Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Identification of Substandard and Falsified Veterinary Medicinal Products on the Rwandan Market Using the Global Pharma Health Fund Minilab®

Version 1 : Received: 9 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 15 January 2024 (07:36:21 CET)

How to cite: Richard, H.; Habimana, J.P.; Nyabinwa, P.; Manishimwe, R.; Irimaso, E.; Ntawubizi, M.; Lejeune, J.; Pinto Ferreira, J. Identification of Substandard and Falsified Veterinary Medicinal Products on the Rwandan Market Using the Global Pharma Health Fund Minilab®. Preprints 2024, 2024010852. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0852.v1 Richard, H.; Habimana, J.P.; Nyabinwa, P.; Manishimwe, R.; Irimaso, E.; Ntawubizi, M.; Lejeune, J.; Pinto Ferreira, J. Identification of Substandard and Falsified Veterinary Medicinal Products on the Rwandan Market Using the Global Pharma Health Fund Minilab®. Preprints 2024, 2024010852. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0852.v1

Abstract

The quality of veterinary medicinal products (VMP) is essential for efficient disease management. Therefore, VMPs that do not meet the required standards of quality can lead to increased sickness, death, and the development of antimicrobial resistance, posing a danger to both animals and humans. This study aimed to identify substandard and falsified VMPs on the Rwandan market using the Global Pharma Health Fund (GPHF)-Minilab™. VMP samples were purchased and collected in a cross-sectional study from veterinary retail pharmacies from five districts in four provinces of Rwanda, during May and June 2023. These samples were transported to the Veterinary Laboratory of the School of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Nyagatare campus, University of Rwanda, and stored until analysis. The samples were subjected to physical and chemical analysis following the GPHF-Minilab™’s guidelines. A total of 130 samples from two categories of VMP were purchased from 10 veterinary retail pharmacies in urban and rural areas. The results of this study revealed that none of the assessed VMP samples failed physical tests (visual inspection, weight verification, and disintegration test). 10 samples (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) out of 130 (7.7%) passed the visual inspections but later failed to comply with Thin-Layer Chromatography result specifications. This is an indication of the presence of substandard and falsified VMP circulating in Rwanda that warrants regular inspection and chemical quality control of VMPs along the supply chain.

Keywords

Rwanda; TLC; Veterinary medicinal products; retailer veterinary shops; Nyagatare

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public Health and Health Services

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.