Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

Version 1 : Received: 8 May 2023 / Approved: 8 May 2023 / Online: 8 May 2023 (11:02:12 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Kuchanskyi, O.; Andrashko, Y.; Biloshchytskyi, A.; Omirbayev, S.; Mukhatayev, A.; Biloshchytska, S.; Faizullin, A. Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity. Publications 2023, 11, 37. Kuchanskyi, O.; Andrashko, Y.; Biloshchytskyi, A.; Omirbayev, S.; Mukhatayev, A.; Biloshchytska, S.; Faizullin, A. Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity. Publications 2023, 11, 37.

Abstract

The article's purpose is a citation analysis of the impact of scientific publications by authors of different gender compositions. The PageRank method was chosen to calculate the citation impact of scientific publications, and the citation has also estimated the impact of scientific publications based on the number of citations. The normalized citation impact of scientific publications is calculated according to nine subsets of scientific publications that correspond to patterns of different gender compositions of authors. Also, these estimates were calculated for each country with which the authors of the publications are affiliated. The Citation database was chosen for the scientometric analysis Network Dataset ( ver . 13). The dataset includes more than 5 million scientific publications and 48 million citations. The main subject areas of scientific publications in this database are computer science, artificial intelligence, mathematics, engineering, etc. The results indicate that articles with a predominantly male composition are cited more than articles with a mixed or female composition of authors in this direction. Analysis of advantages in dynamics indicates that in the last decade for developed countries, there has been a decrease in the connection between the citation impact of scientific publications and the gender composition of their authors. However, the obtained results still confirm the presence of gender inequality in science, which may be related to socioeconomic and cultural characteristics, natural homophily, and other factors that contribute to the appearance of gender gaps. An essential consequence of overcoming these gaps, including in science, is ensuring the rights of people in all their diversity.

Keywords

PageRank; gender inequality; citation impact; scientific research; research productivity; scientometrics

Subject

Social Sciences, Gender and Sexuality Studies

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.