Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Hoverfly and the Wasp: A Critique of the Hallmarks of Aging as a Paradigm

Version 1 : Received: 12 May 2021 / Approved: 13 May 2021 / Online: 13 May 2021 (14:29:48 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Gems, D.; de Magalhães, J.P. The Hoverfly and the Wasp: A Critique of the Hallmarks of Aging as a Paradigm. Ageing Research Reviews 2021, 70, 101407, doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101407. Gems, D.; de Magalhães, J.P. The Hoverfly and the Wasp: A Critique of the Hallmarks of Aging as a Paradigm. Ageing Research Reviews 2021, 70, 101407, doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101407.

Abstract

With the goal of representing common denominators of aging in different organisms López-Otín et al. in 2013 described nine hallmarks of aging. Since then, this representation has become a major reference point for the biogerontology field. The template for the hallmarks of aging account originated from landmark papers by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000, 2011) defining first six and later ten hallmarks of cancer. Here we assess the strengths and weaknesses of the hallmarks of aging account. As a checklist of diverse major foci of current aging research, it has provided a useful shared overview for biogerontology during a time of transition in the field. It also seems useful in applied biogerontology, to identify interventions (e.g. drugs) that impact multiple symptomatic features of aging. However, while the hallmarks of cancer provide a paradigmatic account of the causes of cancer with profound explanatory power, the hallmarks of aging do not. A worry is that as a non-paradigm the hallmarks of aging have obscured the urgent need to define a genuine paradigm, one that can provide a useful basis for understanding the mechanistic causes of the diverse aging pathologies. We argue that biogerontology must look and move beyond the hallmarks to understand the process of aging.

Keywords

aging; geroscience; hallmarks; paradigm; senescence; theory

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Immunology and Allergy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.