PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement.
Version 1
: Received: 9 January 2024 / Approved: 10 January 2024 / Online: 10 January 2024 (12:01:27 CET)
Version 2
: Received: 21 April 2024 / Approved: 22 April 2024 / Online: 22 April 2024 (10:29:06 CEST)
How to cite:
JOHNSON, N. Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement.. Preprints2024, 2024010834. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0834.v1
JOHNSON, N. Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement.. Preprints 2024, 2024010834. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0834.v1
JOHNSON, N. Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement.. Preprints2024, 2024010834. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0834.v1
APA Style
JOHNSON, N. (2024). Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement.. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0834.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
JOHNSON, N. 2024 "Elevating Natural Gas Liquid(Ngl) Extraction And Fractionation Train Performance: A Synertistic Approach Of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modification, And Vertical Advancement." Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0834.v1
Abstract
"Enhancing the Efficiency of Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) Extraction and Fractionation Trains: An Integrated Approach of Simulation Analysis, Advanced Modifications, and Technological Advancements. Through comprehensive research, innovative solutions such as the heat pump aided distillation (HPAD) system and self-heat recuperation technology (SHRT) have been developed to significantly reduce the energy consumption associated with conventional distillation systems. To identify a practical system for NGL fractionation trains, this study extensively examined and compared various HPAD and SHRT options to retrofit a single column. The objective was to find the most suitable and efficient solution for the fractionation process of natural gas liquids (NGLs). The retrofit options analyzed in this study encompassed a range of techniques, including vapor compression (VC), mechanical vapor re-compression (MVR), thermal vapor re-compression (TVR), bottom flashing (BF), side heat exchanger (SHE), intermediate heating and cooling (IHC), self-heat recuperative (SHR), and modified self-heat recuperative (MSHR) distillation. These methods were carefully examined to determine their suitability and effectiveness in improving the performance of NGL fractionation trains In this study, a depropanizer column, typically employed in conventional NGL plants, was selected as a case study. The simulation software Aspen HYSYS V7.3 was employed to model and analyze eight retrofit designs based on predefined criteria. The simulation data was carefully evaluated to identify the most efficient design for minimizing energy consumption. Among the retrofit options, the mechanical vapor re-compression (MVR) technique demonstrated the most significant energy cost reduction, with a remarkable 68.11 percent improvement compared to the base case conventional column. These findings highlight the potential of MVR as an effective solution for lowering energy costs in NGL fractionation trainsFollowing the MVR retrofit option, the study found that vapor compression (VC) achieved a considerable energy cost reduction of 66.65 percent, closely followed by modified self-heat recuperative (MSHR) at 64.02 percent, bottom flashing (BF) at 62.88 percent, self-heat recuperative (SHR) at 55.85 percent, side heat exchanger (SHE) at 54.23 percent, intermediate heating and cooling (IHC) at 39.54 percent, and thermal vapor re-compression (TVR) also at 39.54 percent. These findings highlight the significant potential for energy savings offered by these retrofit options, with VC being the most popular choice, closely followed by MSHR, BF, SHR, SHE, IHC, and TVR.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.