Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Globally- vs Locally-trained Machine Learning Models for Land-slide Detection: A Case Study of a Glacial Landscape

Version 1 : Received: 23 December 2022 / Approved: 13 January 2023 / Online: 13 January 2023 (02:00:25 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Ganerød, A.J.; Lindsay, E.; Fredin, O.; Myrvoll, T.-A.; Nordal, S.; Rød, J.K. Globally vs. Locally Trained Machine Learning Models for Landslide Detection: A Case Study of a Glacial Landscape. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 895. Ganerød, A.J.; Lindsay, E.; Fredin, O.; Myrvoll, T.-A.; Nordal, S.; Rød, J.K. Globally vs. Locally Trained Machine Learning Models for Landslide Detection: A Case Study of a Glacial Landscape. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 895.

Abstract

Landslide risk mitigation is limited by data scarcity. This could be improved using continuous landslide detection systems. In order to investigate which image types and machine learning (ML) models are most useful for landslide detection in a Norwegian setting, we compared the performance of five different ML models, for the Jølster case study (30-July-2019), in Western Norway. These included three globally pre-trained models; i) the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) algorithm, ii) a combined k-means clustering and Random Forest classification model, and iii) a convolutional neural network (CNN), and two locally-trained models, including; iv) Classification and Regression Trees and v) a U-net CNN model. Images used included Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, digital elevation model (DEM) and slope. The globally-trained models performed poorly in shadowed areas, and were all outperformed by the locally-trained models. A maximum Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC) score of 89% was achieved with model v, using combined Sentinel-1 and -2 images as input. This is one of the first attempts to apply deep-learning to detect landslides with both Sentinel-1 and -2 images. Using Sentinel-1 images only, the locally-trained deep-learning model significantly outperformed the conventional ML model. These findings contribute towards developing a national continuous monitoring system for landslides.

Keywords

NDVI; SAR; change detection; Norway; Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; deep learning; U-Net; CCDC; Google Earth Engine

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Geology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.