Submitted:
11 October 2023
Posted:
12 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Symmetrical reliability method
2.1. Forward reliability theory
2.2. Inverse reliability theory
2.3. Implementation steps
3. Reliability model of safety factor of UHPC pile foundation of bridges
4. Application
4.1. Analysis results of safety factor
4.2. Impact of target reliability indicators
4.3. Influence of parameter uncertainty on safety factor
4. The influence of the initial value of the safety factor iteration
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Li, G. Experimental Study of UHPC-RC Composite Pile Connected by Shear Keys. Structural Engineering International, 2022, 32, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, Y.; Langford, T.; Cho, K.; et al. Applicability of Concrete–Steel Composite Piles for Offshore Wind Foundations. Energies 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, K.; Gong, W.; Xu, J.; et al. Effects of inclined bedrock on dissimilar pile composite foundation under vertical loading. Geomechanics and engineering 2022.
- Heimann Martin, Schmidt Holger, Ngoc Linh Tran, Graubner, Carl-Alexande. Reliability of highly stressed UHPC-columns. Beton-Und Stahlbetonbau 2013, 108, 2–12.
- Kwon, K.; Parkkeunhee, Y.; Tae, C.; et al. k-uhpc reliabilitybased performance assessment and prediction of tendon corrosion in kuhpc bridges. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Tran, N.L.; Grziwa, U.; Graubner-Ing, C.A. Spatial Variability of Material Properties and Its influence on Structural Reliability of UHPC Columns[C]//Concrete - Innovation and Design (fib Symposium). 2015.
- Lu, D.; Yalan, X.; Xudong, S. Fatigue reliability assessment of light-weighted steel-UHPC composite bridge deck. Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology) 2018, 49, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- A M M R, B K M I, A A S C; et al. Probabilistic neural networks that predict compressive strength of high strength concrete in mass placements using thermal history. Computers & Structures, 2022, 259, 106707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, M.G.; Li, J. Risk-based assessment of blast-resistant design of ultra-high performance concrete columns. Structural Safety 2021, 88, 102030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zai Jinmin, Lu Zhou, Huang Guanglong. Reliability analysis of designed method of composite pile foundation according to ultimate bearing capacity of single pile. Rock and Soil Mechanics 2004, 25, 1483–1486. [Google Scholar]
- Li Meijuan, Li Jingpei. Reliability analysis of settlement control for composite pile foundation. Journal of Hefei University of Technology 2004, 27, 698–701. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Lijuan, Han Jiang. The probability analysis method of the bearing capacity of composite pile foundation. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University 2001, 32, 433–435. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong Qidong. Reliability analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of composite pile foundation. Journal of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering 1998, 20, 28–32.
- Li Jingpei, Lou Xiaoming, Jia Fubo. Safety and reliability of composite pile foundation designed by controlling settlement and bearing capacity. Journal of Building Structures 2003, 24, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng Jin, Xiao Rucheng. Main Cable Safety Factors Assessment of Long-span Suspension Bridges Based on Inverse Reliability Method. China Journal of Highway and Transport 2007, 20, 58–61. [Google Scholar]
- JiangWei, Lv Dagang. Stability design of concrete filled steel tubular arches using inverse finite element reliability method. Journal of Building Structures 2013, 34, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
- Lou Canhong, Dong Fenghui. Study of overturning stability safety factor of continuous girder bridges during cantilever construction. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University 2017, 50, 264–268. [Google Scholar]
- Der Kiureghian, A.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.C. Inverse reliability problem. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE 1994, 120, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Foschi, R.O. An inverse reliability method and application. Structural safety 1998, 20, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Structural layer | Thickness/m | Ultimate pile side friction resistance/kPa | Ultimate pile end friction resistance/kPa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil layer1 | 6 | 60 | - |
| Soil layer2 | 6 | 50 | - |
| Soil layer3 | 10 | 80 | - |
| Pile end soil | - | - | 2000 |
| Layer order | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean value | coefficient of variation | Mean value | coefficient of variation | Mean value | coefficient of variation | Mean value | coefficient of variation | |
| 2 | 16.8 | 0.45 | 10.4 | 0.20 | 12 | 0.11 | - | - |
| 3 | 9.1 | 0.33 | 15.3 | 0.15 | 12 | 0.26 | - | - |
| 4 | 7.0 | - | 7.5 | - | 12 | 0.16 | - | - |
| 51 | 11.2 | - | 12.0 | - | 33.6 | 0.18 | 800 | 0.25 |
| 52 | 5.0 | - | 25.0 | - | 40 | 0.23 | 1100 | 0.31 |
| 6 | 30.8 | - | 19.5 | - | 48 | 0.20 | 1200 | 0.29 |
| No. | Random variable | Probability distribution type | Mean | coefficients of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| x(1) | Normal | 1 | 0.15 | |
| x(2) | Normal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| x(3) | Normal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| x(4) | Normal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| x(5) | Normal | 1 | 0.2 | |
| x(6) | Normal | 1 | 0.07 |
| Target reliability index | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety factor | 2.3174 | 2.0745 | 1.8449 | 1.6275 | 1.4212 | 1.2240 | 1.0332 |
| Mean | Safety factor | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x(1) | x(2) | x(3) | x(4) | x(5) | x(6) | |
| -15% | 1.0401 | 1.1894 | 1.1947 | 1.1561 | 1.1698 | 1.4402 |
| 0 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 |
| +15% | 1.4078 | 1.2577 | 1.2526 | 1.2905 | 1.2771 | 1.0640 |
| Coefficients of variation | Safety factor | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x(1) | x(2) | x(3) | x(4) | x(5) | x(6) | |
| 0.07 | 1.6135 | - | - | - | - | 1.2240 |
| 0.1 | 1.5117 | - | - | - | - | 1.1945 |
| 0.15 | 1.2240 | 1.2289 | 1.2274 | 1.2478 | 1.2377 | 1.1342 |
| 0.2 | - | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | 1.2240 | - |
| 0.25 | - | 1.2175 | 1.2195 | 1.1907 | 1.2057 | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).