Submitted:
10 July 2024
Posted:
11 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shankar, M.U.; Levitan, C.A.; Spence, C. Grape Expectations: The Role of Cognitive Influences in Color–Flavor Interactions. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampini, M.; Sanabria, D.; Phillips, N.; Spence, C. The Multisensory Perception of Flavor: Assessing the Influence of Color Cues on Flavor Discrimination Responses. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18, 975–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampini, M.; Wantling, E.; Phillips, N.; Spence, C. Multisensory Flavor Perception: Assessing the Influence of Fruit Acids and Color Cues on the Perception of Fruit-Flavored Beverages. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The effect of color on perceived flavor intensity and acceptance of foods by young adults and elderly adults – ProQuest. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5037eb29d98a95dd88c6b7b061de133f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=49142 (accessed on 12 June 2024).
- Shankar, M.U.; Levitan, C.A.; Prescott, J.; Spence, C. The Influence of Color and Label Information on Flavor Perception. Chem. Percept. 2009, 2, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosasco Silva, V. Influences of Spiciness and Visual Color Cue On Salty Taste Intensity Perception In Reduced-Sodium Cheese Dips. LSU Master’s Theses 2018. [CrossRef]
- fMRI Study of Taste Cortical Areas in Humans - Faurion - 1998 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences - Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10623.x (accessed on 12 June 2024).
- Veldhuizen, M.G.; Gitelman, D.R.; Small, D.M. An fMRI Study of the Interactions Between the Attention and the Gustatory Networks. Chemosens Percept 2012, 5, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Gao, X.; Small, D.M.; Chen, H. Extreme Spicy Food Cravers Displayed Increased Brain Activity in Response to Pictures of Foods Containing Chili Peppers: An fMRI Study. Appetite 2019, 142, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kishi, M.; Sadachi, H.; Nakamura, J.; Tonoike, M. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Brain Regions Associated with Astringency. Neurosci Res 2017, 122, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cerf-Ducastel, B.; Van de Moortele, P.F.; MacLeod, P.; Le Bihan, D.; Faurion, A. Interaction of Gustatory and Lingual Somatosensory Perceptions at the Cortical Level in the Human: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Chem Senses 2001, 26, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bembich, S.; Lanzara, C.; Clarici, A.; Demarini, S.; Tepper, B.J.; Gasparini, P.; Grasso, D.L. Individual Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Activity during Perception of Bitter Taste Using fNIRS Methodology. Chem Senses 2010, 35, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Kato, Y.; Luo, Z. An fNIRS Research on Prefrontal Cortex Activity Response to Pleasant Taste. JBBS 2013, 03, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csipo, T.; Mukli, P.; Lipecz, A.; Tarantini, S.; Bahadli, D.; Abdulhussein, O.; Owens, C.; Kiss, T.; Balasubramanian, P.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; et al. Assessment of Age-Related Decline of Neurovascular Coupling Responses by Functional near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) in Humans. Geroscience 2019, 41, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jezierska, K.; Sękowska-Namiotko, A.; Pala, B.; Lietz-Kijak, D.; Gronwald, H.; Podraza, W. Searching for the Mechanism of Action of Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field—The Pilot fNIRS Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19, 4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Minematsu, Y.; Ueji, K.; Yamamoto, T. Activity of Frontal Pole Cortex Reflecting Hedonic Tone of Food and Drink: fNIRS Study in Humans. Sci Rep 2018, 8, 16197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gutierrez, R.; Simon, S.A. Chemosensory Processing in the Taste-Reward Pathway. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 2011, 26, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feeney, S.M.; Johnson, M.C.; Mortlock, D.J.; Peiris, H.V. First Observational Tests of Eternal Inflation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 071301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guedes, D.H.F. Psychological Sweetening: Multisensory Interactions Shaping Sweet Taste Perception. doctoralThesis, 2024.
- Campo, R.; Reinoso-Carvalho, F.; Rosato, P. Wine Experiences: A Review from a Multisensory Perspective. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhagen, J.V.; Engelen, L. The Neurocognitive Bases of Human Multimodal Food Perception: Sensory Integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30, 613–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taste Dysfunction after COVID-19: Analysis with Functional near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Available online: https://otolaryngologypl.com/article/537423/en (accessed on 12 June 2024).
- Haase, L.; Green, E.; Murphy, C. Males and Females Show Differential Brain Activation to Taste When Hungry and Sated in Gustatory and Reward Areas. Appetite 2011, 57, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haase, L.; Cerf-Ducastel, B.; Murphy, C. Cortical Activation in Response to Pure Taste Stimuli during the Physiological States of Hunger and Satiety. NeuroImage 2009, 44, 1008–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spetter, M.S.; Smeets, P.A.M.; De Graaf, C.; Viergever, M.A. Representation of Sweet and Salty Taste Intensity in the Brain. Chemical Senses 2010, 35, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, E.; Murphy, C. Altered Processing of Sweet Taste in the Brain of Diet Soda Drinkers. Physiology & Behavior 2012, 107, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalenberg, J.R.; Hoogeveen, H.R.; Renken, R.J.; Langers, D.R.M.; ter Horst, G.J. Functional Specialization of the Male Insula during Taste Perception. NeuroImage 2015, 119, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Avery, J.A.; Liu, A.G.; Ingeholm, J.E.; Riddell, C.D.; Gotts, S.J.; Martin, A. Taste Quality Representation in the Human Brain. J Neurosci 2020, 40, 1042–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eldeghaidy, S.; Yang, Q.; Abualait, T.; Williamson, A.-M.; Hort, J.; Francis, S.T. Thermal Taster Status: Temperature Modulation of Cortical Response to Sweetness Perception. Physiology & Behavior 2021, 230, 113266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornier, M.-A.; Salzberg, A.K.; Endly, D.C.; Bessesen, D.H.; Tregellas, J.R. Sex-Based Differences in the Behavioral and Neuronal Responses to Food. Physiol Behav 2010, 99, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantyne, K.N.; Ralf, A.; Aboukhalid, R.; Achakzai, N.M.; Anjos, M.J.; Ayub, Q.; Balažic, J.; Ballantyne, J.; Ballard, D.J.; Berger, B.; et al. Toward Male Individualization with Rapidly Mutating Y-Chromosomal Short Tandem Repeats. Human Mutation 2014, 35, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Langeveld, A.W.B.; Teo, P.S.; Vries, J.H.M. de; Feskens, E.J.M.; Graaf, C. de; Mars, M. Dietary Taste Patterns by Sex and Weight Status in the Netherlands. British Journal of Nutrition 2018, 119, 1195–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponticorvo, S.; Prinster, A.; Cantone, E.; Di Salle, F.; Esposito, F.; Canna, A. Sex Differences in the Taste-Evoked Functional Connectivity Network. Chemical Senses 2022, 47, bjac015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Channels | |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | Brodmann area 43, the subcentral area the postcentral gyrus the inferior frontal gyrus (including the pars opercularis, pars triangularis, pars orbitalis) |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | part of the primary visual cortex (the striate cortex; Brodmann area 17) the secondary visual cortex (Brodmann area 18) the tertiary visual cortex (Brodmann area 19) |
| Channels | Stimulation (protocol) | n | ΔoxyHb[μmol/l] | ||
| Mdn | Q1 | Q3 | |||
| 14 | water (I) | 51 | 0,00201 | 0,00090 | 0,00273 |
| 48 | water (I) | 51 | 0,00118 | 0,00077 | 0,00226 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | water (I) | 51 | 0,00081 | 0,00048 | 0,00130 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | water (I) | 49 | 0,00067 | 0,00055 | 0,00117 |
| 14 | coffee A (II) | 51 | 0,00235 | 0,00138 | 0,00311 |
| 48 | coffee A (II) | 51 | 0,00132 | 0,00080 | 0,00276 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee A (II) | 50 | 0,00104 | 0,00061 | 0,00162 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee A (II) | 50 | 0,00076 | 0,00049 | 0,00118 |
| 14 | coffee B (IV) | 50 | 0,00232 | 0,00138 | 0,00348 |
| 48 | coffee B (IV) | 51 | 0,00142 | 0,00059 | 0,00247 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee B (IV) | 50 | 0,00108 | 0,00060 | 0,00168 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee B (IV) | 50 | 0,00077 | 0,00051 | 0,00150 |
| 14 | reference (III) | 51 | 0,00016 | 0,00008 | 0,00028 |
| 48 | reference (III) | 51 | 0,00036 | 0,00018 | 0,00067 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | reference (III) | 51 | 0,00014 | 0,00008 | 0,00021 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | reference (III) | 50 | 0,00023 | 0,00011 | 0,00038 |
| Channels | Stimulation (protocol) | n | ΔoxyHb [μmol/l] | ||
| Mdn/Mn* | Q1/Min* | Q2/Max* | |||
| 14 | water (I) | 10 | 0,00134* | 0,00042* | 0,00242* |
| 48 | water (I) | 10 | 0,00108* | 0,00018* | 0,00271* |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | water (I) | 10 | 0,00074* | 0,00016* | 0,00152* |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | water (I) | 10 | 0,00077* | 0,00040* | 0,00147* |
| 14 | coffee A (II) | 10 | 0,00177* | 0,00080* | 0,00323* |
| 48 | coffee A (II) | 10 | 0,00121 | 0,00083 | 0,00136 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee A (II) | 10 | 0,00063 | 0,00053 | 0,00085 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee A (II) | 10 | 0,00092* | 0,00042* | 0,00199* |
| 14 | coffee B (IV) | 10 | 0,00192* | 0,00082* | 0,00358* |
| 48 | coffee B (IV) | 10 | 0,00139* | 0,00053* | 0,00286* |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee B (IV) | 9 | 0,00096* | 0,00028* | 0,00141* |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee B (IV) | 10 | 0,00084 | 0,00063 | 0,00125 |
| 14 | reference (III) | 10 | 0,00023* | 0,00002* | 0,00053* |
| 48 | reference (III) | 10 | 0,00046* | 0,00011* | 0,00102* |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | reference (III) | 10 | 0,00021* | 0,00000* | 0,00060* |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | reference (III) | 10 | 0,00022 | 0,00012 | 0,00038 |
| Channels | Stimulation (protocol) | n | ΔoxyHb[μmol/l] | ||
| Mdn/Mn* | Q1/Min* | Q2/Max* | |||
| 14 | water (I) | 41 | 0,00214 | 0,00121 | 0,00279 |
| 48 | water (I) | 41 | 0,00124 | 0,00086 | 0,00230 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | water (I) | 41 | 0,00094 | 0,00051 | 0,00138 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | water (I) | 39 | 0,00070 | 0,00054 | 0,00132 |
| 14 | coffee A (II) | 41 | 0,00263* | 0,00017* | 0,00723* |
| 48 | coffee A (II) | 41 | 0,00157 | 0,00076 | 0,00287 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee A (II) | 40 | 0,00120 | 0,00074 | 0,00167 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee A (II) | 40 | 0,00077 | 0,00047 | 0,00120 |
| 14 | coffee B (IV) | 40 | 0,00259* | 0,00018* | 0,00727* |
| 48 | coffee B (IV) | 41 | 0,00146 | 0,00059 | 0,00268 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | coffee B (IV) | 41 | 0,00115 | 0,00060 | 0,00188 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | coffee B (IV) | 40 | 0,00077 | 0,00046 | 0,00153 |
| 14 | reference (III) | 41 | 0,00014 | 0,00008 | 0,00025 |
| 48 | reference (III) | 41 | 0,00032 | 0,00017 | 0,00062 |
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | reference (III) | 41 | 0,00014 | 0,00008 | 0,00020 |
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | reference (III) | 40 | 0,00023 | 0,00011 | 0,00036 |
| p-values for | ||||||||||
| Channel 14 | Channels 14, 21, 28, 29, and 30 | |||||||||
| vs | protocols | vs | protocols | |||||||
| III | I | II | IV | III | I | II | IV | |||
| Protocols | III | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | III | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | ||
| I | <0,05 | 0,12 | 0,16 | I | <0,05 | 0,12 | 0,18 | |||
| II | <0,05 | 0,12 | 0,98 | II | <0,05 | 0,12 | 0,87 | |||
| IV | <0,05 | 0,16 | 0,98 | IV | <0,05 | 0,18 | 0,87 | |||
| p-values for | ||||||||||
| Channel 48 | Channels 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49 | |||||||||
| vs | Protocols | vs | Protocols | |||||||
| III | I | II | IV | III | I | II | IV | |||
| Protocols | III | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | III | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | ||
| I | <0,05 | 0,50 | 0,74 | I | <0,05 | 0,99 | 0,69 | |||
| II | <0,05 | 0,50 | 0,80 | II | <0,05 | 0,99 | 0,68 | |||
| IV | <0,05 | 0,74 | 0,80 | IV | <0,05 | 0,69 | 0,68 | |||
| p-values for protocol I - III | |||||
| vs | Channels | ||||
| 14 | 48 | 14, 21, 28-30 | 45-49 | ||
| Channels | 14 | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | |
| 48 | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | ||
| 14, 21, 28-30 | <0,05 | <0,05 | 0,11 | ||
| 45-49 | <0,05 | <0,05 | 0,11 | ||
| p-values for protocol II - III | |||||
| vs | Channels | ||||
| 14 | 48 | 14, 21, 28-30 | 45-49 | ||
| Channels | 14 | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | |
| 48 | <0,05 | 0,65 | <0,05 | ||
| 14, 21, 28-30 | <0,05 | 0,65 | <0,05 | ||
| 45-49 | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | ||
| p-values for protocol IV - III | |||||
| vs | Channels | ||||
| 14 | 48 | 14, 21, 28-30 | 45-49 | ||
| Channels | 14 | <0,05 | <0,05 | <0,05 | |
| 48 | <0,05 | 0,44 | <0,05 | ||
| 14, 21, 28-30 | <0,05 | 0,44 | 0,06 | ||
| 45-49 | <0,05 | <0,05 | 0,06 | ||
| Variable pairs | ||||
| Bitterness& ΔoxyHb for channels: | R | p value | ||
| Coffee (protocol) | A (II) | 14 | 0,1 | 0,45 |
| 48 | -0,1 | 0,70 | ||
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | -0,1 | 0,74 | ||
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | -0,1 | 0,39 | ||
| B (IV) | 14 | 0,4 | <0,05 | |
| 48 | 0,2 | 0,19 | ||
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | 0,3 | <0,05 | ||
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | 0,1 | 0,47 | ||
| ACC & ΔoxyHb for channels: | R | p value | ||
| Coffee (protocol) | A (II) | 14 | -0,2 | 0,18 |
| 48 | 0,2 | 0,16 | ||
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | 0,004 | 0,97 | ||
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | 0,2 | 0,13 | ||
| B (IV) | 14 | -0,2 | 0,18 | |
| 48 | 0,02 | 0,90 | ||
| 14, 21, 28, 29, 30 | -0,2 | 0,14 | ||
| 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 | 0,03 | 0,86 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).