Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Safety Evaluation of Monoplace Hyperbaric Chamber and Clinical Characteristics of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Version 1 : Received: 2 January 2024 / Approved: 3 January 2024 / Online: 3 January 2024 (10:05:04 CET)

How to cite: LEE, H.Y.; KIM, H.; LEE, Y.; PAIK, J.H. Safety Evaluation of Monoplace Hyperbaric Chamber and Clinical Characteristics of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. Preprints 2024, 2024010109. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0109.v1 LEE, H.Y.; KIM, H.; LEE, Y.; PAIK, J.H. Safety Evaluation of Monoplace Hyperbaric Chamber and Clinical Characteristics of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. Preprints 2024, 2024010109. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202401.0109.v1

Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a well-established treatment for carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. HBOT is performed in a hyperbaric chamber, which increases the atmosphere absolute (ATA) and oxygen concentration in the chamber. To ensure patient safety during HBOT, a gas monitoring system is used to monitor the oxygen levels, ATA, and other parameters. This study aims to perform the safety evaluation of the monoplace hyperbaric chamber compared to a gas monitoring system in the treatment of CO poisoning. In addition, it examined the clinical characteristics of the patients diagnosed with CO poisoning who performed HBOT. In the safety evaluation of the monoplace chamber, it was compared the values of oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2), humidity, and temperature were measured in the hyperbaric chamber and gas monitoring system when operating at 2.0 ATA and 3.0 ATA. Moreover, in the clinical characteristics of patients with CO poisoning who performed HBOT, 1,006 patients were analyzed by using the data registry. Under the condition at 3.0 ATA, the average CO2 was higher in the hyperbaric chamber than in the gas monitoring system (p<0.001). Also, the average humidity was higher in the hyperbaric chamber than in the gas monitoring system (p=0.004). Under the condition at 2.0 ATA, the average humidity was higher in the hyperbaric chamber than in the gas monitoring system (p<0.001). Also, the average temperature was lower in the hyperbaric chamber than in the gas monitoring system (p<0.001). The mean age of the 1,006 CO poisoning patients who received HBOT was 44.93±19.78 years. According to the source of CO, 680 patients (67.6%) visited ER most commonly due to charcoal. The median maximal CO exposure time and time from rescue to ER were 4.0 hours and 3.09 hours, respectively. The median GCS score at the scene or ER was 15. According to the underlying comorbidities, psychiatric diseases (19.5%) were the most common, followed by hypertension (18.1%) and diabetes mellitus (11.5%). In the emergency room, some patients had appeared symptoms such as loss of consciousness (59.8%), shock (6.7%), or seizure (8.3%). The results of this study could be expected that HBOT can be effectively performed by monitoring the gas concentration change inside the hyperbaric chamber.

Keywords

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy; Monoplace chamber; Mechnical safety; Gas monitoring system

Subject

Engineering, Bioengineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.