Submitted:
02 January 2024
Posted:
04 January 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- calculation of PV power output was conducted for a horizontal PV system, where the panels were flat, disregarding tilt and orientation,
- calculations were performed for a PV system appropriately for an east, south and west-facing orientation and a tilt of 30 degrees to explore the performance implications of the orientation and tilt angle widely applied in Poland.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Energy yield assessment
3.2. Comparison with the energy generated in a real PV system
- -
- eastern : 5,5 kWp x 983.64 kWh/kWp = 5410.02 kWh
- -
- western: 4.29 kWp x 947.98 kWh/kWp = 4066.83 kWh
- -
- eastern : 5,5 kWp x 869.38 kWh/kWp = 4781.59 kWh
- -
- western: 4.29 kWp x 839.50 kWh/kWp = 3601.45kWh
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Statistical information on electricity. Monthly Bulletin, Energy Regulatory Office. Available online: https://www.are.waw.pl/wydawnictwa#informacja-statystyczna-o-energii-elektrycznej (accessed on 4 December 2023).
- Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2023.
- Noel, S., 2023, Average cost of solar panels. Available online: https://homeguide.com/costs/solar-panel-cost#kwh (accessed on 4 December 2023).
- Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 — Ministry of Climate and Environment - Portal Gov.pl. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/klimat/polityka-energetyczna-polski (accessed on 8 December 2023).
- Mularczyk, A.; Zdonek, I.; Turek, M.; Tokarski, S. Intentions to Use Prosumer Photovoltaic Technology in Poland. Energies, 2022, 15, 6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dharshing, S. Household Dynamics of Technology Adoption: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Residential Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems in Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2017, 23, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgin, B., Pless, J., Drury, E. Diffusion into new markets: evolving customer segments in the solar photovoltaics market. Environ. Res. Lett, 2015, 10, 084001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ElNozahy, M.S., Salama, M.M.A. Technical Impacts of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems on Electrical Networks—A Review. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2013, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Luthander, R., Widén, J., Nilsson, D., Palm, J. Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review. Appl. Energy 2015, 142. [Google Scholar]
- Martín-Chivelet, N., Montero-Gómez, D. Optimizing photovoltaic self-consumption in office buildings. Energy Build, 2017, 150, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marańda, W. Analysis of self-consumption of energy from grid-connected photovoltaic system for various load scenarios with short-term buffering. SN Appl. Sci., 2019, 1, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chattopadhyay, K., Kies, A., Lorenz, E., von Bremen, L., Heinemann, D. The impact of diferent pv module confgurations on storage and additional balancing needs for a fully renewable european power system. Renew Energy, 2017, 113, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weniger, J., Tjaden, T., Quaschning, V. Sizing of Residential PV Battery Systems. Energy Proc. 2014, 46, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapica, J., Canales, F.A., Jurasz, J. Global atlas of solar and wind resources temporal complementarity. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 246, 114692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klepacka, A.M., Florkowski, W.J., Meng, T. Clean, accessible, and cost-saving: Reasons for rural household investment in solar panels in Poland. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2018, 139, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igliński, B., Piechota, G., Kiełkowska, U. The assessment of solar photovoltaic in Poland: the photovoltaics potential, perspectives and development. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 2023, 25, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statistical Poland. Available online: https://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eTeryt/english.aspx (accessed on 5 December 2023).
- Arsanjani, J.J., Zipf, A., Mooney, P., Helbich, M. An Introduction to OpenStreetMap in Geographic Information Science: Experiences, Research, and Applications. In OpenStreetMap in GIScience, 2015, 1-15.
- AssessingSolar. Available online: https://solarstations.org (accessed on 15 December 2023).
- Stowell, D., Kelly, J., Tanner, D., Taylor, J., Jones, E., Geddes, J., Chalstrey, E. A harmonized, high-coverage, open dataset of solar photovoltaic installations in the UK. Sci Data 2020, 7, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ernst, M., Thomson, A., Haedrich, I., Blakers, A. Comparison of Ground-based and Satellite-based Irradiance Data for Photovoltaic Yield Estimation. Energy Proc 2016, 92, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huld, T., Müller, R., Gambardella, A. A new solar radiation database for estimating PV performance in Europe and Africa. Solar Energy 2012, 86, 1803–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holmgren, W.F., Hansen, C.W., Mikofski, M.A. Pvlib python: a python package for modelling solar energy systems. J. Open Source Softw. 2018, 3, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Github. Available online: https://github.com/jurand71/pv_energy_yield (accessed on 5 December 2023).
- Ballif, C., Haug, FJ., Boccard, M., Verlinden, P.J., Hahn, G. Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry. Nat Rev Mater 2022, 7, 597–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce, J., Solar PV System Losses - How To Calculate Solar Panel Efficiency. Available online: https://www.solarempower.com/blog/10-solar-pv-system-losses-their-impact-on-solar-panel-output/ (accessed on 19 December 2023).
- The World Bank Group, Global Solar Atlas 2.0 – Technical Report, 2019.
- Skoczek, A., Sample, T., Dunlop, E.D. The results of performance measurements of field-aged crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 2019, 17, 227–240. [Google Scholar]




| Voivodship | Orientation of PV system | ||
| E(ast) | S(outh) | W(est) | |
| Lower Silesia | 990.46 | 1246.18 | 961.45 |
| Kuyavia-Pomerania | 964.84 | 1211.23 | 942.00 |
| Lublin | 987.51 | 1229.81 | 961.20 |
| Lubusz | 972.34 | 1216.23 | 938.97 |
| Łódź | 986.96 | 1232.77 | 953.89 |
| Lesser Poland | 967.45 | 1216.84 | 937.80 |
| Masovia | 972.57 | 1214.39 | 947.13 |
| Opole | 997.65 | 1256.00 | 970.69 |
| Subcarpathia | 982.23 | 1237.19 | 960.26 |
| Podlaskie | 942.30 | 1169.96 | 922.54 |
| Pomerania | 923.03 | 1158.82 | 912.99 |
| Silesia | 973.42 | 1214.63 | 942.91 |
| Holy Cross Province | 990.77 | 1244.00 | 967.96 |
| Warmia-Masuria | 925.53 | 1159.41 | 911.70 |
| Greater Poland | 981.32 | 1233.63 | 951.84 |
| West Pomerania | 939.34 | 1177.90 | 922.36 |
| Energy | 2022 | 2023 |
| kWh | 8488.97 | 8227.95 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).