Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Evidence of Global Warming: A Meta-Analysis of Temperature Management in Aortic Arch Surgery

Version 1 : Received: 19 April 2023 / Approved: 20 April 2023 / Online: 20 April 2023 (10:25:07 CEST)

How to cite: Huber, F.; Schachner, B.; Gottsberger, J.Z.; Benedikt, P.; Zierer, A.F. Evidence of Global Warming: A Meta-Analysis of Temperature Management in Aortic Arch Surgery. Preprints 2023, 2023040649. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0649.v1 Huber, F.; Schachner, B.; Gottsberger, J.Z.; Benedikt, P.; Zierer, A.F. Evidence of Global Warming: A Meta-Analysis of Temperature Management in Aortic Arch Surgery. Preprints 2023, 2023040649. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202304.0649.v1

Abstract

Objectives: Treatment of aortic pathologies involving the distal ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta remains a complex and challenging procedure. Appropriate management is important to achieve satisfactory outcome. Surgical management aims to reduce the time of circulatory arrest. The optimal level of hypothermia is still a matter of debate. The present meta-analysis shows the influence of different temperature levels on mortality and morbidity following aortic arch surgery. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published data between January 2000 and March 2020 based on a literature research. 120 studies were included with a total of 32 323 patients divided into three different groups of systemic hypothermia (temperature group 1: ≥ 25 °C, temperature group 2: 25-20°C, temperature group 3: ≤ 20°C) were used for statistical analysis. Results: Early mortality was lowest in temperature group 1 compared to group 2 (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.85; p=0.01) and group 3 (OR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.20–2.52; p=0.003). Perioperative stroke appeared to be less frequently in temperature group 1 versus group 2 (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.20-1.82; p=0.0002) and group 3 (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.19 - 2.18; p=0.002). Similar results are obtained concerning new renal insufficiency (group 1 versus group 2: OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.57, p=0.19; group 1 versus 3: OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.67 - 1.32, p=0.73) and re-exploration for bleeding (group 1 versus group 2: OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.80-1.53, p=0.55; group 1 versus group 3: OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.26 - 2.94, p=0,0025). Conclusions: We observed that moderate level of hypothermia during circulatory arrest reduced the incidence of early mortality. Most dreaded neurologic complications occurred less frequently in TG 1. In contrast there was no difference with regards with new onset of renal failure which is commonly accepted as a reliable marker of the quality of visceral organ protection.

Keywords

hypothermia; hypothermic circulatory arrest,; aortic surgery; aortic aneurysm

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.