Submitted:
04 March 2024
Posted:
04 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Data Acquisition and Pre-Processing
2.2.1. Measured CRC Acquisition
2.2.2. Data Preprocessing for Remote Sensing
2.3. Spectral Indices for CRC Estimation
2.4. PLSR Method
2.5. Evaluation of Accuracy of Fitting
2.5.1. Coefficient of Determination (R2) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)
2.5.2. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC)
3. Results
3.1. CRC Extraction for the Study Area
3.2. Correlation Analysis of Spectral Indices to CRC
3.3. CRC Inversion Using PLSR
3.4. The CRC Prediction Maps
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- From the comprehensive analysis of results, it's evident that all six spectral indices, including STI, NDTI, SRNDR, NDI5, NDI7 and NDSVI, registered correlation coefficients with the CRC exceeded 0.3 in the study area, indicating a consistent and notable relationship across various indices.
- (2)
- In a detailed comparison of data sources, the NDTI and STI, when derived from Sen-tinel-2 MSI remotely sensed data, yielded higher correlation coefficients of 0.803 and 0.810, respectively. Conversely, the NDSVI based on Landsat 8 OLI data exhibited the lowest correlation, with a coefficient of 0.358, pointing to a variance in data source effectiveness for spectral analysis.
- (3)
- Employing the one-dimensional linear regression method, the STI and NDTI using Sentinel-2 MSI data exhibited higher accuracies compared to other indices, producing R2 values of 0.665 and 0.650, and RMSE values of 3.96% and 4.03%, respectively. Spectral indices STI and NDTI, constructed from Landsat 8 OLI data, exhibited the highest estimation accuracy with R2 values of 0.41 and 0.40, respectively, and RMSE values of 5.25% and 5.27%, respectively. In contrast, the CRC model constructed using the PLSR method and Sentinel-2 MSI data demonstrated superior accuracy, with an R2 value of 0.894 and an RMSE value of 2.18%, outperforming the Landsat 8 OLI data, which had an R2 value of 0.695 and an RMSE value of 3.70%. The CRC model constructed using the Sentinel-2 MSI data was considered superior to the Landsat-8 OLI optical data in estimating the CRC. Furthermore, the PLSR model constructed based on Sentinel-2 MSI data was determined to be more effective for estimating the CRC compared to the model based on the Landsat 8 OLI data.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- YAN, Q.; Fei, D.; Ge, L.; Feng, Y.; LU, J.; Feng, L.; ZHANG, J.; LI, J.; DUAN, Z. Alternate Row Mulching Optimizes Soil Temperature and Water Conditions and Improves Wheat Yield in Dryland Farming. Journal of integrative agriculture 2018, 17, 2558–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Xu, C.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D. The influence of the type of crop residue on soil organic carbon fractions: An 11-year field study of rice-based cropping systems in southeast China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 223, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matinfar, H.R.; Maghsodi, Z.; Mousavi, S.R.; Rahmani, A. Evaluation and Prediction of Topsoil organic carbon using Machine learning and hybrid models at a Field-scale. CATENA 2021, 202, 105258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavoosi, Z.; Raoufat, M.H.; Dehghani, M.; Abdolabbas, J.; Kazemeini, S.A.; Nazemossadat, M.J. Feasibility of satellite and drone images for monitoring soil residue cover. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2020, 19, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, C.; Richel, A. The effect of corn straw return on corn production in Northeast China: An integrated regional evaluation with meta-analysis and system dynamics. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laflen, J.; Amemiya, M.; Hintz, E. Measuring Crop Residue Cover. Journal of soil and Water Conservation 1981, 36, 341–343. [Google Scholar]
- Morrison, J.E.; Huang, C.-H.; Lightle, D.T.; Daughtry, C.S. Residue Measurement Techniques. Journal of soil and water conservation 1993, 48, 478–483. [Google Scholar]
- Daughtry, C.; Hunt, E.; McMurtrey, J. Assessing crop residue cover using shortwave infrared reflectance. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2004, 90, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNairn, H.; Protz, R. Mapping Corn Residue Cover on Agricultural Fields in Oxford County, Ontario, Using Thematic Mapper. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 1993, 19, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, L.; Zhang, C.; Yun, W.; Ji, W.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Zhu, D. Mapping crop residue cover using Adjust Normalized Difference Residue Index based on Sentinel-2 MSI data. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 220, 105374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, W.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Peng, F.; Heo, J.; Duan, Z. Estimation of Winter Wheat Residue Coverage Using Optical and SAR Remote Sensing Images. Remote. Sens. 2019, 11, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, X.; Du, J.; Jacinthe, P.-A.; Zhao, B.; Zhou, H.; Liu, H.; Song, K. Integration of tillage indices and textural features of Sentinel-2A multispectral images for maize residue cover estimation. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 221, 105405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astola, H.; Häme, T.; Sirro, L.; Molinier, M.; Kilpi, J. Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 imagery for forest variable prediction in boreal region. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2019, 223, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korhonen, L.; Hadi; Packalen, P. ; Rautiainen, M. Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 in the estimation of boreal forest canopy cover and leaf area index. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 195, 259–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ding, J. , Yu, D., Ma, X., Zhang, Z., Ge, X. Teng, D.; Li, X.; Liang, J.; Guo, Y.; et al. Machine learning-based detection of soil salinity in an arid desert region, Northwest China: A comparison between Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 707, 136092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, S.; Tian, L.; Chang, C.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Tran, L.P.; Tian, C. Grass and maize vegetation systems restore saline-sodic soils in the Songnen Plain of northeast China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.-D.; Yang, F.; Ju, B.; Li, D.-C.; Zhao, Y.-G.; Yang, J.-L.; Zhang, G.-L. The influence of the conversion of grassland to cropland on changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China. CATENA 2018, 171, 588–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Seki, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Ishihama, Y. The causes of soil alkalinization in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China. Paddy Water Environ. 2009, 7, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M.; Liu, X.; Meng, Q.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; Du, W.; Ma, X. Additional application of aluminum sulfate with different fertilizers ameliorates saline-sodic soil of Songnen Plain in Northeast China. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 3521–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dou, S.; Guo, D. ; others Soil Type Distribution and Black Soil Land Protection in Jilin Province. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University 2018, 40, 449–456. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Shi, W.; Li, Z.; Atkinson, P.M. Fusion of Sentinel-2 Images. Remote sensing of environment 2016, 187, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermote, E.; Justice, C.; Claverie, M.; Franch, B. Preliminary Analysis of the Performance of the Land-sat 8/OLI Land Surface Reflectance Product. Remote Sensing of Environment 2016, 185, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, Y.; Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, S.; Fu, Z. Multi-temporal characterization of land surface temperature and its relationships with normalized difference vegetation index and soil moisture content in the Yellow River Delta, China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X.; Ma, J.; Wen, Z.; Song, K. Estimation of Maize Residue Cover Using Landsat-8 OLI Image Spectral Information and Textural Features. Remote. Sens. 2015, 7, 14559–14575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serbin, G.; Daughtry, C.S.; Hunt Jr, E.R.; Brown, D.J.; McCarty, G.W. Effect of Soil Spectral Properties on Remote Sensing of Crop Residue Cover. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2009, 73, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.; Jing, Q. A comparison of two adaptive multivariate analysis methods (PLSR and ANN) for winter wheat yield forecasting using Landsat-8 OLI images. Adv. Space Res. 2017, 59, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Gao, M.; Yan, J.; Li, Z.-L.; Leng, P.; Yang, Q.; Duan, S.-B. Hyperspectral Estimation of Soil Organic Matter Content using Different Spectral Preprocessing Techniques and PLSR Method. Remote. Sens. 2020, 12, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B.R. Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 185, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, X.; Xu, X.; Song, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Guo, W. Estimation of Leaf Water Content in Winter Wheat Using Grey Relational Analysis–Partial Least Squares Modeling with Hyperspectral Data. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ćalasan, M.; Aleem, S.H.A.; Zobaa, A.F. On the root mean square error (RMSE) calculation for parameter estimation of photovoltaic models: A novel exact analytical solution based on Lambert W function. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 210, 112716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Bucchianico, A. Coefficient of Determination (R 2). Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability 2008, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Abdel-Megeed, S.M. Accuracy of Correlation Coefficient with Limited Number of Points. J. Exp. Educ. 1984, 52, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häne, B.G.; Jäger, K.; Drexler, H.G. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is better suited for identification of DNA fingerprint profiles than band matching algorithms. Electrophoresis 1993, 14, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daughtry, C.S. Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Shortwave Infrared Reflectance. Agron. J. 2001, 93, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Ma, K.; Ding, L. Research on estimation models of the spectral characteristics of soil organic matter based on the soil particle size. Spectrochim. Acta Part A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 260, 119963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Deventer, A.; Ward, A.; Gowda, P.; Lyon, J. Using Thematic Mapper Data to Identify Contrasting Soil Plains and Tillage Practices. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 1997, 63, 87–93. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, V.; Irmak, S.; Kilic, A.; Sharma, V.; Gilley, J.E.; Meyer, G.E.; Knezevic, S.Z.; Marx, D. Quantification and Mapping of Surface Residue Cover for Maize and Soybean Fields in South Central Nebraska. Trans. ASABE 2016, 59, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandanici, E.; Bitelli, G. Preliminary Comparison of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 Imagery for a Combined Use. Remote. Sens. 2016, 8, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fassnacht, F.; Hartig, F.; Latifi, H.; Berger, C.; Hernández, J.; Corvalán, P.; Koch, B. Importance of Sample Size, Data Type and Prediction Method for Remote Sensing-Based Estimations of Above-ground Forest Biomass. Remote Sensing of Environment 2014, 154, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, B.; Campbell, J.B.; de Beurs, K.M. Remote sensing of crop residue cover using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2012, 117, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serbin, G.; Daughtry, C.S.; Hunt Jr, E.R.; Brown, D.J.; McCarty, G.W. Effect of Soil Spectral Properties on Remote Sensing of Crop Residue Cover. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2009, 73, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannari, A.; Pacheco, A.; Staenz, K.; McNairn, H.; Omari, K. Estimating and mapping crop residues cover on agricultural lands using hyperspectral and IKONOS data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2006, 104, 447–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco, A.; McNairn, H. Evaluating multispectral remote sensing and spectral unmixing analysis for crop residue mapping. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2219–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serbin, G.; Daughtry, C.S.; Hunt Jr, E.R.; Reeves III, J.B.; Brown, D.J. Effects of Soil Composition and Mineralogy on Remote Sensing of Crop Residue Cover. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Tillage index | Abbreviation | Landsat 8 OLI Formula | Sentinel-2 MSI Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized difference tillage index | NDTI | (B6-B7)/(B6+B7) | (B11-B12)/(B11+B12) |
| Simple tillage index | STI | B6/B7 | B11/B12 |
| Normalized difference index 5 | NDI5 | (B5-B6)/(B5+B6) | (B8A-B11)/(B8A+B11) |
| Normalized difference index 7 | NDI7 | (B5-B7)/(B5+B7) | (B8A-B12)/(B8A+B12) |
| Shortwave red normalized difference index | SRNDI | (B7-B4)/(B7+B4) | (B12-B4)/(B12+B4) |
| Normalized difference senescent vegetation index | NDSVI | (B6-B4)/(B6+B4) | (B11-B4)/(B11+B4) |
| Sample Type | Sample size | Maximum value | Minimum value | Average value | Standard deviation | Skewness | Kurtosis | Coefficient of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Sample | 70 | 42 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4.34 | 22.3 | 1.27 |
| Training set | 47 | 42 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 4.33 | 21.3 | 1.40 |
| Validation set | 23 | 23 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3.35 | 13.6 | 0.94 |
| Data source | Training set | Validation set | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | RMSE | R2 | RMSE | |
| Sentinel-2 | 0.894 | 2.18% | 0.897 | 1.40% |
| Landsat 8 | 0.695 | 3.70% | 0.769 | 2.10% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).