Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Determination of Optimal Spatial Sample Sizes for Fitting Negative Binomial-Based Crash Prediction Models with Consideration of Statistical Modeling Assumptions

Version 1 : Received: 17 August 2023 / Approved: 21 August 2023 / Online: 21 August 2023 (12:01:58 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Koloushani, M.; Abazari, S.R.; Vanli, O.A.; Ozguven, E.E.; Moses, R.; Giroux, R.; Jacobs, B. Determination of Optimal Spatial Sample Sizes for Fitting Negative Binomial-Based Crash Prediction Models with Consideration of Statistical Modeling Assumptions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14731. Koloushani, M.; Abazari, S.R.; Vanli, O.A.; Ozguven, E.E.; Moses, R.; Giroux, R.; Jacobs, B. Determination of Optimal Spatial Sample Sizes for Fitting Negative Binomial-Based Crash Prediction Models with Consideration of Statistical Modeling Assumptions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14731.

Abstract

Transportation authorities aim to boost road safety by identifying risky locations and applying suitable safety measures. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) is a vital resource for US transportation professionals, aiding in the creation of Safety Performance Functions (SPFs), which are predictive models for crashes. These models rely on Negative Binomial distribution-based regression and misinterpreting them due to unmet statistical assumptions can lead to erroneous conclusions, including inaccurately assessing crash rates or missing high-risk sites. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has introduced context classifications to HSM SPFs, complicating assumption violation identification. This study, part of an FDOT-sponsored project, investigates established statistical diagnostic tests to identify model violations and proposes a novel approach to determine optimal spatial regions for Empirical Bayes adjustment. This adjustment aligns HSM-SPFs with regression assumptions. The study employs a case study involving Florida roads. Results indicate that a 20-mile radius offers an optimal spatial sample size for modeling crashes of all injury levels, ensuring accurate assumptions. For severe injury crashes, which are less frequent and harder to predict, a 60-mile radius is suggested to fulfill statistical modeling assumptions. This methodology guides FDOT practitioners in assessing the conformity of HSM-SPFs with intended assumptions and determining appropriate region sizes.

Keywords

Crash Prediction Model; Safety Performance Function; Highway Safety Manual; Negative Binomial Regression; Model Diagnostic; Context Classification System

Subject

Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.