Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Practical Guidance for Biosimilars Approval--Strategy for the ROW

Version 1 : Received: 24 October 2022 / Approved: 26 October 2022 / Online: 26 October 2022 (03:58:16 CEST)

How to cite: Niazi, S.K.; Al-Shaqha, W.M.; Mirza, Z. A Practical Guidance for Biosimilars Approval--Strategy for the ROW. Preprints 2022, 2022100397. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0397.v1 Niazi, S.K.; Al-Shaqha, W.M.; Mirza, Z. A Practical Guidance for Biosimilars Approval--Strategy for the ROW. Preprints 2022, 2022100397. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202210.0397.v1

Abstract

Biological drugs are inaccessible to more than 80% of the world population due mainly to their high costs; this is a significant concern of the World Health Organization. Biosimilars are supposed to reduce the cost burden, but their approval process is complex, including expensive and irrelevant studies. While the Stringent Regulatory Authorities (SRAs) have adopted the guidance of the FDA or EMA, such adoptions are neither necessary nor practical for the rest of the world (ROW). We present a science-driven, rational approach to formulate regulatory guidelines that will enable faster biosimilars' entry into the ROW without compromising their safety and efficacy. The key recommendations include removing animal and safety efficacy testing, making analytical assessment more robust, and cGMP compliance assured through third-party audits. The ROW countries are also recommended to initiate a rapporteur system available in the EU, to overcome the biases and assure state-of-the-science evaluation as the common understanding of the critical quality attributes evolves. It is anticipated that stronger regional agencies like those in the MENA region, with the leadership of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, will help propel the idea faster across the globe.

Keywords

biosimilars; regulatory process; animal studies; clinical efficacy testing; interchangeability; FDA; EMA; MHRA; MENA; cGMP

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Health Policy and Services

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.