Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Impact of Pogil-Based Instruction versus Teacher versus Lecturning-Based Instruction on Grade 12 Performance in Circular Motion Unit

Version 1 : Received: 23 April 2023 / Approved: 25 April 2023 / Online: 25 April 2023 (04:23:47 CEST)

How to cite: Alneyadi, S.S. The Impact of Pogil-Based Instruction versus Teacher versus Lecturning-Based Instruction on Grade 12 Performance in Circular Motion Unit. Preprints 2023, 2023040886. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0886.v1 Alneyadi, S.S. The Impact of Pogil-Based Instruction versus Teacher versus Lecturning-Based Instruction on Grade 12 Performance in Circular Motion Unit. Preprints 2023, 2023040886. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0886.v1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL)-based instruction versus lecture-based instruction on Grade 12 students’ performance in circular motion unit. A quasi-experimental, pretest-posttest design, the impact of POGIL-based instruction versus lecture-based instruction on students’ performance as measured by three types of cognitive outcomes: Knowing, Applying and Reasoning (KAR). The total number of participants was approximately 110 students (N=110); 54 were assigned to treatment groups (25 girls and 29 boys) and 56 were assigned to control groups (27 girls and 29 boys). The treatment group was taught a unit of circular motion in physics using POGIL-based instruction while the control group was taught the unit using lecture-based instruction. The findings of the study showed statistically significant differences between students of the control group and the treatment group in favor of the later regarding their circular motion performance, suggesting the superiority of the POGIL in enhancing student understanding of the circular motion.

Keywords

POGIL-based instruction; lecture-based instruction; unit of circular motion; science performance

Subject

Social Sciences, Education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.