1. Introduction
The classical rational Ramanujan-type series for
introduced by Cooper[
6] have the form
In 1905, Glaisher[
7] proved that
Chan, Chan and Liu[
4] proved that
where
denotes the Domb number
.
Let
, for each
, the coefficient of
in the expansion of
is denoted by
, Sun[
11] gave many conjectural series for
containing the
such as
In[
10], Sun derived several identities involving
by the telescoping method. For example, from Bauer’s series[
2]
and the telescoping sum
he deduced
By Gosper’s algorithm[
8], Hou and Li[
9] give a systematic method to construct
-series of the form (
1). For more results on the
-series, we refer to [
3][
5] .
In 1974 Gosper announced the new identity
Motivated by Gosper’s identity, Almkvist, Krattenthaler and Petersson[
1] found some new identities of the type
where
is a polynomial in
k. If
has degree
d, they also get that
where
is a polynomial in
t of degree
. They find a good way to get
is to have
or
after integration of (
2). Then they get
must have the factor
or
. This restricts
m and
n and gives the value of
x.
Using the method of the beta function, Sun[
12] has recently evaluated some series of the type
. For example, he completely determined the values of
for
.
We first consider the convergence of the left of the equality (
2), by Stirling’s formula
If
are integers, then
, we have
So we get that if
the left of the equality (
2) is convergent.
The Gamma function is pointed out by Euler as
The beta function is defined as
The connection between Gamma function and beta function is given by Euler as
Now we present an auxiliary proposition.
Proposition 1.
Let be integers, and , then we have
Proof. Note that for
, we have
Hence we have
By Proposition (1) and beta function we get the following lemma we will use later. □
Lemma 1.
Let be integers, and let x be real numbers with , then we have
Proof. Clearly we have
Let
Then by Proposition 1 we have
, then we get
□
Using the same method of Lemma 1, we get more equalities we will use later.
Lemma 2.
Let be integers, and let x be real numbers with , then we have
Proof. The proof of equality (
4) and (
5) is similar as the Lemma 1. To prove the equality (
6), we have
Then by Proposition 1 we have
, then we get
By equality (
2) and Lemma 1 and 2, we find the denominator of the integration contains the form
, if we integrate directly, as
x is a symbol we just don’t know, in most times we will fail. □
In this paper, we replace x with a suitable rational function , then by Mathematica we can integrate the rational function from 0 to 1 which the denominator contains the form . Since after integration we get equalities with b and the variable t no longer exists. Then we combine these equalities and let b be a suitable number, this gives lights to find new -series. we will show how to get -series containing the type , , , . For example, we get new -series as follows
2. -series containing
In this section, we will give methods to find -series containing the type .
Proof. By Lemma 1 we have
By inequality (
3) we have
. □
Since
. If
we let
, then we
and by Mathematica we have
If
we let
, then
and by Mathematica we have
Using the same method of Theorem 1 and by Lemma 2 we have
By Theorem 1 and 2 we can get propositions of equality.
Proposition 2.
If , Via we have
By equality (
8) and (
11) we let
, we can get series involves
, here are the examples.
3. -series containing
In this section, we will give methods to find -series containing the type .
We first give an auxiliary lemma we will use.
Lemma 3.
Let , if , let , then we can factor as
where or .
Proof. Consider
, since
, it is easy to calculate that
Then
has one real roots and one pair of unequal conjugate complex roots. Suppose we factor
as
then we have
That is to say
and
and
. Since
, we have
, then we get
or
. □
Theorem 3.
Let μ be defined by
If we define as
If or , we have
Proof. By Lemma 1 we have
By equation (
3) we have
. □
Let
, then we have
. If
, we have
or
. If
, we have
We will calculate the integral by Mathematica. Then we get
Let
It’s easy to deduce that
In the domain of
b we have
and
If
, the theorem also holds, so we complete the proof.
Using the same method of Theorem 3 and by Lemma 2 we have
Theorem 4.
Let μ be defined by
If we define as
If or , we have
where .
Remark 1. If , is defined by
By Theorem 3 and 4 we can get propositions of equality.
Proposition 3.
If or , we have:
Via we get
Via we get
By Proposition 3, by equality (
16) and (
17) we let
and
, we can get four
-series, here are the examples.
4. -series containing
In this section, we will give methods to find -series containing the type .
We first give an auxiliary lemma we will use.
Lemma 4.
Let , let , if , then we can factor as
where or .
If , then we can factor as
where and and
Proof. Consider
, since
, we can deduce that
If
, then
has two pairs of unequal conjugate complex roots. Suppose we factor
as
Then we have
That is to say
and
and
and
. If
, we have
or
. □
If
, then
has two unequal real roots and a pair of conjugate complex roots. Suppose we factor
as
Then we have
That is to say
and
and
and
. Since
and
, we have
and
.
Theorem 5.
Let
If or or and , then we have
where
and
Proof. By Lemma 1 we have
By equation (
3) we have
. □
Let
. Since
, we have
or
or
and
. By Mathematica we have
where
and
Since in the domain of
b we have
and
Then we get the desired results.
Using the same method of Theorem 5 and by Lemma 2 we have
Theorem 6.
Let
If or or and , then we have
By Theorem 5 and 6 we can get propositions of equality.
Proposition 4.
Let
If or or and , then we have:
Via we have
where
and
Via we have
where
and
By Proposition 4, in equation (
25) we let
and in (
26) we let
, we can get one
-series, here is the example.
5. -series containing
In this section, we will give methods to find -series containing the type .
We first give an auxiliary lemma we will use.
Lemma 5.
Let , if , let , then we can factor as
where or .
If , let , then we can factor as
where .
Proof. Consider
, since
, we can deduce that
If
, then
has two unequal real roots and a pair of conjugate complex roots. We then get
□
If
, then
has two pair of conjugate complex roots. Suppose we factor
as
Then we have
That is to say
and
and
and
. Since
, we have
or
We first consider the case , then we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
If or , then we have
Proof. By Lemma 1 we have
By inequality (
3) we have
.
Let
, then we have
If
, we have
or
, then by Mathematica we get
Since in the domain of
b we have
and
Then by some simplification we get the desired results. □
Using the same method of Theorem 7 and by Lemma 2 we have
Theorem 8.
If or , then we have
By Theorem 7 and 8 we get some propositions of equality.
Proposition 5. If or , then we have:
Via we get
Via we get
By Proposition 5 and in equation (
31) and (
32) we let
, we can get some
-series, here are the examples.
Now we consider the case .
Theorem 9.
If , then we have
Proof. By Lemma 1 we have
By equation (
3) we have
. □
Let
, then we have
If
, we have
then by Mathematica we have
Then by some simplifications we get the desired results.
Using the same method of Theorem 9 and by Lemma 2 we have
Theorem 10.
If , then we have
By Theorem 10 we can get propositions of equality.
Proposition 6.
If , via we have
If , via we have
By Proposition 6 and in equation (
43) and (
44) we let
, we can get some
-series, here are the examples.
Data Availability Statement
Data openly available in a public repository.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments We would like to thank the referees for their helpful comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- Almkvist, G.; Krattenthaler, C.; Petersson, J. Some new formulas for π, Experiment. Math. 2003, 12, 441–456. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer, G. Von den Coefficienten der Reihen von Kugelfunctionen einer Variablen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 1859, 56, 101–121. [Google Scholar]
- Borwein, J.M.; Chamberland, M. Chamberland, Integer powers of arcsin. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2007, 10, 19381. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, H.H.; Chan, S.H.; Liu, Z. Dombs numbers and Ramanujan-Sato type series for 1/π. Adv. Math. 2004, 186, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coffey, M.W. Integral representations of functions and Addison-type series for mathematical constants. Journal of number theory 157, 79–98. [CrossRef]
- S. Cooper, Ramanujans Theta Functions, Springer, Cham, (2017).
- Glaisher, J.W.L. On series for 1/π and 1/π2. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1905, 37, 173–198. [Google Scholar]
- Gosper, R.W. Decision procedure for indefinite hypergeometric summation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1978, 75, 40–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qing-Hu Hou, Guo-Jie Li, Gosper summability of rational multiples of hypergeometric terms. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2021, 27, 1723–1733. [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z. W. New series for powers of π and related congruences. Electron. Res. Arch. 2020, 28, 1273–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Z. W. Sun, On sums related to central binomial and trinomial coefficients, in Combinato- rial and Additive Number Theory: CANT 2011 and 2012, Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 101, Springer, New York, (2014), 257–312.
- Z. W. Sun, Evaluations of some series of the type . arXiv:2204.08275.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).