Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Classical Gain Scheduling PID and Fuzzy Gain Scheduled Set-Point Weighted PID Controller Performance Comparison in Isothermal CSTR

Version 1 : Received: 3 October 2023 / Approved: 4 October 2023 / Online: 4 October 2023 (04:59:55 CEST)

How to cite: Haroon, H.E.E. Classical Gain Scheduling PID and Fuzzy Gain Scheduled Set-Point Weighted PID Controller Performance Comparison in Isothermal CSTR. Preprints 2023, 2023100206. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0206.v1 Haroon, H.E.E. Classical Gain Scheduling PID and Fuzzy Gain Scheduled Set-Point Weighted PID Controller Performance Comparison in Isothermal CSTR. Preprints 2023, 2023100206. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202310.0206.v1

Abstract

Abstract: — management of the Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) operation has proven to be a difficult undertaking due to the complex and ever-changing nature of its behavior, which is both nonlinear and dynamic, which is further compounded by its instability. Attempts have been made to use Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers for such processes, but the performance is often poor due to the inherent limitations of the controllers. In contrast, heuristic algorithms have been employed to tune the controllers, but these methods can only provide optimal performance for a restricted range of parameter variations. This paper presents a novel approach that involves using a conventional gain scheduling PID controller in combination with a fuzzy gain scheduling (FGS) controller method to calibrate set-point weighted PID controllers for the CSTR process. The paper outlines the design of the controllers and evaluates their performance by subjecting them to varying input signals within the given bandwidth.

Keywords

continuous stirred tank reactor; Proportional-Integral-Derivative; fuzzy gain scheduling

Subject

Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.