Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Consistency between Definition and Reasons for Applying Corporate Social Responsibility. The Perspective of Social Responsibility Managers

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2023 / Approved: 14 August 2023 / Online: 14 August 2023 (15:16:24 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Licandro, O.; Sánchez, L.C.O.; Huapaya-Huertas, O. Consistency between Definition and Reasons for Applying Corporate Social Responsibility: The Perspective of Social Responsibility Managers. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14838. Licandro, O.; Sánchez, L.C.O.; Huapaya-Huertas, O. Consistency between Definition and Reasons for Applying Corporate Social Responsibility: The Perspective of Social Responsibility Managers. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14838.

Abstract

Knowledge of the motivations of managers to practice Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a critical issue for those who promote its adoption. The understanding of these reasons is complicated by the fact that there are different ways of defining this responsibility, raising the question of whether there is any relationship between reasons for adopting it and how to define it. To address this issue, a classification of these reasons was constructed and related to a classification of the different ways of defining CSR. A self-administered questionnaire was applied to a non-probability sample of Social Responsibility managers, which included indicators for both classifications. It was found that these managers present all types of motives, with proactive outweighing reactive motives and that there is a significant degree of correlation between the ways of defining CSR and the reasons for doing so. This suggests that managers present coherence in their objectives (motives) and means (practices of Social Responsibility.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility; motives; definition; social responsibility managers; Uruguay

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Business and Management

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.