Submitted:
04 October 2023
Posted:
05 October 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Search Methods
3. ChatGPT for Diagnosis of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular disease
4. ChatGPT as a tool for Secondary Prevention and Management
5. Discussion and Future Directions
6. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2020 Dec 22 [cited 2023 Apr 26];76(25):2982–3021. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33309175/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2018 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Apr 26];137(12):E67–492. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29386200/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, Després JP, Gordon-Larsen P, Lavie CJ, et al. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2021 May 25 [cited 2023 Apr 26];143(21):E984–1010. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882682/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Birger M, Kaldjian AS, Roth GA, Moran AE, Dieleman JL, Bellows BK. Spending on Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the United States: 1996 to 2016. Circulation. 2021, 144, 271–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luengo-Fernandez R, Walli-Attaei M, Gray A, Torbica A, Maggioni AP, Huculeci R, et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the European Union: a population-based cost study. Eur Heart J. 2023, 26. [Google Scholar]
- Ahn, C. Exploring ChatGPT for information of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2023, 185, 109729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarker IH. AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems. SN Comput Sci [Internet]. 2022 Mar [cited 2023 Apr 26];3(2). Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35194580/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Muss Google zittern? Künstliche Intelligenz schreibt wie ein Mensch | Leben & Wissen | BILD.de [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 26]. Available online: https://www.bild.de/digital/2022/digital/muss-google-zittern-kuenstliche-intelligenz-schreibt-wie-ein-mensch-82129948.bild.html (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- The Brilliance and Weirdness of ChatGPT - The New York Times [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 26]. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Apr 26];613(7945):620–1. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36653617/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2005 Apr 21 [cited 2023 Apr 26];352(16):1685–95. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15843671/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Rizwan A, Sadiq T. The Use of AI in Diagnosing Diseases and Providing Management Plans: A Consultation on Cardiovascular Disorders With ChatGPT. Cureus 2023, 7.
- Kusunose K, Kashima S, Sata M. Evaluation of the Accuracy of ChatGPT in Answering Clinical Questions on the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines. Circulation Journal 2023, 87, CJ–23. [Google Scholar]
- de Vries TI, Cooney MT, Selmer RM, Hageman SHJ, Pennells LA, Wood A, et al. SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J. 2021, 42, 2455–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hageman S, Pennells L, Ojeda F, Kaptoge S, Kuulasmaa K, de Vries T, et al. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021, 42, 2439–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teperikidis E, Boulmpou A, Papadopoulos C. Prompting ChatGPT to perform an umbrella review. Acta Cardiol. 2023, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Teperikidis E, Boulmpou A, Potoupni V, Kundu S, Singh B, Papadopoulos C. Does the long-term administration of proton pump inhibitors increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes? A ChatGPT powered umbrella review. Acta Cardiol. 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Yeo YH, Samaan JS, Ng WH, Ting PS, Trivedi H, Vipani A, et al. Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023, 29, 721–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan I, Agarwal R. Can ChatGPT Help in the Awareness of Diabetes? Ann Biomed Eng. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hung YC, Chaker SC, Sigel M, Saad M, Slater ED. Comparison of Patient Education Materials Generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Versus Experts. Ann Plast Surg. 2023, 91, 409–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho YC, Tsai TH, Sung PH, Chen YL, Chung SY, Yang CH, et al. Minimizing door-to-balloon time is not the most critical factor in improving clinical outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Apr 26];42(8):1788–96. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24717469/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Lee, H.; The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anat Sci Educ [Internet]. 2023 Mar 28 [cited 2023 Apr 26]. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36916887/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Brown MT, Bussell J, Dutta S, Davis K, Strong S, Mathew S. Medication Adherence: Truth and Consequences. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Apr 26];351(4):387–99. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27079345/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Tsigkas G, Apostolos A, Aznaouridis K, Despotopoulos S, Chrysohoou C, Naka KK, et al. Real-world implementation of guidelines for heart failure management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology. 2022, 66, 72–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, Hentel KD, Reig B, Shih G, et al. ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models Are Double-edged Swords. Radiology [Internet]. 2023 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Apr 26];307(2). Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36700838/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, Yu T, Su D, Xu Y, et al.
- Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health. 2023, 2, e0000198. [Google Scholar]
- Fijačko N, Gosak L, Štiglic G, Picard CT, John Douma M. Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course? Resuscitation 2023, 185, 109732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinha RK, Deb Roy A, Kumar N, Mondal H. Applicability of ChatGPT in Assisting to Solve Higher Order Problems in Pathology. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 Feb 21 [cited 2023 Apr 26];15(2). Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36968864/ (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care. 2023, 27, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahuli SA, Rai A, Mahuli AV, Kumar A. Application ChatGPT in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br Dent J. 2023, 235, 90–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Sellés M, Marina-Breysse M. Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023, 10, 175. [Google Scholar]
- Bridge J, Fu L, Lin W, Xue Y, Lip GYH, Zheng Y. Artificial intelligence to detect abnormal heart rhythm from scanned electrocardiogram tracings. J Arrhythm. 2022, 38, 425–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brady, AP. Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable? Insights Imaging. 2017, 8, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Diagnostic Tool Potential | Treatment Tool Potential |
|---|---|
| Patient reported symptom analysis | Risk stratification |
| Comprehensive differential diagnosis | Treatment optimization |
| Risk assessment | Medication management |
| Real-time data collection | Symptom management |
| Referral Recommendations | Predictive modeling |
| Education and Patient Empowerment | Rehabilitation Support |
| Support for Telemedicine | Patient Education |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).