Submitted:
20 July 2023
Posted:
24 July 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Bioactive Guided Fractionation and Their TLC Analysis
2.2. Phytochemical Assessment
2.3. Antioxidant Assays
2.4. Enzyme Inhibition Assay
2.5. Effect of Potent Bioactive Fractions on Body Weight
2.6. Effect of Potent Bioactive Fractions Waist-Hip Ratio
2.7. Effect of Potent Bioactive Fractions on Biochemical Parameters
2.8. Histopathological Analysis
2.9. HPTLC and HPTLC-ESI MS/MSn (Retro Diels-Alder Fragmentation)
2.10. Insilco Molecular Docking Analysis
2.10.1. Interaction Analysis of the Ligands in the Active Site of Protein 1LPB
2.10.2. Interaction Analysis of the Ligands in the Active Site of Protein 4W93
2.10.3. Interaction Analysis of the Ligands in the Active Site of Protein 7K9N
2.10.4. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Analysis
3. Experimental
3.1. Collection of Plant materials
3.2. Preparation of the Extract
3.3. Preparation of the Bioactive Guided Fractions
3.4. TLC Analysis
3.5. In-Vitro Phytochemical Assessment
3.5.1. Total Phenolic Content
3.5.2. Total Flavonoid Content
3.5.3. Total Steroidal Content
3.6. Invitro Antioxidant Assay
3.6.1. Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity Assay (ABTS)
3.6.2. Nitric Oxide Radical Scavenging Assay
3.6.3. Hydrogen Peroxide Assay
3.6.4. DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) Scavenging Assay
3.7. Invitro Enzyme Inhibitory Assay
3.7.1. Pancreatic Lipase Assay
3.7.2. Alpha Amylase Assay
3.7.3. Alpha Glucosidase Assay
3.8. Invivo Assay
3.8.1. Animals
3.8.2. Obesity Model Induced by Diet and Chemicals
3.8.3. Experimental Design
3.8.4. Biochemical Parameters Estimation:
3.8.5. Measurement of Body Weight and Waist Hip Ratio
3.8.6. Histopathological Examination
3.9. HPTLC and HPTLC-ESI MS/MSn (Retro Diels-Alder Fragmentation)
3.10. Insilco Molecular Docking
3.10.1. Ligand Preparation
3.10.2. Protein Preparation
3.10.3. Receptor Grid Generation
3.10.4. Docking Studies
3.10.5. Molecular Dynamics
3.10.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study
3.10.11. Calculation of IC50 Value and Statistical Analysis
4. Conclusion
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Anjoo, K.; Kumar, S.A. Microscopical and Preliminary Phytochemical Studies on Aerial Part (Leaves and Stem) of Bryophyllum Pinnotum Kurz. Pharmacogn J. 2010, 2, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roh, C.; Jung, U. Screening of Crude Plant Extracts with Anti-Obesity Activity. Int J Mol Sci 2012, 1710–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamboa-gómez, C.I.; Rocha-guzmán, N.E.; Gallegos-infante, J.A.; Jimenez, M.R.M.; Vázquez-Cabral, B.D.; González-Laredo, R.F. Plants with potential use on obesity and its complications. Excil. J. 2015, 809–831. [Google Scholar]
- Pandhare, R.B.; Shende, R.R.; Avhad, M.S.; Deshmukh, V.K.; Mohite, P.B.; Sangameswaram B and Daude, R.B. Anti-urolithiatic activity of Bryophyllum pinnatum Lam . hydroalcoholic extract in sodium oxalate-induced urolithiasis in rats. J Tradit Chinese Med Sci. 2021, 11, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamboj, A.; Saluja, A.K. HPTLC Finger Print Profile of Extracts from Dried Aerial Parts of Bryophyllum Pinnatum in Different Solvents. Pharmacogn J. 2010, 2, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solo, M.; Hui, T.; Saari, N.; Razid, S. Food Bioscience A review: Resistant starch, a promising prebiotic for obesity and weight management. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 101965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salami, E.O.; Ozolua, R.I.; Okpo, S.O.; Eze, G.I.; Uwaya, D.O. Studies on the anti-asthmatic and antitussive properties of aqueous leaf extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum in rodent species. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013, 6, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaviraj, M.; Pradeep, M.A.; Satheesh, D. In-vitro investigation on antiurolithiatic activity and phytochemical examination of Aerva lanata and Bryophyllum pinnatum : A comparative study. J Indian Chem Soc. 2022, 99, 100487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yemitan, O.K.; Salahdeen, H.M. Neurosedative and muscle relaxant activities of aqueous extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum. Fitoterapia 2005, 76, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, J.M.; Cunha, L.M.; Azevedo, E.P.; Fernandes-pedrosa, M.F.; Zucolotto, S.M. Kalanchoe laciniata and Bryophyllum pinnatum : An updated review about ethnopharmacology phytochemistry. pharmacology and toxicology 2019, 29, 529–558. [Google Scholar]
- Toniolo, C.; Nicoletti, M.; Maggi F, & Venditti, A. HPTLC determination of chemical composition variability in raw materials used in botanicals. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamboj, A.; Saluja, A.K. Development of validated HPTLC method for quantification of stigmasterol from leaf and stem of Bryophyllum pinnatum. Arab J Chem. 2017, 10, S2644–S2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gori, A.; Boucherle, B.; Rey, A.; Rome, M.; Fuzzati, N.; Peuchmaur, M. Development of an innovative maceration technique to optimize extraction and phase partition of natural products. Fitoterapia. 2021, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zannou, O.; Pashazadeh, H.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Koca, I.; Galanakis, C.M. Green and highly extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity from kinkeliba (Combretum micranthum G. Don) by natural deep eutectic solvents (NADESs) using maceration, ultrasound-assisted extraction and homogenate-assisted extraction. Arab J Chem. 2022, 15, 103752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertzog, J.; Garnier, C.; Mase, C.; Maariette, S.; Serve, O.; Roux, M.H.; Afonso, C.; Giusti, P.; Mangote, C.B. Fractionation by flash chromatography and molecular characterization of bio-oil by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2022, 166, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernando, G.S.N.; Sergeeva, N.N.; Frutos, M.J.; Marshall, L.J.; Boesch, C. Novel approach for purification of major betalains using flash chromatography and comparison of radical scavenging and antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shraim, A.M.; Ahmed, T.A.; Rahman, M.; Hijji, Y.M. Determination of total flavonoid content by aluminum chloride assay : A critical evaluation. LWT. 2021, 150, 111932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaradat, N.; Hussen, F.; Ali, A. Preliminary phytochemical screening, quantitative estimation of total flavonoids, total phenols and antioxidant activity of Ephedra alata decne. J. of Materials and Environ. Sci 2015, 6, 1771–1778. [Google Scholar]
- Chaves, N.; Santiago, A.; Alías, J.C. Quantification of the antioxidant activity of plant extracts: Analysis of sensitivity and hierarchization based on the method used. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hazra, B.; Biswas, S.; Mandal, N. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Spondias pinnata. BMC Compl. & Alt. Med 2008, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özyürek, M.; Bektaşoğlu, B.; Güçlü, K.; Reşat, A. Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay of phenolics and flavonoids with a modified cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) method using catalase for hydrogen peroxide degradation. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008, 616, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sridhar, S.N.C.; Palawat, S.; Paul, A.T. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of indole glyoxylamides as a new class of potential pancreatic lipase inhibitors. Bioorganic chemistry 2019, 85, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahman, R.N.Z.; Mohd, S.M.A.; Thean, C.L.; Norsyuhada, A. Anti-obesity Potential of Selected Tropical Plants via Pancreatic Lipase Inhibition. Advances in Obesity, Weight Management & Control 2017, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Chaturvedi, S.; Gupta, P. Functional components in extracts of Beta vulgaris (Chukandar) parts for antioxidant effect and antiobesity potential with lipase inhibition. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 100983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J.; Do, H.; Yoen, O.; Shin, M. Antiobesity effects of quercetin-rich onion peel extract on the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and the adipogenesis in high fat-fed rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013, 58, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birari, R.; Javia, V.; Bhutani, K.K. Antiobesity and lipid lowering effects of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng leaves extracts and mahanimbine on high fat diet induced obese rats. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.; Huang, T.; Chen, W.; Aljuffali, I.A. Rhubarb hydroxyanthraquinones act as antiobesity agents to inhibit adipogenesis and enhance lipolysis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, S.; Pattnaik, A. Scientific evaluation of anti-obesity potential of methanolic leaves extract of ocimum sanctum (Linn.) in monosodium glutamate-high fat diet induced obese mice. Indian Jou. of Pharm. Edu. and Res. 2021, 55, S535–S543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibragic, S.; Barbini, S.; Timotheus, J.; Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T.; Stefan, B. Antioxidant properties and qualitative analysis of phenolic constituents in Ephedra spp. by HPTLC together with injection port derivatization GC–MS. Journal of Chromatography B 2021, 1180, 122877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.P.; Pattnaik, A.K. Anti-obesity potential of bioactive guided fractions of Annona squamosa linn. leaves extract: A combination of in-vitro, in-vivo and in-silico studies along with profiling of lead compounds by HPTLC MS-MSn method. 3 Biotech 2023, 13, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrödinger Release 2022-1: Desmond Molecular Dynamics System, D. E. Shaw Research, New York, NY, 2021. Maestro-Desmond Interoperability Tools, Schrödinger, New York.
- Hospital, A.; Goñi, J.R.; Orozco, M.; Gelpí, J.L. Molecular dynamics simulations: Advances and applications. Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry 2015, 8, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mark, P.; Nilsson, L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2001, 105, 9954–9960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Samples | ABTS Assay |
DPPH Assay |
Hydrogen peroxide Assay | Nitric oxide Assay |
| Fraction1 | 1.41±0.25 | 1.17±0.08 | 1.61±0.25 | 1.47±0.21 |
| Fraction 2 | 1.11±0.26 | 1.84±0.05 | 1.37±0.23 | 1.38±0.03 |
| Fraction 3 | 3.19±0.22 | 2.8±0.15 | 3.99±0.22 | 3.08±0.28 |
| Fraction 4 | 2.21±0.31 | 3.57±0.13 | 4.92±0.21 | 2.58±0.25 |
| Ascorbic acid | 1.05±0.12 | 0.97±0.21 | 1.59±0.25 | 0.76±0.29 |
| Samples | Pancreatic Lipase assay |
Alpha amylase assay |
Alpha glucosidase assay |
| Fraction 1 | 2.20±0.23 | 1.24±0.03 | 1.12±0.25 |
| Fraction 2 | 1.23±0.08 | 1.87±0.02 | 1.17±0.37 |
| Fraction 3 | 4.07±0.28 | 4.25±0.12 | 4.21±0.13 |
| Fraction 4 | 3.99±0.26 | 3.89±0.21 | 4.01±0.28 |
| Orlistat | 2.12±0.17 | ---------- | -------- |
| Acarbose | ------- | 0.68±0.17 | 0.92±0.17 |
| Days | Normal group (Weight in grams) |
Obese group (Weight in grams) |
Standard (orlistat) (Weight in grams) |
(Fraction 1) 80 mg/kg/bw (Weight in grams) |
(Fraction 2) 80 mg/kg/bw (Weight in grams) |
| 1st | 25.21±0.26 | 55.65±0.18*** | 54.15±0.2 | 55.12±0.03 | 54.12±0.21 |
| 7th | 26.23±0.26 | 57.12±0.16*** | 48.32±0.3 a | 49.14±0.02 | 48.21±0.12 |
| 14th | 25.38±0.57 | 56.23±0.18*** | 46.54±0.06 b | 45.21±0.03 | 42.07±0.19 |
| 21st | 26.93±0.26 | 55.74±0.16*** | 39.00±0.23 c | 420.03±0.08 | 35.09±0.12 |
| 28th | 28.21±0.18 | 55.00±0.23*** | 31.21±0.32c | 38.02±0.06 | 31.17±0.22 |
| Days | Normal group | Obese group | Standard | (Fraction 1) 80 mg/kg/bw |
(Fraction 2) 80 mg/kg/bw |
| 1st | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 1.4 ±0.05** | 1.4 ±0.011 | 1.4 ±0.023 | 1.4 ±0.012 |
| 7th | 0.5.±0.05 | 1.3 ±0.020** | 1.3 ±0.010 | 1.3 ±0.003 | 1.2 ±0.009 |
| 14th | 0.4.±0.04 | 1.4 ±0.03** | 1.2 ±0.003 a | 1.1 ±0.016 | 1.2 ±0.012 a |
| 21st | 0.5.±0.08 | 1.3 ±0.01** | 0.9 ±0.080 a | 1.0 ±0.020 a | 0.9 ±0.003 b |
| 28th | 0.4 ±0.07 | 1.4 ±0.05** | 0.7 ±0.030 b | 0.8 ±0.240 b | 0.8 ±0.011 c |
| Parameters measured | Normal group | Obese group | Standard | (Fraction 1) 80 mg/kg/bw |
(Fraction 2) 80 mg/kg/bw |
| Serum cholesterol (mg/dl) |
87±0.06 | 208±0.16 *** | 115±0.10c | 131±0.06 b | 113±0.01 c |
| Serum triglyceride (m mol/L) |
47±0.03 | 121±0.21*** | 95±0.14 b | 107±0.03 | 95±0.02 b |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 68±0.02 | 48±0.14*** | 51±0.11 c | 61±0.01 c | 59±0.03 c |
| VLDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 8.1±0.06 | 28±0.13** | 16.21±0.08a | 21.01±0.09 | 20.2±0.07 a |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 14±0.03 | 65±0.21*** | 35.08±0.06 b | 51.27±0.06 | 39.27±0.01 b |
| Cholesterol/HDL ratio (mg/dl) |
1.27±0.01 | 4.33±0.02* | 2.25±0.1 a | 2.14±0.03 a | 1.91 ±0.03 |
| LDL/HDL ratio (mg/dl) |
0.20±0.01 | 1.35±0.1 *** | 0.68±0.02 b | 0.83±0.01 a | 0.66±0.01 b |
| Compounds | Molecular mass | Found ion (m/z+) | Found ion (m/z-) | Found ion [m/z- H2O] | RF value |
| β-sitosterol | 414 | MS1-397;MS2-265:243:203;MS3-187:147:135 and MS4-144:130:109 | 0.71 | ||
| Stigmasterol | 412 | MS1-395; MS2-297:267:255;MS3-241:201:187:149;MS4-173 and MS5-158 |
0.58 | ||
| Thiamine | 265 | MS1-266 MS2 -156:144:121:1090. |
0.39 | ||
| Quercetin | 302 | MS1-301; MS2-179:151 and MS3-150 | 0.24 |
| Pancreatic lipase (PDB ID- 1LPB) | Alpha amylase (PDB ID- 4W93) | Alpha glucosidase (PDB ID- 7K9N) | ||||
| Compounds | Glide score (Kcal/mol) | Glide Energy | Glide score (Kcal/mol) | Glide Energy | Glide score (Kcal/mol) | Glide Energy |
| Quercetin | -4.96 | -29.26 | -8.15 | -40.55 | -3.83 | -25.13 |
| Stigmasterol | -4.86 | -20.95 | -4.29 | -29.83 | -5.42 | -15.30 |
| Sitosterol | -3.80 | -19.62 | -4.05 | -27.64 | -5.78 | -22.08 |
| Thiamine | -3.80 | -27.99 | -4.76 | 53 | -7.17 | -31.53 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).