Submitted:
07 August 2024
Posted:
08 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
LBM surveillance
Site Selection
Sample Size Estimation
Specimen Collection
Wild Bird Surveillance
Site Selection
Sample Size Estimation
Sample Collection
Virus Testing and Sequencing Analysis
Antigenic Characterization of AIVs
3. Results
Detection of Influenza A Virus in LBM Poultry Specimens
Detection of Influenza A Virus in Wild Bird Fecal Specimens
Phylogenetic Analyses of the H9N2 Viruses from LBM Poultry
Phylogenetic Analysis of the H5N2 Virus from Wild Bird Fecal Specimens
Antigenic Analysis Results of H9N2 Poultry Specimens
4. Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer
References
- Webster, R.G., et al., Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiological Reviews, 1992. 56(1): p. 152-79. [CrossRef]
- Sims, L. and I.H. Brown, Multicontinental panzootic of H5 highly pathogenic avian influenza (1996–2015). in Avian Influenza, D.E. Swayne, Editor. 2016, Wiley Blackwell. p. 202-247.
- Lee, D.H., et al., Evolution, global spread, and pathogenicity of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5Nx clade 2.3.4.4. J Vet Sci, 2017. 18(S1): p. 269-280. [CrossRef]
- Olsen, B., et al., Global patterns of influenza a virus in wild birds. Science, 2006. 312(5772): p. 384-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morens, D.M., J.K. Taubenberger, and A.S. Fauci, H7N9 avian influenza A virus and the perpetual challenge of potential human pandemicity. mBio, 2013. 4(4). [CrossRef]
- Peacock, T.H.P., et al., A Global Perspective on H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus. Viruses, 2019. 11(7). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pusch, E.A. and D.L. Suarez, The Multifaceted Zoonotic Risk of H9N2 Avian Influenza. Vet Sci, 2018. 5(4). [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.T., et al., Avian influenza viruses in humans: lessons from past outbreaks. Br Med Bull, 2019. 132(1): p. 81-95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO, Cumulative number of confirmed human cases for avian influenza A(H5N1) reported to WHO, 2003-2023. 2023, WHO: Geneva.
- WHO, Monthly risk assessment summary. 2024, WHO: Geneva.
- Wade, A., et al., Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N8) Virus, Cameroon, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis, 2018. 24(7): p. 1367-1370.
- Kariithi, H.M., et al., Genetic characterization and pathogenesis of the first H9N2 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses isolated from chickens in Kenyan live bird markets. Infect Genet Evol, 2020. 78: p. 104074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalonda, A., et al., Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Birds in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Viruses, 2020. 12(9). [CrossRef]
- Venter, M., et al., Risk of Human Infections With Highly Pathogenic H5N2 and Low Pathogenic H7N1 Avian Influenza Strains During Outbreaks in Ostriches in South Africa. J Infect Dis, 2017. 216(suppl_4): p. S512-S519. [CrossRef]
- Sergei Khomenko, C.A., Laura Roberts, Lauren Waller, Kevin Shaw, Isabella Monne, Joanne Taylor, Madhur Dhingra, Claudia Pittiglio, Moon Mugyeom, Xavier Roche, Kivaria Fredrick, Akiko Kamata, Sam Okuthe, Philippe Kone, Lidewij Wiersma, Sophie Von Dobschuetz, Baba Soumare, Yilma Makonnen, Subhash Morzaria, Juan Lubroth., 2016–2018 Spread of H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiological and ecological observations. FOCUS ON, 2018. 12(12).
- FAO, H5N8 HPAI in Uganda Further Spread in Uganda and Neighbouring Countries (February 2017), in FAO Animal Health Risk Analysis – Assessment,, FAO, Editor. 2017, FAO: Rome.
- Ndumu, D., et al., Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 Clade 2.3.4.4B virus in Uganda, 2017. Infect Genet Evol, 2018. 66: p. 269-271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munyua, P.M., et al., Detection of influenza A virus in live bird markets in Kenya, 2009-2011. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2013. 7(2): p. 113-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, S., Sample Size in Sampling, I. John Wiley & Sons, Editor. 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 53-56.
- Ofula, V.O., et al., Detection of avian influenza viruses in wild waterbirds in the Rift Valley of Kenya using fecal sampling. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 2013. 13(6): p. 394-400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, P.J. and M.K. Torchetti, Newcastle disease virus detection and differentiation from avian influenza. Methods Mol Biol, 2014. 1161: p. 235-9.
- Prevention, U.C.f.D.C.a., CDC Laboratory Support for Influenza Surveillance (CLSIS). 2013, CDC: Atlanta Geogia, USA.
- Shepard, S.S., et al., Viral deep sequencing needs an adaptive approach: IRMA, the iterative refinement meta-assembler. BMC Genomics, 2016. 17: p. 708. [CrossRef]
- Edgar, R.C., MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004. 32(5): p. 1792-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saitou, N. and M. Nei, The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol, 1987. 4(4): p. 406-25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamura, K., et al., MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol, 2011. 28(10): p. 2731-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO, WHO Manual on Animal Influenza Diagnosis and Surveillance. 2002, World Health Organization: Geneva. p. 78.
- Group, S.H.W., Assessing the fitness of distinct clades of influenza A (H9N2) viruses. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2013. Nov;2(11):e75(11).
- Ilyushina, N.A., et al., Human-like receptor specificity does not affect the neuraminidase-inhibitor susceptibility of H5N1 influenza viruses. PLoS Pathog, 2008. 4(4): p. e1000043. [CrossRef]
- Arbani, O., et al., Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza H9N2 Viruses in Morocco: Antigenic and Molecular Evolution from 2021 to 2023. Viruses, 2023. 15(12). [CrossRef]
- Germeraad, E.A., et al., Virus Shedding of Avian Influenza in Poultry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Viruses, 2019. 11(9). [CrossRef]
- El-Shesheny, R., et al., Genesis of Influenza A(H5N8) Viruses. Emerg Infect Dis, 2017. 23(8): p. 1368-1371. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| 1 | GISAID accession numbers EPI_ISL_18856481 – EPI_ISL_18856545. |
| 2 | The viruses isolated from Kenya were A/chicken/Kenya/BU-CO-0688/2019, A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0136/2019, A/chicken/Kenya/KN-CO-0454/2019, A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0756/2019, A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0808/2019, and A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0010/2020 H9N2. |



| Sampling location | County | Main bird type sampled | Total specimens collected n(%) |
| Burma market | Nairobi | Chicken | 1928 (18.6) |
| Busia market | Busia | Chicken | 1496 (14.5) |
| Kariokor market | Nairobi | Chicken | 490 (4.7) |
| Kawangware market | Nairobi | Chicken | 973 (9.4) |
| Kisumu market | Kisumu | Chicken | 1710 (16.5) |
| Nakuru market | Nakuru | Chicken | 1633 (15.8) |
| Nyambari market | Kiambu | Various* | 2110 (20.4) |
| Total | 10,340 | ||
| Wild bird fecal sampling | |||
| Lake Bogoria | Baringo | Wild birds’ fecal specimens | 305 (4.7) |
| Lake Elementaita | Nakuru | Wild birds’ fecal specimens | 484 (7.4) |
| Lake Nakuru | Nakuru | Wild birds’ fecal specimens | 560 (8.6) |
| Lake Naivasha | Nakuru | Wild birds’ fecal specimens | 904 (13.8) |
| Lake Victoria basin | Various† | Wild birds’ fecal specimens | 4278 (65.5)ᵦ |
| Total | 6531 | ||
| Characteristic | Specimen type | Total specimens tested |
Influenza A positive n (%) |
Influenza A percent positive 95% CI |
| Overall | OP | 3727 | 246 (6.6) | 5.8–7.4 |
| CL | 3737 | 46 (1.2) | 0.9–1.6 | |
| Total | 7464 | 292 (3.9) | 3.5–4.3 | |
| Poultry species | ||||
| Chicken | OP | 2928 | 243 (8.3) | 7.3–9.3 |
| CL | 2889 | 46 (1.6) | 1.1–2.0 | |
| Total | 5817 | 289 (5.0) | 4.4–5.5 | |
| Turkey | OP | 291 | 2 (0.7) | 0.1–2.5 |
| CL | 294 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Total | 585 | 2 (0.3) | 0.04–1.2 | |
| Duck/Geese | OP | 305 | 1 (0.3) | 0.01–1.8 |
| CL | 305 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Total | 610 | 1 (0.2) | 0.004–0.9 | |
| Pigeon | OP | 136 | 0 (0.0) | - |
| CL | 136 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Total | 272 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Domestic Guinea fowl | OP | 55 | 0 (0.0) | - |
| CL | 55 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Total | 110 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Domestic dove | OP | 12 | 0 (0.0) | - |
| CL | 12 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Total | 24 | 0 (0.0) | - | |
| Live Bird Market Name [county] | ||||
| Kawangware [Nairobi] | 719 | 126 (17.5) | 14.7–20.3 | |
| Burma [Nairobi] | 1393 | 155 (11.1) | 9.5–12.8 | |
| Busia [Busia] | 1033 | 7 (0.7) | 0.3–1.4 | |
| Kariokor [Nairobi] | 355 | 2 (0.6) | 0.1–2.0 | |
| Nyambari [Kiambu] | 1547 | 1 (0.1) | 0.002–0.3 | |
| Kisumu [Kisumu] | 1224 | 1 (0.1) | 0.002–0.4 | |
| Nakuru [Nakuru] | 1193 | 0 (0.0) | - |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition titersa | ||||||
| Reference Antigens b | HK/1999 | BG/0994 | RG31 | Oman | RG66A | |
| A/Hong Kong/1073/1999 | 1280 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 10 | |
| A/Bangladesh/0994/2011 | 160 | 2560 | 1280 | 640 | 1280 | |
| IDCDC-RG31 (A/Bangladesh/0994/2011-like) | 160 | 2560 | 1280 | 320 | 1280 | |
| A/Oman/2747/2019 | 160 | 640 | 160 | 1280 | 640 | |
| IDCDC-RG66A (A/Oman/2747/2019-like) | 160 | 1280 | 320 | 1280 | 2560 | |
| Test Antigens | ||||||
| A/chicken/Kenya/BU-CO-0688/2019 | 80 | 1280 | 320 | 1280 | 1280 | |
| A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0136/2019 | 80 | 2560 | 1280 | 1280 | 1280 | |
| A/chicken/Kenya/KN-CO-0454/2019 | 80 | 1280 | 640 | 640 | 640 | |
| A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0756/2019 | 160 | 1280 | 1280 | 1280 | 1280 | |
| A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0808/2019 | 160 | 2560 | 1280 | 1280 | 1280 | |
| A/chicken/Kenya/BM-CO-0010/2020 | 80 | 640 | 320 | 640 | 640 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).