Yang, X.; Haleem, N.; Osabutey, A.; Cen, Z.; Albert, K. L.; Autenrieth, D. Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review. Atmosphere, 2022, 13, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030490.
Yang, X.; Haleem, N.; Osabutey, A.; Cen, Z.; Albert, K. L.; Autenrieth, D. Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review. Atmosphere, 2022, 13, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030490.
Yang, X.; Haleem, N.; Osabutey, A.; Cen, Z.; Albert, K. L.; Autenrieth, D. Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review. Atmosphere, 2022, 13, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030490.
Yang, X.; Haleem, N.; Osabutey, A.; Cen, Z.; Albert, K. L.; Autenrieth, D. Particulate Matter in Swine Barns: A Comprehensive Review. Atmosphere, 2022, 13, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030490.
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) represents an air quality management challenge for confined swine production systems. Because of the limited space and ventilation rate, PM can reach relatively high concentrations in swine barns. PM in swine barns possesses different physical, chemical, and biological characteristics than that in the atmosphere and other indoor environments. As a result, it exerts different environmental and health effects and creates some unique challenges regarding PM measurement and mitigation. Numerous research efforts have been made, generating massive data and information. However, relevant review reports are sporadic. This study aims to provide an updated comprehensive review of swine barn PM, focusing on publications since 1990. It covers various topics, including PM characteristics, sources, measurement methods, and in-barn mitigation technologies. Since PM in swine barns is of primarily biological origins, bioaerosols are reviewed in great detail. Relevant topics include bacterial/fungal counts, viruses, microbial community composition, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, antibiotic resistance genes, endotoxins, and (1→3)-β-D-glucans. For each topic, existing knowledge is summarized and discussed and knowledge gaps are identified. Overall, PM in swine barns is complicated in chemical and biological composition and highly variable in mass concentrations, size, and microbial abundance. Feed, feces, and skins constitute the major PM sources. Regarding in-barn PM mitigation, four technologies (oil/water sprinkling, ionization, alternation of feed and feeders, and recirculating air filtration) are dominant. However, none of them have been widely used in commercial barns. A collective discussion of major knowledge gaps and future research needs is offered at the end of the report.
Environmental and Earth Sciences, Environmental Science
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
