Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Analysis of European Medicines Agency’s COVID-19 Vaccine Information Materials in EU and Regional Context

Version 1 : Received: 11 August 2023 / Approved: 11 August 2023 / Online: 14 August 2023 (02:56:05 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Castro, I.; Van Tricht, M.; Bonaccorso, N.; Sciortino, M.; Garcia Burgos, J.; Costantino, C.; Gonzalez-Quevedo, R. Stakeholders’ Understanding of European Medicine Agency’s COVID-19 Vaccine Information Materials in EU and Regional Contexts. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1616. Castro, I.; Van Tricht, M.; Bonaccorso, N.; Sciortino, M.; Garcia Burgos, J.; Costantino, C.; Gonzalez-Quevedo, R. Stakeholders’ Understanding of European Medicine Agency’s COVID-19 Vaccine Information Materials in EU and Regional Contexts. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1616.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic made it harder to communicate accurate information about vaccines because of the spread of misinformation. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) tried to reas-sure the public by communicating about the development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines. They surveyed patients/consumers, healthcare professional organizations, and individual stake-holders to see if their core information materials were informative and well understood. They also asked about the public's preferred communication channels. The surveys showed that indi-vidual patients/consumers generally prefer to get information about COVID-19 vaccines from the internet or mass media. Organizations and individual healthcare professionals prefer to get in-formation from national and international health authorities' sources. This supports EMA's ap-proach of using media, stakeholder engagement, and web-based formats to communicate about COVID-19 vaccines. Both at the EU and local levels, participants had a good understanding of the key messages from regulators and found the materials useful and relevant. However, some im-provements were recommended to the visuals, texts, and dissemination formats. These recom-mendations were generally consistent in both contexts. User-testing of proactive communication materials aimed at prebunking misinformation during a public health crisis helps to ensure that users understand the development and safety safeguards of novel vaccine technologies. This in-formation can then be used as a basis for evidence-based communication activities by regulators and public health bodies in an emergency context.

Keywords

Vaccination; COVID-19; EMA; Misinformation; Hesitancy

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Health Policy and Services

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.