Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Phimosis in adults: narrative review of the current treatments

Version 1 : Received: 20 December 2023 / Approved: 20 December 2023 / Online: 20 December 2023 (21:51:41 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Rosato, E.; Miano, R.; Germani, S.; Asimakopoulos, A.D. Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments. Clin. Pract. 2024, 14, 361-376. Rosato, E.; Miano, R.; Germani, S.; Asimakopoulos, A.D. Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments. Clin. Pract. 2024, 14, 361-376.

Abstract

Background: Phimosis is the inability to completely retract the foreskin and expose the glans. The treatment of phimosis varies depending on the age of the patient and the severity of the disease; a great number of conservative or surgical treatments are currently available. Aim: To provide the first review summarizing the available options for the treatment of adult phimosis. Methods: A PubMed, Cochrane and Embase search for peer-reviewed studies, published between January 2001 - December 2022 was performed using the search terms “phimosis AND treatment”. Results: A total of 288 publications were initially identified through database searching. Thirty manuscripts were ultimately eligible for inclusion in this review. Conservative treatment is an option and it includes topical steroid application and the new medical silicon tubes (Phimostop™) application for gentle prepuce dilation. Concerning the surgical approach, the gold-standard treatment is represented by circumcision in which tissue synthesis after prepuce removal can be also obtained with barbed sutures, fibrin glues or staples. Laser circumcision seems providing superior outcomes in terms of operative time and postoperative complication rate when compared to the traditional one. Several techniques of preputioplasty and use of in-situ devices (which crush the foreskin and simultaneously create haemostasis) have been also described. These in-situ devices seem feasible, safe and effective in treating phimosis while they also reduce the operative time when compared to the traditional circumcision. Patient satisfaction rates, complications and impact on sexual function of the main surgical treatments are presented. Conclusion: Many conservative and surgical treatments are available for the treatment of the adult phimosis. The choice of the right treatment depends on the grade of phimosis, results, complications, and cost-effectiveness.

Keywords

phimosis; foreskin; circumcision; penis; lichen sclerosus

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Urology and Nephrology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.