1. Introduction
Seagrasses are marine macrophytes that inhabit intertidal areas to deep waters (Esteban et al., 2018; Short et al., 2007). These ecosystems are highly productive and play an important role in providing various ecosystem services, such as habitat and nursery for various marine fish, invertebrates and mammals, blue carbon sequestration, coastal nutrient, metals and organic matter cycling, shoreline protection from erosion (Barbier et al., 2011; M. Stankovic et al., 2021; Nordlund et al., 2016; Unsworth et al., 2022; zu Ermgassen et al., 2021). These ecosystem services support millions of coastal communities by providing food and nutritional security, livelihood options and contribute towards well-being of the communities (Ho et al., 2018; Joseph et al., 2018; McKenzie et al., 2021). However, globally seagrass ecosystems are under decline due to various anthropogenic activities related to coastal pollution and land-use changes derived from various human activities (Hu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2018; Nazneen et al., 2022; Stockbridge et al., 2020). These anthropogenic pollution activities include nutrient run-offs from agricultural activities, industrial and domestic wastewater discharges, oil spills, etc., and act as source of various anthropogenic contaminants. These contaminants concentrate in seagrass ecosystems, as they are filtered from the water column by seagrass leaves and shoots and deposited in the sediment where these contaminates gets adsorbed into fine grain sediments and increase their concentration(Bonanno & Borg, 2018a; Gao et al., 2016; A. K. Mishra et al., 2022; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022a; Sungur & Özcan, 2015). Once concentrated these contaminants (such as trace metals) gets accumulated in seagrass tissues (e.g., roots and rhizomes) and cause severe adverse effects on the seagrass plant physiology, associated biota and the coastal communities that utilize seagrass associated biodiversity as source of food and nutrition (Lewis & Richard, 2009; Y. Li et al., 2023; Oreska et al., 2018).
Trace metals are one of the globally concerned ubiquitous anthropogenic contaminants that impart adverse impacts on the seagrass plants and their associated biodiversity (Govers et al., 2014; Y. Li et al., 2023; Nishitha et al., 2022; Thorne-Bazarra et al., 2023). Despite trace metals occurring in very low concentration in the marine environment, they play a critical role in the marine ecosystem functioning (Avelar et al., 2013; Coclet et al., 2021; A. K. Mishra et al., 2022; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022a). Some of the trace metals are categorized as essential (e.g., Co, Cu, Mn, Zn), while others are considered as toxic (e.g., As, Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni and Pb) for marine plants and associated biodiversity(Schneider et al., 2018a). However, the essential trace metals can also impart adverse impacts or become toxic once their threshold levels are breached (Dong et al., 2016; Stockdale et al., 2016; Ward, 1984). Concentrations above threshold level posses a serious threat to seagrass eco-physiology because of their non-biodegradable and persistent nature in the marine sediment and consequent accumulation of these metals into seagrass roots, rhizomes and leaves (Aljahdali & Alhassan, 2020; A. K. Mishra et al., 2022; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022a; Nikalje & Suprasanna, 2018; Rainbow, 2007). Once trace metals are accumulated in seagrass tissues, they are transferred to seagrass associated herbivores (e.g., fish and turtles), detritus grazers, leaf epiphytes and other organisms and gets biomagnified in trophic food chains and webs (Jiang et al., 2023; Schneider et al., 2018a; Suheryanto & Ismarti, 2018; Wilkinson et al., 2022).
Seagrasses of 16 different species are observed along the entire coast of India including the islands of Andaman and Nicobar (ANI) and the Lakshadweep to a depth of 21 m (Bayyana et al., 2020; Geevarghese et al., 2018). These ecosystems being present at the land and sea interface are subjected to various levels of trace metal contamination due to anthropogenic activities along the coast. A recent review on trace metal bioindicator potential of India’s marine macrophytes (e.g., seagrasses and saltmarshes), have suggested that seagrass are better bioindicators of trace metal accumulations than saltmarsh plants that inhabit similar intertidal zones (Mishra and Farooq, 2022; Nazneen et al., 2022). Small seagrass species like Halophila ovalis, Halophila beccarii and Halodule uninervis were found to be better bioindicators of various trace metals due to their higher growth rates and gorilla way of meadow expansion (Arisekar et al., 2021; Govindasamy & Azariah, 1999; Jagtap, 1983; Nazneen et al., 2022; Ragupathi Raja Kannan et al., 2011; Sachithanandam et al., 2020a) . However, bioindicator potential of large seagrass species like Enhalus acoroides and Syringodium isoetifolium may be higher than the small seagrass species, but data on trace metal accumulations in these big seagrasses that are present below 5m depth are very low in India (Arisekar et al., 2021; Nobi et al., 2010; Thangaradjou et al., 2010) .
This study quantified the concentration of trace metals (Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) in water, sediment and tissues (above-and below-ground) of six seagrasses that have a combination of both small and large species (i.e., H. ovalis, H. beccarii, H. uninervis, Thalassia hemprichii, Cymodocea rotundata and E. acoroides) across four locations of ANI of India. This study also assessed the species-specific accumulation and bioindicator potential of these six seagrass species to various trace metals. This study hypothesizes that different seagrass tissues accumulate varying concentration of metals and can be utilized as metal-specific bioindicators and this bioindicator potential is influenced by local anthropogenic influx concentration.
Four locations were selected that have seagrass ecosystems and received anthropogenic influxes mainly due to short-term tourism, local waste water release of untreated domestic sewage and industrial waste from ship yards. Trace metal studies on seagrass ecosystems of ANI is very limited (n=3). But these island ecosystems inhabit,10 out of 16 seagrass species found on the Indian coast (Gole et al., 2023; A. K. Mishra et al., 2023; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022a) and trace metal concentration in the vulnerable seagrass H. beccarii has never been quantified from these islands, which has been recently recorded in these islands (Nobi et al., 2010; Sachithanandam et al., 2020a; Thangaradjou et al., 2010). Being vulnerable and present at the land and sea interface H. beccarii is subjected to maximum exposure towards anthropogenic contamination and habitat disturbances that can lead towards local extirpation of this vulnerable species. (Jagtap, 1983; A. Kumar. Mishra & Apte, 2021).
4. Discussion
Anthropogenic activities are a major source of coastal trace metal contamination and the coastal ecosystems at the land -sea interface and are the storehouse of these contaminants (Jiang et al., 2023; Lu et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2022; Mishra & Farooq, 2022; Schneider et al., 2018b; Thorne-Bazarra et al., 2023). Seagrass ecosystems that inhabit the intertidal areas interacts with these anthropogenic contaminants and can be utilized as suitable bioindicators of these trace metals accumulation. However, till date their utilization for monitoring of trace metal contamination in coastal ecosystems has been limited (Govers et al., 2014; H. Lee et al., 2023). In this study six seagrass species that inhabited four intertidal locations of ANI, India subjected to anthropogenic contamination has been utilized, to assess their bioindicator potential to nine trace metals (Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) and observed that seagrass bioindicator potential to trace metals is both location and species-specific (
Figure 5,
Figure 6 and
Figure 7 and
Supplementary S1). This study also observed that within the same location of ANI, different seagrass species showed variation in trace metal accumulation. To our knowledge this study presents the trace metal accumulation of the vulnerable seagrass
H. beccarii from ANI, India for the first time (Mishra & Farooq, 2022; Mishra & Apte, 2021; Nazneen et al., 2022). This study also highlights that abiotic parameter of sediment (such as OM, and sediment grain size fractions) and pH of surface water above seagrass meadows positively/negatively interact with the available trace metals in the sediment and play an important role in their availability for uptake in seagrass ecosystems of ANI (
Figure 8 and
Figure 9 and
Supplementary S2).
4.1. Effect of Sediment Traits (Organic Matter Content) on Metal Accumulation in Seagrass Sediment
The anthropogenic source of trace metals to coastal marine ecosystems is mostly through riverine input of land derived contaminants and direct disposal of industrial or domestic waste water into the coastal ecosystems that accumulates in the sediment of seagrass ecosystems (H. Lee et al., 2023; Naik et al., 2023; Nazneen et al., 2022). This riverine input also contributes significant amount of land derived OM, silt and clay fractions into the seagrass sediment that plays an important role in trace metal adsorption onto the fine fraction of the sediment (Sahu et al., 2023; Mishra et al., 2020; Nishitha et al., 2022; Sadanandan et al., 2023). However, in our study locations of ANI, there are no direct riverine input as ANI is an island ecosystem and lacks any well-developed riverine system, but our study locations like Burmanallah has a small mangrove creek, whereas Havelock Island and Haddo Bay has permanent waste water drains that provide a continuous input of land derived OM and industrial and domestic waste water rich in OM and silt into these coastal seagrass ecosystems (Sahu et al., 2023; Mishra et al., 2023; Mishra & Kumar, 2020; VishnuRadhan et al., 2015). The increase in sediment OM and silt content by such inputs has been previously documented for seagrass ecosystems at the locations of ANI, considered for this study (Gole et al., 2022; Mishra & Apte, 2020; Mishra & Farooq, 2023; Mishra & Kumar, 2020).
Seagrasses are considered as ‘ecosystem engineers’ because of their ability to modify the surrounding environment to accumulate allochthonous nutrients and OM that can benefit their growth and productivity (De Boer, 2007; Duarte & Krause-Jensen, 2017; Haviland et al., 2022). This interaction between seagrass and their surrounding environment resulting in increase in sediment OM content has been observed for T. hemprichii and H. ovalis meadows from our study locations at Burmanallah, Neil Island and Havelock Island previously (Gole et al., 2022; Mishra et al., 2021; Mishra & Farooq, 2023; Savurirajan et al., 2018), and other locations of ANI, where seagrass ecosystems are present within the intertidal regions dominated by coral reefs and mangrove ecosystems (Nobi et al., 2010; Sachithanandam et al., 2020a). Similar interactions have also been observed for seagrass ecosystems of the Lakshadweep Islands (Thangaradjou et al., 2014) and from the coast of Tamil Nadu at Palk Bay region ( Baby et al., 2017). The range of sediment OM (25.44– 38.70 %) observed in this study is 10-fold higher than the sediment OM previously reported from seagrass and coral reef meadows of ANI (Sachithanandam et al., 2020a) and 2-fold lower than previously reported for Neil Island, Havelock Island and Burmanallah T. hemprichii meadows (A. K. Mishra et al., 2023). These differences in our study and previous authors are a result of anthropogenic input at these locations, which varies yearly, as each summer season is followed by a wet season of monsoon and high wave actions, that either increases or decreases the sediment OM matter by sediment erosion or deposition, as observed from the coast of India (Pradhan et al., 2014) and ANI (Sahu et al., 2023).
The variation of sediment OM between locations and the surface water pH plays an important role in bioavailability of trace metals in sediment for seagrasses (Bonanno & Borg, 2018; Lee et al., 2023; Mishra & Farooq, 2022) . This interplay between sediment OM and surface water pH has been observed for various seagrass species globally (Mishra et al., 2020; Olivé et al., 2017; Renzi et al., 2011), where low pH helps in release of trace metals bound to sediment OM and increases their availability for uptake (Basallote et al., 2014). This interaction is observed in our study mostly at the Haddo Bay location, where the surface water pH and sediment OM is lower compared to the other three locations, but the trace metals concentrations are the highest among the locations due to the effects of low pH releasing the sediment OM and silt bound trace metals (
Table 4). Further, at this location, most of the trace metals showed positive or negative corelationship with sediment OM compared to other locations (
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 and
Supplementary S2). In this study, low pH helped in increase of Pb concentration in the sediment of
H. beccarii meadows at Haddo Bay, as a result of significant negative correlation with pH (
Supplementary S2). Similarly, low pH (7.9-7.5) leading to increase in concentration of Pb in sediment and seagrass tissues has been observed for other seagrass species like
Posidonia oceanica and
Cymodocea nodosa meadows in the Mediterranean Sea (Mishra et al., 2020; Vizzini et al., 2013). Furthermore, this inverse relationship between low pH and sediment OM and trace metals (like As, Pb and Co) have been observed in the Bay of Bengal region and southeast coast of India (Jayaprakash et al., 2016; Naik et al., 2023; Sadanandan et al., 2023).
4.2. Species-Specific Accumulation
The sediment of seagrass ecosystems acts as sink of anthropogenic trace metals (Lee et al., 2023; Mishra et al., 2022; Mishra & Farooq, 2022b). The sediment trace metal concentrations range observed in this study were lower than trace metals concentration range observed for seagrass ecosystems across the coast of India, except for Mg in the sediment of
T. hemprichii meadows of Burmanallah, ANI (
Table 3). These higher range of Mg (2206.07 – 8474.93 mg Kg
-1) in seagrass meadows of ANI are within the range of previous results, where sediment of seagrass ecosystems of ANI accumulated higher concentration of Mg compared to dead coral reef and mangrove ecosystems (Nobi et al., 2010). The 1.3-fold higher range of Mg in our study compared to the coast of India, is a result of lack of research and monitoring of trace metals in the sediment of seagrass ecosystems across India, including the ANI, as the last assessment of Mg in the sediment of seagrass meadows was quantified more than two decades ago (Jagtap, 1983; Nobi et al., 2010). However, during this period both coastal communities and anthropogenic pollution have increased along the coast of ANI, which is reflected in the sediment of seagrass meadows. This increased anthropogenic pollution has resulted in increase of the minimum concentration (min. values) of all trace metals in this study compared to the seagrass sediments from the coast of India (
Table 3).
This increase in minimum concentration of trace metals in sediment of seagrass ecosystems of ANI also resulted in significant increase of trace metal concentrations in the seagrass biomass (
Table 4). The minimum and maximum Co concentration of in
H. uninervis and
T. hemprichii biomass in this study is 48-fold and 8.78-fold higher than the Co concentration observed in
S. isoetifolium and
H. uninervis biomass from Lakshadweep Islands (Thangaradjou et al., 2013). Similarly, Cr concentration in biomass of
H. uninervis in this study was 33-fold higher than the Cr concentration observed in
S. isoetifolium biomass from Gulf of Mannar, Tamil Nadu (Arisekar et al., 2021; Immaculate et al., 2018; Pasumpon & Vasudevan, 2021). The minimum concentrations of Cu and Fe observed in this study in the tissues of
H. uninervis are also 5-fold and 2468-fold higher than the minimum concentration of Cu and Fe observed in
S. isoetifolium biomass from the Palk Bay region of Tamil Nadu (Gopi et al., 2020; Immaculate et al., 2018; Pasumpon & Vasudevan, 2021). Similarly, the concentration of Ni, Zn and Pb in
S. isoetifolium at Palk Bay, Tamil Nadu and Lakshadweep Islands are 5-fold, 4-fold and 4.7-fold lower than the minimum concentration observed for these trace metals in this study in the biomass of
C. rotundata (Ni),
E. acoroides (Pb) and
T. hemprichii (Zn) (
Table 4). This pattern of trace metals accumulation in this study and across India suggests that big seagrass species such as
S. isoetifolium and
E. acoroides tends to accumulate low concentration of trace metals in their tissues compared to their surrounding environment due to their unique growth patterns and presence at increased depths, presence of low organic matter content compared to the small seagrass species, which generally inhabits the intertidal regions that are continuously exposed to land derived anthropogenic contaminants with high sediment organic matter (Bonanno & Borg, 2018a; Bonanno & Raccuia, 2018; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022b; Nazneen et al., 2022). The big seagrass species generally follow guerrilla growth strategy, i.e., low horizontal growth and high vertical growth rates (with wider leaves), that allows them to fulfill their minimum trace metal needs from the water column. Contrastingly small seagrass species follow a phalanx growth strategy, where these species grow faster horizontally (with high leaf turnover rates) getting exposed to high levels of trace metals that are found in the top 10 cm of the seagrass sediment (Govers et al., 2014; G. Lee et al., 2019; Y. Li et al., 2023; Vieira et al., 2022). These differences between small and big seagrass species trace metals accumulation capacity have been observed between
Posidonia oceanica,
Cymodocea nodosa and
Halophila stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea (Bonanno & Raccuia, 2018), between
E. acoroides,
T. hemprichii and
H. ovalis and
H. beccarii in the South China Sea (Lin et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b) and from the coast of India (Arulkumar et al., 2019; Gopi et al., 2020; Pasumpon & Vasudevan, 2021). Other factors such as interspecific differences in metal accumulation between seagrass species due to internal factors (such as uptake capacity) and external factors such as pH, OMcontent, water temperature and presence of fine grain fractions (<65 µm) also helps in determining the metal-species-specific accumulations as observed in this study (
Table 4).
Despite small seagrass species accumulated higher concentration of trace metals than the minimum concentration observed for various seagrass species of India, this did not result in breaching the maximum concentration recorded for trace metals in various seagrass species from India’s coast. Exceptions were trace metals like Co, Ni and Zn for which the seagrasses of this study in ANI accumulated maximum concentration (
Table 4). The Co concentration of in tissues of
T. hemprichii in this study was 8.7-fold higher than the maximum concentration of Co observed in the tissues of
H. uninervis from Lakshadweep Islands (Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Thangaradjou et al., 2013). Similarly, the concentration of Ni and Zn in
H. uninervis and
H. beccarii was 2-fold and 1-fold higher than maximum concentration of these metals observed in the tissues of
S. isoetifolium from Palk Bay, Tamil Nadu. These differences between our study and other studies from the coast of India are probably due to the presence of riverine and mangrove input at the locations from the coast of India, whereas in ANI there are no source of riverine input of trace metals (A. K. Mishra & Kumar, 2020; Nobi et al., 2010; Sachithanandam et al., 2020b). Additionally, being an island ecosystem the short-term spikes in trace metals input during dry season are balanced during the wet season, where large influx of freshwater and wave actions results in washing of the surface sediment and OM, resulting in transport of these metals to deeper waters, that does not allow a long-term accumulation of these metals. We sampled during the dry season, where trace metal concentration and anthropogenic input (due to tourism activities) are higher, that resulted in high concentration of metals in the sediment. However, these anthropogenic activities also cause short-term spikes in nutrient enrichment in these seagrass meadows, leading to growth of various macroalgae (
Figure 2), that utilizes the available nutrients in the water column and available trace metals, thus reducing the load in the sediment (Gopinath et al., 2011; Nobi et al., 2010; Sachithanandam et al., 2020b; Schneider et al., 2018b; Tupan & Azrianingsih, 2016). This is one of the reasons why trace metals in the water column were in very low levels in this study.
4.3. Bioindicator Potential
Seagrass plants are considered as efficient bioindicators of coastal trace metal contamination, as seagrasses possess trace metal accumulation capacity both from the water column and sediment (Aljahdali & Alhassan, 2022; Bonanno & Borg, 2018b; H. Lee et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2021b). Additionally, seagrasses contribute significantly to the coastal primary productivity and plays an important role in trace metal cycling (Nazneen et al., 2022; Sanz-Lázaro et al., 2012). Furthermore, seagrasses also regenerate and shed their leaves, as a result it is important to understand which part of the seagrass tissues are suitable as long-and short-term indicators (Y. Li et al., 2023; A. K. Mishra et al., 2022). From this study, it is evident that seagrass AG and BG-tissues are suitable indicators for different trace metals. For examples, the AG-tissues (i.e., leaves) of
T. hemprichii were suitable bioindicators of trace metals like Co and Mg, whereas the BG-tissues (i.e., roots) of
T. hemprichii are suitable bioindicators of Mn. Similarly, the AG-tissues of
H. uninervis are better indicators of metals like Fe, Ni and Pb and BG-tissues of Cu. For trace metals like Cr and Zn, BG-tissues of
H. ovalis and
H. beccarii are better indicators (
Figure 5,
Figure 6 and
Figure 7). This indicates small seagrass leaves of ANI can serve as short-term bioindicators, whereas roots can serve as long-term bioindicators of coastal trace metal contamination as observed for seagrasses worldwide (Aljahdali & Alhassan, 2022; H. Lee et al., 2023; A. K. Mishra & Farooq, 2022b; Zhang et al., 2021a).
4.3. Toxic Effects of Trace Metals on Seagrasses
In India, there are no trace metal toxicity studies on seagrasses ( Mishra et al., 2022; Mishra & Farooq, 2022b). However, globally various seagrass species have been used to assess the toxic effects of trace metals (Aljahdali & Alhassan, 2022; de los Santos et al., 2019; Gu et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2021 and references therein). Among these seagrass species studied, few are observed in India, i.e., C. serrulata, H. ovalis, H. uninervis, H. stipulacea and T. hemprichii and species like T. hemprichii, H. ovalis, H. uninervis and Cymodocea sp., are part of this study in ANI. Globally, it has been observed that the concentration range to exert trace metal toxicity in seagrass tissues is both metal and species -specific (Ambo-rappe et al., 2011; L. Li & Huang, 2012; Malea & Kevrekidis, 2013). In T. hemprichii, the trace metal concentration observed in this study in AG-and BG-tissues are above the concentration levels that can exert toxic effects (i.e., reduction in photosynthetic pigments) for Cu (0.1 mg L-1), and Zn (10 mg L-1) (Lei et al., 2012), except the Zn concentration in leaves of T. hemprichii at Burmanallah. This suggests, that except for Burmanallah location this species may be experiencing toxic effects of Cu and Zn along the study locations of ANI, as a result, its growth rates are declining as observed for T. hemprichii (A. Mishra & Apte, 2020). Similarly, for H. ovalis the Cu (0.1 mg L-1) and Pb (10 mg L-1) levels are toxic to photosystem -II and leaf growth rates (Ambo-rappe et al., 2011; Prange & Dennison, 2000), and the concentration of Cu and Pb in H. ovalis tissues were significantly above these concertation levels in our study. This indicates that H. ovalis leaves experiencing the toxic effects of these metals, as a result they have the shorter leaves from the coast of ANI compared to the other areas of India (Mishra et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2021).In H. uninervis, the concentration of Cu (1 mg L-1) is toxic to photosystem -II (Prange & Dennison, 2000) and the H. uninervis leaf tissues in our study has multifold higher concentration, possibly reducing its growth rates and resulting in lower canopy height in ANI compared to the other coastal areas of India (Dilipan et al., 2020; Mishra et al., 2021). However, for H. beccarii, E. acoroides and C. rotundata there have been no trace metal toxicity studies, which needs attention. However, as H. beccarii is a vulnerable seagrass species and inhabits intertidal areas or close to mangroves areas that are exposed to high anthropogenic contamination of trace metals, assessing the toxic effects of trace metals on H. beccarii needs to be prioritized in India (Mishra & Apte, 2021; Zhang et al., 2021c). However, it is important to note here that trace metal toxicity does not always depend on the total accumulated metal concentration in seagrass tissues, but on the threshold concentration of internal metabolically available concentration of the trace metals, (Rainbow, 2007), which needs further investigation for various seagrass species of ANI, India.
Figure 1.
Map showing the four study locations (Neil, Havelock, Burmanallah and Haddo Bay) in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (ANI) of India.
Figure 1.
Map showing the four study locations (Neil, Havelock, Burmanallah and Haddo Bay) in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (ANI) of India.
Figure 2.
Pictures of all six seagrass species a) T. hemprichii, b) C. rotundata, c) H. uninervis, d) H. ovalis, e) H. beccarii and f) E. acoroides across the four locations of ANI.
Figure 2.
Pictures of all six seagrass species a) T. hemprichii, b) C. rotundata, c) H. uninervis, d) H. ovalis, e) H. beccarii and f) E. acoroides across the four locations of ANI.
Figure 3.
Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo) of various trace metals in the sediment of seagrass meadows across the four study locations of ANI.
Figure 3.
Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo) of various trace metals in the sediment of seagrass meadows across the four study locations of ANI.
Figure 4.
Bio-Sediment Accumulation Factor (BSAF) values of various trace metals between sediment and below-ground tissues of seagrass meadows across the four study locations of ANI. BSAF>1 indicates higher accumulation capacity for the specific trace metals.
Figure 4.
Bio-Sediment Accumulation Factor (BSAF) values of various trace metals between sediment and below-ground tissues of seagrass meadows across the four study locations of ANI. BSAF>1 indicates higher accumulation capacity for the specific trace metals.
Figure 5.
Trace metals concentration of a) Co, b) Cr and c) Cu in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**).
Figure 5.
Trace metals concentration of a) Co, b) Cr and c) Cu in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**).
Figure 6.
Trace metals concentration of a) Fe, b) Mg and c) Mn in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**).
Figure 6.
Trace metals concentration of a) Fe, b) Mg and c) Mn in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**).
Figure 7.
Trace metals concentration of a) Ni b) Pb and c) Zn in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**, p<0.01*).
Figure 7.
Trace metals concentration of a) Ni b) Pb and c) Zn in sediment (Sd) and above- ground (AG) and below-ground (BG) tissues of T. hemprichii (Th), C. rotundata (Cr), H. uninervis (Hu) and H. ovalis (Ho) across the four study locations of ANI. Significant differences were derived from two-way ANOVA analysis using location and compartments (Sd, AG, BG) as fixed factors. (p<0.0001***, p<0.001**, p<0.01*).
Figure 8.
Pearson correlation between the trace metals in sediment and abiotic parameters of sediment (OM and sediment grain size) and surface water (pH) across the four locations of ANI for T. hemprichii.
Figure 8.
Pearson correlation between the trace metals in sediment and abiotic parameters of sediment (OM and sediment grain size) and surface water (pH) across the four locations of ANI for T. hemprichii.
Figure 9.
Pearson correlation between the trace metals in sediment and abiotic parameters of sediment (OM and sediment grain size) and surface water (pH) across the four locations of ANI for H. uninervis (a &b) and H. ovalis (c & d).
Figure 9.
Pearson correlation between the trace metals in sediment and abiotic parameters of sediment (OM and sediment grain size) and surface water (pH) across the four locations of ANI for H. uninervis (a &b) and H. ovalis (c & d).
Table 1.
Percentage recovery of various trace metals in standards for plant biomass (ERM-CD281) and sediment (Hiss-1).
Table 1.
Percentage recovery of various trace metals in standards for plant biomass (ERM-CD281) and sediment (Hiss-1).
|
Plant biomass |
Sediment |
Trace metals |
Certified value for ERM-CD281 (mg/Kg) |
Recovered value (mg/Kg) |
Percentage recovery (%) |
Certified value for Hiss-1 (mg/Kg) |
Recovered value (mg/Kg) |
Percentage recovery (%) |
Co |
- |
- |
- |
0.65 |
0.60 |
93.77 |
Cr |
24.8 |
23.01 |
92.79 |
30 |
27.16 |
90.54 |
Cu |
10.2 |
9.71 |
95.26 |
2.29 |
2.11 |
92.55 |
Fe |
180 |
172.85 |
96.03 |
2460 |
2342.90 |
95.24 |
Mg |
1600 |
1441 |
90.10 |
|
|
|
Mn |
82 |
74.17 |
90.46 |
66.10 |
61.60 |
93.20 |
Ni |
15.2 |
14.33 |
94.28 |
2.16 |
2.02 |
93.84 |
Pb |
1.67 |
1.57 |
94.38 |
3.13 |
3.06 |
97.91 |
Zn |
30.5 |
30.06 |
98.57 |
4.94 |
4.89 |
99 |
Table 2.
Mean ± SD of abiotic parameters of surface water (pH, temperature and salinity) and sediment [organic matter (OM%) and sediment grain size] of seagrass ecosystems from the four locations of ANI. One way-ANOVA was used to test the statistical significance (p< 0.05) using location as fixed factors.
Table 2.
Mean ± SD of abiotic parameters of surface water (pH, temperature and salinity) and sediment [organic matter (OM%) and sediment grain size] of seagrass ecosystems from the four locations of ANI. One way-ANOVA was used to test the statistical significance (p< 0.05) using location as fixed factors.
Variables |
Locations |
One-way ANOVA |
|
Neil |
Havelock |
Burmanallah |
Haddo Bay |
DF |
MS |
F (DFn, DFd) |
P value |
pH |
8.10 ± 0.01 |
8.14 ± 0.05 |
8.14 ± 0.08 |
8.00 ± 0.08 |
3 |
0.025 |
F (3,20) = 10.50 |
= 0.002 |
Temp.°C |
33.20 ± 1.30 |
34 ± 1.22 |
31.00 ±0.89 |
30 ± 0.46 |
3 |
17.87 |
F (3,16) = 16.96 |
<0.001 |
Salinity (‰) |
32.67 ± 0.57 |
32 ± 1.01 |
33 ± 0.01 |
32.33 ± 1.15 |
3 |
0.55 |
F (3,8) = 0.83 |
= 0.512 |
OM (%) |
38.17 ± 4.32 |
27.52 ± 7.86 |
38.70 ±5.07 |
25.44 ± 3.01 |
3 |
634.0 |
F (3,66) = 18.21 |
<0.0001 |
Grain size (Sand%) |
43.70 ± 15.13 |
45.23 ± 9.50 |
33.89 ± 9.98 |
37.94 ± 13.63 |
3 |
202.8 |
F (3,24) = 0.26 |
= 0.85 |
Grain size (Silt%) |
46.88 ± 12.11 |
39.33 ± 2.09 |
51.34 ± 3.16 |
49.60 ±9.37 |
3 |
232.2 |
F (3,25) = 0.51 |
=0.67 |
Grain size (Clay%) |
9.41 ± 5.89 |
15.44 ± 8.46 |
14.76 ± 8.94 |
12.85 ± 6.25 |
3 |
65.28 |
F (3,24) = 1.01 |
=0.36 |
Table 3.
Comparison of ranges of trace metal levels in surface water and sediments of seagrass ecosystems of India adopted from Mishra and Farooq (2022), with our study. Below Detection Limit (BDL).
Table 3.
Comparison of ranges of trace metal levels in surface water and sediments of seagrass ecosystems of India adopted from Mishra and Farooq (2022), with our study. Below Detection Limit (BDL).
Metals |
Seagrass ecosystems |
This study |
References |
|
Water (µg L-1) |
Sediment (mg kg-1) |
Water (µg L-1) |
Sediment (mg kg-1) |
|
Co |
- |
0.16–100 |
BDL |
3.72 – 18.35 |
Nobi et al., 2010; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Cr |
0.26-2.03 |
2.32–887 |
BDL |
13.09 – 86.92 |
Baby et al., 2017; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Nobi et al., 2010; Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Cu |
0.11-1.02 |
1.58–130 |
BDL |
2.97 – 71.44 |
Baby et al., 2017; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Nobi et al., 2010; Jagtap,1983; Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Kumaresan et al., 1998 Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Fe |
0.12-7.04 |
16.5–75500 |
BDL |
1864 – 18400.99 |
Jagtap, 1983; Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Baby et al., 2017; Nobi et al., 2010; Kumarsen et al., 1998; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Mg |
0.16-18338 |
42–6204 |
25.49–26.34 |
2206.07 –8474.93 |
Jagtap,1983; Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Baby et al., 2017; Nobi et al., 2010 |
Mn |
0.35-0.89 |
4–940 |
BDL |
56.23 – 251.24 |
Jagtap,1983; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Baby et al., 2017; Nobi et al., 2010; Kumarsen et al., 1998; Sachithanandam et al., 2020; |
Ni |
0.19-0.56 |
0.64–607 |
BDL |
2.83 – 16.18 |
Jagtap,1983; Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Baby et al., 2017; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Nobi et al., 2010; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Pb |
0.01-0.12 |
0.54–29 |
BDL |
2.25 – 15.48 |
Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Baby et al., 2017; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Zn |
0.1-11.61 |
2–127.2 |
BDL |
7.49 – 25.93 |
Jagtap and Untawale, 1984; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Baby et al., 2017; Thangaradjou et al., 2014; Nobi et al., 2010; Kumarsen et al., 1998; Sachithanandam et al., 2020 |
Table 4.
Minimum and maximum concentration of trace metals (mg Kg-1) in the tissues of various seagrass species of India adopted from Mishra and Farooq, (2022) and compared with this study. Palk Bay, TN; Gulf of Mannar (GOM), Lakshadweep Island (LK), Andaman and Nicobar Islands (ANI); Neil (N; ANI), Havelock (HV; ANI), Burmanallah (B; ANI), Haddo Bay (HB; ANI).
Table 4.
Minimum and maximum concentration of trace metals (mg Kg-1) in the tissues of various seagrass species of India adopted from Mishra and Farooq, (2022) and compared with this study. Palk Bay, TN; Gulf of Mannar (GOM), Lakshadweep Island (LK), Andaman and Nicobar Islands (ANI); Neil (N; ANI), Havelock (HV; ANI), Burmanallah (B; ANI), Haddo Bay (HB; ANI).
|
Seagrass |
Seagrass tissues; This study |
References |
|
Min (mg kg-1) |
Max (mg kg-1) |
Min (mg kg-1) |
Max (mg kg-1) |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (LK) |
H. uninervis (LK) |
H. uninervis (H) |
T. hemprichii (HB) |
Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Arisekar et al., 2021 |
Co |
0.16 |
11.21 |
7.74 |
97.85 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (GOM) |
Seagrass (ANI) |
H. uninervis (N) |
H. ovalis (HB) |
Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018; Arisekar et al., 2021; Pasumpon and Vasudevan, 2021 |
Cr |
0.1 |
138.2 |
3.28 |
135.56 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (PB) |
Seagrass (ANI) |
H. ovalis (HB) |
H. uninervis (HV) |
Jagtap, 1983; Mathevan, 1990; Kannan et al., 1992; Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Gopinath et al., 2011; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018; Gopi et al., 2020; Arisekar et al., 2021; Pasumpon and Vasudevan, 2021 |
Cu |
0.05 |
86.75 |
0.28 |
68.85 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (PB) |
H. beccarii (GO) |
E. acoroides (HV) |
H. uninervis (HB) |
Jagtap, 1983; Mathevan, 1990; Kannan et al., 1992; Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Gopinath et al., 2011; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018; Arisekar et al., 2021 |
Fe |
0.22 |
32562 |
543 |
11655.49 |
|
Species |
C. rotundata (GOM) |
S. isoetifolium (LK) |
H. ovalis (HV) |
T. hemprichii (B) |
Jagtap, 1983; Nobi et al., 2010; Thangaradjou et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018 |
Mg |
91.54 |
80,050 |
1428.36 |
9190.79 |
|
Species |
C. serrulata (PB) |
H. ovalis (PB) |
T. hemprichii (N) |
T. hemprichii (B) |
Jagtap, 1983; Mathevan, 1990; Kannan et al., 1992; Nobi et al., 2010; Govindaswamy et al., 2011; Kannan et al., 2011; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Arisekar et al., 2021; Pasumpon and Vasudevan, 2021 |
Mn |
0.24 |
2250 |
15.41 |
244.10 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (PB) |
H. decipens (LK) |
C. rotundata (B) |
H. uninervis (HB) |
Jagtap, 1983; Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Immaculate et al., 2018 |
Ni |
0.1 |
19.49 |
0.54 |
39 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (LK) |
H. uninervis (LK) |
E. acoroides (HV) |
H. uninervis (HB) |
Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018; Gopi et al., 2020; Arisekar et al., 2021; Pasumpon and Vasudevan, 2021 |
Pb |
0.1 |
23.12 |
0.47 |
7.95 |
|
Species |
S. isoetifolium (PB) |
H. pinifolia (PB) |
T. hemprichii (B) |
H. beccarii (HB) |
Mathevan, 1990; Kannan et al., 1992; Nobi et al., 2010; Kannan et al., 2011; Gopinath et al., 2011; Sudharsan et al., 2012; Govindaswamy et al., 2012; Thangaradjou et al., 2013; Immaculate et al., 2018; Gopi et al., 2020; Arisekar et al., 2021; Pasumpon and Vasudevan, 2021 |
Zn |
0.15 |
69.17 |
0.60 |
70.4 |
|