Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Modes of Vibration in Basketball Rims and Backboards and the Energy Rebound Testing Device

Version 1 : Received: 7 August 2023 / Approved: 8 August 2023 / Online: 8 August 2023 (11:52:49 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Winarski, D.; Nygren, K.P.; Winarski, T. Modes of Vibration in Basketball Rims and Backboards and the Energy Rebound Testing Device. Vibration 2023, 6, 726-742. Winarski, D.; Nygren, K.P.; Winarski, T. Modes of Vibration in Basketball Rims and Backboards and the Energy Rebound Testing Device. Vibration 2023, 6, 726-742.

Abstract

Six mode shapes, including bending and torsion, were documented for five different basketball rims and backboards at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, USA. The frequency and damping ratio of each mode shape were also determined. The empirical process began with the time-domain excitation and response of each rim-backboard system. The impulse of excitation came from an impact hammer separately applied to sequentially, to each node. The sinusoidal response was gathered from an accelerometer at a fixed location, node 1. Each time-domain excitation-response was then converted to a frequency domain Bode plot for each node by a B&K 2034 Signal Analyzer, giving transfer functions of output/input versus frequency. Structural Measurements System (SMS) Software was used to fit mode shapes to the Bode plots. Each of the six mode shapes were fitted to the Bode plots of each node at a specific modal frequency. Each of the six mode shapes were a function of the locations of the nodes, and the Bode plot gathered at each node. The first and second modes were critical for showing that the Energy Rebound Testing Device statistically correlated with the energy transferred to the rim and backboard. A known perturbation mass was selectively attached to the rim, to help isolate the dynamic masses and spring rates for the rim and backboard, to ascertain the kinetic energy transferred to the rim had a 95.67% inverse correlation with rim stiffness.

Keywords

Basketball Rim and Backboard; Modal Analysis; Frequency; Damping

Subject

Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.