PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study
Version 1
: Received: 7 May 2023 / Approved: 9 May 2023 / Online: 9 May 2023 (08:08:15 CEST)
How to cite:
SHIM, J.; KIM, M.; AN, S.; KANG, E.; CHOI, Y. Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints2023, 2023050593. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1
SHIM, J.; KIM, M.; AN, S.; KANG, E.; CHOI, Y. Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints 2023, 2023050593. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1
SHIM, J.; KIM, M.; AN, S.; KANG, E.; CHOI, Y. Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints2023, 2023050593. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1
APA Style
SHIM, J., KIM, M., AN, S., KANG, E., & CHOI, Y. (2023). Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
SHIM, J., EUN-SUNG KANG and YU-SUNG CHOI. 2023 "Evaluation of Implant Stability Measurements According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Clinical Study" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.0593.v1
Abstract
As medical care aiming to maintain the quality of life for elderly patients is increases, implant treatment for elderly patients is increasing worldwide. Therefore, we aimed to investigate implant stability and the reliability of different measuring devices according to implant placement site and duration in patients aged over 65 years.
The study evaluated 60 implants in 60 patients aged ≥ 65 years. The implant placement sites were divided into six evenly distributed sections (n=10) i.e., maxillary right- posterior, A; maxillary anterior, B; maxillary left-posterior, C; mandibular right-posterior, D; mandibular anterior, E; mandibular left-posterior, F. Participants visited the hospital seven times: preoperatively, 1V; implant surgery, 2V; stitch removal, 3V; 1-month follow-up, 4V; 2-months follow-up, 5V; before final-restoration delivery, 6V; and after final-restoration delivery, 7V. The implant stability was evaluated with the Osstell Mentor (ISQ), Periotest M (PTV), and Anycheck (IST). The mean values of ISQ, PTV, and IST were analyzed (α=.05).
ISQ, PTV, and IST results of 5V and 6V were significantly higher than those of 2V (P<.05). The lowest ISQ results occurred in E location at 5V and 6V (P<.05). In all mandibular locations, IST results of 7V were significantly higher than those of 2V, 3V, 4V, and 5V (P<.05). ISQ results were negatively correlated with PTV and positively correlated with IST, and PTV was negatively correlated with IST.
By considering various factors that affect implant stability, the appropriate implant load application time was determined. This could help increase the implant success rate in elderly patients. And as a diagnostic device for implant stability for evaluation of osseointegration in elderly patients, Anycheck was also able to prove its relative reliability compared to Osstell ISQ Mentor and Periotest M.
Medicine and Pharmacology, Dentistry and Oral Surgery
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
