Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Bridging History with AI: A Comparative Evaluation of GPT- 3.5, GPT-4, and Google-BARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact- Checking

Version 1 : Received: 13 May 2023 / Approved: 15 May 2023 / Online: 15 May 2023 (12:53:11 CEST)

How to cite: Tasar, D.E.; Öcal Taşar, C. Bridging History with AI: A Comparative Evaluation of GPT- 3.5, GPT-4, and Google-BARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact- Checking. Preprints 2023, 2023051047. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1047.v1 Tasar, D.E.; Öcal Taşar, C. Bridging History with AI: A Comparative Evaluation of GPT- 3.5, GPT-4, and Google-BARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact- Checking. Preprints 2023, 2023051047. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1047.v1

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models (LLMs)—GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google- BARD—in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, "Distance to Reality" (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT-4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence; Large Language Models; GPT-3.5; GPT-4; Google-BARD; Historical Fact-Checking; Distance to Reality; History; AI in Education; Gap Bridging

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.