nirwana et al., “A historical review on mapping the evolution and direction of leadership in Islam: Challenges and development opportunities,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 6, 2024.
  13. A. Nirwana et al., “The Role of Traditional Salt Production in Achieving Halal Standards of the Ulamaconsultative Council: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals,” J. Lifestyle SDGs Rev., vol. 4, p. e01721, Aug. 2024. [CrossRef]
  14. A. Edwin, S. Agustin, C. J. Rianingrum, A. Edwin, S. Agustin, and C. J. Rianingrum, “Pendekatan Ekonomi Sirkulasi dalam Pemikiran Desain Sebagai Materi Pendidikan Desain Untuk Pembangunan Keberlanjutan,” J. Seni Ranc., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2019.
  15. Mahmudulhassan, W. Waston, A. Nirwana, S. Amini, M. M. A. Sholeh, and M. Muthoifin, “A moral-based curriculum to improve civilization and human resource development in Bangladesh,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2024137, May 2024. [CrossRef]
  16. M. S. Apriantoro, S. G. Maheswari, and H. Hudaifah, “At-Taradhi : Jurnal Studi Ekonomi Volume XIII Nomor 2 , Desember 2022 Islamic Financial Research Directions During Pandemic : A Bibliometric Analysis Muhamad Subhi Apriantoro Rashifahunnisa ’ Mellinia Shafy Garneta Maheswari Hudaifah Introduction A financ,” vol. XIII, no. 5, 2022.
  17. A. N. AN, . M., . M., and . W., “Bibliometric Analysis of Islamic Education and Character Development in Religious Education Practices in Indonesia,” Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1231–1245, 2024. [CrossRef]
  18. W. K. S. Achmad, “Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar Kesiapan Ekosistem Pendidikan Pada Abad 21,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar 2022, pp. 1–5, 2022.
  19. A. Rokhim, A. Z. Sarnoto, A. T. Raya, and S. Bahri, “Ekosistem Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an,” J. Ilm. AL-Jauhari J. Stud. Islam dan Interdisip., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 188–216, 2022. [CrossRef]
  20. K. Anwarudin and G. Syahril Akbar, “Strategi Pondok Pesantren dalam Membangun Ekosistem Pendidikan Kewirausahaan,” J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 07, no. 8.5.2017, pp. 2003–2005, 2022.
  21. A. Rhain et al., “Reconstructing Deliberative Practices for Building Religious Character: A Quranic Study of Ali Imran: 159 in Alignment with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals,” J. Lifestyle SDGs Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, p. e01914, Aug. 2024. [CrossRef]
  22. Ardiansyah et al., “Tracing Trends in Quran Memorization and Cognitive Learning: A Bibliometric Analysis from the Scopus Database,” Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1493–1509, 2024. [CrossRef]
  23. F. Muhammad, “The Ethics Of Communication To Parents In Surah Maryam Ayat 42-48 (Study On Kitab Tafsir Al-Taysir By Firanda Andirja),” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 35–46, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
  24. A. Haikal Azumardi Azra, B. Cahya Ratri, and C. Azam Firdaus, “Islam and Religious Pluralism in the Perspective of the Al-Qur’an and Tafsir Scholars,” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 115–126, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
  25. A. S. Dhea Salsabila, A. Tsabithania Arifiy, and C. Nursyifa Fitri, “Study of Maudhu’i’s Interpretation of Secularism Verses,” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 143–160, Jun. 2023. [CrossRef]
  26. A. S. Ai, E. Zulaiha, and W. Taufiq, “The Personality of the Prophet Moses in the Al-Quran: Study of the Verses of Moses in the Al-Quran Review of Personality Psychology Theory,” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 81–114, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
  27. D. Herrera et al., “Upstream watershed condition predicts rural children’s health across 35 developing countries,” Nat. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, 2017. [CrossRef]
  28. R. Naidoo, B. Fisher, A. Manica, and A. Balmford, “Estimating economic losses to tourism in Africa from the illegal killing of elephants,” Nat. Commun., vol. 7, 2016. [CrossRef]
  29. B. Fisher, A. M. Ellis, D. K. Adams, H. E. Fox, and E. R. Selig, “Health, wealth, and education: The socioeconomic backdrop for marine conservation in the developing world,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 530, pp. 233–242, 2015. [CrossRef]
  30. S. K. Jacobson, J. R. Seavey, and R. C. Mueller, “Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 21, no. 3, 2016. [CrossRef]
  31. D. Lirman and S. Schopmeyer, “Ecological solutions to reef degradation: Optimizing coral reef restoration in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic,” PeerJ, vol. 2016, no. 10, 2016. [CrossRef]
  32. C. Liotta, Y. Kervinio, H. Levrel, and L. Tardieu, “Planning for environmental justice - reducing well-being inequalities through urban greening,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 112, pp. 47–60, 2020. [CrossRef]
  33. V. Caiozzo et al., “The institute for clinical and translational science at UC Irvine: Building an inquisitive environment where everything is questioned and there is no status quo,” Clin. Transl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 291–294, 2014. [CrossRef]
  34. R. M. Lubis, I. Suryani, A. Syahputra, and W. Sahila, “The Importance of Islamic Education for The Mental Health of Youth in Using Social Media,” Nazhruna J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88–103, 2023. [CrossRef]
  35. M. Sham, S. R. Hj Tibek, and S. K. Juraimi, “Islamic practice among polytechnic Ungku Omar students,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 24, pp. 39–47, 2015. [CrossRef]
  36. Y. Rahayu and A. Nurrohim, “DALIL TEOLOGIS WANITA BEKERJA DALAM AL-QUR’AN,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–64, Feb. 2022. [CrossRef]
  37. A. A. Sweta, M. H. S. bin A. H. Kamil, A. Ullah, and N. Mukhamedov, “THE URGENCY OF SIYAQ (INTERPTRETATION OF THE WORD AL-INS AND BASYAR PERSPECTIVE OF AR-RAGHIB AL-ASHFAHANI) IN KITAB AL-MUFRODAT FI GHARIB AL-QUR’AN,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 329–342, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
  38. W. Waston, A. R. Ridha, and K. Kumaidi, “THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT AND DEVELOPMENT OF WASATIYAH MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS,” Profetika J. Stud. Islam, vol. 24, no. 01, pp. 137–148, Mar. 2023. [CrossRef]
  39. M. F. Hamsan, I. Isman, I. Rosyadi, R. M. ELSakhawy, and A. Rabbani, “THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF WEALTH FROM THE ISLAMIC SYSTEM,” Profetika J. Stud. Islam, vol. 24, no. 02, pp. 226–243, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef]
  40. T. Tupan, R. N. Rahayu, R. Rachmawati, and E. S. R. Rahayu, “Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi,” Baca J. Dokumentasi Dan Inf., vol. 39, no. 2, p. 135, 2018. [CrossRef]
  41. K. Jahan et al., “A living system for future engineers,” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., vol. 138, pp. 537–544, 2010. [CrossRef]
  42. M. Mahmudulhassan, W. Waston, and A. Nirwana AN, “The Rights and Status of Widows in Islam: A Study from the Perspective of Multicultural Islamic Education in the Context of Bangladesh,” Multicult. Islam. Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–14, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef]
  43. Y. Yuhanida, Z. N. Amalia, K. Kerwanto, R. Rahman, M. Y. Muna, and R. Sabour, “EPISTEMOLOGY OF SUFISM IN SUFI INTERPRETATION (ANALYSIS OF THE PATTERNS OF THEORETICAL (NAZHARI) AND PRACTICAL ('AMALI) SUFI EXEGESIS),” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 216–233, Mar. 2024. [CrossRef]
  44. A. Mukrimun and M. Misman, “Application Analysis Study and Implications of Rules ‘Al-`Ibratu Bi `Umūmi Al-Lafdzi Lā Bi Khushūshi As-Sabab’ In Tafsir Mafātih al-Ghoīb,” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–20, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
  45. B. Nasrul Hoir, “Thematic Tafsir Study: Religious Moderation in the Qur’an,” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 47–62, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
  46. Z. F. Djalal, “TAFSIR PASE: (TELAAH ATAS METODOLOGI TAFSIR ACEH),” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 92–104, Feb. 2022. [CrossRef]
Preprints 119278 g002
Figure 2. Year Chats.
Figure 2. Year Chats.
Preprints 119278 g002
Preprints 119278 g003
Figure 3. Name of Author's Charts.
Figure 3. Name of Author's Charts.
Preprints 119278 g003
Preprints 119278 g004
Figure 4. Affiliation Charts.
Figure 4. Affiliation Charts.
Preprints 119278 g004
Preprints 119278 g005
Figure 5. Country Charts.
Figure 5. Country Charts.
Preprints 119278 g005
Preprints 119278 g006
Figure 6. Source Charts.
Figure 6. Source Charts.
Preprints 119278 g006
Preprints 119278 g007
Figure 7. Three Field Plot.
Figure 7. Three Field Plot.
Preprints 119278 g007
Preprints 119278 g008
Figure 8. Corresponding Author's Countries.
Figure 8. Corresponding Author's Countries.
Preprints 119278 g008
Preprints 119278 g009
Figure 9. Network Visualisation.
Figure 9. Network Visualisation.
Preprints 119278 g009
Preprints 119278 g010
Figure 10. Overlay Visualisation.
Figure 10. Overlay Visualisation.
Preprints 119278 g010
Preprints 119278 g011
Figure 11. Density Visualisation.
Figure 11. Density Visualisation.
Preprints 119278 g011
Table 1. Main of Information.
Table 1. Main of Information.
MAIN INFORMATION ABOUT DATA
Timespan 1990:2023
Sources (Journals, Books, etc) 399
Documents 772
Annual Growth Rate % 15.18
Document Average Age 4.75
Average citations per doc 21.86
References 39190
DOCUMENT CONTENTS
Keywords Plus (ID) 5391
Author's Keywords (DE) 2569
AUTHORS
Authors 3839
Authors of single-authored docs 84
AUTHORS COLLABORATION
Single-authored docs 84
Co-Authors per Doc 5.15
International co-authorships % 31.99
DOCUMENT TYPES
article 772
Table 2. Most Global Cited Documents.
Table 2. Most Global Cited Documents.
Paper Total Citations TC per Year
RICHARDSON GE, 2002, J CLIN PSYCHOL 1266 57.55
HOPE D, 2003, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A 631 30.05
ISRAEL BA, 1994, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV 532 17.73
DIBAISE JK, 2008, MAYO CLIN PROC 449 28.06
CIDRAL WA, 2018, COMPUT EDUC 353 58.83
DIETZE MC, 2018, PROC NATL ACAD SCI U S A 341 56.83
HALL DM, 2017, CONSERV BIOL 340 48.57
KAMARAINEN AM, 2013, COMPUT EDUC 339 30.82
CARLONE HB, 2004, J RES SCI TEACH 263 13.15
KENDAL J, 2011, PHILOS TRANS R SOC B BIOL SCI 216 16.62
Table 3. Keyword of Cluster VOSViewer.
Table 3. Keyword of Cluster VOSViewer.
Keyword Occurance Cluster
Agricultural Worker
Awareness
Biodiversity
Conversation
Ecosystem services		 19

27
83
29
44		 1
Climate Change
Ecosystem
Environment
Government
Health		 57
430
25
31
22		 2
Adolescent
Attitude
Educational status
Demography
Interview		 39
20
32
25
25		 3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
bsky
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated