Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Novel 3D Printed Biocarriers from Aluminosilicate Materials

Version 1 : Received: 24 May 2023 / Approved: 26 May 2023 / Online: 26 May 2023 (04:32:47 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Economou, E.A.; Koltsakidis, S.; Dalla, I.; Tsongas, K.; Romanos, G.E.; Tzetzis, D.; Falaras, P.; Theodorakopoulos, G.; Middelkoop, V.; Sfetsas, T. Novel 3D-Printed Biocarriers from Aluminosilicate Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 4826. Economou, E.A.; Koltsakidis, S.; Dalla, I.; Tsongas, K.; Romanos, G.E.; Tzetzis, D.; Falaras, P.; Theodorakopoulos, G.; Middelkoop, V.; Sfetsas, T. Novel 3D-Printed Biocarriers from Aluminosilicate Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 4826.

Abstract

The addition of biocarriers can improve the biological processes appearing in a bioreactor since their surface allows the immobilization, attachment, protection, and growth of microorganisms. In addition, the development of a biofilm layer allows the colonization of microorganisms in the biocarriers. The structure, composition, and roughness of the biocarriers' surface are crucial factors that affect the development of the biofilm. In the current work, the aluminosilicate zeolites 13X and ZSM-5 were examined as the main building components of the biocarrier scaffolds, using bentonite, montmorillonite, and halloysite nanotubes as inorganic binders in various combinations. 3D printing was utilized to form pastes into monoliths that underwent heat treatment. The 3d-printed biocarriers were subjected to a mechanical analysis, including density, compression, and nanoindentation tests. Furthermore, the 3d-printed biocarriers were morphologically and structurally characterized using nitrogen adsorption at 77 K (LN2), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The stress-strain response of the materials being studied was obtained through nanoindentation tests combined with finite element analysis (FEA). These tests were also utilized to simulate the lattice geometries under compression loading conditions to investigate their deformation and stress distribution in relation to experimental compression testing. The results indicated that the 3d-printed biocarrier 13X/halloysite nanotubes was endowed with high specific surface area and extended mesoporous structure. Due to these assets, its bulk density was one of the lowest observed amongst the biocarriers derived from the various combinations of materials. The biocarriers based on the 13X zeolite exhibited the highest mechanical stability and appropriate morphological features. The 13X/halloysite nanotubes scaffold exhibits a moderate hardness value compared to the rest, while it presents the highest value of modulus of elasticity. In conclusion, Aluminosilicate zeolites and their combination with clays and inorganic nanotubes afford 3d-printed biocarriers of various textural and structural properties, which can be utilized to improve biological processes.

Keywords

aluminosilicate clays; zeolites; biocarriers; inorganic nanotubes; 3D printing

Subject

Chemistry and Materials Science, Ceramics and Composites

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.