Version 1
: Received: 28 December 2020 / Approved: 29 December 2020 / Online: 29 December 2020 (09:24:11 CET)
How to cite:
Imam, H. New Normal: An Hrm Perspective of Post COVID-19 in the Airline Industry. Preprints.org2020, 2020120723. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0723.v1
Imam, H. New Normal: An Hrm Perspective of Post COVID-19 in the Airline Industry. Preprints.org 2020, 2020120723. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0723.v1
Cite as:
Imam, H. New Normal: An Hrm Perspective of Post COVID-19 in the Airline Industry. Preprints.org2020, 2020120723. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0723.v1
Imam, H. New Normal: An Hrm Perspective of Post COVID-19 in the Airline Industry. Preprints.org 2020, 2020120723. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0723.v1
Abstract
In January 2020, the World Health Organization declared a public health emergency and announced a new coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which would later go on to be declared as a pandemic, changing the global sphere and placing the economies of almost all countries under heavy stress. The airline industry, that had just begun recovering after facing crises one after another in the last two decades, from early 2000 due to 9/11, to the global financial crisis later, is now oce again facing an enormous challenge of closed borders and greater lockdowns due to the pandemic. Borders are closed, with very few planes are in the air, while the rest are grounded. The purpose of this paper is to give a conceptual understanding of the current pandemic situation and its consequences on the airline industry. The paper takes a unique perspective of human resource management (HRM) that is rarely used in the airline industry.
Keywords
airlines; human resource management; COVID-19; crisis
Subject
Business, Economics and Management, Accounting and Taxation
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
