Submitted:
03 September 2024
Posted:
04 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participant selection
2.2. Data collection and quality management
2.3. Sample Size Calculation
2.4. Questionnaire Design
2.5. Validity and Reliability of the Questionnaire
2.6. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Sociodemographic and Dietary Characteristics
3.2. Scores on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Pre-prepared Foods
3.3. Factors Influencing Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Pre-prepared Foods
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kim SL, K.; Lee, Y. Selection Attributes of Home Meal Replacement by Food-related Lifestyles of Single-person Households in South Korea. Food Qual. Prefer. 2018;66, 44–51.
- Anderson, K.; Mirosa, M. Revealing barriers to healthier fast food consumption choices. Br. Food J. 2014, 116, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao CFC, S.J.; Li, W.B.; Yang, G.H.; Niu, W.; Hao, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.Z. Analysis of Issues in the Development of the Pre-prepared Dishes Sector. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2023;39, 104–109. (In Chinese).
- institute. PsDOR. Pre-Made Dishes Industry Development Report. 2023. Available online: http://yjy. people.com.cn/n1/2023/0710/c440911-40031856.html (accessed on 11 July 2023).
- Research. I. White Paper on the Development of China’s Prefabricated Vegetable Industry in 2022. 2023. Available online: https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/92015.html (accessed on 3 March 2023).
- Fertig, A.R.; Loth, K.A.; Trofholz, A.C.; Tate, A.D.; Miner, M.; Neumark-Sztainer, D.; Berge, J.M. Compared to Pre-prepared Meals, Fully and Partly Home-Cooked Meals in Diverse Families with Young Children Are More Likely to Include Nutritious Ingredients. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 119, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Z. Dietary Sodium and the Incidence of Hypertension in the Chinese Population: A Review of Nationwide Surveys. Am. J. Hypertens. 2009, 22, 929–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Gao, X.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Mai, J.; Nie, Z.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L. Urinary sodium excretion and risk of cardiovascular disease in the Chinese population: a prospective study. Hypertens. Res. 2018, 41, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Association of sodium intake and major cardiovascular outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2018, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti C, Costa A, Balzaretti CM, Russo V, Tedesco DEA. Survey on Food Preferences of University Students: from Tradition to New Food Customs? Agriculture-Basel. Oct 2018;8(10).
- Sprake, E.F.; Russell, J.M.; Cecil, J.E.; Cooper, R.J.; Grabowski, P.; Pourshahidi, L.K.; Barker, M.E. Dietary patterns of university students in the UK: a cross-sectional study. Nutr. J. 2018, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, Y.; Chen, J. Improving Residential Satisfaction of University Dormitories through Post-Occupancy Evaluation in China: A Socio-Technical System Approach. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, W.; Mohammed, J. Mental health status and coping strategies of Chinese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. PLOS ONE 2023, 18, e0296309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, Y. The Relationship between Physical Activity and Life Satisfaction among University Students in China: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Resilience. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Didarloo, A.; Khalili, S.; Aghapour, A.A.; Moghaddam-Tabrizi, F.; Mousavi, S.M. Determining intention, fast food consumption and their related factors among university students by using a behavior change theory. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafri, A.; Mathe, N.; Aglago, E.K.; O Konyole, S.; Ouedraogo, M.; Audain, K.; Zongo, U.; Laar, A.K.; Johnson, J.; Sanou, D. Food availability, accessibility and dietary practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country survey. Public Health Nutr 2021, 24, 1798–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.; Xi, Y.; Huo, J.; Xiang, C.; Yong, C.; Liang, J.; Zou, H.; Pan, Y.; Xie, Q.; Lin, Q. Association between Eating Habits and Sodium Intake among Chinese University Students. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, L.; Yao, X.; et al. Knowledge, Attitude, Risk Perception, and Health-Related Adaptive Behavior of Primary School Children towards Climate Change: A Cross-Sectional Study in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2022, 19, 15648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Contento, I.R. Nutrition Education: Linking Research, theory, and Practice; Jones & Bartlett Learning: 2007.
- Baumann, LJ. HEALTH BEHAVIOR AND HEALTH-EDUCATION - THEORY, RESEARCH, AND PRACTICE - GLANZ,K, LEWIS,FM, RIMER,BK. Contemporary Psychology. Jun 1992;37(6):570-571.
- Al Banna MH, Khan MSI, Rezyona H, et al. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Service Staff in Bangladeshi Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2022;14(12).
- http://yjy.people.com.cn/n1/2023/0710/c440911-40031856.html.
- Research, i. Survey data on food safety consumer perception of prefabricated dishes in China. 2023; https://www.iimedia.cn/c1077/95893.html.
- Agency, X.N. The Number of Internet Users in China Has Reached 989 Million, and Student Internet Users Are the Largest. 2021; https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-02/03/content_5584622.htm.
- Bae, M.A.; Park, S.H.; Cheng, S.; Chang, K.J. Comparison of consumption behaviors and development needs for the home meal replacement among Chinese college students studying abroad in Korea, Chinese college students in China, and Korean college students in Korea. Nutr. Res. Prac. 2021, 15, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, Y.; Lin, X.; Wen, X.; Wang, Y.; Liang, W.; Xing, T. The Analysis of Residents’ Intention to Consume Pre-Made Dishes in China: A Grounded Theory. Foods 2023, 12, 3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- B, H. Normalising Convenience Food?. Food, Culture & Society. 2016;20(1):133-51.
- Jackson, P.; Viehoff, V. Reframing convenience food. Appetite 2016, 98, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laguna, L.; Gómez, B.; Garrido, M.D.; Fiszman, S.; Tarrega, A.; Linares, M.B. Do Consumers Change Their Perception of Liking, Expected Satiety, and Healthiness of a Product If They Know It Is a Ready-to Eat Meal? Foods 2020, 9, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams J, WM. Characterisation of UK diets according to degree of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–12).. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2015;12(1).
- Rauber, F.; Steele, E.M.; Louzada, M.L.d.C.; Millett, C.; Monteiro, C.A.; Levy, R.B. Ultra-processed food consumption and indicators of obesity in the United Kingdom population (2008-2016). PLOS ONE 2020, 15, e0232676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djupegot IL NC, Bere E, Bjørnarå HBT, Helland SH, Øverby NC, et al.. The association between time scarcity, sociodemographic correlates and consumption of ultra-processed foods among parents in Norway: a cross-sectional study.. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1).
- Marchese, L.; Livingstone, K.M.; Woods, J.L.; Wingrove, K.; Machado, P. Ultra-processed food consumption, socio-demographics and diet quality in Australian adults. Public Health Nutr 2021, 25, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim S LK, Lee Y.. Selection attributes of home meal replacement by food-related lifestyles of single-person households in South Korea.. Food Quality and Preference. 2018;66:44-51.
- Daniels S, GI. Convenience, food and family lives. A socio-typological study of household food expenditures in 21st-century Belgium.. Appetite.. 2015;94:54-61.
- Boek S B-SS, Chan K, Goto K.. Gender and Race are Significant Determinants of Students’ Food Choices on a College Campus.. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.. 2012;44(4):372-8.
- Dittmann A WL, Hörz L, Luft T, Finkbeiner F, Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S.. Sociodemographic and behavioural differences between frequent and non-frequent users of convenience food in Germany.. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2024;11.
- Tam R, Yassa B, Parker H, O’Connor H, Allman-Farinelli M. University students’ on-campus food purchasing behaviors, preferences, and opinions on food availability. Nutrition. 2017;37:7-13.
- http://gd.people.com.cn/n2/2023/0919/c123932-40576569.html.
- FENG Xiaoyi LY, GUO Yingqi, ZHAO Tengyun. Discussion on the Potential, Advantages and Countermeasures of Developing Light Food Catering inColleges and Universities. Nutrition and Health. 2023;29(14):128-130.
- Zhao CFC, S.J.; Li, W.B.; Yang, G.H.; Niu, W.; Hao, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.Z. Analysis of Issues in the Development of the Pre-prepared Dishes Sector. Modern Food Science and Technology. 2023;39(2):104-109.
- Alzghoul BI, AN. Pain Management Practices by Nurses: An Application of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) Model.. Global Journal of Health Science.. 2015;8(6).
- Mohammed, T.; Woldearegay, E.; Kedir, S.; Ahmed, K.; Getnet, M.; Gudina, E.K. Patient safety knowledge, attitude and practice among undergraduate health science students in South West Ethiopia. Front. Public Health 2023, 10, 1064896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loofbourrow, B.M.; Jones, A.M.; Chodur, G.M.; Martinez, S.M.; Kemp, L.C.; Scherr, R.E. Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding CalFresh Participation in University Students. Nutrients 2022, 15, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Co.Ltd Pcam. Do Pre-made Dishes Have to be Deficient in Nutrients? Can It Get on Campus? Professional Researchers Interpret It. 2024; https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1795354704685158476.
| Variables and Category | Frequency | Percent |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 627 | 40.0 |
| Female | 939 | 60.0 |
| Nationality | ||
| The Han nationality | 1249 | 79.8 |
| Other | 317 | 20.2 |
| Place of residence | ||
| Town | 1179 | 75.3 |
| Rural or suburban area | 387 | 24.7 |
| Whether you are an only child | ||
| Yes | 596 | 38.1 |
| No | 970 | 61.9 |
| Marital status | ||
| Unmarried | 1518 | 96.9 |
| Married or cohabiting | 36 | 2.3 |
| Divorce or separated | 2 | 0.1 |
| Widowed | 3 | 0.2 |
| Unknown | 7 | 0.4 |
| Education level | ||
| College | 79 | 5.0 |
| Bachelor’s Degree | 984 | 62.8 |
| Master’s Degree or above | 503 | 32.1 |
| Grade level | ||
| First grade | 406 | 25.9 |
| Second grade | 344 | 22.0 |
| Third grade | 402 | 25.7 |
| Fourth grade | 282 | 18.0 |
| Fifth grade and above | 132 | 8.4 |
| Monthly family income (RMB) | ||
| Below 2000 yuan | 44 | 2.8 |
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 229 | 14.6 |
| 5,000 yuan to 10,000 yuan | 550 | 35.1 |
| 10,000 yuan to 20,000 yuan | 488 | 31.2 |
| 20,000 yuan or above | 255 | 16.3 |
| Monthly living expenses | ||
| Below 1000 yuan | 108 | 6.9 |
| 1000 yuan to 2000 yuan | 909 | 58.0 |
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 517 | 33.0 |
| Above 5000 yuan | 32 | 2.0 |
| Overall level of satisfaction with school meals | ||
| Very satisfied | 80 | 5.1 |
| Satisfied | 545 | 34.8 |
| Fair | 787 | 50.3 |
| Dissatisfied | 116 | 7.4 |
| Very dissatisfied | 38 | 2.4 |
| How to perceive your weight | ||
| Too thin | 56 | 3.6 |
| Somewhat thin | 194 | 12.4 |
| Just right | 566 | 36.1 |
| Somewhat fat | 646 | 41.3 |
| Too fat | 104 | 6.6 |
| Currently trying to figure out how to manage your weight | ||
| Lose weight | 707 | 45.1 |
| Maintain current weight | 698 | 44.6 |
| Weight gain | 161 | 10.3 |
| BMI | ||
| Thin | 232 | 15.0 |
| Normal | 998 | 64.4 |
| Overweight | 319 | 20.6 |
| Statements | Responses, n (%) | The average score of the question | ||
| TRUE | FALSE | Don’t Know | ||
| Prepared food refers to finished or semi-finished products made from agricultural, animal, poultry and aquatic products as raw materials, with various auxiliary materials, after pre-processing. | 1344 (85.8) | 42 (2.7) | 180 (11.5) | 0.86±0.35 |
| Reheating food may cause food contamination. | 1101 (70.3) | 215 (13.7) | 250 (16.0) | 0.70±0.46 |
| A large proportion of take-away food is prepared dishes. | 1298 (82.9) | 40 (2.6) | 228 (14.6) | 0.83±0.38 |
| Prepared vegetables are generally high in carbohydrates, protein, and fat. | 759 (48.5) | 346 (22.1) | 461 (29.4) | 0.48±0.50 |
| Prepared vegetables are generally high in vitamins, minerals, and biologically active ingredients. | 244 (15.6) | 837 (53.4) | 485 (31.0) | 0.53±0.50 |
| Long-term consumption of prepared vegetables may lead to excessive salt intake and increase the risk of high blood pressure. | 1231 (78.6) | 54 (3.4) | 281 (17.9) | 0.79±0.41 |
| At present, there is a unified standard system, certification system and traceability system for prepared vegetables. | 379 (24.2) | 561 (35.8) | 626 (40.0) | 0.36±0.48 |
| Preservatives, additives, coloring, etc. may be added to pre-prepared vegetables for long-term preservation and to ensure good taste. | 1362 (87.0) | 44 (2.8) | 160 (10.2) | 0.87±0.34 |
| Statements | Responses, n (%) | Average score | ||
| Agree | Disagree | Don’t Know | ||
| I think that prepared food has brought convenience to our eating and drinking. | 1152 (73.6) | 308 (19.7) | 106 (6.8) | 0.74±0.44 |
| I do not mind that the takeaway food is prepared food of the heated ready-to-eat type. | 459 (29.3) | 999 (63.8) | 108 (6.9) | 0.29±0.46 |
| I do not mind that the school cafeteria uses prepared food to prepare three meals a day. | 159 (10.2) | 1346 (86.0) | 61 (3.9) | 0.10±0.30 |
| I think the preparation of prepared food is technically demanding. | 593 (37.9) | 685 (43.7) | 288 (18.4) | 0.38±0.49 |
| I think the prepared food is clean and hygienic. | 201 (12.8) | 985 (62.9) | 380 (24.3) | 0.13±0.36 |
| I have a positive attitude towards the development of the prepared food industry. | 487 (31.1) | 727 (46.4) | 352 (22.5) | 0.31±0.46 |
| I do not mind using prepared food at home to prepare three meals a day. | 258 (16.5) | 1204 (76.9) | 104 (6.6) | 0.16±0.37 |
| I think prepared food is the inevitable result of the fast-paced era. | 961 (61.4) | 444 (28.4) | 161 (10.3) | 0.61±0.49 |
| I think the freshness of prepared food is higher. | 91 (5.8) | 1323 (84.5) | 152 (9.7) | 0.06±0.23 |
| I think that prepared food can replace daily meals in the future. | 99 (6.3) | 1366 (87.2) | 101 (6.4) | 0.06±0.24 |
| I think it is safe and healthy for the elderly and teenagers to consume prepared food. | 138 (8.8) | 1207 (77.1) | 221 (14.4) | 0.09±0.28 |
| Statements | Responses, n (%) | Average score | ||||
| Never | Rarely | Sometimes | Often | Always | ||
| Do you often buy and consume prepared food? | 268 (17.1) | 687 (43.9) | 550 (35.1) | 54 (3.4) | 7 (0.4) | 1.26±0.80 |
| Do you encourage people around you to eat prepared food? | 928 (59.3) | 461 (29.4) | 134 (8.6) | 30 (1.9) | 13 (0.8) | 0.56±0.80 |
| Do you make your own prepared food? | 984 (62.8) | 372 (23.8) | 174 (11.1) | 26 (1.7) | 10 (0.6) | 0.54±0.80 |
| Do your family members often buy and eat prepared food? | 747 (47.7) | 585 (37.4) | 218 (13.9) | 12 (0.8) | 4(0.3) | 0.69±0.76 |
| Does your family make their own prepared food? | 898 (57.3) | 455 (29.1) | 190 (12.1) | 17 (1.1) | 6(0.4) | 0.58±0.77 |
| Scores | Frequency | Percent | Degree | Frequency | Percent |
| Knowledge score | |||||
| 0.00 | 22 | 1.4 | bad | 112 | 7.2 |
| 1.00 | 36 | 3.0 | |||
| 2.00 | 54 | 3.4 | |||
| 3.00 | 120 | 7.7 | medium | 566 | 36.1 |
| 4.00 | 201 | 12.8 | |||
| 5.00 | 245 | 15.6 | |||
| 6.00 | 408 | 26.1 | good | 888 | 56.7 |
| 7.00 | 328 | 20.9 | |||
| 8.00 | 152 | 9.7 | |||
| Attitude score | |||||
| 0.00 | 174 | 11.1 | bad | 1034 | 66.0 |
| 1.00 | 261 | 16.7 | |||
| 2.00 | 309 | 19.7 | |||
| 3.00 | 290 | 18.5 | |||
| 4.00 | 226 | 14.4 | medium | 469 | 30.0 |
| 5.00 | 125 | 8.0 | |||
| 6.00 | 83 | 5.3 | |||
| 7.00 | 35 | 2.2 | |||
| 8.00 | 23 | 1.5 | good | 63 | 4.0 |
| 9.00 | 20 | 1.3 | |||
| 10.00 | 7 | 0.4 | |||
| 11.00 | 13 | 0.8 | |||
| Practice score | |||||
| 0.00 | 165 | 10.5 | bad | 1351 | 86.3 |
| 1.00 | 217 | 13.9 | |||
| 2.00 | 223 | 14.2 | |||
| 3.00 | 214 | 13.7 | |||
| 4.00 | 234 | 14.9 | |||
| 5.00 | 182 | 11.6 | |||
| 6.00 | 116 | 7.4 | |||
| 7.00 | 88 | 5.6 | medium | 209 | 13.4 |
| 8.00 | 49 | 3.1 | |||
| 9.00 | 30 | 1.9 | |||
| 10.00 | 29 | 1.8 | |||
| 11.00 | 6 | 0.4 | |||
| 12.00 | 5 | 0.3 | |||
| 13.00 | 2 | 0.1 | |||
| 15.00 | 3 | 0.2 | good | 6 | 0.4 |
| 17.00 | 1 | 0.1 | |||
| 20.00 | 2 | 0.1 |
| Characteristics | Knowledge Score | Attitude Score | Practice Score | Total score | ||||
| Mean±SD | р Value | Mean±SD | р Value | Mean±SD | р Value | Mean±SD | р Value | |
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 5.34±1.87 | 0.23 | 3.21±2.35 | <0.01 | 3.37±2.74 | <0.01 | 11.92±4.43 | 0.55 |
| Female | 5.48±1.76 | 2.76±2.04 | 3.79±2.64 | 12.02±4.18 | ||||
| Nationality | ||||||||
| Han | 5.54±1.75 | <0.01 | 2.86±2.04 | 0.15 | 3.52±2.54 | 0.05 | 11.92±4.02 | 0.58 |
| Other | 4.95±1.95 | 3.24±2.62 | 4.03±3.19 | 12.23±4.76 | ||||
| Place of residence | ||||||||
| Town | 5.49±1.78 | 0.02 | 3.00±2.15 | 0.02 | 3.58±2.67 | 0.30 | 12.06±4.13 | 0.28 |
| Rural or suburban area | 5.23±1.87 | 2.75±2.56 | 3.74±2.75 | 11.73±4.31 | ||||
| Whether you are an only child | ||||||||
| Yes | 5.65±1.68 | <0.01 | 3.08±2.13 | 0.01 | 3.53±2.45 | 0.73 | 12.26±3.84 | 0.03 |
| Not | 5.28±1.86 | 2.85±2.20 | 3.68±2.82 | 11.81±4.37 | ||||
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Unmarried | 5.42±1.80 | 0.75 | 2.95±2.16 | 0.16 | 3.62±2.66 | 0.85 | 11.99±4.17 | 0.51 |
| Married or cohabiting | 5.53±1.50 | 2.81±2.56 | 3.56±2.72 | 11.89±4.39 | ||||
| Divorce or separation | 3.00±4.24 | 1.00±1.41 | 10.50±13.44 | 14.50±7.78 | ||||
| Widowed | 6.33±0.58 | 4.00±5.29 | 3.00±3.61 | 13.33±2.52 | ||||
| Unknown | 5.29±2.36 | 1.57±2.15 | 2.71±2.21 | 9.57±4.72 | ||||
| Education level | ||||||||
| College | 4.22±2.02 | <0.01 | 3.32±2.75 | 0.70 | 3.84±3.33 | 0.59 | 11.37±4.77 | 0.02 |
| Bachelor’s Degree | 5.38±1.83 | 2.91±2.18 | 3.55±2.61 | 11.84±4.16 | ||||
| Master’s degree or above | 5.71±1.64 | 2.92±2.07 | 3.72±2.72 | 12.35±4.09 | ||||
| Grade level | ||||||||
| First grade | 5.24±1.83 | 0.12 | 2.83±2.21 | 0.08 | 3.59±2.86 | 0.08 | 11.66±4.53 | 0.07 |
| Second grade | 5.55±1.75 | 2.87±2.18 | 3.47±2.44 | 11.88±3.92 | ||||
| Third grade | 5.52±1.79 | 3.10±2.05 | 3.74±2.53 | 12.36±3.89 | ||||
| Fourth grade | 5.40±1.86 | 2.99±2.19 | 3.41±2.66 | 11.79±4.01 | ||||
| Fifth grade and above | 5.42±1.78 | 2.83±2.40 | 4.19±3.20 | 12.45±4.78 | ||||
| Monthly family income (RMB) | ||||||||
| Below 2000 yuan | 4.70±2.22 | <0.01 | 2.59±2.46 | 0.15 | 3.82±3.72 | 0.15 | 11.11±4.78 | 0.25 |
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 5.14±1.98 | 3.00±2.45 | 3.82±2.77 | 11.96±4.49 | ||||
| 5,000 yuan to 10,000 yuan | 5.33±1.83 | 2.90±2.14 | 3.76±2.63 | 11.99±4.26 | ||||
| 10,000 yuan to 20,000 yuan | 5.59±1.68 | 2.82±1.96 | 3.38±2.47 | 11.78±3.74 | ||||
| 20,000 yuan or above | 5.70±1.65 | 3.24±2.32 | 3.57±2.91 | 12.51±4.37 | ||||
| Monthly living expenses | ||||||||
| Below 1000 yuan | 4.69±2.23 | <0.01 | 2.78±2.49 | 0.30 | 3.96±3.70 | 0.23 | 111.43±4.87 | 0.41 |
| 1000 yuan to 2000 yuan | 5.34±1.81 | 2.95±2.21 | 3.69±2.58 | 11.98±4.25 | ||||
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 5.70±1.67 | 2.89±1.96 | 3.44±2.61 | 12.03±3.84 | ||||
| Above 5000 yuan | 5.84±1.37 | 3.91±3.23 | 3.31±2.67 | 13.06±4.76 | ||||
| Overall level of satisfaction with school meals | ||||||||
| Very satisfied | 4.98±1.86 | 0.01 | 4.19±2.95 | <0.01 | 4.43±3.81 | 0.07 | 13.59±5.08 | <0.01 |
| Satisfied | 5.40±1.80 | 3.14±2.21 | 3.77±2.65 | 12.32±4.12 | ||||
| Fair | 5.43±1.78 | 2.79±2.02 | 3.46±2.51 | 11.68±4.05 | ||||
| Dissatisfied | 5.82±1.85 | 2.26±1.80 | 3.53±2.80 | 11.60±4.05 | ||||
| Very dissatisfied | 5.37±1.99 | 2.42±2.60 | 3.32±3.23 | 11.11±5.21 | ||||
| How to perceive your weight | ||||||||
| Too thin | 5.27±2.02 | 0.12 | 3.13±2.48 | 0.16 | 3.14±2.49 | 0.49 | 11.54±4.05 | 0.78 |
| Somewhat thin | 5.46±1.75 | 2.84±2.16 | 3.55±2.56 | 11.85±4.19 | ||||
| Just right | 5.33±1.77 | 2.91±2.18 | 3.65±2.69 | 11.90±4.06 | ||||
| Somewhat fat | 5.56±1.74 | 2.91±2.16 | 3.68±2.68 | 12.15±4.27 | ||||
| Too fat | 5.07±2.26 | 3.33±2.12 | 3.45±3.04 | 11.85±4.27 | ||||
| Currently trying to figure out how to manage your weight | ||||||||
| Lose weight | 5.47±1.79 | 0.65 | 3.03±2.22 | 0.40 | 3.76±2.78 | 0.06 | 12.25±4.37 | 0.08 |
| Maintain current weight | 5.40±1.78 | 2.84±2.10 | 3.59±2.64 | 11.83±3.94 | ||||
| Weight gain | 5.32±1.96 | 2.93±2.27 | 3.17±2.39 | 11.42±4.26 | ||||
| BMI | ||||||||
| Thin | 5.34±1.93 | 0.96 | 2.72±2.00 | 0.03 | 3.84±2.70 | 0.23 | 11.91±3.94 | 0.68 |
| normal | 5.46±1.75 | 2.90±2.17 | 3.58±2.72 | 11.93±4.17 | ||||
| Overweight | 5.41±1.87 | 3.23±2.29 | 3.58±2.58 | 12.22±4.40 | ||||
| Model | Variable | β | 95% CI | р Value |
| Model 1 Knowledge scores | (const) | 3.745 | 3.011,4.478 | <0.01 |
| Nationality | ||||
| The Han nationality | RC | |||
| Other | -0.444 | -0.669,-0.220 | <0.01 | |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Town | RC | |||
| Rural or suburban area | 0.062 | -0.166,0.290 | 0.59 | |
| Whether you are an only child | ||||
| Yes | RC | |||
| No | -0.199 | -0.390,-0.007 | 0.04 | |
| Education level | ||||
| College | RC | |||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 0.965 | 0.550,1.380 | <0.01 | |
| Master’s Degree or above | 1.252 | 0.823,1.681 | <0.01 | |
| Monthly family income (RMB) | ||||
| Below 2000 yuan | RC | |||
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 0.188 | -0.401,0.777 | 0.53 | |
| 5,000 yuan to 10,000 yuan | 0.084 | -0.507,0.674 | 0.78 | |
| 10,000 yuan to 20,000 yuan | 0.260 | -0.345,0.866 | 0.40 | |
| 20,000 yuan or above | 0.214 | -0.426,0.854 | 0.51 | |
| Monthly living expenses | ||||
| Below 1000 yuan | RC | |||
| 1000 yuan to 2000 yuan | 0.424 | 0.032,0.817 | 0.03 | |
| 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan | 0.656 | 0.214,1.097 | <0.01 | |
| Above 5000 yuan | 0.643 | -0.119,1.406 | 0.10 | |
| Overall level of satisfaction with school meals | ||||
| Very satisfied | RC | |||
| Satisfied | 0.193 | -0.223,0.610 | 0.36 | |
| Fair | 0.216 | -0.193,0.625 | 0.30 | |
| Dissatisfied | 0.507 | 0,1.015 | 0.05 | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0.240 | -0.443,0.922 | 0.49 | |
| Model 2 Attitudes scores | (const) | 4.700 | 4.184,5.216 | <0.01 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | RC | |||
| Female | -0.429 | -0.647,-0.212 | <0.01 | |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Town | RC | |||
| Rural or suburban area | -0.210 | -0.468,0.048 | 0.11 | |
| Whether you are an only child | ||||
| Yes | RC | |||
| No | -0.182 | -0.41,0.047 | 0.12 | |
| Overall level of satisfaction with school meals | ||||
| Very satisfied | RC | |||
| Satisfied | -1.142 | -1.652,-0.632 | <0.01 | |
| Fair | -1.475 | -1.975,-0.976 | <0.01 | |
| Dissatisfied | -2.015 | -2.631,-1.400 | <0.01 | |
| Very dissatisfied | -1.818 | -2.655,-0.981 | <0.01 | |
| BMI | 0.000 | 0,0 | 0.14 | |
| Model 3 Practices scores | (const) | 3.004 | 2.537,3.471 | <0.01 |
| Knowledge scores | -0.127 | -0.198,-0.056 | <0.01 | |
| Attitudes scores | 0.324 | 0.264,0.383 | <0.01 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | RC | |||
| Female | 0.588 | 0.326,0.851 | <0.01 | |
| Model 4 Total scores | (const) | 13.471 | 12.186,14.757 | <0.01 |
| Whether you are an only child | ||||
| Yes | RC | |||
| No | -0.431 | -0.855,-0.007 | 0.05 | |
| Overall level of satisfaction with school meals | ||||
| Very satisfied | RC | |||
| Satisfied | -1.385 | -2.361,-0.409 | <0.01 | |
| Fair | -1.978 | -2.935,-1.021 | <0.01 | |
| Dissatisfied | -2.100 | -3.285,0.916 | <0.01 | |
| Very dissatisfied | -2.506 | -4.109,-0.903 | <0.01 | |
| Education level | ||||
| College | RC | |||
| Bachelor’s Degree | 0.593 | -0.363,1.549 | 0.22 | |
| Master’s Degree or above | 1.106 | 0.116,2.096 | 0.03 | |
| Currently trying to figure out how to manage your weight | ||||
| Lose weight | RC | |||
| Maintain current weight | -0.414 | -0.848,0.021 | 0.06 | |
| Weight gain | -0.737 | -1.448,-0.027 | 0.04 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).