Preprint
Article

Differences Between Hepatic and Cerebral Regional Tissue Oxygen Saturation at the Onset of Intradialytic Hypotension

Altmetrics

Downloads

136

Views

26

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

21 June 2023

Posted:

21 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a critical pathological condition associated with all−cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, few studies have investigated IDH-related changes in hepatic and cerebral regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2). This study investigated IDH-induced changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2. Methods: Hepatic and cerebral rSO2 during HD were measured using an INVOS 5100C oxygen saturation monitor, and their percentage (%) changes during IDH development were analyzed. Ninety-one patients undergoing HD were investigated, including 20 with IDH development. Results: In patients with IDH, % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 decreased at IDH onset. Additionally, the % change in hepatic rSO2 was significantly larger than those in cerebral rSO2 (P < 0.001). In patients without IDH, no significant differences were found between the % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 at time of the lowest systolic blood pressure during HD. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that the difference between the % change in cerebral and hepatic rSO2 was significantly associated with IDH development (P < 0.001) and ultrafiltration rate (P = 0.010). Conclusion: Hepatic and cerebral rSO2 significantly decreased in IDH development and hepatic rSO2 was more largely decreased than cerebral rSO2 at IDH onset.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Urology and Nephrology

Introduction

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is defined as symptomatic hypotension during hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular disease, vascular access thrombosis, and all−cause mortality in patients undergoing HD [1,2]. In previous literature, IDH-induced organ damage has been explained by impaired organ perfusion [1,2]. However, unexpectedly, only a few studies have empirically ,examined IDH and organ perfusion. The major reason for the insufficient evidence regarding IDH and organ perfusion is the difficulty in measuring organ blood flow during HD. Organ blood flow measurement using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) is challenging to apply because continuous and dynamic changes are difficult to detect in the patient’s condition during HD in real-time [3,4,5]. Additionally, catheter-based organ blood flow measurements are difficult because of their high invasiveness [5]. Therefore, the relationship between IDH and organ blood flow is still hypothetical and a significant challenge for researchers.
The clinical importance of measuring the regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) using near-infrared spectroscopy has recently gained great attention [6,7,8,9,10]. Measurement of the rSO2 is a real-time and non-invasive method for evaluating organ tissue oxygenation in various clinical settings [6,7,8,9,10]. The rSO2 is not a parameter directory that indicates organ blood flow but assesses the organ tissue oxygenation, which is calculated using the ratio of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin in the targeted tissue. However, the rSO2 reflects the organ blood flow because it is significantly associated with the organ blood flow measured using MRI and PET [3,4]. Therefore, the relatively straightforward measurement of rSO2 enables us to assess organ blood flow in the patient’s condition during HD. We have previously focused on the hepatic and cerebral rSO2 in patients undergoing HD and reported the clinical importance of their changes in different clinical situations related to HD treatment [6,7,8,9]. Interestingly, hepatic and cerebral rSO2 appear not to change synchronously but asynchronously under various HD conditions (blood transfusion during HD, treatment of congestive heart failure with HD, and feeding during HD) [11,12,13]. Currently, only a few studies have focused on IDH-induced changes in organ rSO2 [7,10]. Moreover, no clinical research has concurrently detected IDH-induced changes in rSO2 in multiple organs. Therefore, we aimed to investigate IDH-induced changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 and explore the importance of the difference in the two rSO2 changes.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Review Board of the Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University (RIN15-104 and RINS19-HEN007) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Tokyo in 2004).

Study design and participants

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the dialysis center of the Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University. Hepatic and cerebral rSO2 during HD were measured (once per patient) in the patients undergoing HD. Detailed information about the study’s protocol was provided to patients undergoing HD, and those who agreed to participate in this study and signed the written consent form were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients who agreed to participate in this study, and (ii) patients aged ˃ 20 years undergoing HD (ii). The following were the exclusion criteria: (i) ˂ 1 month after starting HD, (ii) patients with congestive heart failure and severe neurological disorders, (iii) patients who developed the lowest SBP within 1 h after HD initiation, and (iv) patients who received intradialytic feeding. Recruitment of the study’s participants was conducted between August 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019.

Collection of clinical information

Clinical information excluding rSO2 was obtained from medical records. These include age, sex, anthropometric data (body mass index), comorbidities (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases), HD vintage, medication (antihypertensive drug and vasopressor), laboratory data (hemoglobin (Hb), sodium, and albumin), transcutaneous oxygen saturation, UFR, and blood pressure. In this institute, blood pressure was measured every 30 minutes during HD, and additional measurement was conducted when intradialytic symptoms developed. The HD vintage (year) is the length of time a patient has been on HD treatment since its introduction in the past. HD time (hour) is the amount of time a patient is treated in one treatment session. In this study, some value changes were analyzed as the % change. The % changes were calculated as [(value at the point in time of minimum SBP - value at baseline)/value at baseline × 100].

Measurement of rSO2

Hepatic and cerebral rSO2 data during HD were measured by the INVOS 5100C oxygen saturation monitor (Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan), whose detailed measurement mechanisms have been previously described [14]. Briefly, this measurement device is composed of a light-emitting diode that transmits two wavelengths (735 and 810 nm) of near-infrared light and two light detectors to measure oxygenated and deoxygenated Hb. rSO2 is calculated based on the ratio of the signal strengths of the oxygenated Hb and the total Hb (oxygenated Hb + deoxygenated Hb) [15,16]. The light detector obtains two signals at two different depths: 30 and 40 mm depth as superficial and deep tissues, respectively. By analyzing these differences in the signals, rSO2 of 20–30 mm from the body surface can be measured [17,18]. This measurement is conducted once every 5 seconds and recorded automatically. For the measurement of hepatic rSO2, the sensor device was attached to the right intercostal area above the liver after the correct position was confirmed through ultrasonography. In contrast, the sensor device was attached to the patient’s forehead to measure cerebral rSO2.

Definition of IDH

In accordance with previous guidelines, IDH was defined as (i) intradialytic sudden decrease in SBP (> 20 mmHg) with IDH-related symptoms such as muscle cramps and loss of consciousness [19] or (ii) intradialytic sudden decrease in SBP (> 30 mmHg) or MBP (> 10 mmHg) with IDH-related symptoms [20].

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, or median and interquartile range. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed using the Student’s t-test. Correlations between the difference in the % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 and clinical parameters in patients undergoing HD were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation or Spearman’s rank correlation for data with normal and skewed distribution, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to extract independent factors of the difference in the two rSO2 changes. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients’ Characteristics

Overall, 91 patients undergoing HD met this study’s criteria. Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the patients. The patients’ age was 70.0 (63.0 – 76.0) years, 69 (76%) were male, and their mean body mass index was 22.4 (19.9 – 25.0) kg/m2. Twenty (22%) patients developed IDH in this study, and all those who developed IDH complained of muscle cramps as IDH-related symptoms. The values of hepatic and cerebral rSO2 at baseline were 55.8 ± 15.3% and 50.2 ± 10.1%, respectively. In contrast, the hepatic and cerebral rSO2 values at the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) were 53.8 ± 14.9% and 49.3 ± 9.7%, respectively. The percentage (%) changes were calculated as [(value at the lowest SBP - value before HD)/value before HD × 100]. % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 were -2.8 ± 11.3% and - 1.5 ± 6.4%, respectively. Furthermore, % changes in SBP and mean blood pressure (MBP) were -13.4 (-21.3 – -7.6) % and -9.0 (-20.4 – -5.0) %, respectively.

IDH-related changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2

Table 2 and Figure 1 show the IDH-related changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 in patients who developed IDH (n = 20). The % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 significantly decreased to -13.8 ± 9.3% (P < 0.001) and -4.8 ± 6.7% (P = 0.004), respectively. Additionally, the % change in hepatic rSO2 was significantly larger than that in cerebral rSO2 (P < 0.001). The difference in the % change in cerebral rSO2 and that in hepatic rSO2 was 9.0 ± 9.9%. Clinical factors between the IDH group (n = 20) and the non-IDH group (n = 71) are described in Supplementary Table S1 online. In the IDH group, % changes in hepatic (p < 0.001) and cerebral rSO2 (p = 0.010) were significantly larger than that in the non-IDH group, and the difference in the two rSO2 changes was significantly higher in the IDH group than in the non-IDH group (P < 0.001) (see Supplementary Figure S1 online). In patients without IDH, no significant differences were found in the % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2, respectively (% changes in hepatic rSO2: 0.3 ± 9.8%, % changes in cerebral rSO2: -0.6 ± 6.1%, p = 0.426). Furthermore, the difference between the % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 at the lowest SBP during HD was not significant in this study (-0.9 ± 9.8%, p = 0.426).

Factors associated with the difference in the two rSO2 changes

The clinical factors associated with the difference between the % change in cerebral and hepatic rSO2 were investigated with univariate and multivariate analyses (Table 3). Univariate analysis showed that ultrafiltration rate (UFR) (P = 0.004) and IDH development (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the difference between the two rSO2 changes. In contrast, multivariable linear regression analysis using these factors as explanatory variables showed that the difference in the two rSO2 changes was significantly associated with UFR (P = 0.010) and the development of IDH (P < 0.001, Figure 2).

Discussion

In this study, we explored the IDH-induced changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2. Summarily, our findings showed that both hepatic and cerebral rSO2 significantly decreased in IDH development and that hepatic rSO2 was more largely decreased than cerebral rSO2 at the time of IDH onset. Additionally, the difference in the two rSO2 changes calculated using “% change in cerebral rSO2 - % change in hepatic rSO2” was significantly associated with UFR and the development of IDH. These results are considered to be important because only a few previous studies have examined IDH-related changes in rSO2.
As mentioned in the introduction section, rSO2 reflects the organ blood flow [3,4]. In this regard, hepatic and cerebral rSO2 indicate hepato-splanchnic and cerebral circulations, respectively [3,4,21]. Our study result suggested that hepato-splanchnic and cerebral circulation decreased with IDH onset; this result was expected [1,2]. However, it was unexpected that hepato-splanchnic circulation decreases more largely than cerebral circulation with IDH onset. Why there is the difference between the changes in hepato−splanchnic circulation and cerebral circulation with the onset of IDH? The difference may be explained by the fact that each organs have different mechanisms for maintaining organ blood flow.
The patient’s body is constantly exposed to hypovolemic stress due to ultrafiltration during HD [1,2]. Therefore, the body performs various compensatory functions to maintain the central circulation under this condition, including the activated sympathetic nervous system, arterial constriction, plasma refilling, and blood volume transfers from organs to the central circulation (described later) [1,2]. These compensatory mechanisms allow the patient’s body to maintain the central circulation (cardiac output) and prevent impaired organ perfusion [1,2]. In these mechanisms, hepato-splanchnic circulation particularly plays an important role [1,2]. The hepato-splanchnic circulation is known to be the reservoir that supplies blood volume to the central circulation under hypovolemic stress; this mechanism is known as the “De Jager–Krogh effect.” Hepato-splanchnic circulation has a very large capillary bed. In the absence of arterial constriction (not under hypovolemic stress), the pressure in the capillary bed is increased, and blood is pooled due to the stasis. However, in the presence of arterial constriction (under hypovolemic stress), the pressure in the capillary bed is decreased, supplying blood to the central circulation [1,2]. Specifically, the central circulation is constantly maintained on the basis of the self-sacrificing effect of hepato-splanchnic circulation, whereas the situation of cerebral circulation is greatly different. The brain has a mechanism that maintains cerebral blood flow even if systemic blood pressure fluctuates widely; this mechanism is known as “cerebral autoregulation” [22,23]. Cerebral blood flow is maintained by increasing cerebral vascular resistance when systemic blood pressure drops [22,23]. Classically, cerebral blood flow has been considered to be maintained at an MBP of 60−150 mmHg [22,23]. This range appears to be slightly different in patients undergoing HD; however, a recent study reported that the lower limit (i.e., not inducing cerebral ischemia) is an MBP of 74 mmHg [10]. At least, cerebral circulation appears to be on the protected side under hypovolemic stress. When IDH develops due to triggers such as myocardial ischemia, hepato-splanchnic and cerebral circulation are negatively affected. In this case, hepato-splanchnic circulation would be greatly affected by its nature (self-sacrificing effect), whereas cerebral circulation would be minimally affected. This difference would have been indicated as the difference between hepatic and cerebral rSO2 in this study. This study evaluated rSO2 and not organ blood flow directly. However, we believe that there is no inconsistency considering previous reports.
This study is cross-sectional and cannot prove the causal relationships among parameters. However, it appears certain that the increased difference in the two rSO2 changes is an “unfavorable sign” associated with IDH development. Interestingly, the difference in the two rSO2 changes is also correlated with UFR. For clinicians, the optimization of UFR is a very important subject of discussion [24]. High UFR (for example, > 13 mL/h/kg) is associated with not only IDH development but also patients’ mortality [24,25,26,27]. Therefore, the optimal UFR should be customized for each patient since it is influenced by the patient’s body size and background disease (particularly cardiac diseases) [24]. In our study, we found a significant association between “the unfavorable sign” and UFR. This result provides us with an important suggestion indicating the importance of optimizing the UFR to prevent circulatory failure (IDH development). This clinical message may appear obvious to many clinicians. However, most evidence on UFR optimization is based on observational studies. Therefore, we explained the importance of optimizing the UFR in this study using the rSO2 changes, which we measured.
This study has some limitations. First, there is a scope for further investigation regarding the relationship between rSO2 and organ blood flow. However, rSO2 remains the most promising method of assessing organ blood flow during HD at this time despite these concerns. Second, this cross-sectional method in our study should be emphasized. Specifically, we only found correlations between parameters; therefore, it is difficult to draw any causal conclusion. Furthermore, analysis of real-time changes during HD may provide more insight into the causal relationship between organ rSO2 and IDH. Particularly, predicting IDH development using rSO2 change would be an interesting research topic in the future. Third, the rSO2 value may have been influenced by various dialysis conditions (dialysis setting, pre-dialysis feeding, medical history, medication, and various physiological factors) [6,7,8,9,10].

Conclusion

Hepatic and cerebral rSO2 significantly decreased in IDH development and hepatic rSO2 was more largely decreased than cerebral rSO2 at IDH onset. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that the difference between the % change in cerebral and hepatic rSO2 was significantly associated with IDH development and UFR. Therefore, larger-scale studies, including factor analysis, should be conducted to clarify this issue. Moreover, further large-scale studies are also required to accumulate data on rSO2 changes in IDH development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O; methodology, S.K., S.O., and K.I.; software, S.K., S.O., and K.I.; validation, S.K., S.O., and K.I.; formal analysis, S.K., S.O., and K.I.; investigation, S.K.; resources, S.O. and K.I.; data curation, S.K., S.O., K.I., S.M., Y.M., Y.U., K.H., and Y.M.; writing-original draft preparation, S.K.; writing−review and editing, S.K., S.O., and K.I.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, S.O.; project administration, S.O. and Y.M.

Funding

This work was partially supported by a grant from the Japanese Association of Dialysis Physicians [JADP Grant 2017-9, 2018-10] and JSPS KAKENHI [grant number. JP20K11534 to S.O. and JP21K16192 to K.I.].

Informed Consent Statement

This study was approved by the Review Board of the Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University (RIN15-104 and RINS19-HEN007) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Tokyo in 2004).

Data Availability Statement

All data analyzed during this study are available within the paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participants of this study and staff at the dialysis center at Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sars, B.; van der Sande, F. M.; Kooman, J. P. Intradialytic hypotension: mechanisms and outcome. Blood Purif. 2015, 49, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reeves, P. B.; Mc Causland, F. R. Mechanisms, clinical implications, and treatment of intradialytic hypotension. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 13, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Polinder-Bos, H. A.; Elting, J. W. J.; Aries, M. J.; Garcia, D. V.; Willemsen, A. T.; van Laar, P. J.; Kuipers, J.; Krijnen, W. P.; Slart, R. H.; Luurtsema, G.; et al. Changes in cerebral oxygenation and cerebral blood flow during hemodialysis - A simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and positron emission tomography study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alderliesten, T.; De Vis, J. B.; Lemmers, P. M. A.; van Bel, F.; Benders, M. J. N. L.; Hendrikse, J.; Peterson, E. T. Simultaneous quantitative assessment of cerebral physiology using respiratory-calibrated MRI and near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy adults. NeuroImage. 2014, 85, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fantini, S.; Sassaroli, A.; Tgavalekos, K. T.; Kornbluth, J. Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation: current measurement techniques and prospects for noninvasive optical methods. Neurophotonics. 2016, 3, 031411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ookawara, S.; Ito, K.; Sasabuchi, Y.; Miyahara, M.; Miyashita, T.; Takemi, N.; Nagamine, C.; Nakahara, S.; Horiuchi, Y.; Inose, N.; et al. Cerebral oxygenation and body mass index association with cognitive function in chronic kidney disease patients without dialysis: a longitudinal study. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kitano, T.; Ito, K.; Ookawara, S.; Shindo, M.; Uchida, T.; Kofuji, M.; Hayasaka, H.; Miyazawa, H.; Ueda, Y.; Hirai, K.; et al. Changes in tissue oxygenation in response to sudden intradialytic hypotension. J. Artif. Organs. 2020, 23, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ito, K.; Ookawara, S.; Ueda, Y.; Miyazawa, H.; Uchida, T.; Kofuji, M.; Hayasaka, H.; Minato, S.; Kaneko, S.; Mutsuyoshi, Y.; et al. Cerebral oxygenation improvement is associated with hemoglobin increase after hemodialysis initiation. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2020, 43, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ookawara, S.; Ito, K.; Sasabuchi, Y.; Hayasaka, H.; Kofuji, M.; Uchida, T.; Horigome, K.; Imai, S.; Akikawa, T.; Wada, N.; et al. Associations of cerebral oxygenation with hemoglobin levels evaluated by near-infrared spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients. PLOS ONE. 2020, 15, e0236720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. MacEwen, C.; Sutherland, S.; Daly, J.; Pugh, C.; Tarassenko, L. Relationship between hypotension and cerebral ischemia during hemodialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 2511–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mutsuyoshi, Y.; Ito, K.; Ookawara, S.; Uchida, T.; Morishita, Y. Difference in cerebral and hepatic oxygenation in response to ultrafiltration in a hemodialysis patient with congestive heart failure. Cureus. 2021, 13, e13023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Minato, S.; Ookawara, S.; Ito, K.; Miyazawa, H.; Hayasaka, H.; Kofuji, M.; Uchida, T.; Morino, J.; Kaneko, S.; Yanai, K.; et al. Differences in cerebral and hepatic oxygenation in response to intradialytic blood transfusion in patients undergoing hemodialysis. J. Artif. Organs. 2019, 22, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Imai, S. Does food ingestion during hemodialysis lead to change in hepatic oxygenation? Nefrologia 2022. (Online ahead of print). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ueda, Y.; Ookawara, S.; Ito, K.; Sasabuchi, Y.; Hayasaka, H.; Kofuji, M.; Uchida, T.; Imai, S.; Kiryu, S.; Minato, S.; et al. Association between hepatic oxygenation on near-infrared spectroscopy and clinical factors in patients undergoing hemodialysis. PLOS ONE 2021, 16, e0259064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferrari, M.; Mottola, L.; Quaresima, V. Principles, techniques, and limitations of near infrared spectroscopy. Can. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004, 29, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tobias, J. D. Cerebral oxygenation monitoring: near-infrared spectroscopy. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2006, 3, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maslehaty, H.; Krause-Titz, U.; Petridis, A. K.; Barth, H.; Mehdorn, H. M. Continuous measurement of cerebral oxygenation with near-infrared spectroscopy after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. ISRN Neurol. 2012, 2012, 907187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hongo, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Okudera, H.; Hokama, M.; Nakagawa, F. Noninvasive cerebral optical spectroscopy: depth-resolved measurements of cerebral haemodynamics using indocyanine green. Neurol. Res. 1995, 17, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. K/DOQI Workgroup. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2005, 45 Supplement 3, S1-S153. [CrossRef]
  20. Hirakata, H.; Nitta, K.; Inaba, M.; Shoji, T.; Fujii, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Tabei, K.; Joki, N.; Hase, H.; Nishimura, M.; Ozaki, S.; et al. Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy guidelines for management of cardiovascular diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2012, 16, 387–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harper, D.; Chandler, B. Splanchnic circulation. BJA Educ. 2016, 16, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Armstead, W. M. Cerebral blood flow autoregulation and dysautoregulation. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2016, 34, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Paulson, O. B.; Strandgaard, S.; Edvinsson, L. Cerebral autoregulation. Cerebrovasc. Brain Metab. Rev. 1990, 2, 161–192. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kanbay, M.; Ertuglu, L. A.; Afsar, B.; Ozodogan, E.; Siriopol, D.; Covic, A.; Basile, C.; Ortiz, A. An update review of intradialytic hypotension: concept, risk factors, clinical implications and management. Clin. Kidney J. 2020, 13, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saran, R.; Bragg-Gresham, J. L.; Levin, N. W.; Twardowski, Z. J.; Wizemann, V.; Saito, A.; Kimata, N.; Gillespie, B. W.; Combe, C.; Bommer, J.; Akiba, T.; et al. Longer treatment time and slower ultrafiltration in hemodialysis: associations with reduced mortality in the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 1222–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Movilli, E.; Gaggia, P.; Zubani, R.; Camerini, C.; Vizzardi, V.; Parrinello, G.; Savoldi, S.; Fisher, M. S.; Londrino, F.; Cancarini, G. Association between high ultrafiltration rates and mortality in uraemic patients on regular haemodialysis. A 5-year prospective observational multicentre study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2007; 22, 3547–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Flythe, J. E.; Kimmel, S. E.; Brunelli, S. M. Rapid fluid removal during dialysis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 in the development of IDH (n = 20). (A) % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 from baseline to the time of IDH onset. (B) Comparison between the % changes in hepatic rSO2 and in cerebral rSO2. Abbreviations: rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; IDH, intradialytic hypotension. *p < 0.001.
Figure 1. % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 in the development of IDH (n = 20). (A) % changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 from baseline to the time of IDH onset. (B) Comparison between the % changes in hepatic rSO2 and in cerebral rSO2. Abbreviations: rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; IDH, intradialytic hypotension. *p < 0.001.
Preprints 77244 g001
Figure 2. Association of the difference in the two rSO2 changes and ultrafiltration rate. The difference in the two rSO2 changes was calculated using “% change in cerebral rSO2 - % change in hepatic rSO2.” The statistical association between the two is shown with a scatter plot. Abbreviations: rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; r, correlation coefficient.
Figure 2. Association of the difference in the two rSO2 changes and ultrafiltration rate. The difference in the two rSO2 changes was calculated using “% change in cerebral rSO2 - % change in hepatic rSO2.” The statistical association between the two is shown with a scatter plot. Abbreviations: rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; r, correlation coefficient.
Preprints 77244 g002
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics (n = 91).
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics (n = 91).
Age (years) 70.0 (63.0 – 76.0)
Male sex, n (%) 69 (76)
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.4 (19.9 – 25.0)
HD vintage (years) 0.6 (0.1 – 6.2)
Cardiovascular diseases, n (%) 35 (38)
Cerebrovascular diseases, n (%) 15 (16)
Administration of antihypertensive drugs, n (%) 84 (92)
Administration of vasopressor before HD, n (%) 11 (12)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 9.8 ± 1.6
Sodium (mEq/L) 137 ± 4
Albumin (g/dL) 3.1 (2.8 – 3.6)
O2 saturation (%) 96.0 (93.7 – 97.2)
Ultrafiltration rate (mL/Kg/h) 9.3 (5.4 – 11.4)
Development of IDH, n (%) 20 (22)
Hepatic rSO2 before HD (%) 55.8 ± 15.3
Hepatic rSO2 at the lowest SBP (%) 53.8 ± 14.9
% Change in hepatic rSO2 (%) -2.8 ± 11.3
Cerebral rSO2 before HD (%) 50.2 ± 10.1
Cerebral rSO2 at the lowest SBP (%) 49.3 ± 9.7
% Change in cerebral rSO2 (%) -1.5 ± 6.4
SBP before HD (mmHg) 147 ± 24
Lowest SBP (mmHg) 122 ± 24
% Change in SBP (%) -13.4 (-21.3 – -7.6)
MBP before HD (mmHg) 100 ± 17
MBP at the lowest SBP (mmHg) 86 ± 18
% Change in MBP (%) -9.0 (-20.4 – -5.0)
Categorical data are presented as number (%), continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range. Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; HD, hemodialysis; IDH, intradialytic hypotension; rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure.
Table 2. IDH-related changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 (n = 20).
Table 2. IDH-related changes in hepatic and cerebral rSO2 (n = 20).
Variables
% Change in hepatic rSO2 (%) -13.8 ± 9.3
% Change in cerebral rSO2 (%) -4.8 ± 6.7
The difference in the two rSO2 changes (%) 9.0 ± 9.9
% Change in SBP (%) -24.1 ± 15.8
% Change in MBP (%) -24.9 (-37.6 - -20.6)
Abbreviations: HD, hemodialysis; IDH, intradialytic hypotension; rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure. The difference in the two rSO2 changes was calculated using “% change in cerebral rSO2 - % change in hepatic rSO2.”.
Table 3. Factors associated with the difference in the two rSO2 changes (n = 91).
Table 3. Factors associated with the difference in the two rSO2 changes (n = 91).
Simple linear regression Multivariable linear regression
Variables r P Standardized coefficient P
Age -0.045# 0.670
Male sex -0.148 0.161
Body mass index 0.014# 0.896
HD vintage 0.138# 0.191
Cardiovascular diseases 0.044 0.682
Cerebrovascular diseases -0.122 0.251
Administration of hypertensive drugs 0.136 0.199
Administration of vasopressor before HD 0.143 0.178
Hemoglobin 0.013 0.900
Sodium -0.118 0.265
Albumin 0.008# 0.938
O2 saturation 0.203# 0.054
Ultrafiltration rate 0.302# 0.004* 0.250 0.010*
Development of IDH 0.389 < 0.001* 0.356 < 0.001*
*Statistically significant. # indicates spearman’s rank correlation for skewed distribution of data. The difference in the two rSO2 changes was calculated using “% change in cerebral rSO2 - % change in hepatic rSO2.” Abbreviations: HD, hemodialysis; IDH, intradialytic hypotension; rSO2, regional tissue oxygen saturation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated