Submitted:
19 May 2023
Posted:
26 May 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Experimental Design and Methodology
2.3. Colostrum and Body weight
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgment
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Milerski, M.; Margetín, M.; Čapistrák, A.; Apolen, D.; Špánik, J.; Oravcová, M. Relationships between External and Internal Udder Measurements and the Linear Scores for Udder Morphology Traits in Dairy Sheep. Czech Journal of Animal Science. 2011, 51, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourlis, A. Ovine mammary morphology and associations with milk production, milkability and animal selection. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 184, 106009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ángeles Pérez-Cabal, M.; Legaz, E.; Cervantes, I.; de la Fuente, L.F.; Martínez, R.; Goyache, F.; Gutiérrez, J. P. Association between body and udder morphological traits and dairy performance in Spanish Assaf sheep. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2013, 6, 430–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frisch, J.E. The use of teat-size measurements or calf weaning weight as an aid to selection against teat defects in cattle. Anim. Sci. 1982, 35, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ventorp, M.; Michanek, P. The Importance of Udder and Teat Conformation for Teat Seeking by the Newborn Calf. Journal of Dairy Science. 1992, 75, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huntley, S.J.; Cooper, S.; Bradley, A.J.; Green, L.E. A cohort study of the associations between udder conformation, milk somatic cell count, and lamb weight in suckler ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 5001–5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casu, S.; Pernazza, I.; Carta, A. Feasibility of a linear scoring method of udder morphology for the selection scheme of Sardinian sheep. Journal of Dairy Science. 2006, 89, 2200–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Innovation flocks (2022) Innovation Flocks measurements and DNA sampling.
- Fernandes, D. Body Condition Scoring of Sheep. University of Arkansas Extension: Animal Science. Accessed March 23, 2023. 23 March.
- SAS Institute (2015) SAS Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
- Heinrichs, J.; Jones, J. M. (2016) Colostrum Management Tools: Hydrometers and Refractometers. Penn State Extension: Colostrum Management Tools.
- Kessler E., C.; Bruckmaier R., M.; Gross, J.J. Short Communication: Comparative estimation of colostrum quality by Brix refractometry in bovine, caprine, and ovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020, 104, 2438–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbagianni, M. S.; Mavrogianni, V.S.; Vasileiou, N.G.C.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Petridis, I.G. Ultrasonographic Examination of the Udder in Sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 2017, 152, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caja, G.; Rovai, M. Udder Morphology and Machine Milking Ability in Dairy Sheep. Virascience 2001. Udder Morphology and Machine Milking Ability in Dairy Sheep. Available online: virascience.com.
- Nowak, R.; Pascal, P. From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 2006, 46, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Variable | Udder Conformation Type | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (n = 11) | Abnormal (n = 39) | ||
| Total Protein (mg/dl) | 14.82 ± 0.58 | 13.31 ± 0.33 | 0.02 |
| Brix% | 21.70 ± 0.88 | 19.54 ± 0.52 | 0.03 |
| Age of Lamb | Mean BW (kg) of Lambs | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Udder | Abnormal Udder’ | ||
| Day 2 | 2.44 ± 0.12 | 2.48 ± 0.07 | 0.77 |
| Day 45 | 17.28 ± 0.91 | 16.02 ± 0.60 | 0.34 |
| Day 60 | 22.5 ± 1.31 | 21.1 ± 0.68 | 0.34 |
| ADG | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.33 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).