Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Effectiveness Of Deep Cervical Fascial Manipulation® And Yoga Postures On Pain And Function In Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Pragmatic, Parallel-Group, Randomised, Controlled Trial

Version 1 : Received: 13 September 2023 / Approved: 14 September 2023 / Online: 15 September 2023 (05:30:06 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Raja G, P.; Bhat, S.; Gangavelli, R.; Prabhu, A.; Stecco, A.; Pirri, C.; Jaganathan, V.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C. Effectiveness of Deep Cervical Fascial Manipulation® and Sequential Yoga Poses on Pain and Function in Individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Life 2023, 13, 2173. Raja G, P.; Bhat, S.; Gangavelli, R.; Prabhu, A.; Stecco, A.; Pirri, C.; Jaganathan, V.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C. Effectiveness of Deep Cervical Fascial Manipulation® and Sequential Yoga Poses on Pain and Function in Individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Life 2023, 13, 2173.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of fascial manipulation (FM) of the deep cervical fascia (DCF) and sequential yoga poses (SYP) on pain and function in individuals with mechanical neck pain (MNP). Method: Following the predefined criteria, ninety-nine individuals with MNP were recruited, randomised and assigned to either the intervention group (IG) (n=51) or the control group (CG) (n=48). Individuals in the IG received FM (4 sessions in 4 weeks) along with the home-based SYP (4 weeks). The CG participants received the usual care (cervical mobilization and thoracic manipulation (4 sessions in 4 weeks) along with unsupervised therapeutic exercises (4 weeks). The participants underwent baseline and weekly follow-up measurements of pain using a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and elbow extension range of motion (EEROM) during upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1). The baseline and the 4th session follow-up measurements of the Patient-specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and Fear-avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ) were also taken. Results: A repeated-measures ANOVA was performed. The mean differences between the IG and CG on NPRS 3rd and 4th sessions are -1.009 (p< 0.05) and -1.701 (p< 0.001), respectively; on EEROM in the 4th session is 20.120 (p< 0.001); on FABQ during the follow-up is -5.036 (p<0.001), showing a statistically significant difference, whereas on PSFS during follow-up is 0.263 (p=0.566), suggesting no significant differences in PSFS. Conclusion: FM and SYP can aid in reducing pain and fear avoidance behavior as well as improving the function and extensibility of the upper quarter region.

Keywords

cervical pain; musculoskeletal manipulation; stretching; soft tissue mobilisation

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.